Subtitle:

Geographia Polonica Vol. 91 No. 4 (2018)

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

24 cm

Type of object:

Czasopismo/Artykuł

Abstract:

Foreign direct investment plays a crucial role in global capital and trade flows. The FDI’s influence on national, regional and local economies is often the subject of public political and economic discussion, as well as numerous incentives to acquire foreign capital. The aim of this article is to identify the spatial concentration of firms with foreign capital (FOEs) in Poland at the municipality/gmina level (LAU 2) between 1995 and 2017 as well as the determinants of their location. With the use of I Moran’s statistics and spatial probit models, the intensity of the FDI location as well as their location determinants were verified. The authors also indicate the areas of spatial concentration and potential areas of positive externalities resulting from FOEs agglomeration.

References:

1. Ambroziak A.A., Hartwell C.A., 2017. The impact of investments in special economic zones on regional development. The case of Poland. Regional studies, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 1322‑1331. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1395005
2. Anselin L., 1995. Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geographical Analysis, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 93‑115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x
3. Arrow K.J., 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention [in:] N.B.o.E. Researc (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400879762-024
4. Audretsch B., 1998. Agglomeration and the location of innovative activity. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/14.2.18
5. Baldwin R., Forslid R., Martin P., 2005. Economic geography and public policy. Princeton University Press.
6. Brodzicki T., Uminski S., 2017. A gravity panel data analysis of foreign trade by regions. The role of metropolises and history. Regional studies, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1‑13.
7. Bronzini R., 2007. FDI inflows, Agglomeration and host country firms' size. Evidence from Italy. Regional studies, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 963‑978. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701281618
8. Casi L., Resmini L., 2014. Spatial complexity and interactions in the FDI attractiveness of regions. Papers in Regional Science, vol. 93, S51-S78. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12100
9. Casi L., Resmini L., 2017. Foreign direct investment and growth. Can different regional identities shape the returns to foreign capital investments? Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1483‑1508.
10. Chidlow A., Salciuviene L., Young S., 2009. Regional determinants of inward FDI distribution in Poland. International Business Review, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 119‑133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.02.004
11. Ciccone A., Hall R., 1993. Productivity and the density of economic activity. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w4313
12. Cieślik A., 2005. Geografia inwestycji zagranicznych: przyczyny i skutki lokalizacji spółek z udziałem kapitału zagranicznego w Polsce. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
13. Cieślik A., 2005. Location of foreign firms and national border effects. The Case of Poland. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 287‑297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2005.00460.x
14. Cieślik A., 2005. Regional characteristics and the location of foreign firms within Poland. Applied Economics, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 863‑874. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500061087
15. Cieślik A., 2007. Czynniki lokalizacji spółek z udziałem kapitału zagranicznego w Polsce. Gospodarka Narodowa, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 25‑48.
16. Cieślik A., 2013. Determinants of the location of foreign firms in Polish regions. Does firm size matter? Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 175‑193. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12017
17. Cieślik A., Ryan M., 2005. Location determinants of Japanese multinationals in Poland. Do special economic zones really matter for investment decisions? Journal of Economic Integration, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 475‑496. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2005.20.3.475
18. Crozet M., Mayer T., Mucchielli J.-L., 2004. How do firms agglomerate? A study of FDI in France. Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 27-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0462(03)00010-3
19. Domański B., 2001. Kapitał zagraniczny w przemyśle Polski: prawidłowości rozmieszczenia, uwarunkowania i skutki. Kraków: Instytut Geografii i Gospodarki Przestrzennej Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
20. Du J., Lu Y., Tao Z., 2008. FDI location choice. Agglomeration vs institutions. International Journal of Finance & Economics, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 92-107. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.348
21. Fujita M., Krugman P.R., Venables A.J., 2001. The spatial economy. Cities, regions, and international trade. Inglaterra: MIT Press.
22. Fujita M., Thisse J.-F., 2013. Economics of agglomeration. Cities, industrial location, and globalization. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139051552
23. Gal Z., Schmidt A., 2017. Geoeconomics in Central and Eastern Europe [in:] J.M. Munoz (ed.), Advances in geoeconomics. Europa economic perspectives, London-New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315312132-6
24. Glaeser E.L., KallalH.D., Scheinkman J.A., Shleifer A., 1992. Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 100, no. 6, pp. 1126-1152. https://doi.org/10.1086/261856
25. Hoover E.M., 1936. The measurement of industrial localization. The Review of Economics and Statistics, pp. 162-171. https://doi.org/10.2307/1927875
26. Jacobs J., 1969. The economy of cities. New York: Vintage.
27. Kisiel R., Krajewska A., Nazarczuk J.M., 2017. Spatial concentration of businesses with foreign capital in the capital cities of the Polish voivodeships and their agglomerations from 1995-2016. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum-Oeconomia, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 71-81. https://doi.org/10.22630/ASPE.2017.16.4.46
28. Kopczewska K., 2013. The spatial range of local governments. Does geographical distance affect governance and public service? The Annals of Regional Science, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 793‑810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-013-0567-z
29. Krugman P., 1991. Increasing returns and Economic Geography. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 483‑499. https://doi.org/10.1086/261763
30. Krugman P., Venables A.J., 1996. Integration, specialization, and adjustment. European Economic Review, vol. 40, no. 3‑5, pp. 959‑967. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(95)00104-2
31. Latocha T., 2002. Lokalizacja produkcji międzynarodowej a procesy integracji europejskiej. Studia Europejskie/Centrum Europejskie Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, no. 3, pp. 73‑90.
32. LeSage J., Pace P., 2009. Introduction to spatial econometrics. Statistics, Textbooks and Monographs, Boca Raton-London-New York: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420064254
33. Lundvall B.-ä., Johnson B., 1994. The learning economy. Journal of industry studies, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 23‑42.
34. Marshall A., 1920. Principles of Economics. London: MacMillan.
35. Martin P., 1998. Can regional policies affect growth and geography in Europe? The World Economy, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 757-774. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9701.00162
36. Martin P., 1999. Are European regional policies delivering? EIB Papers, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 10‑23.
37. McCann P., 2001. Urban and regional economics. New York: Oxford University Press.
38. Nazarczuk J.M., 2013. Potencjał rozwojowy a aktywność inwestycyjna województw i podregionów Polski. Olsztyn: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego.
39. Nazarczuk J.M., 2015. Regional distance. The concept and empirical evidence from Poland. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic series, vol. 28, no. 28, pp. 129-141.
40. Nazarczuk J.M., Krajewska A., 2018. Local determinants of foreign direct investment in Poland. The role of relative distance. Equilibrium, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 73‑88. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2018.004
41. Nazarczuk J.M., Umiński S., 2018. The geography of openness to foreign trade in Poland: The role of special economic zones and foreignowned entities. Bulletin of Geography. Socioeconomic series, no. 38, pp. 97‑111.
42. Nazarczuk J.M., Umiński S., 2018. The impact of special economic zones on export behaviour. Evidence from Polish firm-level data. E+M Ekonomie a Management, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 4‑22. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2018-3-001
43. Nicolini M., Resmini L., 2011. FDI spillovers in new EU member states. Economics of Transition, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 487‑511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0351.2009.00379.x
44. Nicolini M., Resmini L., 2011. Productivity spillovers, regional spillovers and the role of by multinational enterprises in the new EU Member States [in:] K. Kourtit, P. Nijkamp, R. Stough (eds.), Drivers of innovation, entrepreneurship and regional dynamics. Advances in spatial science, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer, pp. 105-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17940-2_6
45. OECD, 2010. Regional development policies in OECD countries. OECD Publishing.
46. Ottaviano G.I.P., 2011. 'New' new economic geography. Firm heterogeneity and agglomeration economies. Journal of Economic Geography, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 231‑240. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbq041
47. Ottaviano G.I.P., Puga D., 1998. Agglomeration in the global economy. A survey of the 'new economic geography'. The World Economy, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 707‑731. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9701.00160
48. Ottaviano G.I.P., Thisse J.-F., 2005. New economic geography. What about the N? Environment and Planning A, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1707‑1725. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3730
49. Resmini L., 2007. The determinants of FDI in Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. Lessons from the past and prospects for the future [in:] K. Liebscher, J. Christl, P. Mooslechner, D. Ritzberger-Grünwald (eds.), Foreign Direct Investment in Europe: A changing landscape. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 207-226.
50. Resmini L., 2013. FDI in services in European regions. An overview [in:] J.R. Cuadrado-Roura (ed.), Service Industries and Regions: Growth, Location and Regional Effects, Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 159-176.
51. Roubíčková M., Heryán T., 2014. Impacts of selected NACE industries´ foreign ownership on the Czech economy. E+M Ekonomie a Management, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 58-69. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2014-4-005
52. Sokołowicz M.E., 2015. Rozwój terytorialny w świetle dorobku ekonomii instytucjonalnej: Przestrzeń – bliskość – instytucje. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. https://doi.org/10.18778/8088-785-4
53. Umiński S., 2012. Rozważania nad naturą, przyczynami oraz konkurencyjnością działalności eksportowej w ujęciu regionalnym dla Polski. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.
54. Wu J., Radbone I., 2005. Global integration and the intra-urban determinants of foreign direct investment in Shanghai. Cities, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 275-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2005.05.005
55. Zarycki T., 2007. History and regional development. A controversy over the 'right' interpretation of the role of history in the development of the Polish regions. Geoforum, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 485‑493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.11.002
56. Zdanowska N., 2017. Distribution of foreign direct investments across the national urban systems in countries of Central and Eastern Europe in 2013. Geographia Polonica, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 5-24. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0084

Relation:

Geographia Polonica

Volume:

91

Issue:

4

Start page:

413

End page:

426

Detailed Resource Type:

Artykuł

Format:

Rozmiar pliku 2,6 MB ; application/pdf

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:67570 ; 0016-7282 (print) ; 2300-7362 (online) ; 10.7163/GPol.0128

Source:

CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.2085, Cz.2173, Cz.2406 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Language of abstract:

eng

Rights:

Licencja Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0

Terms of use:

Zasób chroniony prawem autorskim. [CC BY 4.0 Międzynarodowe] Korzystanie dozwolone zgodnie z licencją Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0, której pełne postanowienia dostępne są pod adresem: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Polskiej Akademii Nauk

Original in:

Centralna Biblioteka Geografii i Ochrony Środowiska Instytutu Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania PAN

Projects co-financed by:

Program Operacyjny Polska Cyfrowa, lata 2014-2020, Działanie 2.3 : Cyfrowa dostępność i użyteczność sektora publicznego; środki z Europejskiego Funduszu Rozwoju Regionalnego oraz współfinansowania krajowego z budżetu państwa

Access:

Otwarty