Inny tytuł:

Geographia Polonica Vol. 91 No. 1 (2018)

Wydawca:

IGiPZ PAN

Miejsce wydania:

Warszawa

Opis:

24 cm

Typ obiektu:

Journal/Article

Abstrakt:

The work detailed in this article sought to determine the nature of the transborder cooperation ongoing in Poland’s eastern borderland, focusing in particular on the transborder network. Research encompassed analysis of the scope of cooperation in terms of subject matter and type of beneficiary, as well as analysis of the transborder cooperation network using SNA. All beneficiaries and projects pursued under the Poland-Belars-Ukraine 2007-2013 Cross-Border Cooperation Programme within the framework of the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument were examined. Cooperation structures in the Polish-Ukrainian-Belarusian borderland area were then compared with those in the Polish-Czech and Polish-Slovak border areas. Results showed that, while the pursuit of common projects contributed to intensified connections in the Polish-Belarusian-Ukrainian borderland area, the transborder cooperation is much influenced by the strong formalisation of the EU’s external border, and by formal-legal regulations in the neighbouring countries. The cooperation network in the eastern borderland of Poland thus differs greatly from those in the south.

Bibliografia:

1. Blatter J., 2004. From 'spaces of place' to 'spaces of flows'? Territorial and functional governance in cross-border regions in Europe and North America. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 530-548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00534.x
2. Borowczak A., Czerniejewski B., Kozak M., Kozicki B., Kościelecki P., Ledzion B., Olejniczak K., Pander W., Płoszaj A., Weremiuk A., Wolański M., 2012. Wyzwania i cele dla programów współpracy transgranicznej z udziałem Polski po 2013 r. Wrocław-Warszawa: Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego.
3. Dołzbłasz S., Raczyk A. 2015. Different borders – different cooperation? Transborder cooperation in Poland. Geographical Review, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 360-376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2015.12077.x
4. Dołzbłasz S., Raczyk A. 2017. Transborder cooperation and competition among firms in the Polish-German borderland. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 141-156. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12191
5. DÖRRY S., DECOVILLE A., 2012. Transportation policy networks in cross-border regions. First results from a social network analysis in Luxembourg and the Greater Region. CEPS/INSTEAD Working Paper, No 2012-22.
6. DURAND F., NELLES J., 2012. Cross-border governance within the Eurometropolis Lille-Kortrijk-Tournai (ELKT) through the example of crossborder public transportation. CEPS/INSTEAD Working Paper, No 2012-16.
7. González-Gómeza T., Gualda E., 2014. Cross-border networks in informal and formal cooperation in the border regions Andalusia–Algarve–Alentejo and South Finland–Estonia. European Planning Studies, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1407-1424. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.789487
8. Gorzelak G., Zawalińska K. (eds.), 2013. European territories: From cooperation to integration? Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
9. HSU J-Y., 2005. A site of transnationalism in the "Ungrounded Empire": Taipei as an interface city in the cross-border business networks. Geoforum, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 654-666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.11.004
10. Jones R., 2009. Categories, borders and boundaries. Progress in Human Geography, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 174-189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508089828
11. Komornicki T., Miszczuk A., 2010. Eastern Poland as the borderland of the European Union. Quaestiones Geographicae, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 55-69. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10117-010-0014-5
13. Lara-Valencia F., 2011. The "thickening" of the US–Mexico border: Prospects for cross-border networking and cooperation. Journal of Borderlands Studies, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 251-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2011.675715
14. Leick B., 2012. Business networks in the cross-border regions of the enlarged EU: What do we know in the post-enlargement era? Journal of Borderlands Studies, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 299-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2012.750952
15. Miszczuk A., Kawałko B. (ed.), 2005. Pogranicze polsko-ukraińskie. Środowisko. Społeczeństwo. Gospodarka. Zamość: Wyższa Szkoła Zarządzania i Administracji.
16. Miszczuk A., 2015. Directions of Development of Tourism in the Polish-Ukrainian Cross-Border Area in the New European Union Programming Period (2014-2020) in the Context of Regional Planning Documents. Barometr Regionalny, 13/3, pp. 49-59.
17. Olejniczak K., 2008. Mechanizmy wykorzystania ewaluacji. Studium ewaluacji średniookresowych INTERREG III. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
18. OLEJNICZAK K., LEDZION B., KOŚCIELECKI P., PŁOSZAJ A., PANDER W., DOMARADZKA A., 2008. Ocena udziału polskich partnerów w projektach realizowanych w ramach programu INTERREG IIIB CADSES, Warszawa: EGO s.c., Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego.
19. Płoszaj A., 2013. Sieci instytucji otoczenia biznesu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
20. Płoszaj A., 2014. Inter-organizational network of cross-border cooperation in Podkarpackie Voivodship and Lviv Oblast, Warszawa: Euroreg.
21. Potocki J., 2009. Funkcje turystyki w kształtowaniu transgranicznego regionu górskiego Sudetów. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Wrocławskiego Towarzystwa Naukowego.
22. Proniewski M., Proniewski M., 2008. Zewnętrzna granica Unii Europejskiej–Białoruś – możliwości wykorzystania dla dynamizacji procesów rozwojowych. Współpraca transgraniczna. Ekspertyza przygotowana na potrzeby Strategii rozwoju społeczno-gospodarczego Polski Wschodniej do roku 2020. Warszawa: Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego.
23. Provan K.G., Veazie M.A., Staten L.K.,Teufelshone N.I., 2005. The use of network analysis to strengthen community partnerships. Public Administration Review, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 603-603. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00487.x
24. Pysarenko S., 2016. Main directions of reforming the regional policy in Ukraine. Europa XXI, vol. 30, pp. 77-87. https://doi.org/10.7163/Eu21.2016.30.5
25. Rudenko L., Lisovsky S., Maruniak E., Farion Y., 2016. Challenges and threats of Ukrainian spatial development on the way to European integration, Europa XXI, vol. 30, pp. 89-107. https://doi.org/10.7163/Eu21.2016.30.6
26. Smętkowski M., 2016. Spatial patterns of regional economic development in Central and Eastern European countries. Geographia Polonica, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 539-555. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0033
27. Strihan A., 2008. A network-based approach to regional borders: The case of Belgium. Regional Studies, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 539-554. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701541813
28. Svensson S, 2013. Social capital and governance in European borderlands: A comparative study of Euroregions as policy actors. Budapest: Central European University [PhD Thesis].
29. WALTHER O., REITEL B., 2012. Cross-border policy networks in the trinational region of Basel. CEPS/INSTEAD Working Paper No 2012-26.
30. Wasserman S., Faust K., 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478
31. Wesselink E., Boschma R., 2017. European neighbourhood policy: History, structure, and implemented policy measures. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 4-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12207
32. Wiering M., Verwijmeren J., 2012. Limits and borders: Stages of transboundary water management. Journal of Borderlands Studies, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 257-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2012.750949
33. Więckowski M., Michniak D., Bednarek-Szczepańska M., Chrenka B., Ira V., Komornicki T., Rosik P., Stępniak M., Székely V., Śleszyński P., Świątek D., Wiśniewski R., 2012. Polish-Slovak borderland. Transport accessibility and tourism, Prace Geograficzne, 234, Warszawa: Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania PAN.
34. WIĘCKOWSKI M., 2013. Eco-frontier in the mountainous borderlands of Central Europe. The case of Polish border parks. Journal of Alpine Research, vol. 101, no. 2.
35. Vaishar A., Dvořák P., Hubačíková V., Zapletalová J., 2013. Contemporary development of peripheral parts of the Czech-Polish borderland: Case study of the Javorník area. Geographia Polonica, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 237-253. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.2013.21
36. Van Houtum H., 1999. Internationalisation and mental borders. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 329-335. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00074
37. Van Houtum H., 2005. The geopolitics of borders and boundaries. Geopolitics, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 672-679. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040500318522
38. Yeung H.W.-C., 1998. Transnational economic synergy and business networks: The case of two-way investment between Malaysia and Singapore. Regional Studies, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 687-706. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409850119391

Czasopismo/Seria/cykl:

Geographia Polonica

Tom:

91

Zeszyt:

1

Strona pocz.:

63

Strona końc.:

76

Szczegółowy typ zasobu:

Article

Format:

File size 1,3 MB ; application/pdf

Identyfikator zasobu:

oai:rcin.org.pl:64177 ; 0016-7282 ; 10.7163/GPol.0091

Źródło:

CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.2085, Cz.2173, Cz.2406 ; kliknij tutaj, żeby przejść

Język:

eng

Prawa:

Creative Commons Attribution BY-SA 3.0 PL license

Zasady wykorzystania:

Copyright-protected material. [CC BY-SA 3.0 PL] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY-SA 3.0 PL license, full text available at: ; -

Digitalizacja:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Lokalizacja oryginału:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Dofinansowane ze środków:

European Union. European Regional Development Fund ; Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure

Dostęp:

Open