Subtitle:

Przegląd Geograficzny T. 92 z. 4 (2020)

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

24 cm

Type of object:

Journal/Article

Abstract:

The review conducted in this paper provides for closer identification of social, psychological and economic determinants of effectiveness where environmental-protection instruments are concerned. It further supplies conclusions as to which of these instruments may prove most effective. Reference to research achievements in social psychology and behavioural economics sustains the idea that so-called “choice architecture” may enhance the effectiveness of local-government units’ environmental protection instruments. Analysis further sustains the conclusion that – on account of the psychological impact – efforts to specify environmental costs in money terms yield better results than the (verbal or written) discussion of these costs as left unquantified. Beyond that, analysis of relevant literature points to best results being achieved where instruments translate into costs incurred individually, as well as perceived benefits. Adaptation of different instruments to different societal targets renders environmental policy more effective, providing that people are left aware of the fact that other members of their community behave in a similar way. The integration of environmental policy with other sectoral policies (e.g. spatial or health policy) offers another means of raising effectiveness. Finally, environment policy should be based on a culture of participation an consensus-building between the often-conflicting interests of municipal stakeholders, and supported by frequent and legible public-communication campaigns.

References:

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179‑211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749‑5978(91)90020-T
Allcott, H. (2011). Social norms and energy conservation. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 1082‑1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.03.003
Aro, R. (2016). Normality against Sustainability - mobility practices of well-to-do households. Environmental Policy and Governance, 26, 116‑128. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1705
Baddeley, M. (2017). Behavioural Economics. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15, 73‑80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005
Beckenbach, F. (2016). Innovative Behavioral Approaches to Analyze the Incentives of Environmental Instrument.W: F. Beckenbach, & W. Kahlenborn (red.), New Perspectives for Environmental Policies Through Behavioral Economics (s. 15‑68), Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978‑3-319‑16793‑0
Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2006). Incentives and Prosocial Behavior. The American Economic Review, 96(5). https://doi.org/1652‑1678
Benjamin, D., Por, H.H., & Budescu, D. (2017). Climate change versus global warming: Who is susceptible to the framing of climate change? Environment and Behavior, 4, 745‑770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516664382
Bhalla, K., Shotten, M., Cohen, A., Brauer, M., Shahraz, S., Burnett, R., Leach-Kemon, K., Freedman, G., & Murray, C.J.L. (2014). Transport for Health: The Global Burden of Disease From Motorized Road Transport. Washington: World Bank Group.
Breidert, Ch., Hahsler, M., & Reutterer, Th. (2006). A Review of Methods for Measuring Willingness-to-Pay. Innovative Marketing (hybrid), 2(4), 8‑32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747‑019‑00666‑6
Brög, W., Erl, E., & Mense, N. (2004). Individualised marketing: changing travel behaviour for a better environment. Communicating Environmentally Sustainable Transport. The Role of Soft Measures, OECD, 83‑97.
Bovens, L. (2008). The Ethics of Nudge. W: T. Grüne-Yanoff, & S.O. Hansson (red.), Preference Change: Approaches from Philosophy, Economics and Psychology. Berlin: Springer, 207‑220.
Cairns, S., Harmer, C., Hopkin, J., & Skippon, S. (2014). Sociological perspectives on travel and mobilities: a review. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 63, 107‑117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.01.010
Camerer, C., Issacharoff, S., Loewenstein, G., O'Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2003). Regulation for Conservatives: Behavioral Economics and the Case for 'Asymmetric Paternalism. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151, 211‑254. https://doi.org/10.2307/3312889
Cheng, L., Trenberth, K.E., Fasullo, J., Boyer, T., Abraham, J., & Zhu, J. (2017). Improved estimates of ocean heat content from 1960 to 2015. Science Advances, 3(3). e1601545. https://doi.org/e1601545. 10.1126/sciadv.1601545
Ciccone, A. (2018). Environmental effects of a vehicle tax reform: Empirical evidence from Norway. Transport Policy, 69, 141‑157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.05.002
Coase, R. (1960). The Problem of Social Cost. The Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1‑44. https://doi.org/10.1086/466560
COWI. (2002). Fiscal Measures to Reduce CO2 Emissions from New Passenger Cars. Study contract for the EU Commission. DG Environment, Brussels.
Czajkowski, M. (2010). Nierynkowe metody wyceny. W: J. Kronenberg, & T. Bergier, Wyzwania zrównoważonego rozwoju w Polsce (s. 14‑16). Kraków: Fundacja Sendzimira.
Demarque, C., Charalambides, L., Hilton, D.J., & Waloquier, L. (2015). Nudging sustainable consumption: The use of descriptive norms to promote a minority behavior in a realistic online shopping environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 166-174. https://doi.org/166‑174. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.008
de Vries, G. (2020). Public Communication as a Tool to Implement Environmental Policies. Social Issues and Policy Review, 14(1), 244‑272. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12061
Dong, Y., & Hauschild, M. (2017). Indicators for Environmental Sustainability. Procedia CIRP, 61, 697‑702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.173
Dowbor, L. (2017). Co to za gra? Nowe podejścia do ekonomii. Warszawa: Instytut Wydawniczy Książka i Prasa.
European Union. (2020). Sustainable development in the European Union. Monitoring report on progress towards the SDGs in an EU context. 2020 edition. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Evans, J.P. (2011). Resilience, ecology and adaptation in the experimental city. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36, 223‑237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475‑5661.2010.00420.x
Feldman, D.R., Collins, W.D., Gero, P.J., Torn, M.S., Mlawer, E.J., & Shippert, T.R. (2015). Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010. Nature, 519, 339‑343. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14240
Gifford, R. (2015). 33 Reasons We Can't Think Clearly About Climate Change. New Scientist, 11 July 2015, 28‑33.
Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 66, 290‑302. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023566
Glaeser, E.L. (2006). Paternalism and Psychology. University of Chicago Law Review, 73(1), 133‑156. https://doi.org/10.3386/w11789
Glaeser, E.L. (2012). Triumph of the city. London: Penguin Books.
Goldstein, N.J., Cialdini, R.B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 472‑482. https://doi.org/10.1086/586910
Gómez-Baggethun, E., Martín-López, B., Barton, D.N., & Braat, L. (2014). State-Of-The-Art Report on Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services. EU FP7 OpenNESS Project Deliverable 4.1.
Greene, D.L., Patterson, P.D., Singh, M., & Jia, L. (2005). Feebates, rebates and gas-guzzler taxes: a study of incentives for increased fuel economy. Energy Policy, 33, 757‑775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.10.003
Hall, R.P., Gudmundsson, H., Marsden, G., & Zietsman, J. (2014). Sustainable Transportation. Sage Publications. Pobrane z: http://www.dragonsofinaction.com/ (18.02.2020).
IEA. (2008). World energy outlook. Paris: International Energy Agency.
INFRAS. (2000). Traffic congestion, pollution and accidents result in significant direct and indirect cost. INFRAS Consulting Group for Policy Analysis and Implementation and IWW. Pobrane z: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305725237_Direct_Costs_of_Urban_Traffic_Congestion_Case_Study_Main_Corridors_in_Mansoura_City (17.11.2020).
Jewtuchowicz, A. (1987). Efekty zewnętrzne w procesach urbanizacji i uprzemysłowienia. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
John, P. (2018). How Far to Nudge? Assessing Behavioural Public Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Johnson, E.J., Shu, S.B., Dellaert, B.G.C., Fox, C., Goldstein, D.G., Häubl, G., Larrick, R.P., Payne, J.W., Peters, E., Schkade, D., Wansink, B., & Weber, E.U. (2012). Beyond nudges: Tools of a choice architecture. Marketing Letters, 21, 487‑504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002‑012‑9186‑1
Kahneman, D. (2012). Pułapki myślenia. O myśleniu szybkim i wolnym. Poznań: Media Rodzina.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263‑291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
Komisja Europejska. (2019). Przegląd wdrażania polityki ochrony środowiska 2019. Sprawozdanie na temat państwa: Polska. Komunikat Komisji do Parlamentu Europejskiego, Rady, Europejskiego Komitetu Ekonomiczno-Społecznego i Komitetu Regionów. Bruksela: Unia Europejska.
Korzhenevych, A., Dehnen, N., Bröcker, J., Holtkamp, M., Meier, H., Gibson, G., Varma, A., & Cox, V. (2014). Update of the Handbook on External Costs of Transport, Final Report. European Commission - DG Mobility and Transport.
Laakso, S. (2017). Giving up cars - The impact of a mobility experiment on carbon emissions and everyday routines. Journal of Cleaner Production, 169, 135‑142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.035
Lehner, M., Mont, O., & Heiskanen, E. (2015). Nudging - A promising tool for sustainable consumption behaviour? Journal of Cleaner Production, 134, 166‑177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.086
Myers, D.G. (2003). Psychologia społeczna. Poznań: Zysk i S-ka.
Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J., & Khreis, H., (2016). Car free cities: Pathway to healthy urban living. Environment International, 94, 251‑262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.05.032
OECD. (2016). International Migration Outlook 2016. Paryż: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/migr_outlook-2016-en
Packard, V. (1960). The Hidden Persuaders. London: Penguin Books.
Pérez, K., Olabarria, M., Rojas-Rueda, D., Santamariña-Rubio, E., Borrell, C., & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. (2017). The health and economic benefits of active transport policies in Barcelona. Journal of Transport & Health, 4, 320‑321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2015.04.497
Pigou, A.C. (1920). The Economics of Welfare. Londyn: Macmillan.
Qiong, X., Min, L., Huaqing, W., & Zhenggang, L. (2016). Does the Central Government's Environmental Policy Work? Evidence from the Provincial-Level Environment Efficiency in China. Sustainability, 8(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su8121241
Rzeńca, A. (2016). Polityka ekologiczna miasta. W: A. Rzeńca (red.) Ekomiasto#Środowisko. Zrównoważony, inteligentny i partycypacyjny rozwój miasta (s. 89‑115). Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Schubert, C. (2017). Green nudges: Do they work? Are they ethical? Ecological Economics, 132, 329‑342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.11.009
Scitovsky, T. (1954). Two Concepts of External Economies. Journal of Political Economy, 2, 443‑451.
Shove, E., Watson, M., & Spurling, N. (2015). Conceptualizing connections: energy demand, infrastructures and social practices. European Journal of Social Theory, 18, 274‑287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431015579964
Simon, H.A. (1955). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 6, 99‑118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852
Smith, N.C., Goldstein, D.G., & Johnson, E.J. (2013). Choice without awareness: ethical and policy implications of defaults. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 32(2), 159‑172. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.10.114
Sokołowicz, M.E. (2015). Rozwój terytorialny w świetle dorobku ekonomii instytucjonalnej. Przestrzeń-bliskość-instytucje. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Sokołowicz, M. E (2013). Wokół koncepcji zrównoważonego transportu. Ślepe tory polemik. Kronika Miasta Łodzi, 2, 17‑24.
Southerton, D. (2013). Habits, routines and temporalities of consumption: from individual behaviours to the reproduction of everyday practices. Time & Society, 22, 335‑355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X12464228
Stern, P.C. (2000). Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407‑424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022‑4537.00175
Sumarga, E., Hein, L., Edens, B., & Suwarno, A. (2015). Mapping monetary values of ecosystem services in support of developing ecosystem accounts. Ecosystem Services, 12, 71‑83.
Sunstein, C.R., & Thaler, R.T. (2003). Libertarian Paternalism is Not an Oxymoron. University of Chicago Law Review, 70(4), 1159‑1202. https://doi.org/10.2307/1600573
Sunstein, C.R., & Reisch, L.A. (2016). Behaviorally Green: Why, Which and When Defaults Can Help. W: F. Beckenbach, & W. Kahlenborn (red.), New Perspectives for Environmental Policies Through Behavioral Economics, Springer, 161‑194. https://doi.org/10.1007/978‑3-319‑16793‑0
Szaszi, B., Palinkas, A., Palfi, B., Szollosi, A., & Aczel, B. (2017). A Systematic Scoping Review of the Choice Architecture Movement: Toward Understanding When and Why Nudges Work. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31, 355‑366. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2035
TEEB. (2011). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity. Manual for cities: Ecosystem services in urban management. UNEP and the European Commission.
Thaler, R.T., & Sunstein, C. R (2008). Nudge. Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven-London: Yale University Press.
Thaler, R.T., & Sunstein, C. R (2017). Jak podejmować właściwe decyzje dotyczące zdrowia, dobrobytu i szczęścia. Poznań: Zysk i Spółka.
Thaler, R.T. (2018). Zachowania niepoprawne. Tworzenie ekonomii behawioralnej. Poznań: Media Rodzina.
The Behavioural Insights Team. (2017). EAST. Four simple ways to apply behavioural insights. Annual Review of Policy Design, 5(1).
Truelove, H.B., Schultz, P.W., & Gillis, A.J. (2019). Using Social Psychology to Protect the Environment. W: K.C. O'Doherty, & D. Hodgetts (red.), The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Psychology. SAGE Publications, 491‑514. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526417091
Warde, A. (2005). Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5, 131‑153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540505053090
WHO. (2015). Global health Observatory. Pobrano z: http://www.who.int/gho/road_safety/mortality/en/ (21.02.2015).
Wild, M., Ohmura, A., Schär, C., Müller, G., Folini, D., Schwarz, M., Hakuba, M.Z., & Sanchez-Lorenzo, A. (2017). The Global Energy Balance Archive (GEBA) version 2017: a database for worldwide measured surface energy fluxes. Earth Systems Science Data, 9, 601‑613. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2017‑28
Wilkin, J. (2005). Teoria wyboru publicznego - homo oeconomicus w sferze polityki. W: J. Wilkin (red.), Teoria wyboru publicznego. Wstęp do ekonomicznej analizy funkcjonowania sfery publicznej. Warszawa: Scholar.
Wilkinson, T. (2013). Nudging and manipulation. Political Studies, 61(2), 341‑355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‑9248.2012.00974.x
www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/xx.html (18.02.2020).

Relation:

Przegląd Geograficzny

Volume:

92

Issue:

4

Start page:

569

End page:

589

Detailed Resource Type:

Article

Format:

application/octet-stream

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:157604 ; 2300-8466 (on-line) ; 10.7163/PrzG.2020.4.6

Source:

CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.181, Cz.3136, Cz.4187 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

pol

Language of abstract:

eng

Rights:

Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. [CC BY 4.0] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license, full text available at: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

Operational Program Digital Poland, 2014-2020, Measure 2.3: Digital accessibility and usefulness of public sector information; funds from the European Regional Development Fund and national co-financing from the state budget.

Access:

Open