Subtitle:

Geographia Polonica Vol. 91 No. 4 (2018)

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

24 cm

Type of object:

Czasopismo/Artykuł

Abstract:

The quality of life and the residential environment in an urban space are considerably influenced by Green Infrastructure. This results from the growing ecological awareness of society and the greater importance attached to the quality of the surrounding environment. Such an approach influences the city’s image and its perception with respect to the quality of life. Olsztyn is an example of a city with exceptionally rich natural environmental assets, located in the cleanest region of Poland. The city is developing in line with the “Olsztyn: the Garden City” slogan. The objective of the article is to compare the results of a public opinion poll among city dwellers with respect to the quality of life in terms of natural environment resources.

References:

1. Badiu D. L., Iojă C. I., Pătroescu M., Breuste J., Artmann M., Nită M.R., Gradinaru S.R., Hossu C.A., Onose D.A., 2016. Is urban green space per capita a valuable target to achieve cities' sustainability goals? Romania as a case study. Ecological Indicators, vol. 70, pp. 53‑66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.044
2. Baycan-Levent T., Nijkamp P., 2009. Planning and management of urban greenspaces in Europe: comparative analysis. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, vol. 135, pp. 1‑12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2009)135:1(1)
3. Błaszczyk M., Kosmala M., 2008. Społeczne znaczenie zieleni ulicznej i jej wpływ na ocenę możliwości użytkowania przestrzeni. Nauka Przyroda Technologie, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 1-10.
4. Borys T., 2008. Propozycja siedmiu typologii jakości życia. Gospodarka a Środowisko, vol. 22, pp.125‑134.
5. Böhm A., 2007. Zasady i pokusy. Czasopismo Techniczne Architektura, vol. 104, pp. 10-16.
6. Burton E., Jenks M., Williams K. (eds.) 2003. The compact city: A sustainable urban form? Oxford, UK: Routledge.
7. Camps-Calvet M., Langemeyer J., Calvet-Mir L., Gómez-Baggethun E., 2016. Ecosystem services provided by urban gardens in Barcelona, Spain: Insights for policy and planning. Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 62, pp. 14‑23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.007
8. Connop S., Vandergert P., Eisenberg B., Collier M.J., Nash C., Clough J., Newport D., 2016. Renaturing cities using a regionally-focused biodiversity-led multifunctional benefits approach to urban green infrastructure. Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 62, pp. 99-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.013
9. Degórska B., Degórski M. 2017. Green infrastructure as a very important quality factor in urban areas – Warsaw case study. Europa XXI, vol. 32, pp. 51-70 https://doi.org/10.7163/Eu21.2017.32.4
10. de la Barrera F., Reyes-Paecke S., Harris J., Bascu-án D., Farías J.M., 2016. People's perception influences on the use of green spaces in socioeconomically differentiated neighborhoods. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, vol. 20, pp. 254-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.09.007
11. Derkzen M.L., van Teeffelen A.J., Verburg P.H., 2017. Green infrastructure for urban climate adaptation: How do residents' views on climate impacts and green infrastructure shape adaptation preferences? Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 157, pp. 106‑130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.027
12. EEA, 2011. Green infrastructure and territorial cohesion. The concept of green infrastructure and its integration into policies using monitoring systems. European Environment Agency Technical report No 18/2011, Publications Office of the European Union.
13. Ernstson H., 2013. The social production of ecosystem services: A framework for studying environmental justice and ecological complexity in urbanized landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 109, pp. 7-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.005
14. Feng Y., Burian S., Pomeroy C., 2016. Potential of green infrastructure to restore predevelopment water budget of a semi-arid urban catchment. Journal of Hydrology, vol. 542, pp. 744-755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.09.044
15. Garmendia E., Apostolopoulou E., Adams W.M., Bormpoudakis D., 2016. Biodiversity and Green Infrastructure in Europe: Boundary object or ecological trap? Land Use Policy, vol. 56, pp. 315‑319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.003
16. GUS, 2014. Turystyka i wypoczynek w gospodarstwach domowych w 2013 r. [Tourism and leisure in households in 2013]. Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny.
17. GUS, 2016. Jakość życia w Polsce: Edycja 2016 [The quality of life in Poland: Edition 2016]. Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny.
18. GUS, 2017. Jakość życia w Polsce: Edycja 2017 [The quality of life in Poland: Edition 2017]. Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny.
19. Hassan R., Scholes R., Ash N. (eds.), 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current State and Trends. Volume 1. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Washington-Covelo-London: Islandpress.
20. Kabisch N., Strohbach M., Haase D., Kronenberg J., 2016. Urban green space availability in European cities. Ecological Indicators, vol. 70, pp. 586-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.029
21. KF Research, 2016. Badanie opinii mieszkańców Olsztyna ich problemów i wizji miasta. Raport z badania [A survey of Olsztyn inhabitants' opinions, their problems, and the vision of the city. Report of the survey]. Olsztyn: Agencja Badawcza KF Research.
22. Kim H.W., Park Y., 2016. Urban green infrastructure and local flooding: The impact of landscape patterns on peak runoff in four Texas MSAs. Applied Geography, vol. 77, pp. 72-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.10.008
23. Kuo F.E., Sullivan W.C., 2001. Aggression and violence in the inner city: Effects of environment via mental fatigue. Environment and Behavior, vol. 33, no. 4. pp. 543‑571. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973124
24. Lanza K., Stone B., 2016. Climate adaptation in cities: What trees are suitable for urban heat management? Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 153, pp. 74‑82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.12.002
25. Li B., Chen D., Wu S., Zhou S., Wang T., Chen H., 2016. Spatio-temporal assessment of urbanization impacts on ecosystem services: Case study of Nanjing City, China. Ecological Indicators, vol. 71, pp. 416-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.017
26. Lin B.S., Lin C.T., 2016. Preliminary study of the influence of the spatial arrangement of urban parks on local temperature reduction. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, vol. 20, pp. 348‑357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.10.003
27. Lis A., Weber-Siwirska M., Ziemiańska M. 2016. Metoda oceny i weryfikacji doboru roślin w aspekcie bezpieczeństwa przestrzeni. Przestrzeń i Forma, vol. 26, pp. 213‑228.
28. Liu W., Chen W., Feng Q., Peng C., Kang P., 2016. Cost-benefit analysis of green infrastructures on community stormwater reduction and utilization: A case of Beijing, China. Environmental Management, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 1015-1026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0765-4
29. Maksymiuk G. 2013. Wpływ zielonej infrastruktury na wartość ekonomiczną nieruchomości. Problemy Ekologii Krajobrazu, vol. 36, pp. 145‑153.
30. Matthews T., Lo A.Y., Byrne J.A, 2015. Reconceptualizing green infrastructure for climate change adaptation: Barriers to adoption and drivers for uptake by spatial planners. Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 138, pp. 155‑163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.010
31. Mell I.C., Henneberry J., Hehl-Lange S., Keskin B., 2016. To green or not to green: Establishing the economic value of green infrastructure investments in The Wicker, Sheffield. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, vol. 18, pp. 257-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.06.015
32. Michniewicz-Ankiersztajn H., 2014. Rola zieleni w kształtowaniu przestrzeni miast europejskich w kontekście jakości życia ich mieszkańców. Journal of Health Sciences, vol. 4, no. 13, pp. 130‑140.
33. Miller J.T., 2016. Is urban greening for everyone? Social inclusion and exclusion along the Gowanus Canal. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, vol. 19, pp. 285-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.03.004
34. Morakinyo T.E., Lam Y.F., Hao S., 2016. Evaluating the role of green infrastructures on near-road pollutant dispersion and removal: Modelling and measurement. Journal of environmental management, vol. 182, pp. 595-605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.077
35. Olsztyn city council, 2013. Studium uwarunkowań i kierunków zagospodarowania przestrzennego Olsztyna 2013 r. [A study on determinants and directions of spatial development of Olsztyn, 2013]. Resolution of the City Council No XXXVII/660/13 of 15 May 2013 on a change to the study on determinants and directions of spatial development of the City of Olsztyn – consolidated text.
36. Paliwoda J., Kowarik I., von der Lippe M., 2017. Human-biodiversity interactions in urban parks: The species level matters. Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 157, pp. 394‑406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.09.003
37. Papuziński A., 2006. Świadomość ekologiczna w świetle teorii i praktyki. Problemy Ekorozwoju, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 33‑40.
38. Puzdrakiewicz K., 2017. Zielona infrastruktura jako wielozadaniowe narzędzie zrównoważonego rozwoju. Studia Miejskie, vol. 27, pp.155-174. https://doi.org/10.25167/sm2017.027.12
39. Salata K. D., Yiannakou A., 2016. Green Infrastructure and climate change adaptation. Tema. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 7-24.
40. Sandström U.G., Angelstam P., Khakee A., 2006. Urban comprehensive planning – identifying barriers for the maintenance of functional habitat networks. Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 75, no. 1‑2, pp. 43‑57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.11.016
41. Sang Å.O., Knez I., Gunnarsson B., Hedblom M., 2016. The effects of naturalness, gender, and age on how urban green space is perceived and used. Urban Forestry & Urban, Greening, vol. 18, pp. 268-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.06.008
42. Santos T., Mendes R.N., Vasco A., 2016. Recreational activities in urban parks: Spatial interactions among users. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, vol. 15, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2016.06.001
43. Savvas W., 2016. Green Infrastructure and Urban Biodiversity. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 40‑51.
44. Suárez-Varela M., Guardiola J., González-Gómez F., 2016. Do pro-environmental behaviors and awareness contribute to improve subjective well-being? Applied Research in Quality of Life, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-014-9372-9
45. Suchocka M., 2013. Drzewo jako element zielonej infrastruktury. Problemy Ekologii Krajobrazu, vol. 36, pp. 85‑94.
46. Szczepanowska H.B. 2012. Miejsce terenów zieleni w strukturze zintegrowanego projektowania, zarządzania i oceny ekologicznej inwestycji miejskich. Człowiek i Środowisko, vol. 36, no. 1-2, pp. 25-49.
47. Szulczewska B., Kaliszuk E., 2005. Problems of green structure planning and management in Warsaw. Final report Cost Action C11 – Green structure and urban planning, pp. 90-102.
48. Votsis A., 2017. Planning for green infrastructure: The spatial effects of parks, forests, and fields on Helsinki's apartment prices. Ecological Economics, vol. 132, pp. 279‑289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.09.029
49. Wang Y., de Groot R., Bakker F., Wörtche H., Leemans R., 2017. Thermal comfort in urban green spaces: A survey on a Dutch university campus. International Journal of Biometeorology, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-016-1193-0
50. Zadrożniak M., 2016. Jakość życia w mieście [in:] A. Nowakowska, Z. Przygodzki, A. Rzeńca (eds.), EkoMiasto – Społeczeństwo. Zrównoważony, inteligentny i partycypacyjny rozwój miasta, Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, pp. 22‑38. https://doi.org/10.18778/7969-221-7.02
51. Žuvela-Aloise M., Koch R., Buchholz S., Früh B., 2016. Modelling the potential of green and blue infrastructure to reduce urban heat load in the city of Vienna. Climatic Change, vol. 135, no. 3‑4, pp. 425‑438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1596-2

Relation:

Geographia Polonica

Volume:

91

Issue:

4

Start page:

469

End page:

487

Detailed Resource Type:

Artykuł

Format:

Rozmiar pliku 2,9 MB ; application/pdf

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:67573 ; 0016-7282 (print) ; 2300-7362 (online) ; 10.7163/GPol.0131

Source:

CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.2085, Cz.2173, Cz.2406 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Language of abstract:

eng

Rights:

Licencja Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0

Terms of use:

Zasób chroniony prawem autorskim. [CC BY 4.0 Międzynarodowe] Korzystanie dozwolone zgodnie z licencją Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0, której pełne postanowienia dostępne są pod adresem: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Polskiej Akademii Nauk

Original in:

Centralna Biblioteka Geografii i Ochrony Środowiska Instytutu Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania PAN

Projects co-financed by:

Program Operacyjny Polska Cyfrowa, lata 2014-2020, Działanie 2.3 : Cyfrowa dostępność i użyteczność sektora publicznego; środki z Europejskiego Funduszu Rozwoju Regionalnego oraz współfinansowania krajowego z budżetu państwa

Access:

Otwarty