Advanced search
Advanced search
Advanced search
Advanced search
Advanced search
Książka = Book ; KS/3/1992/R03
Instytut Badań Systemowych. Polska Akademia Nauk ; Systems Research Institute. Polish Academy of Sciences
357-366, [1] pages ; 21 cm ; Bibliography p. 366
Starting off with a pairwise-comparison method to evaluate the possible deals between two parties in conflict, we generalize the approach and we consider the case of three parties in conflict. The basic step is the subjective evaluation of a deal where cach party olfers exactly one concession. The trade-off of benefits and costs is judged in verba. I terms which are subsequently converted into numerical values on a discrete geometrie scale. Although the number of plausible geometrie scales is large, the information to be used by a mediator appears to be scale-independent. The a.pproa.ch is illustra.ted by the results of an exploratory project aiming at a balanced C02 emission reduction in Poland, Brazil and the Netherlands. The success of the method depends largely on the information-processing support. Given the limitations of human imagination and human judgement, the method is not likely to be effective in a conflict between four or more parties although it can easily be generalized.
Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license
Copyright-protected material. [CC BY 4.0] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license, full text available at: ; -
Systems Research Institute of the Polish Academy of Sciences
Library of Systems Research Institute PAS
Oct 15, 2021
Jul 15, 2021
35
https://rcin.org.pl./publication/234178