Subtitle:

Geographia Polonica Vol. 90 No. 3 (2017)

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

24 cm

Type of object:

Czasopismo/Artykuł

Abstract:

This article analyzes the impact of selected external and internal factors on environmental behaviour and the relationship between individuals’ willingness to engage in environmentally friendly activity and their actual actions. Our model served as a framework for understanding the development of environmental awareness and the change of habits in favor of sustainability. The main variables included in the model were values, beliefs, norms, perceived environmental control, demographic variables, knowledge, intention, and behaviour. The results based on the example of Ljubljana indicate that environmental motives and knowledge are the factors predominantly influencing actual environmentally friendly habits. It is concluded that a bottom-up approach with selected social influence methods is the most appropriate.

References:

1. Abrahamse W., 2007. Energy conservation through behavioral change: Examining the effectiveness of a tailor made approach. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen [PhD thesis].
2. Abrahamse W., Steg L., 2011. Factors related to household energy use and intention to reduce it: The role of psychological and sociodemographic variables. Human Ecology Review, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 30-40.
3. Ajzen I., 1991. The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 179-211.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T -
4. Ajzen I., Fishbein M., 1969. The prediction of behavioural intentions in a choice situation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 400-416.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(69)90033-X -
5. Ajzen I., Fishbein M., 1970. The prediction of behaviour from attitudinal and normative variables. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 466-487.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(70)90057-0 -
6. Armitage C.J., Conner M., 2001. Social cognitive determinants of blood donation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1431-1457.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02681.x -
7. Bamberg S., Schmidt S., 2003. Incentives, morality or habit? Predicting students´ car use for university routes with the models of Ajzen, Schwartz and Triandis. Environment and Behaviour, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 264-285.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502250134 -
8. Bandura A., 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. New York: Prentice Hall.
9. Bandura A., 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
10. Beck L., Ajzen I., 1991. Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Research in Personality, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 285-301.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(91)90021-H -
11. Boyd B., Wandersman A., 1991. Predicting undergraduate condom use with the Fishbein and Ajzen and the Triandis attitude-behaviour models: Implications for public-health interventions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 21, no. 22, pp. 1810-1830.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00506.x -
12. Brandon G., Lewis A., 1999. Reducing household energy consumption: A qualitative and quantitative field study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 19, pp. 75-85.
https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1998.0105 -
13. Breg M., Kladnik D., Smrekar A., 2007. Dumpingsites in the Ljubljansko polje water protectionarea, the primary source of Ljubljana’s drinkingwater. Acta Geographica Slovenica, vol. 47, no. 1,pp. 73-103.
https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS47104 -
14. Brown L.R., Flavin C., 1999. A new economy for a new century [in:] State of the world 2007: Our urban future: State of the World. A Worldwatch Institute Report on Progress Toward a Sustainable Society, New York: W.W. Norton & Company, pp. 3-21.
15. Budd R.J., Spencer C.P., 1985. Exploring the role of personal normative beliefs in the theory of reasoned action: The problem of discriminating between alternative path models. European Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 299-313.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420150305 -
16. CLIFT R., SIM S., SINCLAIR P., 2013. Sustainable consumption and production: Quality, luxury and supply chain equity [in:] I.S. Jawahir, S.K. Sikdar, Y. Huang (eds.), Treatise on sustainability science and engineering, Amsterdam: Springer.
17. Collins A., Mullan B., 2011. An extension of the theory of planned behavior to predict immediate hedonic behaviors and distal benefit behaviors. Food Quality and Preference, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 638-646.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.03.011 -
18. Conner M., Armitage C.J., 1998. Extending the theory of planned behaviour: A review and avenues for further research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 28, no. 15, pp. 429–1464.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01685.x -
19. Corral-Verdugo V., Bechtel R.B., Fraijo-Sing B., 2003. Environmental beliefs and water conservation: An empirical study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 247-257.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00086-5 -
20. Crompton T., Kasser T., 2009. Meeting environmental challenges: The role of human identity. Surrey: Green Books Ltd.
21. De Groot J.I.M., Steg L., 2007. Value orientations and environmental beliefs in five countries: Validity of an instrument to measure egoistic, altruistic and biospheric value orientations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 318-332.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022107300278 -
22. De Groot J.I.M., Steg L., 2008. Value orientations to explain environmental attitudes and beliefs: How to measure egoistic, altruistic and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behaviour, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 330-354.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506297831 -
23. De Groot J.I.M., Steg L., 2010. Relationships between value orientations, self-determined motivational types and pro-environmental behavioural intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 368-378.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.002 -
24. Dietz T., Fitzgerald A., Shwom R., 2005. Environmental values. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, vol. 30, pp. 335-372.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144444 -
25. Dulany D.E., 1968. Awareness, rules, and propositional control: A confrontation with S-R behaviour theory [in:] T. Dixon, D. Horton (eds.), Verbal behavioural and general behaviour theory, pp. 340-387. New York: Prentice-Hall.
26. Endler N.S., Macrodimitris S.D., Kocovski N.L., 1999. Controllability in cognitive and interpersonal tasks: Is control good for you?. Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 951-962.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00246-9 -
27. Fishbein M., 1967. Attitude and the prediction of behaviour [in:] M. Fishbein (eds.), Readings in attitude theory and measurement, pp. 477-492. New York: Wiley.
28. Follows S.B., Jobber D., 1999. Environmentally responsible purchase behaviour: A test of a consumer model. European Journal of Marketing, vol. 34, no. 5-6, pp. 723-746.
29. Gamba R., Oskamp S., 1994. Factors influencing community residents participation in commingled curbside recycling programs. Environment and Behaviour, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 587-612.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916594265001 -
30. Gardner G.T., Stern P.C., 2002. Environmental problems and human behaviour. Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing.
31. GARVILL J., 1999. Choice of transportation mode: Factors influencing drivers' willingness to reduce personal car use and support car regulations [in:] M. Foddy, M. Smithson, S. Schneider, M. Hogg (eds.), Resolving social dilemmas: Dynamics, structural, and intergroup aspects, pp. 263-280. Philadelphia: Psychological Press.
32. Gatersleben B., Steg L., Vlek C., 2002. Measurment and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behaviour. Environment and Behaviour, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 335-362.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502034003004 -
33. Giddens A., 2002. Runway world: How globalization is reshaping our lives. London: Profile Books.
34. GIFFORD R., STEG L., RESER J.P., 2011. Environmental psychology [in:] P.R. Martin, F.M. Cheung, M.C. Knowles, M. Kyrios, L. Littlefield, J.B. Overmier (eds.), The IAAP handbook of applied psychology, pp. 440-470. Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444395150.ch18 -
35. Godin G., Kok G., 1996. The theory of planned behaviour: A review of its applications to health-related behaviours. American Journal of Health Promotion, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 87-98.
https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-11.2.87 -
36. Harland P., Staats H., Wilke H.A.M., 1999. Explaining proenvironmental intention and behaviour by personal norms and the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 2505-2528.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00123.x -
37. Hines J.M., Hungerford H.R., Tomera A.N., 1987. Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behaviour: A metaanalysis. Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1-8.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1987.9943482 -
38. JAMNIK B., SMREKAR A., VRŠČAJ B., 2009. Vrtičkarstvo v Ljubljani. Geografija Slovenije, 21, Ljubljana: Založba ZRC.
39. Jekria N., Daud S., 2016. Environmental concern and recycling behavior. Procedia Economics and Finance, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 183-208.
40. Kaiser F.G., 2006. A moral extention of the theory of planned behaviour: Norms and anticipated feelings of regret in conservationism. Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 71-81.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.028 -
41. Kaiser F.G., Shimoda T.A., 1999. Responsibility as a predictor of ecological behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 243-253.
https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1998.9123 -
42. Kladnik D., Rejec Brancelj I., Smrekar A., Frantar P., Sajko I., 2003. Dung installations as dangerous point sources burdening the groundwater of Ljubljansko polje. Acta Geographica Slovenica, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 121-139.
https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS43204 -
43. Kollmuss A., Agyeman J., 2002. Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behaviour? Environmental education research, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 239-260.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401 -
44. Malačič E., 2007. Oblikovanje ekološko ozaveščenega posameznika in vpliv njegovih ukrepov na okolje in družbo. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana [Bachelor’s thesis].
45. MARENTIČ -POŽARNIK B., 2000. Psihologija učenja in pouka: temeljna spoznanja in primeri iz prakse. Ljubljana: DZS.
46. Midden C.J.H., Kaiser F.G., Mccalley L.T., 2007. Technology’s four roles in understanding individuals´ conservation of natural resources. Journal of Social Issues, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 155-174.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00501.x -
47. Midden C.J., Ritzema B.S., 1986. The meaning of normative processes for energy conservation. Journal of Economic Psychology, vol. 4, no. 1-2, pp. 37-55.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(83)90044-2 -
48. Musek J., 1993. Osebnost in vrednote. Ljubljana: Educy.
49. Musek J., 2000. Nova psihološka teorija vrednot. Ljubljana, Educy.
50. Oişte A.M., 2014. Groundwater quality assessment in urban environment. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 2095-2102.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0477-8 -
51. Oskamp S., Harrington M.J., Edwards T.C., Sherwood D.L., Okuda S.M., Swanson D.C., 1991. Factors influencing household recycling behavior. Environment and Behavior, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 494-519.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916591234005 -
52. Parker D., Manstead A.S.R., Stradling S.G., 1995. Extending the theory of planned behaviour: The role of personal norm. British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 127-138.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1995.tb01053.x -
53. Polajnar Horvat K., 2010. Survey on drinking water behavior in the urban environment. Ljubljana: ZRC SAZU Anton Melik Geographical Institute.
54. Polajnar Horvat K., 2015. Environmentally friendly behaviour. Ljubljana: Založba ZRC.
55. Polič M., 2002. Odnos do okolja, vedenjske in socialne pasti. Panika, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 170-177.
56. Schlegelmilch B.B., Bohlen G.M., Diamantopoulso A., 1996. The link between green purchasing decisions and measures of environmental consciousness. European Journal of Marketing, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 35-55.
https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569610118740 -
57. SCHULTZ P.W., 2002. Knowledge, education, and household recycling: Examining the knowledgedeficit model of behaviour change [in:] T. Dietz, P.C. Stern (eds.), New tools for environmental protection, pp. 67-82, Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.
58. Schwartz S.H., 1968. Words, deeds, and the perception of consequences and responsibility in action situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 232-242.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026569 -
59. Schwartz S.H., 1977. Normative influences on altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, pp. 221-279.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5 -
60. Schwartz S.H., 1992. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretic advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology vol. 25, pp. 1-65.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6 -
61. Schwartz S.H., Howard J.A., 1984. Internalised values as moderators of altruism [in:] E. Staub, D. Bar-Tal, J. Karylowski, J. Reykowski (eds.), Development and maintenance of prosocial behaviour, New York: Plenum Press, pp. 189-211.
62. Schwartz S.H., Tessler R.C., 1972. A test of a model for reducing measured attitude-behaviour inconsistencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol., 24, no. 2, pp. 225-236.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033365 -
63. Smrekar A., 2011. From environmental awareness in word to environmental awareness in deed: The case of Ljubljana. Acta Geographica Slovenica, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 277-292.
https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS51203 -
64. Smrekar A., Kladnik D., 2007. Zasebni vodnjaki in vrtine na območju Ljubljane. Geofitem, 4, Ljubljana: Založba ZRC.
65. Steg L., De Groot J.I.M., Dreijerink L., Abrahamse W., Siero F., 2011. General antecedents of personal norms, policy acceptability, and intentions: The role of values, worldviews, and environmental concern. Society and Natural Resources, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 349-367.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920903214116 -
66. Steg L., Dreijerink L., Abrahamse W., 2005. Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 25, pp. 415-425.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.003 -
67. Steg L., Perlaviciute G., Van Den Verff E., Lurvink J., 2014. The significance of hedonic values for environmentally relevant attitudes, preferences, and actions. Environment and Behaviour, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 163-192.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512454730 -
68. Steg L., Vlek C., 1997. The role of problem awareness in willingness-to-change car use and in evaluating relevant policy measures [in:] T. Rothengatter (eds.), Traffic and transport psychology: Theory and application, Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 465-475.
69. Stępniewska M., 2015. Assessing the water footprint of national consumption for Poland. Geographia Polonica, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 503-514.
https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0012 -
70. Stern P.C., 2000. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behaviour. Journal of Social Issues, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 407-424.
https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175 -
71. Stern P.C., Dietz T., Abel T., Guagnano G.A., Kalof L., 1999. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmental concern. Human Ecology Review, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 81-97.
72. Stern P.C., Dietz T., Guagnano G.A., 1998. A brief inventory of values. Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 984-1001.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164498058006008 -
73. Van Der Putte B., 1991. 20 years of the theory of reasoned action of Fishbein and Ajzen: A meta-analysis. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam [Unpublished manuscript].
74. Vining J., Ebreo A., 1990. What makes a recycler?: A comparison of recyclers and nonrecyclers. Environment and Behavior, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 55-73.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916590221003 -
75. Vlek C., Steg L., 2007. Human behaviour and environmental sustainability: Problems, driving forces and research topics. Journal of Social Issues, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 1-19.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00493.x -
76. Urbanc M., Breg M., 2005. Gravel plains in urban areas: Gravel pits as an element of degraded landscapes. Acta geographica Slovenica, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 35-61.
https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS45202 -
77. Žibret M., 2009. Vrednote kot motiv družbeno odgovorne potrošnje: primer ekološke hrane. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana [Master thesis].

Relation:

Geographia Polonica

Volume:

90

Issue:

3

Start page:

301

End page:

317

Detailed Resource Type:

Artykuł

Format:

Rozmiar pliku 1,1 MB ; application/pdf

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:63178 ; 0016-7282 ; 10.7163/GPol.0094

Source:

CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.2085, Cz.2173, Cz.2406 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Rights:

Licencja Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa-Na tych samych warunkach 3.0 Polska

Terms of use:

Zasób chroniony prawem autorskim. [CC BY-SA 3.0 PL] Korzystanie dozwolone zgodnie z licencją Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa-Na tych samych warunkach 3.0 Polska, której pełne postanowienia dostępne są pod adresem: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Polskiej Akademii Nauk

Original in:

Centralna Biblioteka Geografii i Ochrony Środowiska Instytutu Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania PAN

Projects co-financed by:

Unia Europejska. Europejski Fundusz Rozwoju Regionalnego ; Program Operacyjny Innowacyjna Gospodarka, lata 2010-2014, Priorytet 2. Infrastruktura strefy B + R

Access:

Otwarty