Subtitle:

Vol. 1 (2015) - Special Issue - English Edition

Publisher:

IBL PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

21 cm ; Text eng.

Type of object:

Journal/Article

References:

1. The Anthropology of Extinction. Essays on Culture and Species Death, ed. by G. M. Sodikoff (Indiana University Press, 2012).
2. T. A. Arcury et al., „Ecological Worldview and Environmental Knowledge: The ‘New Environmental Paradigm’”, Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 17, no. 4 (1986): 35-40.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1986.9941424
3. D. Bachmann-Medick, Cultural Turns. Neuorientierungen in den Kulturwissenschaften, 3. (neu bearb. Aufl. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt 2009).
4. A. Benezra, J. DeStefano, J. I. Gordon, “Anthropology of Microbes”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 109, no. 17, 24 (2012): 6378-6381.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200515109
5. K. Bennett, “Epistemicide! The Tale of a Predatory Discourse”, Translator, vol. 13, no. 2 (2007): 151-169.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2007.10799236
6. P. Becker, „The Coming of a Neurocentric Age?” Medicina & Storia, vol. X, no. 19-20 (2010): 101-128.
7. A. Berleant, Aesthetics Beyond the Arts. New and Recent Essays (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2012).
8. D. Bird Rose, L. Robin, „The Ecological Humanities in Action: An Invitation”. Australian Humanities Review, no. 31-32 (2004). http://www.australianhumanitiesreview.org/archive/Issue-April-2004/rose.html[access 01.06.2012].
9. C. Bowers, The Culture of Denial: Why the Environmental Movement Needs a Strategy for Reforming Universities and Public Schools (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997).
10. G.A. Bradshaw, ”An Ape Among Many: Co-Authorship and Trans-species Epistemic Authority”, Configurations, vol. 18 (2011): 28.
11. R. Braidotti, “Feminist Epistemology After Postmodernism: Critiquing Science, Technology and Globalisation”. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, vol. 32, no. 1 (2007): 65-74.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/030801807X183623
12. R. Braidotti, „Locating Deleuze’s Eco-Philosophy: Between Bio/Zoe Power and Necro-Politics”, in: Deleuze and Law Forensic Futures, ed. by R. Braidotti, C. Colebrook and P. Hanafin (London: Palgrave MacMillan, 2009), 96-116.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230244771_7
13. F. J. Broswimmer, Ecocide. A Short History of the Mass Extinction of Species (London: Pluto Press, 2002).
14. L. Buell, The Future of Environmental Criticism (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2005).
15. G. Cajete, Native Science: Natural Laws of Interdependence (Santa Fe, New Mexico: Clear Light Publishers, 2000).
16. I. Callus, S. Herbrechter, “Introduction: Posthumanist subjectivities, or, coming after the subject … “. Subjectivity, vol. 5, no. 3 (2012): 241-264.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/sub.2012.17
17. V. de Campos Mello, „Mainstreaming the Environment: Global Ecology, International Institutions and the Crisis of Environmental Governance”, Human Ecology Review, vol. 7, no 1(2000): 31-43.
18. F. Capra, The Web of Life. A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems (New York: Anchor Books, 1996).
19. F. Capra, D. Steindl-Rest, T. Matus, Belonging to the Universe: Explorations on the Frontiers of Science and Spirituality (San Francisco: Harper San Francisco, 1991).
20. Cognitive Justice in a Global World: Prudent Knowledges for a Decent Life, ed. by Boaventura de Sousa Santos (Lanham: Lexington Books, 2007).
21. D. Coleman, “Different Knowings and the Indigenous Humanities”, ECS: English Studies in Canada, vol. 38, no. 1 (2012): 142.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/esc.2012.0009
22. B. Commoner, The Closing Circle: Nature, Man, and Technology (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1971).
23. F. Coyle, „Posthuman Geographies? Biotechnology, nature and the demise of the autonomous human subject”, Social & Cultural Geography, vol. 7, no. 4 (2006): 505-523.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14649360600825653
24. S. Cubitt, EcoMedia (New York: Rodopi, 2005).
25. R. Denkhausa, M. Bös, „How Cultural is ‘Cultural Neuroscience’? Some Comments on an Emerging Research Paradigm”, BioSocieties, vol. 7, no. 4 (2012): 433-458.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2012.30
26. Ph. Descola, “Human Natures”, Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale, vol. 17, no. 2 (2009): 145-157.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8676.2009.00063.x
27. E. Domanska, „Die paradigmatische Lücke (paradigmatic gap) in den heutigen Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften“, trans. by M. G. Esc, Historie. Jahrbuch des Zentrums für Historische Forschung Berlin der Polnischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, no. 4 (2010/2011): 34-54.
28. E. Domanska, “Wiedza o przeszłości – perspektywy na przyszłość” (Knowledge of the Past – Prospects for the Future, in Polish), Kwartalnik Historyczny, vol. CXX, no. 2 (2013): 221-274.
29. A. Dove, “Microbiomatics: The Germ Theory of Everything”, Science, vol. 340, no. 6133 (2013): 763-765.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.340.6133.763
30. R. C. Dudgeon, F. Berkes, “Local Understanding of the Land: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Indigenous Knowledge”, in: Nature Across Cultures: Views of Nature and the Environment in Non-Western Cultures, ed. by H. Selin (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003), 75-96.
31. J. F. Dunagan, „Politics for the Neurocentric Age”, Journal of Futures Studies, vol. 15, no. 2 (2010): 51-70.
32. M. DeLanda, A New Philosophy of Society. Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity (London: Continuum, 2006).
33. R. Eckersley, „The Death of Nature and the Birth of Ecological Humanities”, Organization and the Environment, vol. 11, no. 2 (1998): 183-185.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0921810698112004
34. Ecocinema Theory and Practice, ed. by S. Rust, S. Monani and S. Cubitt (Routledge, 2012).
35. „Ecocriticism and Biology”, Configurations: A Journal of Literature, Science and Technology, vol. 18, no. 1-2 (2010).
36. “Ecopoetics and the Ecological Humanities in Australia”, Australian Humanities Review, (vol. 39-40, 2006)
37. „Environmental Humanities” http://environmentalhumanities.org/ [access: 3.01.2013].
38. A. Escobar, “The ‘ontological turn’ in social theory: a commentary on ‘Human geography without scale’ by S. Marston, J. P. Jones II and K. Woodward, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, vol. 32, 2007: 106-111.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00243.x
39. The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology and Environment, ed. by A. Fill and P. Mühlhäusler. (London and New York: Continuum, 2001).
40. “The Fate of the Disciplines”, Critical Inquiry, vol. 35, no. 4 ( 2009).
41. N. Gane, „When We Have Never Been Human, What Is to Be Done?: Interview with Donna Haraway”, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 23, no. 7-8 (2006): 135-158.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276406069228
42. G. Garrard, Ecocriticism (Oxon and New York: Routledge, 2012).
43. S. F. Gilbert, J. Sapp, A. I. Tauber, „A Symbiotic View of Life: We Have Never Been Individuals”, The Quarterly Review of Biology, vol. 87, no. 4 (2012): 325-341.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/668166
44. T.Glavin, The Sixth Extinction. Journeys Among the Lost and Left Behind (St. Martin’s Press, 2007).
45. „Gregory Bateson and Ecological Aesthetics”, Australian Humanities Review, (vol. 35, 2005).
46. M. Hall, Plants as Persons. A Philosophical Botany (Albany, NY: Sunny Press, 2011).
47. D. Haraway, When Species Meet (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008).
48. G. Harvey, Animism. Respecting the Living World (New York: Columbia University Press, 2006).
49. U. K. Heise, “Lost Dogs, Last Birds, and Listed Species: Cultures of Extinction”, Configurations, vol. 18 (2010): 49-72.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/con.2010.0007
50. S. Herbrechter, Posthumanism. A Critical Analysis (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013).
51. I. Hodder, Entangled. An Archaeology of the Relationships Between Humans and Things (Malden, MA: Willey-Blackwell, 2012).
52. M. Horkheimer, Zur Kritik der instrumentellen Vernunft: aus d. Vorträgen u. Aufzeichn. seit Kriegsendem. Frankfurt am Main, 1967 (Eclipse of Reason. London: Continuum Press, 2004).
53. J. Kaipayil, Relationalism: A Theory of Being (Bangalore: JIP Publications, 2009).
54. S. E. Kirksey, S. Helmriech, “On the Emergence of Multispecies Ethnography”, Current Anthropology, vol. 25, no. 4 (2010): 545-576.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01069.x
55. S. Knickerbocker, Ecopoetics: The Language of Nature, the Nature of Language (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2012).
56. T. S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: The University of Chicago, 1970, [International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, vol. 2, no. 2]), 103.
57. B. Latour, Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).
58. J. T. Lebakeng, M. Manthiba Phalane, N. Dalindjebo, “Episemicide, Institutional Cultures and the Imperative for the Africanisation of Universities in South Africa” Alternation, vol. 13, no. 1(2006): 70-87.
59. H. Maturana, F. Varela, Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living (Reidl, London, 1980).
60. H. Maturana, F. Varela, The Tree of Knowledge, The Biological Roots of Human Understanding (Boston, MA: Shambhala Publications, 1998).
61. R. McNeil Douglas, „The Ultimate Paradigm Shift. Environmentalism as Antithesis to the Modern Paradigm of Progress”, in: Future Ethics. Climate Change and Apocalyptic Imagination, ed. by S. Skrimshire (New York-London: Continuum, 2010), 107-215.
62. D. Mihesuah, A. Wilson, Indigenizing the Academy: Transforming Scholarship and Empowering Scholarship (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2004).
63. R. Morrison, Ecological Democracy (Boston: South End Press, 1995).
64. T. Morton, Ecology without Nature: Rethinking Environmental Aesthetics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 2009).
65. R. Mukamel, A. D. Ekstrom, [and others], „Single-Neuron Responses in Humans During Execution and Observation of Actions”, Current Biology, vol. 20, no. 8 (2010): 750-756.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.02.045
66. P. Nayar, Posthumanism (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2013).
67. The Neuroscientific Turn. Transdisciplinarity in the Age of the Brain, ed. by M. M. Littlefield and J. M. Johnson (The University of Michigan Press, 2012);
68. G. P. Nicholas, “Native peoples and archaeology”, in Encyclopedia of Archaeology, vol. 3, ed. by D. M. Pearsall, Elsevier, (Oxford, 2008), 1660.
69. D. Parikh, K. Hall, introduction in: „Science and the Material Record” of the Archaeological Review from Cambridge, vol. 27, no. 1 (2012): 3.70. S. C. Pepper, World Hypotheses (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1942).
70. S. C. Pepper, World Hypotheses (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1942).
71. A. Pickering, “The Mangle of Practice: Agency and Emergence in the Sociology of Science”, The American Journal of Sociology, vol. 99, no. 3 (1999): 559-589.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/230316
72. R. W. Preucel, „Indigenous Archaeology and the Science Question”, Archaeological Review from Cambridge, vol. 27, no. 1 (2012): 121-141.
73. Qui Parle: Critical Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 19, no. 2 (2012).
74. J. Rifkin, The Empathic Civilization. The Race to Global Consciousness in a World of Crisis (New York: Penguin, 2009).
75. J. Rifkin, Entropy: A New World View (New York: Viking Press, 1980).
76. D. Rose, T. van Dooren, M. Chrulew, S. Cooke, M. Kearnes and E. O’Gorman, “Thinking Through the Environment, Unsettling the Humanities”, Environmental Humanities, vol. 1 (2012): 1-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3609940
77. E. Salmon, „Kincentric Ecology: Indigenous Perceptions of the Human Nature Relationship”. Ecological Applications, vol. 10, no. 5 (2000): 1327-1332.
78. S. Savage-Rumbaugh, K. Wamba, P. Wamba, N. Wamba, “Welfere of Apes in Captive Environments: Comments On, and By, a Specific Group of Apes”. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, vol. 10, no. 1 (2007): 7-19.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888700701277261
79. T. Sharon, “A Cartography of the Posthuman, Humanist, Non-Humanist and Mediated Perspectives on Emerging Biotechnologies. Krisis, no. 2 (2012): 4-14.
80. H. Skolimowski, Living Philosophy: Eco-Philosophy as a Tree of Life (Penguin/Arkana, 1992).
81. H. Skolimowski, “Problems of rationality in biology”, in: Studies in the Philosophy of Biology, ed. by F. J. Ayala and Th. Dobzhansky (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974), 205-224.
82. H. Skolimowski, Zmierzch światopoglądu naukowego (The Twighlight of Scientific Outlook – Polish edition) (London: Odnowa, 1974).
83. C.P. Snow, Two Cultures (London: Cambridge University Press, 1959).
84. O. Starn, „Here Come the Anthros (Again): The Strange Marriage of Anthropology and Native America”. Cultural Anthropology, vol. 26, no. 2 (2011): 179-204.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2011.01094.x
85. I. Stengers, Cosmopolitics, trans. by R. Bononno (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2010).
86. K. Stotz, P. E. Griffiths, “Biohumanities: Rethinking the Relationship Between Bioscience, Philosophy, and History of Science, and Society”, The Quarterly of Biology, vol. 83, no. 1 (2008): 37-45.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/529561
87. Ch. Tsekeris, “Relationalism in Sociology: Theoretical and Methodological Elaborations”, Facta Universitatis, Series: Philosophy, Sociology, Psychology and History, vol. 9, no. 1(2010): 139-148.
88. A. Tsing, “Arts of Inclusion, or How to Love a Mushroom”, Manoa. A Pacific Journal of International Writing, vol. 22, no. 2 (2010:) 191-203.
89. P. J. Turnbaugh, R. E. Ley, M. Hamady, C. M. Fraser-Liggett, R. Knight, J. I. Gordon, “The Human Microbiome Project”, Nature, no. 449, 18 (2007): 804-810.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06244
90. “Unloved Others: Death of the Disregarded in the Time of Extinctions”, (vol. 50, 2011).
91. A. Weisman, The World Without Us (New York: Thomas Dunne Books; St. Martin Press, 2007).
92. E. O. Wilson, Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge (Knopf, 1998).
93. A. Wilson, O. H. Huntington, “They’re here – I can feel them: the epistemic spaces of Indigenous and Western Knowledges”, Social and Cultural Geography, vol. 9, no. 3 (2008): 257-281.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14649360801990488
94. C. T. Wolfe, “Do Organisms Have an Ontological Status?” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, vol. 32, no. 2-3 (2010): 195-231.
95. C. Wolfe, What is Posthumanism? (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2010).
96. “Writing in the Anthropocene”, Australian Humanities Review, Australian Humanities Review, (vol. 47, 2009);
97. H. Zapf (Hg.), Kulturökologie und Literatur: Beiträge zu einem transdisziplinären Paradigma der Literaturwissenschaft (Heidelberg: Winter, 2008).

Relation:

Teksty Drugie

Issue:

1

Start page:

186

End page:

209

Detailed Resource Type:

Article : original article

Format:

application/pdf

Resource Identifier:

doi:10.18318/td.2015.en.1.12 ; oai:rcin.org.pl:59981 ; 0867-0633

Source:

IBL PAN, call no. P.I.2524 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

pol

Language of abstract:

eng

Rights:

Rights Reserved - Free Access

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. May be used within the limits of statutory user freedoms

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Literary Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Library of the Institute of Literary Research PAS

Projects co-financed by:

Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure ; European Union. European Regional Development Fund

Access:

Open