Subtitle:

Przegląd Geograficzny T. 82 z. 2 (2010)

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

24 cm

Type of object:

Czasopismo/Artykuł

References:

1. Aalbers M.B., 2004, Creative destruction through the Anglo-American hegemony: A non-Anglo-American view on publications, referees and language, Area, 36, 3, s. 319–322.
2. Aalbers M.B., Rossi U., 2006, Beyond the Anglo-American hegemony in human geography: A European perspective, GeoJournal, 67, 2, s. 137–147.
3. Aalbers M.B., Rossi U., 2007, A coming community: Young geographers coping with multi-tier spaces of academic publishing across Europe, Social and Cultural Geography, 8, 2, s. 283–302.
4. Belina B., 2005, Anglophones: If you want us to understand you, you will have to speak understandably, Antipode, 37, 5, s. 853–855.
5. Berg L.D., Kearns R.A., 1998, America unlimited, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 16, 2, s. 128–132.
6. Desforges L., Jones R., 2001, Geographies of languages/Languages of geography, Social and Cultural Geography, 2, 3, s. 261–264.
7. The Dictionary of Human Geography (fourth edition), 2000, Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Oxford.
8. Garcia-Ramon M.D., 2003, Globalization and international geography: The questions of languages and scholarly traditions, Progress in Human Geography, 27, 1, s. 1–5.
9. Garcia-Ramon M.D., 2004, The spaces of critical geography: an introduction, Geoforum, 35, 5, s. 523–524.
10. Gregson N., Simonsen K., Vaiou D., 2003, Writing (across) Europe: On writing spaces and writing practices, European Urban and Regional Studies, 10, 1, s. 5–22.
11. Guttiérrez J., López-Nieva P., 2001, Are international journals of human geography really international?, Progress in Human Geography, 25, 1, s. 53–69.
12. Harris C.D., 2001, English as international language in geography: development and limitations, Geographical Review, 91, 4, s. 675–689.
13. Hassink R., 2007, It’s the language stupid! On emotions, strategies, and consequences related to the use of only one language to describe and explain a diverse world, Environment and Planning A, 39, 6, s. 1282–1287.
14. Helms G., Lossau J., Oslender U., 2005, Einfach sprachlos but not simply speechless: Language(s), thought and practice in the social sciences, Area, 37, 3, s. 242–250.
15. Johnston R.J., 1979, Geography and Geographers. Anglo-American Human Geography since 1945, Edward Arnold, London.
16. Johnston R.J., 2005, On journals, Environment and Planning A, 37, 1, s. 2–8.
17. Kitchin R., 2005, Disrupting and destabilizing Anglo-American and English-language hegemony in geography, Social and Cultural Geography, 6, 1, s. 1–15.
18. Minca C., 2000, Venetian geographical praxis, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18, 2, s. 285–289.
19. Minca C., 2003, Critical peripheries, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 21, 2, s. 160–168.
20. Moss P., Berg L.D., Desbiens C., 2002, The political economy of publishing in geography, ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 1, 1, s. 1–7.
21. Olds K., Poon J., 2002, Theories and discourses of economic geography: Papers from Singapore Conference on Economic Geography, December 2000, Environment and Planning A, 34, 3, s. 379–383.
22. Paasi A., 2005, Globalisation, academic capitalism and the uneven geographies of international journal publishing spaces, Environment and Planning A, 37, 5, s. 769–789.
23. Pénot J., Agnew J, 1998, How cultural boundaries limit intellectual horizons: Reflections on the untimely death of Joël Bonnemaison (1940–1997), Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 16, 2, s. 253–256.
24. Rodríguez-Pose A., 2004, On English as a vehicle to preserve geographical diversity, Progress in Human Geography, 28, 1, s. 1–4.
25. Rodríguez-Pose A., 2006, Is there an ‘Anglo-American’ domination in human geography? And, is it bad?, Environment and Planning A, 38, 4, s. 603–610.
26. Samers M., Sidaway J.D., 2000, Exclusions, inclusions and occlusions in ‘Anglo-American geography’: Reflections on Minca’s “Venetian geographical praxis”, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18, 5, s. 663–666.
27. Short J.R., Boniche A., Kim Y., Li Li P., 2001, Cultural globalization, global English, and geography journals, Professional Geographer, 53, 1, s. 1–11.
28. Simonsen K., 2004, Differential spaces of critical geography, Geoforum, 35, 5, s. 525–528.
29. Timár J., 2004, More than ‘Anglo-American’, it is ‘Western’: hegemony in geography from Hungarian perspective, Geoforum, 35, 5, s. 533–538.
30. Whitehand J.W.R., 2005, The problem of Anglophone squint, Area, 37, 2, s. 228–230.
31. Whitehand J.W.R., Edmondson P.M., 1977, Europe and America. The reorientation in geographical communication in the post-war period, Professional Geographer, 29, 3, s. 278–282.
32. Vaiou D., 2004, The contested and negotiated dominance of Anglophone geography in Greece, Geoforum, 35, 5, s. 529–531.
33. Yeung H.W., 2001, Redressing the geographical bias in social science knowledge, Environment and Planning A, 33, 1, s. 1–9.

Relation:

Przegląd Geograficzny

Volume:

82

Issue:

2

Start page:

143

End page:

158

Detailed Resource Type:

Artykuł

Format:

Rozmiar pliku 0,5 MB ; application/pdf

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:956 ; 0033-2143 ; 10.7163/PrzG.2010.2.1

Source:

CBGiOŚ, sygn. Cz.181, Cz.3136, Cz.4187 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

pol

Language of abstract:

eng

Rights:

Prawa zastrzeżone - dostęp nieograniczony

Terms of use:

Zasób chroniony prawem autorskim. Korzystanie dozwolone w zakresie określonym przez przepisy o dozwolonym użytku.

Digitizing institution:

Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Polskiej Akademii Nauk

Original in:

Centralna Biblioteka Geografii i Ochrony Środowiska Instytutu Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania PAN

Projects co-financed by:

Unia Europejska. Europejski Fundusz Rozwoju Regionalnego ; Program Operacyjny Innowacyjna Gospodarka, lata 2010-2014, Priorytet 2. Infrastruktura strefy B + R

Access:

Otwarty