Wydawca:

Instytut Rozwoju Wsi i Rolnictwa Polskiej Akademii Nauk

Miejsce wydania:

Warszawa

Typ obiektu:

Czasopismo/Artykuł

Abstrakt:

Zagadnienie zawarte w pytaniu: „Jak skuteczne są środki walki z ubóstwem wdrażane w Zimbabwe?” nie było dotychczas poruszane w kontekście obszarów podmiejskich. Należałoby jednak je rozważyć, ponieważ kraj ten charakteryzuje wysoki wskaźnik ubóstwa, a jednocześnie władze i społeczeństwo Zimbabwe dążą do osiągnięcia Celu Zrównoważonego Rozwoju nr 1 z „Agendy 2030” ONZ nazwanego: „Koniec z ubóstwem”. Wykorzystując studium przypadku podmiejskiego regionu Mutasa South w Zimbabwe, niniejsze badanie miało na celu znalezienie odpowiedzi na postawione wyżej pytanie. Przyjęto metodologię eksploracyjną i zebrano dane od mieszkańców Mutasa South oraz od kluczowych informatorów z organizacji pozarządowych i Rady Okręgu Wiejskiego Mutasa. Z badania wynika, że ubóstwo przybiera tu różne formy. Środki ograniczania ubóstwa wdrażane na obszarze będącym przedmiotem badania obejmują pomoc żywnościową, edukacyjną i gotówkową, a także mikrofinansowanie i programy rolnicze. Skuteczność tych środków została zbadana na podstawie zakresu, w jakim programy obejmują wielorakie wymiary ubóstwa występujące w regionie Mutasa South. Jak stwierdzono, programy uwzględniają wszystkie wymiary ubóstwa, ale są też ich pewne aspekty, którym poświęca się mniej uwagi, stąd mają one tendencję do wykluczania niektórych ubogich z programów pomocowych.

Bibliografia:

Abdul Razak R., Donkoh S., Ansah I. (2015). Towards women’s empowerment in peri-urban Tamale: The role of sustainable microfinance. UDS International Journal of Development, 2 (1), 160–173.
Abdulai I., Derbile E., Fuseini M. (2021). Livelihood diversification among indigenous peri-urban women in the Wa Municipality, Ghana. Ghana Journal of Development Studies, 18, 72–96.
Adu-Okoree B. (2012). Peri-urban poverty: Can micro-finance be a panacea? International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 4 (6), 190–198.
Allen A. (2010). Neither rural nor urban: Service delivery options that work for the periurban poor. In: M. Khurian, P. McCarney (eds.). Peri-urban Water and Sanitation Services: Policy, Planning and Method (pp. 27–61). Cham: Springer.
Allen A., Davila J., Hofmann P. (2006). The peri-urban water poor: Citizens or consumers? Environment and Urbanization, 18 (2), 333–351.
Allen A., Hofmann P., Mukherjee J., Walnycki A. (2017). Water trajectories through non-networked infrastructure: Insights from peri-urban Dar es Salaam, Cochabamba and Kolkata. Urban Research & Practice, 10 (1), 22–42.
Amegah A.K. (2021). Slum decay in Sub-Saharan Africa. Environmental Epidemiology, 5 (3), 1–2.
Banerjee M.M. (2016). “We routinely borrow to survive”: Exploring the financial capability of income-poor people in India. Social Work, 61 (4), 349–358.
Banu N., Fazal S. (2016). Urban fringe: Sustainability of livelihoods and well-being of urban fringe households. In: N. Banu, S. Fazal (eds.). Livelihood and Wellbeing in the Urban Fringe (pp. 153–167). New York: Springer International Publishing.
Binala L. (2016). Irrigation cooperative as a strategy of peri-urban poverty reduction: Case study of Ward 5 in Epworth, Harare. In: C. Chirisa, E. Mazhindu, E. Bandauko (eds.).
Peri-Urban Developments and Processes in Africa with Special Reference to Zimbabwe (pp. 55–66). Cham: Springer.
Brand C. (2002). Making the Livelihoods Framework Work (RUP, No. 20). Harare: Department of Rural and Urban Planning, University of Zimbabwe.
Chambers R. (2012). Provocations for Development. Rugby, UK: Practical Action Publishing.
Chambers R. (2007). Poverty Research: Methodologies, Mindsets and Multidimensionality (Institutes of Development Studies, No. 293). Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
Chingono N. (2021). Half of Zimbabweans fell into extreme poverty during Covid. The Guardian, June 21. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2021/jun/21/half-of-zimbabweans-fell-into-extreme-poverty-during-covid [access: 9th March 2022].
Chingono N. (2020). Zimbabwe urged to prioritise children as record poverty causes food shortages. The Guardian, January 24. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/jan/24/zimbabwe-urged-to-prioritise-children-as-record-poverty-causes-food-shortages [access: 2nd February 2022].
Devereux S., Sabates-Wheeler R., Longhurst R. (2012). Seasonality, Rural Livelihoods and Development. London–New York: Earthscan.
Eurostat (2021). Living conditions in Europe: Poverty and social exclusion. European Commission. https://static.poder360.com.br/2021/10/eurostat-pobreza-na-UE-out-2021.pdf [access: 22nd March 2022].
Faldi G., Rosati F.N., Moretto L., Teller J. (2021). A Multi-perspective discourse on the sustainability of water and sanitation service co-production in Global South Cities. In: J. Martinez, C.A. Mikkelsen, R. Phillips (eds.). Handbook of Quality of Life and Sustainability (pp. 53–80). New York: Springer International Publishing.
Godinot X., Walker R. (2020). Poverty in all its forms: Determining the dimensions of poverty through merging knowledge. In: V. Beck, H. Hahn, R. Lepenies (eds.). Dimensions of Poverty: Measurement, Epistemic Injustices, Activism (pp. 263–279). New York: Springer International Publishing.
Gordon D. (2010). Poverty. In: P. Townsend (ed.). The Peter Townsend Reader (pp. 129–268). Bristol: Policy Press.
Gratton C., Jones I. (2010). Research Methods for Sports Studies. London: Routledge.
Gweshengwe B. (2021). What is the state of poverty in Zimbabwe? https://blessinggweshengwe.wordpress.com/2021/10/05/what-is-the-state-of-poverty-in-zimbabwe/ [access: 15th March 2022].
Gweshengwe B. (2020). Seasonal poverty in Zimbabwe and Cambodia: A comparative analysis of the developing world. Cambodia Journal of Basic and Applied Research, 2 (1), 57–88. http://www.rupp.edu.kh/CJBAR/files/Vol-2-Issue-1/5-BLESSING-2020. pdf [access: 15th March 2022].
Gweshengwe B., Hassan N.H. (2020). Defining the characteristics of poverty and their implications for poverty analysis. Cogent Social Sciences Journal, 6 (1), 1–10.
Gweshengwe B., Hassan N.H. (2019). Knowledge to policy: Understanding poverty to create policies that facilitate Zero Poverty in Brunei Darussalam. Southeast Asia: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 19, 95–104.
Gweshengwe B., Matai J. (2022). Peri-urbanisation and the quality of life: Experiences of and lessons from the original inhabitants of Domboshava peri-urban area, Harare. International Journal of Community and Social Development, online.
Hagen-Zanker J., Bastagli F., Harman L., Barca V., Sturge G., Schmidt T. (2016). Understanding the impact of cash transfers: The evidence. London: Overseas Development Institute. https://www.calpnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/10748.pdf [access: 15th March 2022].
Hungwe E. (2014). Land transactions and rural development policy in the Domboshava peri-urban communal area, Zimbabwe. Dissertation presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at Stellenbosch University. https://scholar.sun.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10019.1/96059/hungwe_land_2014.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y [access: 28th August 2022].
Jenkins S.P. (2020). Perspectives on poverty in Europe: Following in Tony Atkinson’s footsteps. Italian Economic Journal, 6 (1), 129–155.
Kalinowski S. (2020). Poverty in rural areas: An outline of the problem. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum – Oeconomia, 19 (4), 69–78.
Kalinowski S., Wyduba W. (2021). Rural poverty in Poland between the wars. Rural History, 32 (2), 217–232
Kirwan B.E., McMillan M. (2007). Food aid and poverty. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89 (5), 1152–1160.
Maoneni N.S. (2014). Impact of Informal Urban Expansion on Peri-urban Livelihoods: The Case of Seke Communal Lands. Gweru: Midlands State University.
Marshall F., Randhawa P. (2017). Tackling poverty and food security: Lessons from India’s peri-urban frontier. International Institute for Environment and Development. Briefing. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep02592 [access: 15th March 2022].
McNabb D.E. (2010). Research Methods for Political Science: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
Méndez-Lemus Y., Vieyra A. (2014). Tracing processes in poverty dynamics: A tale of peri-urban small-scale farmers in Mexico City. Urban Studies, 51 (10), 2009–2035.
Moretto L., Faldi G., Ranzato M., Rosati F.N., Boozi J.I., Teller J. (2018). Challenges of water and sanitation service co-production in the global South. Environment and Urbanization, 30 (2), 425–443.
Mutasa F. (2015). The future of the Basic Education Assistance Module, a poverty alleviation strategy in Zimbabwe. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 5 (3), 155–164. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.894.900&rep=rep1&type=pdf [access: 15th March 2022].
Narayan D., Chambers R., Shah M.K., Petesch P. (2000). Voices of the Poor: Crying Out for Change. New York: Oxford University Press.
OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development] (2007). Addressing the multiple dimensions of poverty. In: Promoting Pro-Poor Growth: Policy Guidance for Donors (pp. 31–36). Paris: OECD Publishing.
OPHI [Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative] (2018). Global Multidimensional Poverty Index 2018: The Most Detailed Picture to Date of the World’s Poorest People. Oxford: Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI), University of Oxford. https://ophi.org.uk/gmpi-2018/ [access: 22nd March 2022].
Reda M.A., Calfat G. (2020). Food aid impact on poverty reduction: Empirical evidence from rural households in Ethiopia. IOB Discussion Papers. Antwerp: Institute of Development Policy and Management.
Sen A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Siddique M. (2010). NGOs and poverty issues in peri-urban areas. Economia. Seria Management, 13 (1), 72–88.
UNDP, OPHI (2020). Charting Pathways out of Multidimensional Poverty: Achieving the SDGs. New York: United Nations Development Programme, Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative. https://ophi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/G-MPI_Report_2020_Charting_Pathways.pdf [access: 22nd March 2022].
UNDP, OPHI (2019). Global Multidimensional Poverty Index 2019: Illuminating Inequalities. New York: United Nations Development Programme, Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative.
UNICEF (2022). Africa to drastically accelerate progress on water, sanitation and hygiene. https://www.unicef.org/senegal/en/press-releases/africa-drastically-accelerate-progress-water-sanitation-and-hygiene-report [access: 31st March 2022].
UNICEF Zimbabwe (2021). Half of Zimbabweans faced extreme poverty in 2020 due to COVID-19: Rapid Poverty Income Consumption and Expenditure Survey (PICES). https://www.unicef.org/zimbabwe/press-releases/half-zimbabweans-faced-extreme-poverty-2020-due-covid-19-rapid-poverty-income [access: 31st March 2022].
Wegedie T.K. (2018). Determinants of peri-urban households’ livelihood strategy choices: An empirical study of Bahir Dar city, Ethiopia. Cogent Social Sciences, 4 (1), 1562508.
World Bank (2022). GDP per capita (current US$) – Zimbabwe. Washington D.C.: World Bank. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?locations=ZW [access: 31st March 2022].
World Bank (2020). Africa Eastern and Southern Zimbabwe. Poverty & Equity Brief (PEB). World Bank Group. https://databank.worldbank.org/data/download/poverty/987B9C90-CB9F-4D93-AE8C-750588BF00QA/SM2020/Global_POVEQ_ZWE.pdf [access: 31st March 2022].
Yang L. (2017). The relationship between poverty and inequality: Concepts and measurement. In: CASE Papers /205. Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE. https://ideas.repec.org/p/cep/sticas/-205.html [access: 31st March 2022].
Zimbabwe National Statistics Agency (2019). Zimbabwe Poverty Report 2017. Harare: Zimbabwe National Statistics Agency. http://www.zimstat.co.zw/wp-content/uploads/publications/Income/Finance/Poverty-Report-2017.pdf [access: 31st March 2022].

Czasopismo/Seria/cykl:

Wieś i Rolnictwo

Zeszyt:

1 (194)

Strona pocz.:

57

Strona końc.:

76

Szczegółowy typ zasobu:

Artykuł

Identyfikator zasobu:

oai:rcin.org.pl:243716 ; doi:10.53098/wir012022/03 ; 0137-1673 (print); 2657-5213 (on-line)

Źródło:

kliknij tutaj, żeby przejść

Język:

en

Język streszczenia:

eng

Prawa:

Licencja Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0

Zasady wykorzystania:

Zasób chroniony prawem autorskim. [CC BY 4.0 Międzynarodowe] Korzystanie dozwolone zgodnie z licencją Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0, której pełne postanowienia dostępne są pod adresem:

Digitalizacja:

Instytut Rozwoju Wsi i Rolnictwa Polskiej Akademii Nauk

Lokalizacja oryginału:

Biblioteka Instytutu Rozwoju Wsi i Rolnictwa PAN

Dofinansowane ze środków:

Program "Rozwój czasopism naukowych"- Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego (projekt numer RCN/SP/0473/2021/1)

Dostęp:

Otwarty