Instytut Języka Polskiego Polskiej Akademii Nauk
The article presents different, often contradictory, opinions on the status and nature of lexicography and discusses,among others, the following issues: is lexicography practice, theory or both? Is lexicography a partof linguistics, applied linguistics, a sub-discipline of lexicology or applied lexicology, or a separate discipline?The main aim of the article is to show how lexicography should be understood both as practice andtheory, and that lexicography, whose object of study is a dictionary, is not a part of linguistics, whose objectof study is language. According to the author, metalexicography should be considered a separate scientificdiscipline, while lexicography as a whole, i.e. its practical and theoretical components, can be consideredan academic discipline.
Copyright-protected material. May be used within the limits of statutory user freedoms
Mar 17, 2021
Mar 17, 2021
293
https://rcin.org.pl./publication/208083
Edition name | Date |
---|---|
Status i istota leksykografii. Stanowiska i kontrowersje / Bielińska, Monika | Mar 17, 2021 |
Hamanowa, Monika (1925–2022) Wipszycka, Ewa (1933– ) Jaczynowska, Maria (1928–2008) Zientara, Benedykt (1928–1983) Kłoczowski, Jerzy (1924–2017) Wyrozumski, Jerzy (1930–2018) Bielińska, Maria (1918–2020) Tomczak, Andrzej (1922–2017) Wójcik, Zbigniew (1922–2014) Tazbir, Janusz (1927–2016) Geremek, Bronisław (1932–2008) Cieślak, Edmund (1922–2007) Molenda, Danuta (1931–2004) Skowronek, Jerzy (1937–1996) Wereszycki, Henryk (1898–1990) Zgórniak, Marian (1924–2007) Tomaszewski, Jerzy (1930–2014) Ajnenkiel, Andrzej (1931–2015) Orzechowski, Marian (1931– ) Banasiak, Stefan (1929– )