• Search in all Repository
  • Literature and maps
  • Archeology
  • Mills database
  • Natural sciences

Search in Repository

How to search...

Advanced search

Search in Literature and maps

How to search...

Advanced search

Search in Archeology

How to search...

Advanced search

Search in Mills database

How to search...

Advanced search

Search in Natural sciences

How to search...

Advanced search

RCIN and OZwRCIN projects

Object

Title: Obiektywność spleciona z męskością, czyli o języku nauki z perspektywy feministycznej

Creator:

Derra, Aleksandra

Date issued/created:

2011

Resource type:

Text

Subtitle:

Teksty Drugie Nr 4 (2011)

Publisher:

IBL PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

21 cm ; Tekst pol., streszcz. ang.

Type of object:

Journal/Article

References:

1. Arystoteles, 1979, O rodzeniu się zwierząt, Warszawa: PWN.
2. Alcoff L., Potter E., 1993, Feminist epistemologies, London: Routledge.
3. Anderson E., 2005, Feminist epistemology: an interpretation and a defence, w: Cudd, Andreasen 2005.
4. Bartel, H., 2004, Embriologia. Podręcznik dla studentów, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Lekarskie.
5. Bartz J., Katz D., Cone R., 1988, Mechanism of sperm-egg interaction at the zona pellucida, „Biophysical Journal” 54 (4), 643-654.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(88)83000-5
6. Bordo S., 1987, The Cartesian masculinization of thought, w: Harding, O’Barr 1987.
7. Cudd A., Andreasen R., 2005,Feminist theory. A philosophical anthology, Oxford: Blackwell.
8. Doeuff Le M., 2003, The sex of knowing, New York, London: Routledge.
9. Easlea B., 1980, Witch hunting, magic and the new philosophy, Sussex: Harvester Press.
10. Fausto-Streling A., 2004, The five sexes: why male and female are not enough, w: Heldke, Lisa, O’Connor, Peg (ed.) Oppression, privilege and resistance. Theoretical perspectives on racism, sexism and heterosexism, New York: Basic Book.
11. Fee E., 1982, A feminist critique of scientific objectivity, „Science for the People” 14 July/August.
12. Fee E., 1983, Women’s nature and scientific objectivity, w: Hubbard, Lowe 1983.
13. Gaynong W., 2005, Fizjologia, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL.
14. Gross P., 1998, Bashful eggs, macho sperm and tonypandy, w: Koertge, Noretta (ed.)House built on sand. Exposing postmodernist myths about science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Gutting G., 2005, Continental philosophy of science, Oxford: Blackwell.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470755501
16. Haack S., 1998, Knowledge and propaganda. Reflections of an old feminist, w: Manifesto of a passionate moderate, Chicago–London: The University of Chicago Press.
17. Haraway D., 1987, Animal sociology and a natural economy of the body politic, part 1:A political physiology of dominance, w: Harding, O’Barr 1987.
18. Haraway D., 1991, „Płeć” do marksistowskiego słownika, http://www.ekologiasztuka.pl/pdf/f0013haraway1.pdf [dostęp 2.02.2010].
19. Harding S., 1993, Rethinking standpoint epistemology: what is ‘strong objectivity’?, w: Alcoff, Potter 1993.
20. Harding S., O’Barr J. (ed.), 1987, Sex and scientific inquiry, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
21. Hartsock N.C.M., 2001,The nature of a standpoint, w: Lorber J. (ed.) Gender. Inequality. Feminist theories and politics, Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing Company, 131-135.
22. Horowitz H., Trefil J., 1992, Jak powstaje człowiek. Nauka i spór o aborcję, Warszawa: PIW.
23. Hubbard R., 1983, Social effects of some contemporary myths about women, w: Hubbard, Lowe 1983.
24. Hubbard R., 1997, Have only men evolved, w: tejże The politics of women’s biology, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
25. Hubbard R., Lowe M. (ed.), 1983, Women’s nature. Rationalization of inequality, New York, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
26. Irigaray L., 2005, In science, is the subject sexed?, w: Gutting 2005.
27. Keller E., 1987, Feminism and science, w: Harding, O’Barr 1987.
28. Keller E., 1995 Reflections on gender and science, London: Yale University Press.
29. Lee R., deVore I. (ed.), 1968, Man the hunter, Chicago: Aldine Publishing CO.
30. Llyod G., 2005, The man of reason, w: Cudd, Adreasen 2005.
31. Longino H., 1990, Science as social knowledge, New York: Princeton University Press.
32. Longino H., 1994, In search of feminist epistemology, „Monist” 77.
33. Longino H., 2005, Can there be a feminist science?w: Cudd, Andreasen 2005.
34. Longino H., Doell R., 1987, Body bias and behaviour. A comparative analysis of reasoning in two areas of biological science, w: Harding, O’Barr 1987.
35. Machinek M., 2007, Spór o status ludzkiego embrionu, Olsztyn: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego.
36. Martin E., 2007, Jajo i plemnik. Naukowy romans, w: Gryciuk R., Kościańska A. (red.) Gender, perspektywa antropologiczna. Kobiecość, męskość, seksualność, Warszawa: Wyd. UW.
37. Nelson J., Hankinson L., 1993, Epistemological communities, w: Alcoff, Potter 1993.
38. Nelson J., Hankinson L., 1996, Empiricism without dogmas, w: Nelson J., Hankinson L. (ed.) Feminism, Science and philosophy of science, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
39. Pakszys E., 1995, Płeć a rozwój nauki. Problemy epistemologii feministycznej, w: Pakszys E. (red.) Humanistyka i płeć. Studia kobiece z psychologii, filozofii i historii, Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, 85-99.
40. Pakszys E., Sobczyńska D. (red.), 1995, Humanistyka i płeć. Kobiety w poznaniu naukowym wczoraj i dziś, Poznań: Wyd. Nauk. UAM.
41. Paludi M., Strayer L., 1985, What’s in an author’s name. Differential evaluations of performance as a function of author’s name,„Sex roles” vol. 12.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00287601
42. Potter E., 2006, Feminism and philosophy of science. An introduction, London: Routledge.
43. Rocznik statystyczny RP 2008, Warszawa: Zakład Wydawnictw Statystycznych.
44. Schatten G., Schatten H., 1984, The energetic egg, „Medical World News” 23.
45. Schiebinger L., 1987, The history and philosophy of women in science. A review essay, w: Harding, O’Barr 1987.
46. Schiebinger L., 1989, The mind has no sex. Women in the origin of modern science, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
47. Smith D., 1987, The everday world as problematic. A feminist sociology for women, Boston: Northeastern University Press.
48. Stengers, Isabelle 2000, The Invention of Modern Science, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
49. Tanner N., Zilhman A., 1976, Women in evolution, „Signs” 1.
50. Traczyk W., Trzebski A. (red.), 1990, Fizjologia człowieka z elementami fizjologii stosowanej i klinicznej, Warszawa: Państwowy Zakład Wydawnictw Lekarskich.
51. Wasserman P.M., 1987, The biology and chemistry of fertilization, „Science” vol. 235.
52. Williams P., Wendell-Smith C.P., 1972, Podstawy embriologii człowieka, Warszawa: Państwowy Zakład Wydawnictw Lekarskich.

Relation:

Teksty Drugie

Issue:

4

Start page:

49

End page:

68

Detailed Resource Type:

Article : original article

Format:

application/pdf

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:48079 ; 0867-0633

Source:

IBL PAN, call no. P.I.2524 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

pol

Language of abstract:

eng

Rights:

Rights Reserved - Free Access

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. May be used within the limits of statutory user freedoms

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Literary Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Library of the Institute of Literary Research PAS

Projects co-financed by:

Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure ; European Union. European Regional Development Fund

Access:

Open

Object collections:

Last modified:

Oct 2, 2020

In our library since:

Sep 25, 2014

Number of object content downloads / hits:

1102

All available object's versions:

https://rcin.org.pl./publication/65337

Show description in RDF format:

RDF

Show description in RDFa format:

RDFa

Show description in OAI-PMH format:

OAI-PMH

×

Citation

Citation style:

This page uses 'cookies'. More information