Advanced search
Advanced search
Advanced search
Advanced search
Advanced search
21 cm ; Pol. text, eng. summary
1. W. Lutosławski, The origin and growth of Plato’s logic: with an account of Plato’s style and of the chronology of his writings, Longmans, Green, London 1897.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2176779
2. L. Campbell, The Sophistes and Politicus of Plato, Clarendon Press, London 1867.
3. C. Ritter, Untersuchunger über Plato. Die echtheit und chronologie der platonischen schriften, nebst anhang: Gedankengang und grundanschauungen von Platos Theätet, W. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart 1888.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0009840x00193941
4. Thomas C. Mendenhall, A mechanical solution of a literary problem, „Popular Science Monthly” 1901 nr 60.
5. F. Mosteller, D. Wallace, Inference and disputed authorship: the Federalist, Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1964.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/202633
6. John Burrows, Computation into criticism: a study of Jane Austen’s novels and an experiment in method, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1987.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3508082
7. H. Craig, A.F. Kinney Shakespeare, computers, and the mystery of authorship, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2009.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511605437
8. K. van Dalen-Oskam, Names in novels: an experiment in computational stylistics, „Literary and Linguistic Computing” 2013 nr 28.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqs007
9. D. Hoover, Corpus stylistics, stylometry, and the styles of Henry James, „Style” 2007 nr 41(2), s. 174-203.
10. D. Hoover, Stylistics: prospect & retrospect, Rodopi, Amsterdam 2007.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqn028
11. F. Jannidis, M. Jockers, Macroanalysis. Digital methods and literary history, University of Illinois Press, Champaign 2013.
12. F. Moretti, Distant reading, Verso, New York 2013
http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/ccs.2013.0105
13. F. Moretti, Graphs, maps, trees: abstract models for a literary history, Verso, New York 2005.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fmls/cql045
14. G.K. Zipf, Human Behaviour and the Principles of Least Effort, Addison-Wesley, Boston 1949.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2226729
15. M. Eder, Does size matter? Authorship attribution, small samples, big problem, „Literary and Linguistic Computing”, publikacja online, 14.11.2013. http://llc.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/11/14/llc.fqt066.full?sid=5d729c48-0b31-480f-8d69-f0cde7e195de (dostęp: 1.01.2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqt066
16. H. Craig, R. Whipp, Old spellings, new methods: automated procedures for indeterminate linguistic data, „Literary and Linguistic Computing” 2010 nr 25(1), s. 37-52.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqp033
17. M. Eder, Metody ścisłe w literaturoznawstwie i pułapki pozornego obiektywizmu – przykład stylometrii.
18. M. Eder, M. Kestemont, J. Rybicki, Stylometry with R: a suite of tools, w: Digital Humanities 2013: Conference Abstracts, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln 2013, s. 487-489.
19. R Core Team, A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Wien 2013, http://www.R-project.org/ (dostęp: 1.1.2014).
20. M. Bastian, S. Heymann, M. Jacomy, Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media 2009.
21. J. Rybicki, Stylometryczna niewidzialność tłumacza, „Przekładaniec” 2013 nr 27, s. 61-87.
http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/rp.2008.012
22. Cz. Miłosz, Historia literatury polskiej do roku 1939, Znak, Kraków 1998, s. 427.
23. J. Rybicki, Angielskie przekłady „W pustyni i w puszczy”, w: Wokół „W pustyni i w puszczy”. W stulecie pierwodruku powieści, red. J. Axer, T. Bujnicki, Universitas, Kraków 2012, s. 555-570.
24. J. Burrows, Who wrote Shamela? Verifying the authorship of a parodic text, „Literary and Linguistic Computing” 2005 nr 20(4), s. 437-450.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqi049
25. W. Gombrowicz, Dziennik 1953-1956, Wydawnictwo Literackie, Kraków 1997, s. 108.
26. A. Kowalska, przedmowa do M. Dąbrowska Przygody człowieka myślącego, red. E. Korzeniewska, Czytelnik, Warszawa 1970.
27. M. Samozwaniec Maria i Magdalena, Wydawnictwo Literackie, Kraków 1960.
28. S. Kisielewski Dzienniki, Iskry, Warszawa 2001.
29. P. Wilczek, Czy istnieje kanon literatury polskiej?, w: Literatura polska w świecie. Tom I. Zagadnienia recepcji i odbioru, red. R. Cudak, Gnome, Katowice 2006.
30. J. Rybicki, Visualizing literature: artistic statistics, w: The art of literature, art in literature, red. B. Kucała, I. Curyło-Klag, M. Bleinert, Wydawnictwo UJ, Kraków 2014 (w druku).
31. S. Argamon, Interpreting Burrows’s Delta: geometric and probabilistic foundations, „Literary and Linguistic Computing” 2008 nr 23(2), s. 140.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqn003
32. M. Eder, Style-markers in authorship attribution: a cross-language study of the authorial fingerprint, „Studies in Polish Linguistics” 2011 nr 6, s. 99-114.
33. J. Rybicki i M. Heydel, The stylistics and stylometry of collaborative translation: Woolf’s Night and Day in Polish, „Literary and Linguistic Computing” 2013 nr 28(4), s. 708-717.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqt027
oai:rcin.org.pl:59776 ; 0867-0633 ; 10.18318/td.
IBL PAN, call no. P.I.2524 ; click here to follow the link
Copyright-protected material. May be used within the limits of statutory user freedoms
Institute of Literary Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences
Library of the Institute of Literary Research PAS
Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure ; European Union. European Regional Development Fund
Oct 2, 2020
Sep 22, 2016
2897
https://rcin.org.pl./publication/78493
Edition name | Date |
---|---|
Rybicki, J. - Pierwszy rzut oka na stylometryczną mapę literatury polskiej | Oct 2, 2020 |
Eder, Maciej