Subtitle:

Przegląd Geograficzny T. 96 z. 1 (2024)

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

24 cm

Abstract:

Rural areas in Europe are undergoing significant transformations due to the emergence of a service-based society and a knowledge-based economy. Consequently, much of the countryside is experiencing a phenomenon known as rural decline. The concept of smart development has been proposed to address this issue, with the emphasis placed on the increasing importance of knowledge and the pivotal role of digital technologies in development processes. The objective of this article is to identify the key features of spatial differentiation in Internet quality in Poland, and to elucidate the determinants of this phenomenon. Internet quality, encompassing both fixed and mobile Internet access, was assessed by reference to data on Internet speed data at the municipality level, within the context of smart rural development. The study employed the method of principal components and correlation coefficient analysis. Spatial variations in the two components related to Internet quality reveal distinct spatial arrangements, with an evident urban-rural divide. However, this does not imply a general weakness of rural areas, but rather highlights their diversity. On the one hand, certain rural areas close to major cities exhibit excellent Internet quality for both fixed and mobile services. On the other hand, other rural areas, including those located at the peripheries of regions and in the vicinity of major cities, present disparate Internet quality. Furthermore, correlation analysis identified interdependence between Internet quality and fundamental characteristics describing the level of socio-economic development in the studied areas. Infrastructural and economic characteristics exhibited the strongest relationships, while the weakest were found for variables such as migration balance, dwellings given over for use, CIT per capita, and the value of contracts under the Digital Poland Operational Programme. These variables depend largely on the local situation, leading to varying spatial patterns. It can be concluded from the research results presented that the regularities known from other spatial dimensions (countries, regions) gain confirmation in the case of Internet quality at the local scale in Poland. Notably, this can be associated with features describing important spheres of local-community functioning. However, these correlations are not always of a strength pointing to easily interpretable patterns of spatial differentiation, with the result that the formulation of categorical conclusions regarding universal rules affecting Internet quality in local systems is precluded. This underscores the relevance of local conditions, often found to vary greatly from one municipality to another, albeit in line with the principles of smart rural development. Regarding more practical issues related to the possibility of foundations for smart growth being laid, it can be argued that the analyses presented, especially in terms of spatial variation alone, point to areas with poorer access to high-speed Internet – in which appropriate investment decisions need to be made. An important problem with such inference is that users do not necessarily choose the best available link parameter that ISPs offer. Hence, in part, results from studies based on crowdsourcing data do not reflect the quality of the services offered. Nevertheless, the importance of small, local ISPs, highlighted in the study, is an important argument that, in the case of Internet quality, it is possible to act in such a way that even in rural areas (including those located in peripheral areas), Internet of very good parameters can still be provided.

References:

Ahlmeyer, F., & Volgmann, K. (2023). What Can We Expect for the Development of Rural Areas in Europe? -Trends of the Last Decade and Their Opportunities for Rural Regeneration. Sustainability, 15(6), 5485. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065485
Ball, M. (2022). The Metaverse: And How It Will Revolutionize Everything. Nowy Jork: Liveright Publishing.
Barnes, S.J. (2020). Information management research and practice in the post-COVID-19 world. International Journal of Information Management, 102175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102175
Bauer, S., Clark, D.D., & Lehr, W. (2010). Understanding Broadband Speed Measurements. TPRC 2010. Pobrane z: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1988332 (06.05.2023).
Bourgeois, R. (2015). What future for rural areas? Seven plausible rural transformations. Development, 58(2‑3), 177‑186. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-016-0017-1
Bronzino, F., Feamster, N., Liu, S., Saxon, J., & Schmitt, P. (2021). Mapping the digital divide: before, during, and after COVID-19. TPRC48: The 48th Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy (s. 1‑11). Pobrane z: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3786158 (06.05.2023).
Brown, A., & Kristiansen, A. (2009). Urban Politics and the Right to the City: Rights, Responsibilities and Citizenship. MOST-2 Policy Paper Series. Pobrane z: https://www.hic-net.org/content/urban%20policies-R2C.pdf
Budnitz, H., & Tranos, E. (2022). Working from home and digital divides: resilience during the pandemic. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 112(4), 893‑913. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2021.1939647
Caldas, M.P., Veneri, P., & Marshalian, M. (2023). Assessing spatial disparities in Internet quality using speed tests. OECD Regional Development Papers No. 47. https://doi.org/10.1787/77c42f5e-en
Cambra‐Fierro, J.J., & Pérez, L. (2022). (Re) thinking smart in rural contexts: A multi‐country study. Growth and Change, 53(2), 868‑889. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12612
Chapman, R., & Slaymaker, T., (2002). ICTs and rural development: review of the literature, current interventions and opportunities for action. ODI Working Papers 192. Londyn: Overseas Development Institute (ODI). Pobrane z: https://odi.org/en/publications/icts-and-rural-development-review-of-the-literature-current-interventions-and-opportunities-for-action/ (06.05.2023).
Chiou, L., & Tucker, C. (2020). Social distancing, internet access and inequality (No. w26982). National Bureau of Economic Research. Pobrane z: https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/26982. html (06.05.2023).
Copus, A.K., Shucksmith, M., Dax, T., & Meredith, D. (2011). Cohesion Policy for rural areas after 2013. A rationale derived from the EDORA project (European Development Opportunities in Rural Areas) - ESPON 2013 Project 2013/1/2. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 2, 121‑132. http://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.119647
Courtois, C., & Verdegem, P. (2016). With a little help from my friends: An analysis of the role of social support in digital inequalities. New Media & Society, 188, 1508‑1527. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814562162
Cullinan, J., Flannery, D., Harold, J., Lyons, S., & Palcic, D. (2021). The disconnected: COVID-19 and disparities in access to quality broadband for higher education students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1‑21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00262-1
Czapiewski, K. (2010). Koncepcja wiejskich obszarów sukcesu społeczno-gospodarczego i ich rozpoznanie w województwie mazowieckim. Studia Obszarów Wiejskich, XXII. Warszawa: PTG, IGiPZ PAN.
Czapiewski, K.Ł., & Janc, K. (2011). Accessibility to Education and its Impact on Regional Development in Poland. W: N. Adams, G. Cotella, & R. Nunes (red.), Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning. Knowledge and policy development in an enlarged EU (s. 345‑372). Oxon: Routledge.
Farrington, J., Philip, L., Cottrill, C., Abbott, P., Blank, G., & Dutton, W.H. (2015). Two-speed Britain: Rural internet use. Aberdeen University Press. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2645771
Floriańczyk, Z., Janc, K., & Czapiewski, K. (2012). The importance and diffusion of knowledge in the agricultural sector: the Polish experience. Geographia Polonica, 83(1), 45‑56. https://doi.org/GPol.2012.1.4
Ford, G.S. (2022). Speed-Tests: Substitute for, or Complement to, Broadband Maps? Phoenix Center Perspectives, 22‑05. Pobrane z: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4251557 (02.03.2023).
Graves, J.M., Abshire, D.A., Amiri, S., & Mackelprang, J.L. (2021). Disparities in technology and broadband internet access across rurality: implications for health and education. Family & Community Health, 44(4), 257. https://doi.org/10.1097/fch.0000000000000306
Grubesic, T.H., & Mack, E.A. (2015). Broadband telecommunications and regional development. Nowy Jork: Routledge.
Janc, K. (2019). Przestrzeń cyfrowa i internet jako przedmiot zainteresowań w badaniach geograficznych. Przegląd Geograficzny, 91(2), 21‑37. https://doi.org/10.7163/PrzG.2019.2.2
Janc, K., & Czapiewski, K. (2013). The Internet as a development factor of rural areas and agriculture. Studia Regionalia KPZK PAN, 36, 89‑105.
Janc, K., & Jurkowski, W. (2022). Przestrzenne zróżnicowanie jakości Internetu w aspekcie wykluczenia cyfrowego w Polsce. Prace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG, 1, 73‑84. http://doi.org/10.4467/2543859XPKG.22.002.15962
Janc, K., Czapiewski, K., & Wójcik, M. (2019). In the starting blocks for smart agriculture: The Internet as a source of knowledge in transitional agriculture. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90-91, 1‑18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2019.100309
Janc, K., Ilnicki, D., & Jurkowski, W. (2022). Spatial regularities in Internet performance at a local scale: The case of Poland. Moravian Geographical Reports, 30(3), 163‑178. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2022-0011
Kalinowski, S., Komorowski, Ł., & Rosa, A. (2021). Koncepcja smart villages. Przykłady z Polski. Warszawa: Instytut Rozwoju Wsi i Rolnictwa PAN.
Kitchin, R. (2014). The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, 79(1), 1‑14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8
Komorowski, Ł., & Stanny, M. (2020). Smart villages: Where can they happen? Land, 9(5), 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9050151
Kongaut, C., & Bohlin, E. (2017). Impact of broadband speed on economic outputs: An empirical study of OECD countries. Economics and Business Review, 3(2), 12‑32. http://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2017.2.2
Kuhmonen, T., & Kuhmonen, I. (2015). Rural futures in developed economies: The case of Finland. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 101, 366‑374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.028
Kumar, V.T.M., & Dahiya, B. (2017). Smart Economy in Smart Cities. W: Kumar, V.T.M. (red.), Smart Economy in Smart Cities: International Collaborative Research: Ottawa, St. Louis, Stuttgart, Bologna, Cape Town, Nairobi, Dakar, Lagos, New Delhi, Varanasi, Vijayawada, Kozhikode, Hong Kong (s. 3‑76). Singapur: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1610-3_1
Lai, J., & Widmar, N.O. (2020). Revisiting the Digital Divide in the COVID-19 Era. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 43(1), 458‑464. https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13104
Li, Y., Westlund, H., & Liu, Y. (2019). Why some rural areas decline while some others not: An overview of rural evolution in the world. Journal of Rural Studies, 68, 135‑143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.03.003
Llorent-Bedmar, V., Palma, V.C.C.D., & Navarro-Granados, M. (2021). The rural exodus of young people from empty Spain. Socio-educational aspects. Journal of Rural Studies, 82, 303‑314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.01.014
Lobato, R. (2019). Netflix nations. New York: New York University Press.
Lüdering, J.W. (2015). The measurement of internet availability and quality in the context of the discussion on the digital divide (Discussion Paper No. 65). Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Zentrum für Internationale Entwicklungs- und Umweltforschung ZEU. Pobrane z: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/119872/1/835443345.pdf (02.03.2023).
Malik, P.K., Singh, R., Gehlot, A., Akram, S.V., & Das, P.K. (2022). Village 4.0: Digitalization of village with smart internet of things technologies. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 165, 107938.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.107938
McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2015). Smart specialization, regional growth, and applications to European Union cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1291‑1302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.799769
Naldi, L., Nilsson, P., Westlund, H., & Wixe, S. (2015). What is smart rural development. Journal of Rural Studies, 40, 90‑101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.06.006
Ozili, P.K., & Arun, T. (2023). Spillover of COVID-19: Impact on the global economy. W: U. Akkucuk (red.), Managing inflation and supply chain disruptions in the global economy (s. 41‑61). Hershey: IGI Global.
Paul, U., Liu, J., Adarsh, V., Gu, M., Gupta, A., & Belding, E. (2021). Characterizing performance inequity across US Ookla Speedtest users. Pobrane z: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.12038 (06.05.2023).
Pělucha, M. (2019). Smart villages and investments to public services and ICT infrastructure: case of the Czech rural development program 2007‑2013. European Countryside, 11(4), 584‑598. https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2019-0032
Pělucha, M., & Kasabov, E. (2019). Rural development in the digital age: exploring neo-productivist EU rural policy. Oxon: Routledge.
Pemberton, S. (2019). Rural regeneration in the UK. Oxon: Routledge.
Philip, L.J., Cottrill, C., & Farrington, J. (2015). 'Two-speed' Scotland: Patterns and implications of the digital divide in contemporary Scotland. Scottish Geographical Journal, 131(3‑4), 148‑171. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702541.2015.1067327
Prieger, J.E. (2003). The supply side of the digital divide: Is there equal availability in the broadband Internet access market? Economic Inquiry, 41(2), 346‑363. https://doi.org/10.1093/ei/cbg013
Riddlesden, D., & Singleton, A.D. (2014). Broadband speed equity: A new digital divide? Applied Geography, 52, 25‑33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.04.008
Rifkin, J. (2014). The zero marginal cost society: The internet of things, the collaborative commons, and the eclipse of capitalism. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Rusten, G., & Skerratt, S. (2008). Being rural in a digital age. W: G. Rusten & S. Skerratt (red.), Information and Communication Technologies in Rural Society. Being rural in a digital age (s. 1‑16). Oxon: Routledge.
Salemink, K., Strijker, D., & Bosworth, G. (2017). Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 360‑371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001
Sanders, C.K., & Scanlon, E. (2021). The digital divide is a human rights issue: Advancing social inclusion through social work advocacy. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 6(2), 130‑143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-020-00147-9
Saxon, J., & Black, D.A. (2022). What we can learn from selected, unmatched data: Measuring Internet inequality in Chicago. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 98, 101874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101874
Stein, V., & Pentzold, C. (2023). Perspectives for Digital Participation in Rural Areas: Evidence from German Regions. W: A. Lorenz & L.H. Anders (red.), EU Citizenship Beyond Urban Centres: Perceptions and Practices of Young People in East Central European Peripheral Areas (s. 215‑224). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Stein, V., Pentzold, C., Peter, S., & Sterly, S. (2022). Digitalization and Civic Participation in Rural Areas. A Systematic Review of Scientific Journals, 2010‑2020. Raumforschung und Raumordnung/ Spatial Research and Planning, 80(3), 251‑265. https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.112
Stocker, V., Lehr, W., & Smaragdakis, G. (2023). COVID-19 and the Internet: Lessons learned. W: J. Whalley, V. Stocker & W. Lehr (red.), Beyond the Pandemic? Exploring the Impact of COVID-19 on Telecommunications and the Internet (s. 17‑69). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
Sun, H. (2020). Bridging the Digital Chasm through the Fundamental Right to Technology. Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law & Policy, 28. University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper #2021/018. Pobrane z: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3845905 (02.03.2023).
Święcicki, I. (2021). Nierównomierna jakość dostępu do Internetu w Polsce w dobie pandemii COVID-19. Polski Instytut Ekonomiczny. Pobrane z: https://pie.net.pl/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/PIE-Raport_Nierownomierna-jakosc.pdf (06.05.2023).
Tallon, A. (2010). Urban regeneration in the UK. Oxon: Routledge.
Toffler, A. (2006). Revolutionary wealth. New York: Knopf.
UKE, 2023. Raport o stanie rynku telekomunikacyjnego w 2022 roku. Warszawa: Urząd Komunikacji Elektronicznej. Pobrane z: https://www.uke.gov.pl/download/gfx/uke/pl/defaultaktualnosci/36/485/5/uke_raport_tele_2022_2.pdf (06.05.2023).
Vaishar, A., Šťastná, M., Zapletalová, J., & Nováková, E. (2020). Is the European countryside depopulating? Case study Moravia. Journal of Rural Studies, 80, 567‑577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.10.044
van Deursen, A., & van Dijk, J.A.G.M. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507‑526. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481348
Vironen, H., & Kah, S. (2019). Meeting the challenges of digitalisation: Implications for regional and rural development. European Policy Research Paper, 111. Glasgow: European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde. Pobrane z: http://eprc-strath.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Meeting-the-Challenges-of-Digitalisation-EPRP-111.pdf (06.05.2023).
Wójcik, M. (2018). Koncepcja inteligentnego rozwoju (smart development) - wyzwanie dla planowania obszarów wiejskich. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Geographica Socio-Oeconomica, 31, 5‑15. https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-1117.31.01
Wójcik, M., Tobiasz-Lis, P., Czapiewski, K., Janc, K., Jeziorska-Biel, P., & Wolski, O. (2018). Inteligentny rozwój obszarów wiejskich (smart rural development): Koncepcja, wymiary, metody. Łódź: GlobalPoint.
Wolski, O., & Wójcik, M. (2019). Smart villages revisited: Conceptual background and new challenges at the local level. W: A. Visvizi, M. Lytras, & G. Mudri (red.), Smart Villages in the EU and Beyond (s. 29‑48). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.

Relation:

Przegląd Geograficzny

Volume:

96

Issue:

1

Start page:

27

End page:

47

Detailed Resource Type:

Article

Format:

application/octet-stream

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:241129 ; 0033-2143 (print) ; 2300-8466 (on-line) ; 10.7163/PrzG.2024.1.2

Source:

CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.181, Cz.3136, Cz.4187 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

pol

Language of abstract:

eng

Rights:

Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. [CC BY 4.0] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license, full text available at: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure ; European Union. European Regional Development Fund

Access:

Open