Subtitle:

Geographia Polonica Vol. 91 No. 4 (2018)

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

24 cm

Type of object:

Czasopismo/Artykuł

Abstract:

Regional socio-economic inequality is a major threat of instability in northeast Europe. The polarisation-equalization dynamics has a direct influence over the distribution of population, industry, financial resources, environmental load, and other domains of the Baltic region. The research scope covers an area of nine countries, including the Baltic coast of Germany, Poland, and north-western Russia. Official data of Eurostat and Rosstat are used to evaluate the relationship between a number of statistical indicators over a period of 2000-2016. Research results reveal an inverse correlation between the volume of GRP per capita generated and the rate of its increase, as well as between GRP per capita and population change. A less significant direct correlation between population density and the rate of population increase found. Results emphasise cross-country differences in polarisation and equalization processes and stress that the population of the Baltic region is increasingly concentrating in capital cities. The latter is especially evident in countries with a relatively small population size. An important factor affecting the development of international cooperation in the Baltic region and national economic growth is the high economic growth rates in the less economically developed countries. The article puts forward arguments in favour of regional equalization and advocates against polarisation strategy, including special measures to stimulate growth of urban agglomerations.

References:

1. Agh A. 2012. Global governance and integrative balancing: EU efforts to respond to the global challenge. Journal of Global Policy, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 145‑153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00111.x
2. Anokhin A.A., Fedorov G.M. 2017. The correlation of the processes of polarization and alignment of the level of social and economic development in the subjects of Russian Federation. Vestnik SPbGU. Nauki o Zemle, vol. 62, no 4. pp. 327‑342.
3. Asheim B.T., Gertler M.S., 2009. The Geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems [in:] J. Fagerberg, D.D. Mowery (eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Backer H., 2011. Transboundary maritime spatial planning: A Baltic Sea perspective. Journal of Coastal Conservation, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 279-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-011-0156-1
5. Baklanov P.Ya., 2012. Notes on the article A.N. Pilyasova "New economic geography (neg) and its potential for studying the distribution of productive forces of Russia" Regionalnye issledovanija, vol. 2, no. 36, pp. 166‑172.
6. Baklanov P.Ya., 2016. Geographical and geopolitical factors in regional development [in:] V.M., Kotlyakov, V.N. Streletskiy, O.B. Glezer, S.G. Safronov (eds.), Problems of regional development of Russia, Voprosy geografii, no. 141, Moscow: Kodeks Publishing house, pp. 166‑175.
7. Berezhnoy V.I., Taran O.L., Berezhnaya O.V., Shurakova M.M. 2017. Asimmetrija i prostranstvennaja poljarizacija razvitija regional'nyh social'no-èkonomičeskih sistem. Moscow: Rusajns.
8. Berger-Schmitt R., 2002. Social cohesion between the member states of the European Union: Past developments and prospects for an Enlarged Union. Sociologický časopis, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 721-748.
9. Blockmans W., 2006. Europe's history of integration and diversity. European Review, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 241-256. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798706000238
10. Boudeville J., 1966. Problems of regional economic planning. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UniversityPress.
11. Bourdin S., 2013. A geographical approach to economic convergence. Exploring regional disparities in the European Union and their evolution. L'Espace géographique (English Edition), vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 256‑270.
12. Camagni R., 2017. Territorial capital, competitiveness and regional development [in:] R. Huggins, P. Thompson (eds.), Handbook of regions and competitiveness: Contemporary theories and perspectives on economic development, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783475018.00016
13. Capello R., 1999. Spatial transfers of knowledge in high technology milieux: Learning versus collective learning processes. Regional Studies, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 353‑366. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409950081211
14. Capello R., Caragliu A., Nijkamp P., 2011. Territorial capital and regional growth: Increasing returns in knowledge use. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 385‑405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2010.00613.x
15. Capello R., Faggian A., 2005. Collective learning and relational capital in local innovation processes. Regional Studies, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320851
16. Caragliu A., Nijkamp P., 2016. Space and knowledge spillovers in European regions: The impact of different forms of proximity on spatial knowledge diffusion. Journal of Economic Geography, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 749‑774. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbv042
17. Chistobaev A.I., 2013. Prostranstvennoe planirovanie v Rossii: Sostojanie, problemy, zadači geografov. Social'no-èkonomičeskaja geografija. Vestnik Associacii rossijskih geografov-obsestvovedov, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 15-24.
18. De Dominicis L., 2014. Inequality and growth in European Regions: Towards a place-based approach. Spatial Economic Analysis, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 120-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2014.891157
19. Delhey J., Kohler U., 2006. From nationally bounded to pan-European inequalities? On the importance of foreign countries as reference groups. European Sociological Review, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 125-140. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jci047
20. Druzhinin P.V., Prokopyev E.A., 2018. An assessment of the economic performance of the EU Baltic Region States. Baltic Region, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 4-18. https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2018-1-1
21. Dyba W., Loewen B., Looga J., Zdražil P., 2018. Regional development in Central-Eastern European countries at the beginning of the 21st Century: Path dependence and effects of EU cohesion policy. Quaestiones Geographicae, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 77-92. https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2018-0017
22. Epstein R.A., 2014. Overcoming 'economic backwardness' in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 17‑34. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12078
23. Friedmann J., 1967. A general theory of polarized development. Ford Foundation, Urban and Regional Development Advisory Program in Chile, Santiago.
24. Garretsen H., Martin R., 2010. Rethinking (new) economic geography models: Taking geography and history more seriously. Spatial Economic Analysis, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 127-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421771003730729
25. Gaspar J., 2018. A prospective review on New Economic Geography. Annals of Regional Science, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 237‑272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-018-0866-5
26. Gladkiy Yu. 2014. The questions of optimization of inter-regional proportions in Russia: the dangerous range of opinion. Vestnik ARGO, no. 3, pp. 41-50.
27. Gyuris F., 2013. The political discourse of spatial disparities: Geographical inequalities between science and propaganda. Berlin: Springer.
28. Hassink R., Gong H. (eds.), 2016. New economic geography [in:] A.M. Orum, M. Garcia, D. Judd, B. Roberts, P.C. Piew (eds.), Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
29. Kern K., Löffelsend T., 2004. Sustainable development in the Baltic Sea Region. Governance beyond the nation state. Local Environment, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 451-467. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354983042000255351
30. Kinossian N., 2013. Stuck in transition: Russian regional planning policy between spatial polarization and equalization. Eurasian Geography and Economics, vol. 54, no. 5-6, pp. 611-629. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2014.901176
31. Kiryushin P., Mulloth B., Iakovleva T., 2013. Developing cross-border regional innovation systems with clean technology entrepreneurship: The case of Øresund. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, vol. 5, no. 2, pp.179-195. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIRD.2013.055237
32. Klemeshev A.P., Korneevets V.S., Palmowski T., Studzieniecki T., FedorovG.M., 2017. Approaches to the definition of the Baltic Region. Baltic Region, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 4-20. https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2017-4-1
33. Koch K., 2015. Region-building and security: The multiple borders of the Baltic Sea region after EU enlargement. Geopolitics, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 535‑558. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2015.1026964
34. Koliousis I.G., Papadimitriou S., Riza E., Stavroulakis P.J., Tsioumas V., 2018. Scarcity theory and maritime clusters: From paradox to modelling. Marine Policy, vol. 93, pp. 40‑46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.03.029
35. Kretinin G.V., Katrovskiy A.P., Pototskaya T.I., Fedorov G.M., 2016. Geopolitical and geo-economic changes in the Baltic Sea Region at the turn off the XX-XXI centuries. Baltic Region, no. 4, pp. 13‑25.
36. Krugman P., 1991. Geography and trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Lasuen J.R., 1969. On growth poles. Urban Studies, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 137‑161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420986920080231
38. Lepik K.-L., 2009. Euroregions as mechanisms for strengthening cross-border cooperation in the Baltic sea region. Trames, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 265-282. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2009.3.05
39. Makhrova A.G., Nefedova T.G., Treyvish A.I., 2016. The central Russian megalopolis: polarization of space and population mobility. Moscow University Bulletin, series 5, Geography, pp. 77-85 [in Russian].
40. Melnikas B., 2008. Integral spaces in the European Union: Possible trends of the social, economic and technological integration in the Baltic region. Journal of Business Economics and Management, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 65-77. https://doi.org/10.3846/1611-1699.2008.9.65-77
41. Melnikas B., 2008. Integration processes in the Baltic region: The new form of regional transformations in the European Union. Engineering Economics, vol. 5, no. 60, pp. 54-64.
42. Melnikova L.V., 2014. Regional economics seeking consensus, regional policy looking for targets. ECO, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 28-51.
43. Mezhevich N.M., Kretinin G.V., Fedorov G.M., 2016. Economic and geographical structure of the Baltic Sea Region. Baltic Region, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 11‑21. https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2016-3-1
44. Mikhailova A.A., 2013. Innovation capacity of Russia and the Baltics: A comparative approach. Baltic Region, no. 1 (15), pp. 91-100.
45. Mikhaylov A.S., Mikhaylova A.A., 2014. Spatial and sectoral distribution of international clusters in the Baltic region. European Journal of Scientific Research, vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 122‑137.
46. Morgan K., 2007. The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies, no. 41:S1, pp. 147-159.
47. Nizhegorodtsev R.M., 2008. Poljarizacija èkonomičeskogo prostranstva Rossii i zadači èkonomičeskoj nauki. Vestnik ekonomicheskoy integratsii, no. 3, Moskva: Izdatel'stvo: Integracija, pp. 5-10.
48. Paas T., 2003. Regional integration and international trade in the context of EU eastward enlargement. HWWA Discussion Paper, no. 218, Hamburg: Institute of International Economics.
49. Pacuk M., Palmowski T., Tarkowski M., 2018. The emergence of Baltic Europe: An overview of Polish research on regional integration. Quaestiones Geographicae, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 47‑60. https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2018-0013
50. Park S.-C., 2014. Innovation policy and strategic value for building a cross-border cluster in Denmark and Sweden. AI & Society, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 363‑375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-013-0460-4
51. Perroux F. 1955. Note sur la notion de 'pôle de croissance. Économique Appliquée, no.7, pp. 307‑320.
52. Perucca G., 2014. The role of territorial capital in local economic growth: Evidence from Italy. European Planning Studies, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 537‑562. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.771626
53. Petruzzelli A.M., Albino V., Carbonara N., 2009. External knowledge sources and proximity. Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 301‑318. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910988123
54. Pettersson T., 2002. Social capital and traditional-conservative values in the Baltic region [in:] W. Maciejewski (ed.), The Baltic Sea Region Cultures, Politics, Societies, pp. 165-225.
55. Pilyasov A.N., 2011. New economic geography and its contribution to the studies of placement of productive forces in Russia. Regionalnye issledovaniya, vol. 1, no. 13, pp. 3‑31.
56. Rohde S., 2016. Industry clusters across national borders: Lliterature review and research deficits. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 338‑358. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2016.078699
57. Scott J.W., 2002. Cross-border governance in the Baltic Sea region. Regional & Federal Studies, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 135‑153. https://doi.org/10.1080/714004777
58. Scott J.W., 2002. Baltic Sea regionalism, EU geopolitics and symbolic geographies of co-operation. Journal of Baltic Studies, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 137‑155. https://doi.org/10.1080/01629770200000021
59. Seliverstov V.E., 2008. Dve modeli regionalnoj politiki. ECO, no. 4, pp. 88-92.
60. Stead D., 2013. Convergence, divergence, or constancy of spatial planning? Connecting theoretical concepts with empirical evidence from Europe. Journal of Planning Literature, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 19‑31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412212471562
61. Toth B.I., 2014. Territorial capital: Theory, empirics and critical remarks. European Planning Studies, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 1327‑1344. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2014.928675
62. Williamson J.G., 1965. Regional inequality and the process of national development: A description of patterns. Economic Development and Cultural Change, vol. 13, no. 4, part 2, pp. 1‑84.
63. Zubarevich N., 2015. The relations between the center and the regions [in:] M. Lipman, N. Petrov (eds.), The state of Russia: What comes next?, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 50-68. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137548115_4

Relation:

Geographia Polonica

Volume:

91

Issue:

4

Start page:

399

End page:

411

Detailed Resource Type:

Artykuł

Format:

Rozmiar pliku 4,9 MB ; application/pdf

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:67569 ; 0016-7282 (print) ; 2300-7362 (online) ; 10.7163/GPol.0127

Source:

CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.2085, Cz.2173, Cz.2406 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Language of abstract:

eng

Rights:

Licencja Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0

Terms of use:

Zasób chroniony prawem autorskim. [CC BY 4.0 Międzynarodowe] Korzystanie dozwolone zgodnie z licencją Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0, której pełne postanowienia dostępne są pod adresem: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Polskiej Akademii Nauk

Original in:

Centralna Biblioteka Geografii i Ochrony Środowiska Instytutu Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania PAN

Projects co-financed by:

Program Operacyjny Polska Cyfrowa, lata 2014-2020, Działanie 2.3 : Cyfrowa dostępność i użyteczność sektora publicznego; środki z Europejskiego Funduszu Rozwoju Regionalnego oraz współfinansowania krajowego z budżetu państwa

Access:

Otwarty