Inny tytuł:

Archaeological Reports ; Archäologische Berichte

Wydawca:

Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii Polskiej Akademii Nauk

Miejsce wydania:

Kraków

Opis:

il. ; 25 cm

Typ obiektu:

Czasopismo/Artykuł

Abstrakt:

This article presents a new archaeological material to discuss methodological issues encountered by scientists working both on minimally-modified bones from Mousterian assemblages, to those dealing with the identification of “retouchers” having a flaked bone aspect. The technological approach integrates complementary analytical study-frames in order to assess archaeological information. On the one hand, analogies with similar experimentally produced patterns reduce the functional identification of the archaeological specimen. They do not deal with a single artefact-type in the category of “retouchers”, which thus remains generic. On the other hand, the recording of the patterns in their chronological order, combined together with that of modifications relative to the diagenesis of the bone as an artefact, suggests the “retoucher” was reduced in a relatively fresh state by a carnivorous predator also. The evidence of this co-occurrence, if characterizing the successive anthropic-originated bone beds ultimately degraded by predators in situ, would suggest a relatively short period of human occupation generated by the use of the site in a singular cyclical conception “prey-hunter-predator” at regional scale.

Bibliografia:

Abrams Gr., Bello S. M., Bonjean D., Di Modica K., Otte M. and Pirson St. 2014. Les retouchoirs en os de l’ensemble sédimentaire 5 de Scladina: utilisation des restes d’ours des cavernes. Notae Praehistoricae 34, 5-19.
Armand D. and Delagnes A. 1998. Les retouchoirs en os d’Artenac (couche 6c): Perspectives archéozoologiques, taphonomiques et expérimentales. In J.-Ph. Brugal, L. Meignen and M. Patou-Mathis (eds), Economie préhistorique: Les comportements de subsistance au Paléolithique, Actes des XVIIIe Rencontres Internationales d’Archéologie et d’Histoire d’Antibes, 23-25 Octobre 1997. Sophia-Antipolis: APDCA, 205-214.
Baudouin M. Dr. 1906. Discussion sur l’usage de l’os comme outil à l’époque moustérienne. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 3, 189-200.
Baumann M., Plisson H., Rendu W., Maury S., Kolobova K. and Krivoshapin A. 2020. The Neandertal bone industry at Chagyrskaya Cave, Altai Region, Russia. Quaternary International 559, 68-88.
Baumann M., Plisson H., Maury S., Renou S., Coqueugniot H., Vanderesse N., Kolobova K., Shnaider S., Rots V., Guérin G. and Rendu W. 2023. On the Quina side: A Neanderthal bone industry at Chez-Pinaud site, France. PLoS ONE 18(6), e0284081.
Bello S.M. and Parfitt S.A. 2023. Taphonomic approaches to distinguish chewing damage from knapping marks in Palaeolithic faunal assemblages. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 51, 104183.
Bertran P., Todisco D., Bordes J.-G., Discamps E. and Vallin L. 2019. Perturbation assessment in archaeological sites as part of the taphonomic study: a review of methods used to document the impact of natural processes on site formation and archaeological interpretations. PALEO 30/1, 52-75.
Binford L. 1981. Bones, ancient men and modern myths. London/New York: Academic Press.
Blasco R., Rosell J., Cuartero F., Fernández Peris J., Gopher A. and Barkai R. 2013. Using bones to shape stones: MIS 9 bone retouchers at both edges of the Mediterranean Sea. PLoS ONE 8/10, e76780.
Burke Ch. C. 2018. North American Great Plains bison bonebeds: Exploring human impacts to scavenging carnivores through carnivore utilization taphonomy. In K. E. Krasinski, Ch. C. Burke and K. E. Graf (eds.), From taphonomy to Human paleoecology: A commemorative issue celebrating the career of Gary Haynes, INQUA-HABCOM President from 2003-2011. Amsterdam: Quaternary International (466-B), 223-232.
Castel J.-Ch., Chauvière Fr.-X. and Madelaine St. 2003. Sur os et sur dents: Les «retouchoirs» aurignaciens de la Ferrassie (Savignac-de-Miremont, Dordogne). PALEO 15, 29-50.
Chase Ph. G. 1990. Tool-making tools and Middle Paleolithic behavior. Current Anthropology 31/4, 443-447.
Child A. M. 1995. Microbial taphonomy of archaeological bone. Studies in conservation 40/1, 19-30.
Courtenay L. A., Herranz-Rodrigo D., Huguet R., Maté-González, González-Aguilera D. and Yravedra J. 2020. Obtaining new resolutions in carnivore tooth pit morphological analyses: A methodological update for digital taphonomy. PLoS ONE 15(10), e0240328.
Daujeard C., Moncel M.-H., Fiore I., Tagliacozzo A., Bindon P. and Raynal J.-P. 2014. Middle Palaeolithic bone retouchers in Southeastern France. Variability and functionality. In A. Nadachowski and Kr. J. Cyrek (eds), European Middle Palaeolithic (MIS 8-MIS 3): Cultures, environment, chronology. Amsterdam: Quaternary International (326-327), 492-518.
Daujeard C., Valensi P., Fiore I., Moigne A.-M., Tagliacozzo A., Moncel M.-H., Santagata C., Cauche D. and Raynal J.-P. 2018. A reappraisal of lower to Middle Palaeolithic bone retouchers from southeastern France. In J. M. Hutson, A. García-Moreno, E. S. Noack A. Villaluenga and S. Gaudzinski-Windheuser (eds), The origins of bone tool technologies: “Retouching the Palaeolithic: Becoming Human and the origins of bone tool technology” Conference at Schloss Herrenhausen in Hannover, Germany, 21-23 Oktober 2015. Mainz: Verlag des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums, 93-132.
David É. 2007. Technology on bone and antler industries: a relevant methodology for characterizing early Post-Glacial societies (9th-8th millennium BC). In C. Gates St.-Pierre and R. Walker (eds), Bones as tools: current methods and interpretations in worked bone studies (= British Archaeological Reports — International Series 1622). Oxford: Archaeopress, 35-50.
David É. and Ducrocq Th. 2023. The biography of decorated antler adzes from Montières (France) suggests a magic function in Mesolithic art. In J. M. Grünberg, B. Gramsch, E. Brinch Petersen, Th. Płonka and H. Meller (eds), Mesolithic Art – Abstraction, Decoration, Messages. International and interdisciplinary Conference Halle (Saale), Germany, 19th-21st September 2019. Halle: Tagungen des Landesmuseums für Vorgeschichte (Band 26-1), 41-54.
David É. and Gargani E. 2018. À la recherche des os anthropisé de Roc-en-Pail (Maine-et-Loire). Rapport d’expertise préliminaire. In S. Soriano (ed.), Fouille programmée pluriannuelle (FPP) Roc-en-Pail (Chalonnes-sur-Loire, 49). Opération n°185995. Second rapport de fouille intermédiaire. Exercice 2017 de la programmation triennale 2016-2018. Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication DRAC Pays-de-la-Loire / Service régional de l’Archéologie, 85-143.
David É. and Pelegrin J. 2009. Possible Late Glacial bone “retouchers” in the Baltic Mesolithic: The contribution of experimental tests with lithics on bone tools. In M. Street, R. N. E. Barton and Th. Terberger (eds), Humans, environment and chronology of the Late Glacial of the North European Plain. Proceedings of workshop 14 (Commission XXXII) of the XVth Congrès de l’Union internationale des sciences pré- et protohistoriques UISPP, Lisboa, 4th-9th of September 2006 (= Tagungsbänder 6). Mainz: Verlag der Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums, 155‑168.
David É. and Valentin Eriksen B. 2021. Antler tool’s biography shortens time frame of Lyngby-axes to the last stage of the Late-Glacial. In S. Gaudzinski-Windheuser and O. Jöris (eds), The beef behind all possible pasts. The tandem festschrift in honour Elaine Turner and Martin Street (= Monographien des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums 157). Mainz: Monographien des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums, 639-656.
David É., Sørensen M., Diemer S., Santaniello F. and Vatsvåg Nielsen S. 2023(a). Maglemosian in contact: The disruptive invention of stone pressure flaking on the curve crutch 7000 CAL BC. In É. David and E. Hrnčiarik (eds), Contact, circulation, exchange. Proceedings of the Modified Bone & Shell UISPP Commission Conference (2-3 March 2017, University of Trnava) (= Industrie de l’os préhistorique 15). Oxford: Archaeopress Archaeology, 52-76.
David É., Fernandes P., Fjellström M. and Eriksson G. 2023(b). Prémices à une anthropologie philosophique et pragmatique sur le geste mortuaire en préhistoire – Cas d’un ancien lot, ici daté, d’os humains artéfactualisés du mas d’Azil (France). In É. David, H. Forestier and S. Soriano (eds), De la préhistoire à l’anthropologie philosophique — Recueil de textes offert à Eric Boëda (= Anthropologie des techniques Cahier 6). Paris: l’Harmattan, 343-390.
Diedrich C. J. 2015. ‘Neanderthal bone flutes’: simply products of Ice Age spotted hyena scavenging activities on cave bear cubs in European cave bear dens. Royal Society Open Science 2, 140022.
Domínguez-Rodrigo M., Pickering Tr. and Bunn H. T. 2010. Configurational approach to identifying the earliest hominin butchers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107/49, 20929-20934.
Doyon L., Li Z., Li H. and d’Errico Fr. 2018. Discovery of circa 115,000-year-old bone retouchers at Lingjing, Henan, China. PLoS ONE 13(3), e0194318.
d’Errico Fr. and Henshilwood C. 2007. Additional evidence for bone technology in the southern African Middle Stone Age. Journal of Human Evolution 52, 142-163.
d’Errico Fr., Zilhão J., Julien M., Baffier D. and Pelegrin J. 1998. Neanderthal acculturation in Western Europe? A critical review of the evidence and its interpretation. Current Anthropology 39, 1-44.
Farizy C., David F. and Jaubert J. (ed.) 1994. Hommes et bisons du Paléolithique moyen à Mauran, Haute Garonne. Paris: Gallia préhistoire (XXXe supplément).
Fernández-Jalvo Y. and Andrews P. 2016. Atlas of taphonomic identifications. 1001+ Images of fossil and recent mammal bone modification. Dordrecht: Springer.
Haynes G. 1983. Frequencies of spiral and green-bone fractures on ungulate limb bones in modern surface assemblages. American Antiquity 48, 102-114.
Henri-Martin L. 1906. Maillets ou enclumes en os provenant de la couche moustérienne de la Quina (Charente). Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 3, 155-162.
Henri-Martin L. 1907. Recherches sur l’évolution du Moustérien dans le gisement de La Quina (Charente). Premier volume, Industrie osseuse. Paris: Schleicher (1907-1910).
Holen St. R. and Holen K. A. 2011. Evidence for a Human occupation of the North American Great Plains during the Late Glacial Maximum. In J. López, C. Serrano Sánchez, A. Gonzáles Gonzáles and F. J. Aguilar Arellano (eds), IV Symposio Internacional El hombre temprano en America. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma/Museo del Desierto, 85-105.
Hutson J. M., García-Moreno A., Noack E. S., Villaluenga A. and Gaudzinski-Windheuser S. (eds) 2018. The origins of bone tool technologies: “Retouching the Palaeolithic: Becoming Human and the origins of bone tool technology” Conference at Schloss Herrenhausen in Hannover, Germany, 21-23 Oktober 2015. Mainz: Verlag des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums.
Lakovleva L., Djindjian Fr., Moigne A.-M., Mashenko E., Konik St., Matviichina J., Grégoire S. and Sapojnikova G. 2018. Gontsy (Ukraine), a settlement with Mammoth bone dwellings of the Late Upper Palaeolithic in Eastern Europe. UISPP journal 1(1), 42-61.
Langlais M., Pétillon J.-M., A. de Beaune S., Cattelain P., Chauvière Fr.-X., Letourneux Cl., Szmidt C., Bellier Cl., Beukens R. and David Fr. 2010. Une occupation de la fin du dernier maximum glaciaire dans les Pyrénnées: Le Magdalénien inférieur de la grotte des Scilles (Lespugue, Haute-Garonne). Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française 107, 5-51.
Madgwick R. 2014. What makes bones shiny? Investigating trampling as a cause of bone abrasion. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 6, 163-173.
Mallye J. B., Thiébaut C., Mourre V., Costamagno S., Claud É. and Weisbecker P. 2012. The Mousterian bone retouchers of Noisetier Cave: experimentation and identification of marks. Journal of Archaeological Science 39, 1131-1142.
Maté-González M. Á., González-Aguilera D., Linares-Matás G. and Yravedra J. 2019. New technologies applied to modelling taphonomic alterations. In J. Yravedra Sainz de los Terreros, M. Á.
Maté-González, L. A. Courtenay and J. Aramendi-Picado (eds), Taphonomic new technologies. Amsterdam. Quaternary international 517, 4-15.
Mateo-Lomba P., Rivals Fl. and Blasco R. 2019. The use of bones as retouchers at Unit III of Teixoneres Cave (MIS 3; Moià, Barcelona, Spain). Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 27, 101980.
Parfitt S. A. and Bello S. M. 2024. Bone tools, carnivore chewing and heavy percussion: assessing conflicting interpretations of Lower and Upper Palaeolithic bone assemblages. Royal Society Open Science 11, 231163.
Parfitt S. A., Lewis M. D. and Bello S. M. 2022. Taphonomic and technological analyses of Lower Palaeolithic bone tools from Clacton-on-Sea, UK. Scientific Reports 12, 20222.
Patou-Mathis M. (ed.) 2002. Retouchoirs, compresseurs, percuteurs… Os à impressions et éraillures (= Fiches de la Commission de nomenclature sur l’industrie de l’os préhistorique – Cahier X). Paris: Société préhistorique française.
Richard M., Pons-Branchu Ed., Genuite K., Jaillet St., Joannes-Boyau R., Wang N., Genty D., Cheng H., Price G. and Pierre M. 2021. Timing of neanderthal occupations in the southern margins of the Massif central (France): A multi-method approach. Quaternary Science Reviews 273, 107241.
Romagnoli Fr., Baena J., Pardo Naranjo A. I. and Sarti L. 2017. Evaluating the performance of the cutting edge of Neanderthal shell tools: A new experimental approach. Use, mode of operation, and strength of Callista chione from a behavioural, Quina perspective. In A. Jerardino, P. Faulkner and C. Flores (eds), Current methodological issues in archaeomalacological studies. Amsterdam: Quaternary international (427-A), 216-228.
Schiffer M. B. 1983. Towards the identification of formation processes. American Antiquity 48/4, 675-706.
Schwab C. and Rigaud A. 2009. Les «os à impressions et à éraillures»: premiers résultats expérimentaux. Antiquités nationales 40, 29-37.
Shipman P. 2001. What can you do with a bone fragment? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98/4, 1335-1337.
Soriano S., Ahmed-Delacroix N., Borvon A., Chevrier B., David É., Dessoles M., Elalouf J.-M., Faivre J.-P., Forré P., Guérin G., Lahaye C., Lebreton L., Lhomme V., Massoulié M., Mellier B., Primault J., Rasse M., Sévêque N., Todisco D., Utge J., Verna C. and Voeltzel B. 2021. Le site de Roc-en-Pail (Chalonnes-sur-Loire, Maine-et-Loire). État des connaissances 150 ans après sa découverte. Gallia préhistoire 61, 55-85.
Stiner M. C. 2004. Comparative ecology and taphonomy of spotted hyenas, humans and, wolves in Pleistocene Italy. Revue de Paléobiologie, Genève 23/2, 771-785.
Tartar E. 2012. Réflexion autour de la fonction des retouchoirs en os de l’Aurignacien ancien. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française 109/1, 69-83.
Thiébault C., Claud É and Costamagno S. (eds) 2019. L’acquisition et le traitement des matières végétales et animales par les néandertaliens: quelles modalités et quelles stratégies? Paris: Presses universitaires du Midi (P@lethnologie 10, 3548).
Toth N. and Woods M. 1989. Molluscan shell knives and experimental cut-marks on bones. Journal of Field Archaeology 16, 250-255.
Turner E., Humphrey L., Bouzouggar A. and Barton N. 2020. Bone retouchers and technological continuity in the Middle Stone Age of North Africa. PLoS ONE 15/3, e0230642.
Vettese D. and Daujeard C. 2021. The myth of the bone retoucher: analysis of an experimental remain. In Colloque en hommage à Émilie Campmas, Université Toulouse Jean Jaurès, Sociétés humaines et environnements dans la zone circum méditerranéenne du Pléistocène au début de l’Holocène, 8-9 mars 2021. Poster available, the 28/02/2024, at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349946933_The_myth_of_the_bone_retoucher_analysis_of_an_experimental_remain
Vettese D., Blasco R., Cáceres I., Gaudzinski-Windheuser S., Moncel M.-H., Thun Hohenstein U. and Daujeard C. 2020. Towards an understanding of Hominin marrow extraction strategies: a proposal for a percussion mark terminology. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 12/2, 1-19.
Villa P. and Bartram L. 1996. Flaked bone from a hyena den. PALEO 8, 143-159.
Villa P., Boshian G., Pollarolo L., Saccà D., Marra F., Nomade S. and Pereira A. 2021. Elephant bones for the Middle Pleistocene toolmaker. PLoS ONE 16/8, e0256090.
Vincent A. 1988. L’os comme artefact au Paléolithique moyen: Principes d’étude et premiers résultats. In L. Binford and J.-Ph. Rigaud (eds), L’Homme de Neandertal, La technique (volume 4), Actes du Colloque International de Liège, 4-7 Décembre 1986. Liège: ERAUL (31), 185-196.
Vincent A. 1993. L’outillage osseux au Paléolithique moyen: Une nouvelle approche. Nanterre: University Paris X (Unpublished PhD).

Czasopismo/Seria/cykl:

Sprawozdania Archeologiczne

Tom:

76

Zeszyt:

1

Strona pocz.:

139

Strona końc.:

158

Szczegółowy typ zasobu:

Artykuł

Format:

application/octet-stream

Identyfikator zasobu:

oai:rcin.org.pl:242590 ; 0081-3834 ; doi:10.23858/SA/76.2024.1.3645

Źródło:

IAiE PAN, sygn. P 244 ; IAiE PAN, sygn. P 245 ; IAiE PAN, sygn. P 243 ; kliknij tutaj, żeby przejść

Język:

eng

Prawa:

Licencja Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0

Zasady wykorzystania:

Zasób chroniony prawem autorskim. [CC BY 4.0 Międzynarodowe] Korzystanie dozwolone zgodnie z licencją Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0, której pełne postanowienia dostępne są pod adresem: ; -

Digitalizacja:

Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii Polskiej Akademii Nauk

Lokalizacja oryginału:

Biblioteka Instytutu Archeologii i Etnologii PAN

Dostęp:

Otwarty