Subtitle:

Ethnologia Polona 37 2016 (2017)

Publisher:

Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology Polish Academy of Sciences

Place of publishing:

Warsaw

Description:

24 cm

Type of object:

Journal/Article

Abstract:

Mongolia is often regarded as a young democratic state that has successfully undergone the process of transformation from communism to democracy. However, a cultural anthropological analysis of Mongolian political life shows the potential differences between the ideas organizing social life in Mongolia and those known in advanced democratic societies. This article1 traces some cultural peculiarities that have impacted on the political situation of contemporary Mongolia. Special attention has been devoted to the concept of yos, which is regarded as a relevant aspect of morality in Mongolian traditional culture and is still important in understanding behavioral motives of contemporary Mongols. The rules of yos contain a set of proper and improper behavioral criteria towards family members and friendship networks as well as providing a model for proper relations to the state. The concept of collective personhood in the Mongolian cultural way of thinking means a range of social consequences incapable of being observed through analyzes involving individualistic personhood-based methodology

References:

Byambajav D. 2012. Formal and informal networks in post-socialist Mongolia: Access, uses, and inequalities. In J. Dierkes (ed.), Change in Democratic Mongolia, Social Relations, Health, Mobile Pastoralism, and Mining, Leiden, Boston, 31–54
Dierkes J. (ed.) 2012. Change in Democratic Mongolia. Social Relations, Health, Mobile Pastoralism, and Mining, Leiden, Boston
Empson R. 2011. Harnessing fortune. Personhood, Memory and Place in Mongolia, Oxford
Empson R. 2012. The Dangers of Excess. Accumulating and Dispersing Fortune in Mongolia, Social Analysis 56 (Issue 1), 1–16, doi: 10.3167/sa.2012.560108
Humphrey C. 1997. Exemplars and rules. Aspects of the discourse of moralities in Mongolia. In S. Howell (ed.), The ethnography of moralities, 25–47
Humphrey C. 2012a. Favors and “normal heroes”. The case of socialist higher education, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2, 22–24
Humphrey C. and Hürelbaatar U. 2012b. Fortune in the Wind: An Impersonal Subjectivity, Social Analysis 56 (2), 152–167
Kaplonski C. 2006. Exemplars and heroes: the individual and the moral in the Mongolian political imagination. In D. Sneath (ed.), States of mind: Power, place and subject in Inner Asia, Western Washington University
Nagaanbuu B. H. 2011. Mongolchuudyn yazguur gün u khan, Ulaanbaatar
Potter S. H. and Potter J. M. 1990. China’s Peasants: The Anthropology of a Revolution, Cambridge
Sabloff P. 2013. Does Everyone Want Democracy? Insights from Mongolia, California
Sneath D. 2006. Transacting and enacting: Corruption, obligation and the use of monies in Mongolia, Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology 71 (1), 89–112
Skrynnikova T. D. 2013. Charizma i vlast’ w epohu Cingis-hana, Sanktpetersburg
Zapaśnik S. 2010. Tolerancja a odmienni kulturowo. In I. Jakubowska-Branicka (ed.), O tolerancji we współczesnej demokracji liberalnej, Warszawa

Relation:

Ethnologia Polona

Volume:

37

Start page:

133

End page:

144

Detailed Resource Type:

Article

Format:

application/pdf

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:66279 ; 0137-4079

Source:

IAiE PAN, call no. P 366 ; IAiE PAN, call no. P 367 ; IAiE PAN, call no. P 368 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Rights:

Rights Reserved - Free Access

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Library of the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Access:

Open