Advanced search
Advanced search
Advanced search
Advanced search
Advanced search
Local development in urban and rural space: project and planning ; Studia Obszarów Wiejskich = Rural Studies, t. 38
Australia’s rural regions typically have fragile and narrow economic bases specializing in agriculture, mining, or leisure and recreation. We canvass the major sources of economic fragility, which is growing fast through global competition, massive technological progress, and many other pressures for change. These severely diminish the capacity of governments to deliver effective top-down and one-size-fits-all regional development strategies. The antidote to fragility resides instead in local self-help strategies designed to increase communities’ entrepreneurial, technological, future-oriented, and innovative capacities. Knowledge about optimal delivery of such outcomes in Australia’s sparsely settled regions is, however, limited. This suggests an agenda of action research to promote and document local experiences – both successes and failures – in promoting the cultural change necessary to deliver stable adaptation.
1. Argent N. M., Tonts M., Jones R., Holmes J., 2013, A creativity-led rural renaissance? Amenity led migration, the creative turn and the uneven development of rural Australia, Applied Geography, 44, pp. 88–98.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.07.018 -
2. Brockman J., 2014, What Should We Be Worried About? Real scenarios that keep scientists up at night, New York, Harper Collins.
3. Brynjolfsson E., McAfee A., 2014, The Second Machine Age: work, progress and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies, New York, Norton.
4. Deloitte, 2014, Positioning for prosperity? Catching the next wave, Building the Lucky Country: Business imperatives for a prosperous Australia, Report #3, Sydney, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. [see www.buildingtheluckycountry.com.au]
5. Florida R., 2004, Cities and the Creative Class, New York, Routledge.
6. Hammersley B., 2012, 64 Things You Need to Know Now for Then, Sydney, Hodder.
7. Jacobs J., 1961, The Death and Life of Great American Cities, New York, Random House.
8. Lem S., 2013, Summa Technologiae, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press. [a translation of the original 1964 text]
9. Montaigne M. de, 1580, Essais, Bordeaux, Simon Millanges.
10. Pentland A., 2014, Social Physics: How Good Ideas Spread – The Lessons from a New Science, Penguin Press, New York.
11. Prechter R. Jr., 2003, Socionomics: The Science of History and Social Prediction, Gainesville, GA, New Classics Library.
12. Productivity Commission, 2005, Trends in Australian Agriculture, Research Paper, Canberra.
13. Regional Australia Institute, 2012, Tapping the Growth Potential of Regions for National Success, Canberra, RAI Policy Briefing. Sourced at: http://www.regionalaustralia.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/RAI-OECD-Regional-Policy-Briefing.pdf.
14. Savage M., Devine F., Cunningham N., Taylor M., Li Y., Hjellbrekke J., Le Roux B., Friedman S., Miles A., 2013, A New Model of Social Class: findings from the BBC's Great British class survey experiment, Sociology, 47 (2), pp. 219–250.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038513481128 -
15. Sorensen A. D., 2000, Regional Development: Some Issues for Policy Makers, Research Paper, 26, 1999–2000, Department of the Parliamentary Library, Canberra.
16. Sorensen A. D., 2002, Regional Economic Governance: States, Markets and DIY, [in] Bell S. (ed), Economic Governance and Institutional Dynamics, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 262–285.
17. Sorensen A. D., 2009, Creativity in Rural Development: an Australian response to Florida (or a view from the fringe), International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 5, (1/2/3), pp. 24–43.
18. Sorensen A. D., 2009, Local development under uncertainty; Australia's rural perspective, Rural Studies, 20, pp. 7–26.
19. Sorensen A. D., 2009, Australian Rural Development: multiple problems, bespoke solutions, the abdication of central governments and the ghost of Friedrich Nietzsche, [in:] Frutos L. M., Climent E., Ruiz E., Bicalho A. M., Laurens L. (eds), New Ruralities and Sustainable Use of Territory, Zaragoza, IGU Commission on the Sustainable Development of Rural Systems, pp. 257–268.
20. Sorensen A. D., 2010, The Psychology of regional Development, Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 16 (1), pp. 85–98.
21. Sorensen A. D., 2011, Australian Agricultural R&D and Innovation Systems, International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 7 (1, 2, 3), pp. 192–211.
22. Sorensen A. D., 2011, Quantum Dreaming: the relevance of quantum mechanics to regional science, Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 17 (1), pp. 81–99.
23. Sorensen A. D., Epps., 2005, The Idea of Stable Adaptation and its Origins, [in:] Mather A. (ed.), Land Use and Rural Sustainability, International Geographical Union Commissions on Land Use/Cover Change and the Sustainability of Rural Systems, University of Aberdeen, pp. 1–10.
24. Sorensen A. D., Marshall N., Dollery B., 2007, Changing Governance of Australian Regional Development: Systems and Effectiveness, Space and Polity, 11 (3), pp. 297–315.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562570701811593 -
25. Stephenson N., Brin D., Egan G., Powers R., Robson J., Watts P., Aldiss B. W., Ridbom C., McAuley P., Kress N., Steele A., McDonald I., Fulda N., Goonan K. A., 2013, Twelve Tomorrows, Cambridge, Mass., Technology Review, Inc.
26. Storey K., 2001, Fly-in/Fly-out and Fly-over: Mining and regional development in Western Australia, Australian Geographer 32 (2), pp. 133–148.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00049180120066616 -
27. Taleb N., 2007, The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable, New York, Random House.
28. Taleb N., 2012, Antifragile: Things That Gain From Disorder, London, Penguin.
29. World Bank, 2011, Multipolarity: The New Global Economy, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Washington D. C.
Rozmiar pliku 1,7 MB ; application/pdf
oai:rcin.org.pl:56651 ; 1642-4689 ; 10.7163/SOW.38.1
CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, sygn. Cz.4488 ; CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, sygn. Cz.4489 ; click here to follow the link
Licencja Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 3.0 Polska
Zasób chroniony prawem autorskim. [CC BY 3.0 PL] Korzystanie dozwolone zgodnie z licencją Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 3.0 Polska, której pełne postanowienia dostępne są pod adresem: ; -
Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Polskiej Akademii Nauk
European Union. European Regional Development Fund ; Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure
Mar 25, 2021
Oct 14, 2015
2694
https://rcin.org.pl./publication/76920
Polskie Towarzystwo Geograficzne. Komisja Obszarów Wiejskich. Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania im. Stanisława Leszczyckiego. Zespół Badań Obszarów Wiejskich.
Polskie Towarzystwo Geograficzne. Komisja Obszarów Wiejskich. Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania im. Stanisława Leszczyckiego. Zespół Badań Obszarów Wiejskich.
Szmytkie, Robert Zydroń, Adam
Polskie Towarzystwo Geograficzne. Komisja Obszarów Wiejskich. Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania im. Stanisława Leszczyckiego. Zespół Badań Obszarów Wiejskich.
Polskie Towarzystwo Geograficzne. Komisja Obszarów Wiejskich. Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania im. Stanisława Leszczyckiego. Zespół Badań Obszarów Wiejskich.
Czapiewska, Gabriela