Advanced search
Advanced search
Advanced search
Advanced search
Advanced search
Etnografia Polska 63 z. 1-2 (2019)
Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii Polskiej Akademii Nauk
In essence a discursive category, heritage is currently one of the most widespread tools for developing historical policy. Supplied with the “heritage” brand by appropriate institutions certifying objects and cultural practices, heritage serves as a canvas for the creation of attractive images of the past in specific places and communities. Thanks to its persuasive power, it can successfully model the collective imagination and influence identity processes. Guarded by procedures and verifying institutions, the special symbolic and economic value of heritage becomes an element of rivalry and a source of social conflicts. An illustration of such tension is Kraków’s palimpsestic and semantically dense space, which is ordered according to a strict symbolic hierarchy. Consideration of the different treatment of Kraków’s Old Town complex, which was entered on UNESCO’s World Heritage List in 1978, and the socialist realist centre of Nowa Huta, which unsuccessfully pretended to the title, reveals the hidden rules governing the supposedly democratic heritage policy
oai:rcin.org.pl:113636 ; 0071-1861 ; doi:10.23858/EP63.2019.009
IAiE PAN, sygn. P 325 ; IAiE PAN, sygn. P 326 ; IAiE PAN, sygn. P 327 ; click here to follow the link
Prawa zastrzeżone - dostęp nieograniczony
Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii Polskiej Akademii Nauk
Biblioteka Instytutu Archeologii i Etnologii PAN
Feb 2, 2022
Feb 17, 2020
444
https://rcin.org.pl./publication/142039
Edition name | Date |
---|---|
Golonka-Czajkowska, Monika, 2019, Between ennoblement and exclusion: heritage policies in Kraków | Feb 2, 2022 |
Roeske, Małgorzata
Biernacka-Gemel, Adrianna Zieliński, Konrad
Kozhevnikova, Magdalena
Kowalska, Małgorzata Zofia
Jarska, Natalia (1981– )
Gleń, Elżbieta (1949– )
Golonka-Czajkowska, Monika