• Search in all Repository
  • Literature and maps
  • Archeology
  • Mills database
  • Natural sciences

Search in Repository

How to search...

Advanced search

Search in Literature and maps

How to search...

Advanced search

Search in Archeology

How to search...

Advanced search

Search in Mills database

How to search...

Advanced search

Search in Natural sciences

How to search...

Advanced search

RCIN and OZwRCIN projects

Object

Title: Uncovering Spatial Planning Values through Law: Insights from Central East European Planning Systems

Subtitle:

Europa XXI 47 (2024)

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

29 cm ; Każdy numer posiada własny tytuł.

Abstract:

The spatial planning act should define the key values of a given planning system. However, legally defining these values does not guarantee their smooth or efficient implementation. Though, it should provide guidance in their subsequent interpretation. Spatial planning law defines values but does not guarantee their realisation. The articulation of values in spatial planning law must, as a rule, be more general, detailed by specific provisions and considered in judicial interpretation. The aim of this article is to extract and comparative analysis spatial planning values comprised within national legal acts of Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary, Poland, and Romania. It then sets out to compare these values to the planning practices within these countries. Values stated in legislation at the national level are also applicable at lower planning levels, particularly at the local level. Their inclusion in acts is therefore very important from the perspective of planning practice. For the purposes of this article, values in spatial planning are those comprised within national laws on spatial planning matters. This refers to the values explicitly identified and included at the beginning of such laws. The way these values are framed and understood is explored in the article. The legal recognition of values in spatial planning can provide a basis for their wider implementation. However, there are several barriers against their successful implementation. Different jurisdictions engage with these values in distinct ways. The same applies to actual planning practice. Identifying and comparing the ways in which spatial planning values are framed in the laws of the surveyed countries made it possible to single out values that are repeated in all systems (e.g., sustainable development, environmental protection, protection of architectural properties and public interest) and values that are framed differently across Central East European planning systems.

References:

Act Bulg (2001). Act of 31 March 2001 Spatial Planning, Ministry of Regional Development and Public Works Bulgaria. Retrieved from https://www.mrrb.bg/bg/zakon-za-ustrojstvo-na-teritoriyata-84665/(accessed on 22 January 2024)
Act Est (2015). Act of 28 January 2015 Planning Act, Parliament of Estonia. Retrieved from https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/527062016001/consolide (accessed on 9 January 2024)
Act HU (1997). Act LXXVIII of 1997 on the Development and Protection of the Built Environment, Hungary. Retrieved from https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/hun11532E.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2024)
Act PL (2003). Act of 27 March 2003 Act on on spatial planning and development. Journal of Laws 741. Retrieved from https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20030800717/U/D20030717Lj.pdf (accessed 10 July 2022)
Act RO (2001). Act of 10 July 2001 Territorial and Urban Planning; no. 350/2001. The Official Gazette of Romania: Bucharest, Romania.
Allsop, J. (2017). Rules and values in law: Greek philosophy; the limits of text; restitution; and neuroscience - anything in common. Retrieved from https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/45476/Allsop-J-20170329.pdf
Altrock, U., & Güntner, S. (2017). Spatial Planning and Urban Development in the New EU Member States. (D., Peters, Ed.). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315242675 DOI
Auzins, A., & Chigbu, U. E. (2021). Values-led planning approach in spatial development: A methodology. Land, 10(5), 461. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10050461 DOI
Auziņš, A., & Viesturs, J. (2017). A values-led planning approach for sustainable land use and development. Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, 5(1), 275-286. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjreecm-2017-0021 DOI
Auziņš, A., Jürgenson, E., & Burinskienė, M. (2020). Comparative analysis of spatial planning systems and practices: Changes and continuity in Baltic countries: A comparative study of Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania. In E., Hepperle, J., Paulsson, V., Maliene, R., Mansberger, A., Auzins & J., Valciukiene (Eds.). Methods and Concepts of Land Management. Diverity, Changes and New Approaches (pp. 13-22). Zurich: vdf Hochschulverlag AG an der ETH Zürich.
Beluszky, P. (1999). Magyarország településföldrajza. Budapest-Pécs: Dialóg Campus Kiadó.
Blaszke, M., Nowak, M., Śleszyński, P., & Mickiewicz, B. (2021). Investments in Renewable Energy Sources in the Concepts of Local Spatial Policy: The Case of Poland. Energies, 14(23), 7902. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14237902 DOI
Bonenberg, W. (2020). The Role of Cultural Heritage in Sustainable Development. Values and Valuation as Key Factors in Spatial Planning of Rural Areas. In J., Charytonowicz & C., Falcão (Ed.). Advances in Human Factors in Architecture, Sustainable Urban Planning and Infrastructure (vol. 966, pp. 124-134). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20151-7_12 DOI
Borisov, B., & Kovachev, A. (2017, June 3). Territorial Development and Town Planning or Spatial Planning and Urbanism? VIII th International Scientific Conference on Architecture and Civil Engineering, Varna, Bulgaria.
Cassatella, C. (2015). Landscape Scenic Values: Protection and Management from a Spatial-Planning Perspective. In R., Gambino & A., Peano (Eds.). Nature Policies and Landscape Policies (pp. 341-351). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05410-0_39 DOI
Cullingworth, B., & Nadin, V. (2006). Town and Country Planning in the UK. London: Routledge. DOI
Dąbrowski, M., & Piskorek, K. (2018). The development of strategic spatial planning in Central and Eastern Europe: Between path dependence, European influence, and domestic politics. Planning Perspectives, 33(4), 571-589. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2018.1513373 DOI
Darin, M. (2016). Spatial planning law as controller of city space utilization in the sustainable development context. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 56, 109.
Davoudi, S. (2016). The value of planning and the values in planning. The Town Planning Review, 87(6), 615-618. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2016.40 DOI
De Mulder, R., & Gubby, H. (2019). What is the role of norms and values in the reception of law? In S. P., Donlan & J., Mair (Eds.). Comparative Law. Mixes, Movements, and Metaphors (pp. 98-110). London: Routledge. DOI
Deslatte, A., Swann, W. L., & Feiock, R. C. (2017). Three sides of the same coin? A Bayesian analysis of strategic management, comprehensive planning, and inclusionary values in land use. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(3), 415-432. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw054 DOI
Dianto, R., & Cahyaningtyas, I. (2021). Administrative Law Enforcement against Urban Spatial Planning Based on the Spatial Planning Law. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 4(05), 1174-1179. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i5-36 DOI
Florin, M. A. (2013). Aspects Regarding Environmental Protection in Romania and EU, from a Juridical Perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 81, 27-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.382 DOI
Geißler, G., Köppel, J., & Grimm, M. (2022). The European Union Environmental Impact Assessment Directive: Strengths and Weaknesses of Current Practice. In K., Hanna (Ed.). Routledge Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment (pp. 282-301). London: Routledge. DOI
Gwaleba, M. J., & Chigbu, U. E. (2020). Participation in property formation: Insights from land-use planning in an informal urban settlement in Tanzania. Land Use Policy, 92, 104482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104482 DOI
Hamdan, M. (2020). Law enforcement on the issuance of construction permits violating spatial planning in Medan City. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 452(1), 012073. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/452/1/012073 DOI
Hartmann, H., Bastos, A., Das, A. J., Esquivel-Muelbert, A., Hammond, W. M., Martínez-Vilalta, J., McDowell, N. G., Powers, J. S., Pugh, T. A., & Ruthrof, K. X. (2022). Climate change risks to global forest health: Emergence of unexpected events of elevated tree mortality worldwide. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 73, 673-702. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-102820-012804 DOI
Healey, P. (2004). The treatment of space and place in the new strategic spatial planning in Europe. In B., Müller, S., Löb & K., Zimmermann (Eds.). Steuerung und Planung im Wandel: Festschrift für Dietrich Fürst (pp. 297-329). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80583-6_17 DOI
Healey, P. (2008). Andreas Faludi (1973), 'The Rationale of Planning Theory', in Andreas Faludi, A Reader in Planning Theory, Oxford: Pergamon Press. In J., Hillier (Ed.). Foundations of the Planning Enterprise (pp. 35-53). London: Routledge.
Hersperger, A., Mueller, G., Knöpfel, M., Siegfried, A., & Kienast, F. (2017). Evaluating outcomes in planning: Indicators and reference values for Swiss landscapes. Ecological Indicators, 77, 96-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.004 DOI
Herzog, R. H., Gonçalves, J. E., Slingerland, G., Kleinhans, R., Prang, H., Brazier, F., & Verma, T. (2022). Identifying public values and spatial conflicts in urban planning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.04719. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.04719 DOI
Jarvis, R. M., Breen, B. B., Krägeloh, C. U., & Billington, D. R. (2016). Identifying Diverse Conservation Values for Place-Based Spatial Planning Using Crowdsourced Voluntary Geographic Information. Society & Natural Resources, 29(5), 603-616. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2015.1107793 DOI
Kenter, J. O., O'Brien, L., Hockley, N., Ravenscroft, N., Fazey, I., Irvine, K. N., Reed, M. S., Christie, M., Brady, E., & Bryce, R. (2015). What are shared and social values of ecosystems? Ecological Economics, 111, 86-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.01.006 DOI
Koresawa, A., & Konvitz, J. (2001). Towards a new role for spatial planning. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264189928-en DOI
Latifiani, D., & Ilyasa, R. M. A. (2021). The Position of Moral Values in Law. Diponegoro Law Review, 6(1), 51-61. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.6.1.2021.51-61 DOI
Leffers, D. (2018). Real estate developers' influence of land use legislation in the Toronto region: An institutionalist investigation of developers, land conflict and property law. Urban Studies, 55(14), 3059-3075. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017736426 DOI
Malloy, R. P. (2015). Land Use Law and Disability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Manole, S. D., & Tache, A. V. (2019). Analysis of Polycentricity of the South-East Region of Romania. Urbanism. Arhitectura. Constructii, 10(2), 83-98.
Marković, I., & Babić, I. (2014). Importance of Interdisciplinary Spatial Planning of National Parks: Case Study of Croatia. Journal of US-China Public Administration, 11(3), 221-231. https://doi.org/10.17265/1548-6591/2014.03.004 DOI
Mart, H., & Nele, N. (2016). Spatial planning in Estonia-From a socialist to inclusive perspective. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 12(47), 63-79.
Medve-Bálint, G., Martin, J. P., & Nagy, G. (2022). Célellentétes következmények? Az uniós források hasznosulása Magyarországon (Kolosi Tamás - Szelényi Iván - Tóth István György). Társadalmi Riport 2022. Budapest: TÁRKI. DOI
Meita, V., Petrisor, A.-I., & Georgescu, E.-S. (2014). Planning, architecture, seismic, construction and energy-related criteria for sustainable spatial development in the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve area. Urbanism. Arhitectura. Constructii, 5(3), 55.
Mitincu, C.-G., Ioja, I.-C., Hossu, C.-A., Artmann, M., Nita, A., & Nita, M.-R. (2021). Licensing sustainability related aspects in Strategic Environmental Assessment. Evidence from Romania's urban areas. Land Use Policy, 108, 105572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105572 DOI
Mitricǎ, B., Sǎgeatǎ, R., Grigorescu, I., & Dumitraşcu, M. (2021). Competitiveness and cohesion in Romania's regional development: A territorial approach. Geodetski Vestnik, 65(3), 440-458. https://doi.org/10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2021.03.440-458 DOI
Nadin, V. (2007). The emergence of the spatial planning approach in England. Planning Practice & Research, 22(1), 43-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450701455934 DOI
Nadin, V., Fernández Maldonado, A. M., Zonneveld, W., Stead, D., Dąbrowski, M., Piskorek, K., Sarkar, A., Schmitt, P., Smas, L., & Cotella, G. (2018). COMPASS - Comparative Analysis of Territorial Governance and Spatial Planning Systems in Europe: Applied Research 2016-2018.
National Development 2030 (2014). National Development 2030 - National Development and Regional Development Concept. Hungary. Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/faolex/results/details/en/c/LEX-FAOC197284/
Needham, B., Buitelaar, E., & Hartmann, T. (2019). Planning Law and Economics: The Rules We Make for Using Land (Second edition). London: Routledge. DOI
Neukranz, N. (2021). Impact of Land Use Zoning Changes on Land Values. Kaiserslautern: European Real Estate Society. DOI
Nowak, M. J., Dühr, S., Peña, S., Batsuuri, B., Fast, V., Fidélis, T., Gagakuma, D., He, Z., Khavarian-Garmsir, A. R., Legutko-Kobus, P., De Marchi Moyano, B., Sugar, M., Peres, O. M., & Blaszke, M. (2024). An international comparison of the scope and instruments of local spatial planning. Town Planning Review, 95(2), 197-217. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2023.40 DOI
Nowak, M. J., James, V. U., & Golubchikov, O. (2022). The Role of Spatial Policy Tools in Renewable Energy Investment. Energies, 15(7), 2393. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15072393 DOI
Nowak, M. J., Mitrea, A., Lukstiņa, G., Petrişor, A.-I., Filepné Kovács, K., Simeonova, V., Yanchev, P., Jürgenson, E., Põdra, K., Řezáč, V., Mikalauskaite, K., Pranevičienė, B., Ladzianska, Z., & Baloga, M. (2023). Spatial planning systems in Central and Eastern European countries: Review and comparison of selected issues. Cham: Springer Nature. DOI
Nowak, M. J., Śleszyński, P., Ostrowska, A., Oleńczuk-Paszel, A., Śpiewak-Szyjka, M., & Mitrea, A. (2023). Planning disputes from the perspective of court rulings on building conditions. A case study of Poland. Planning Practice & Research, 38(3), 425-446. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2023.2186358 DOI
Nowak, M., & Lorens, P. (2020). Ochrona i kształtowanie ładu przestrzennego w miejscowych planach zagospodarowania przestrzennego. Propozycje kierunku wykładni. In M., Nowak (Ed.). Ochrona ładu przestrzennego z perspektywy prawno-urbanistycznej (pp. 104-128). Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer.
Nowak, M., Petrisor, A.-I., Mitrea, A., Kovács, K. F., Lukstina, G., Jürgenson, E., Ladzianska, Z., Simeonova, V., Lozynskyy, R., Rezac, V., Pantyley, V., Praneviciene, B., Fakeyeva, L., Mickiewicz, B., & Blaszke, M. (2022). The Role of Spatial Plans Adopted at the Local Level in the Spatial Planning Systems of Central and Eastern European Countries. Land, 11(9), 1599. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091599 DOI
Nowak, M., Śleszyński, P., & Ostrowska, A. (2021). Orzeczenia sądów administracyjnych dotyczące studiów uwarunkowań i kierunków zagospodarowania przestrzennego gmin. Perspektywa polityki publicznej i geograficzna. Studia Regionalne i Lokalne, 84(2), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.7366/1509499528405 DOI
Nowak, M., Śleszyński, P., Churski, P., Degórski, M., Komornicki, T., Sagan, I., & Stryjakiewicz, T. (2023). Wymiar prawny w dyscyplinie geografia społeczno-ekonomiczna i gospodarka przestrzenna. Podstawy teoretyczne i zagadnienia badawcze. Przegląd Geograficzny, 95(4), 343-367. https://doi.org/10.7163/PrzG.2023.4.1 DOI
OECD (2015). Developing an Inventory and Typology of Land-Use Planning Systems and Policy Instruments in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrp6wgxp09s-en DOI
OECD (2017). The Governance of Land Use in OECD Countries: Policy Analysis and Recommendations. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264268609-en DOI
Oliveira, E. (2014). Making Strategies in Spatial Planning - Knowledge and Values. European Planning Studies, 22(4), 885-888. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.872385 DOI
Purkarthofer, E., Humer, A., & Mattila, H. (2021). Subnational and Dynamic Conceptualisations of Planning Culture: The Culture of Regional Planning and Regional Planning Cultures in Finland. Planning Theory & Practice, 22(2), 244-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2021.1896772 DOI
Rannila, P. (2021). Relationality of the Law: On the Legal Collisions in the Finnish Planning and Land Use Practices. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 41(2), 226-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X18785443 DOI
Reimer, M., Getimis, P., & Blotevogel, H. H. (Eds.). (2014). Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes. London: Routledge. DOI
Rokeach, M. (1979). Some unresolved issues in theories of beliefs, attitudes, and values. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 27, 261-304.
Rose, J. G. (2017). Legal Foundations of Land Use Planning: Textbook-Casebook and Materials on Planning Law. London: Routledge. DOI
Rose, M. (2002). Landscape and labyrinths. Geoforum, 33(4), 455-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7185(02)00030-1 DOI
Rydin, Y., Natarajan, L., Lee, M., & Lock, S. (2018). Black-boxing the evidence: Planning regulation and major renewable energy infrastructure projects in England and Wales. Planning Theory & Practice, 19(2), 218-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2018.1456080 DOI
Salkin, P. E., Juergensmeyer, J. C., Roberts, T. E., & Roweberry, R. M. (2018). Land Use Planning and Development Regulation Law. St. Paul, MN: West Academic Publishing.
Savini, F., Boterman, W. R., Van Gent, W. P. C., & Majoor, S. (2016). Amsterdam in the 21st century: Geography, housing, spatial development and politics. Cities, 52, 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.017 DOI
Scalia, V. (2017). Mobs, sucanchiuostru, anti-communists: Global and local actors in the Sack of Palermo. In F., Chiodelli, T., Hall & R., Hudson (Eds.). The Illicit and Illegal in Regional and Urban Governance and Development (pp. 107-120). London: Routledge. DOI
Scolozzi, R., Morri, E., & Santolini, R. (2012). Delphi-based change assessment in ecosystem service values to support strategic spatial planning in Italian landscapes. Ecological Indicators, 21, 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.07.019 DOI
Scott, M. (2017). Renewing Urban Communities: Environment, Citizenship and Sustainability in Ireland. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315244518 DOI
Simeonova, V. (2017). Spatial Planning Instruments in Bulgaria: Toward the Europeanization of the Spatial Model, PhD Thesis. University of Barcelona. Retrieved from https://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/bitstream/2445/116722/1/SIMEONOVA_PhD_THESIS.pdf
Śleszyński, P., Kowalewski, A., Markowski, T., Legutko-Kobus, P., & Nowak, M. (2020). The contemporary economic costs of spatial chaos: Evidence from Poland. Land, 9(7), 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9070214 DOI
Solarek, K., & Kubasińska, M. (2022). Local Spatial Plans as Determinants of Household Investment in Renewable Energy: Case Studies from Selected Polish and European Communes. Energies, 15(1), 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15010126 DOI
Su, Z., Wang, Z., & Zhang, L. (2022). Spatial-Temporal Characteristics of Ecosystem Service Values of Watershed and Ecological Compensation Scheme Considering Its Realization in Spatial Planning. Sustainability, 14(13), 8204. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138204 DOI
Suškevičs, M. (2019). Legitimate planning processes or informed decisions? Exploring public officials' rationales for participation in regional green infrastructure planning in Estonia. Environmental Policy and Governance, 29(2), 132-143. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1836 DOI
Szulczewska, B., Blaszke, M., Giedych, R., Wójcik-Gront, E., Legutko-Kobus, P., & Nowak, M. (2022). Ratio of Biologically Vital Area in Local Spatial Plans as an Instrument of Green Infrastructure Creation in Single-and Multi-Family Residential in Small and Medium-Sized Towns in Poland. Teka Komisji Urbanistyki i Architektury Oddziału Polskiej Akademii Nauk w Krakowie, L/2022, 189-201. https://doi.org/10.24425/tkuia.2022.144850 DOI
Taff, G. (2005). Conflict between global and local land-use values in Latvia's Gauja National Park. Landscape Research, 30(3), 415-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390500171227 DOI
Văidianu, N., Tătui, F., Ristea, M., & Stănică, A. (2020). Managing coastal protection through multiscale governance structures in Romania. Marine Policy, 112, 103567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103567 DOI
Virtudes, A. (2019). Urban rehabilitation: A glimpse from the spatial planning law. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 471(8), 082032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/8/082032 DOI
Wheeler, I. W. (2018). Recent Developments in Land Use and Environmental Law. Florida State University Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law, 15(1), 6.
Zhou, L., Wu, Y., Woodfin, T., Zhu, R., & Chen, T. (2018). An approach to evaluate comprehensive plan and identify priority lands for future land use development to conserve more ecological values. Sustainability, 10(1), 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010126 DOI

Relation:

Europa XXI

Volume:

47

Detailed Resource Type:

Artykuł

Format:

application/octet-stream

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:241481 ; 1429-7132 (print) ; 2300-8547 (online) ; 10.7.7163/Eu21.2024.47.8

Source:

CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Language of abstract:

eng

Rights:

Licencja Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0

Terms of use:

Zasób chroniony prawem autorskim. [CC BY 4.0 Międzynarodowe] Korzystanie dozwolone zgodnie z licencją Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0, której pełne postanowienia dostępne są pod adresem: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Polskiej Akademii Nauk

Original in:

Centralna Biblioteka Geografii i Ochrony Środowiska Instytutu Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania PAN

Projects co-financed by:

Unia Europejska. Europejski Fundusz Rozwoju Regionalnego ; Program Operacyjny Innowacyjna Gospodarka, lata 2010-2014, Priorytet 2. Infrastruktura strefy B + R

Access:

Otwarty

×

Citation

Citation style:

This page uses 'cookies'. More information