Subtitle:

Geographia Polonica Vol. 90 No. 2 (2017)

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

24 cm

Type of object:

Journal/Article

Abstract:

The paper analyses two interrelated fields: residential differentiation in the Vilnius metropolitan area on the basis of socio-economic status and of political alignment. Data from the 2001 and 2011 censuses were used to investigate socio-economic and ethnic segregation and data from the parliamentary elections of 2000 and 2012 were used for the analysis of political alignment. Indices of segregation and isolation were calculated, and the main occupational groups were used as a proxy for socio-economic status. GIS tools were used to visualise existing spatial differences. Though most indices indicated quite low levels of segregation, the situation was changing. The wealthiest and poorest groups tend to live more and more separately. The political preferences of the different social groups differ and differentiation of political field is increasing. The paper reveals socio-political spatial interrelations in the metropolitan area which have a unique ethnic structure. Our findings suggest that socio-economic structure is a major factor determining the degree of differentiation of electoral alignment in the metropolitan area. The different political preferences of the different ethnic groups could be related not simply to ethnicity but rather to socio-economic status.

References:

1. Aidukaitė J., 2014. Housing policy regime in Lithuania: Towards liberalization and marketization. GeoJournal, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 421- 432.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-014-9529-y -
2. Baldassare M., 1992. Suburban communities. Annual review of Sociology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 475-494.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.002355 -
3. BARANAUSKAITĖ A., 2015. Vilniaus miesto teritorijos elektorinės struktūros raida. VU Geografijos ir kraštotvarkos katedra, Vilnius: VU [Master thesis].
4. BARANAUSKAITË A., BUNEIKA D., TUČAS R., 2015. Elektoriniř struktűrř erdvinë diferenciacija Lietuvos miestř regionuose. Geografijos metraštis, vol. 48, pp. 3-23.
5. Bilodeau A., 2009. Residential segregation and the electoral participation of immigrants in Australia. International Migration Review, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 134-159.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0197-9183.2008.01150.x -
6. Bjørklund T., 2007. The 1987 Norwegian local elections: A protest election with a swing to the right. Scandinavian Political Studies, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 211-234.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.1988.tb00368.x -
7. Boren T., Gentile M., 2007. Metropolitan processes in post-communist states: An introduction. Geografiska Annaler, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 95-110.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00242.x -
8. Brade I., Herfert G., Wiest K., 2009. Recent trends and future prospects of socio-spatial differentiation in urban regions of Central and Eastern Europe: A lull before the storm? Cities, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 233-244.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2009.05.001 -
9. Burneika D., Daugirdas V., Ubarevičienė R., 2014. Migration as a factor of development of the depopulating areas in East EU Countries – The case of Lithuania. Europa XXI, vol. 27, pp. 79-94.
https://doi.org/10.7163/Eu21.2014.27.6 -
10. Burneika D., Ubarevičienė R., Valatka V., 2015. Socio-economic segregation in growing urban regions of Lithuania. Filosofija. Sociologija, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 277-292.
11. Burneika D.; Ubarevičienė R., 2016. Socio-ethnic segregation in the metropolitan areas of Lithuania. Czech Sociological Review, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 795-81
https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2016.52.6.287 -
12. Burneika D., Ubarevičienė R., Valatka V., Baranauskaitė A., Pociūtė-Sereikienė G., Daugirdas V., Krupickaitė D., 2017. Lietuvos metropoliniai regionai. Gyventojų erdvinė diferenciacija XXI a. pradžioje. Vilnius: LSTC.
13. CENTRAL ELECTORAL COMMISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA, 2016. http://www.vrk.lt/en/home [5 March 2017].
14. Chandra K., 2004. Why ethnic parties succeed: Patronage and ethnic head counts in India. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. CHARTER OF THE NEW URBANISM, 1996. Congress for the New Urbanism, http://www.cnu.org/charter [10 March 2017].
16. Cohen C., Dawson M., 1993. Neighbourhood poverty and African American politics. American Political Science Review, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 286-302.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2939041 -
17. Czerniakiewicz J., Czerniakiewicz M., 2007. Resettlements from the East 1944-1959. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Pedagogicznej TWP.
18. DAUKŠAS D., 2008. Pase įrašytoji tapatybė: Lietuvos lenkų etninio/nacionalinio tapatumo trajektorijos. Lietuvos Etnologija: Socialines Antropologijos ir Etnologijos Studijo, vol. 8, pp. 57-72.
19. Eberhardt P., 2011. Political migrations on Polish territories (1939-1950). Warszawa: Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania PAN.
20. Davoudi S., 2008. Conception of the city-region: A critical review. Urban Design and Planning, vol. 161, no. 2, pp. 51-60.
https://doi.org/10.1680/udap.2008.161.2.51 -
21. Erlingsson G.O., Persson M., 2011. The Swedish pirate party and the 2009 European Parliament Election: Protest or issue voting? Politics, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 121-128.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2011.01411.x -
22. EUROSTAT, 2015. Gini coefficient of equivalised disposable income. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ [10 April 2017].
23. Gaidys V., 2004. Viešoji nuomonė ir politika [in:] A. Krupavičius, A. Lukošaitis (eds.), Lietuvos politinė sistema: sandara ir raida. Kaunas: Poligrafija ir Informatika.
24. GAIDYS V., 2014. Socialinių demografinių parametrų įtaka gyventojų partinėms preferencijoms ir politiniam aktyvumui: jungtinių duomenų masyvų analizė. Lietuvos gyventojai XXI a. pradžioje: Sociodemografiniai aspektai. Lietuvos socialinė raida, vol. 3, pp. 7-24.
25. Gainsborough J.F., 2001. Fenced off: The suburbanization of American politics. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
26. Gentile M., Tammaru T., Van Kempen R., 2012. Heteropolitanization: Social and spatial change in Central and East European Cities. Cities, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 291-350.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.005 -
27. Gimpel J.G., Dyck J.J., Shaw D.R., 2004. Registrants, voters and turnout variability across neighborhoods. Political Behavior, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 343-375.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-004-0900-4 -
28. Hall M., Crowder K.D., Tolnay S., 2010. Immigration and native residential mobility in established, new, and nongateway metropolitan destinations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, USA.
29. Hamilton F., Andrews K., Pichler-Milanovic N. (eds.), 2005. Transformation of cities in Central and Eastern Europe: Towards globalization. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
30. Hamnett CH., 1996. Social geography: A reader. Arnold: London.
31. HIEBERT D., 2009. Segregation [in:] R. Johnston, G. Pratt, M. Watts, S. Whatmore (eds.), The Dictionary of Human Geography, (5th edition), pp. 673, Singapore: Wiley-Blackwell.
32. Huckfeldt R., 1979. Political participation and the neighborhoods social context. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 579-592.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2111030 -
33. Huckfeldt R., Sprague J., 1995. Citizens, politics and social communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511664113 -
34. INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANISATION, 2012. International standard classification of occupations, http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_172572.pdf [2 April 2017].
35. Johnston R., Pattie C., 2006. Putting voters in their place. Geography and elections in Great Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268047.001.0001 -
36. Johnston R.J., Jones K., 2010. Measuring segregation – cautionary tale. Environment and Planning, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1264- 1270.
https://doi.org/10.1068/a43136 -
37. Jurkynas M., Ramonaitė A., 2005. Kairė ir dešinė Lietuvoje: ekspertų ir elektorato nesusikalbėjimas. Lietuva po Seimo rinkimų, A. Jankauskas (ed.), Vilnius: Naujasis lankas, pp. 71-90.
38. Kaufmann K.M., 2004. The urban voter: Group conflict and mayoral voting behavior in American cities. The Politics of Race and Ethnicity, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.11800 -
39. Krupickaitė D., 2011. Vilnius – between persistence and socio-spatial change. Europa regional, vol. 19, no. 3-4, pp. 21-31.
40. Legeby A., 2010. Urban segregation and urban form. From residential segregation to segregation in public space. Stockholm: KTH [licentiate thesis].
41. Leighley J.E., Vedlitz A., 1999. Race, ethnicity and political participation: Competing models and contrasting explanations. Journal of Politics, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 1092-1114.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2647555 -
42. Manis J.G.; Stone L.C., 1958. Suburban residence and political behaviour. The Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 22, no. 4, 483-489.
https://doi.org/10.1086/266822 -
43. Marcińczak S., Tammaru T., Novák J., Gentile M., Kovács Z., Temelová J., Valatka V., Kährik A., Szabó B., 2015. Patterns of socioeconomic segregation in the capital cities of fast-track reforming postsocialist countries. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 105, no. 1, 183-202.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2014.968977 -
44. Masiulis K., 1997. Lietuvos elitas: Ekonominės vertybės, politinės orientacijos, prognozės. Studijų š altiniai, 3. Vilnius: Pradai.
45. Massey D., Denton N., 1998. American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
46. Mendelsohn E., 1983. The Jews of East Central Europe between the world wars. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
47. Oliver J.E., Ha S.E., 2007. Vote choice in suburban elections. American Political Science Review, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 393-408.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055407070323 -
48. Park E., Burgess E., Mckenzie R., 1925. The City: Suggestions for investigation of human behavior in the urban environment. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
49. Parsons W., 2001. Viešoji politika: Politikos analizės teorijos ir praktikos įvadas. Vilnius: Eugrimas.
50. PETRULIS V., 2009. Lietuvos politinio lauko teritorinė struktūra (elektorinio metodo pagrindu). Vilnius: VU [PhD thesis].
51. RAMONAITĖ A., JASTRAMSKIS M., KAVALIAUSKAITĖ J., NEVINSKAITĖ L., ŽILIUKAITĖ R., 2014. Kaip renkasi Lietuvos rinkėjai? Idėjos, interesai ir įvaizdžiai politikoje. Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla.
52. Robinson T., Noriega S., 2010. Voting migration as a source of electoral change in the Rocky Mountain West. Political Geography, vol. 29, no.1, pp. 28-39.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.12.012 -
53. RUDOKAITĖ J., 2014. Lietuvos Žiemgalos regiono elektorinė struktūra, Vilnius: VU Geografijos ir kraštotvarkos katedra. Vilnius: VU [Master thesis].
54. SAVICKAITĖ I., KRUPICKAITĖ D., TUČAS R., 2013. Gyventojų rinkiminės elgsenos kaita Vilniaus suburbanizacijos zonoje. Geografijos metraštis, vol. 46, pp. 72-94.
55. Scott A.J., 2001. Globalization and the rise of cityregions. European Planning Studies, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 813-826.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310120079788 -
56. Sellers J.M., Kubler D., Walter-Rogg M., Walks A., 2013. The political ecology of the metropolis: Metropolitan sources of electoral behaviour in eleven countries. Colchester: ECPR Press.
57. SKLAR H., 2000. Booming economic inequality, falling voter turnout. March 1, 2000, Z Magazine, https://zcomm.org/zmagazine/booming-economic-inequality-falling-voter-turnout-by-site-administrator/ [22 May 2017].
58. Stanilov K., 2007. The post-socialist city: Urban form and space transformations in Central and Eastern Europe after socialism, Dordrecht: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6053-3 -
59. STATISTICS LITHUANIA, 2016. http://osp.stat.gov.lt/en/web/guest/home [20 April 2017].
60. Stein R.M., Ulbig S.G., Post S.S., 2005. Voting for minority candidates in multiracial/multiethnic communities. Urban Affairs Review, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 157-181.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087405280311 -
61. Stokes S.C., Boix C., 2009. The Oxford handbook of comparative politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62. SÝKORA L., 2009. Post-socialist cities [in:] R. Kitchin, N. Thrift (eds.), International encyclopedia of Human Geography, pp. 387-395. Amsterdam-Oxford: Elsevier.
https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-008044910-4.01072-5 -
63. SZELENYI I., 1996. Cities under socialism – and after [in:] G. Andrusz, M. Harloe, I. Szelenyi (eds.), Cities after socialism: Urban and regional change and conflicts in post-socialist societies, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 286-317.
64. Tammaru T., Kulu H., 2003. The ethnic minorities of Estonia: Changing size, location, and composition. Eurasian Geography and Economics, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 105-120.
https://doi.org/10.2747/1538-7216.44.2.105 -
65. Tammaru T., Marcińczak S., Van Ham M., Musterd S. (eds.), 2016. Socio-economic segregation in European capital cities: East meets West. London-New York: Routledge.
66. TEREŠKINAS A., ŽILYS A., INDRILIŪNAITĖ R., 2013. Pilietiškumas ir tapatumas šiuolaikinėje visuomenėje: socialinė atskirtis ir socialinė segregacija Lietuvos didmiesčiuose. Vytauto Didžiojo universiteto mokslo klasteriai, vol. 2, pp. 171-185.
67. UBAREVIČIENĖ R., BURNEIKA D., VAN HAM M., 2015. Ethno-political effects of suburbanization in the Vilnius Urban Region: An analysis of voting behavior. Journal of Baltic Studies, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 1-26.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01629778.2015.1027935 -
68. Vaitekūnas S., 2006. Lietuvos gyventojai per du tūkstantmečius. Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidybos institutas, Vilnius.
69. Valatka V., Burneika D., Ubarevičienė R., 2016. Large social inequalities and low levels of socioeconomic segregation in Vilnius [in:] T. Tammaru, S. Marcińczak, M. van Ham, S. Musterd (eds.), Socio-economic segregation in European Capital cities: East meets West, London-New York: Routledge, pp. 313-332.
70. Van Kempen R., Şule Özüekren A., 1998. Ethnic segregation in cities: New forms and explanations in a dynamic world. Urban studies, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 1631-1656.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098984088 -
71. Walks R.A., 2005. City – suburban electoral polarization in Great Britain, 1950-2001. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 500-517.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00185.x -
72. Walks R.A., 2006. The cause of city – suburban political polarization? A Canadian case study. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 390-414.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00483.x -
73. White M.J., 1986. Segregation and diversity measures in population distribution. Population Index, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 198-221.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3644339 -
74. Wolfinger R.E., 1965. The development and persistence of ethnic voting. The American Political Science Review, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 896-908.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1953212 -
75. Wolfinger R.E.; Rosenstone S.J., 1980. Who votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
76. Zaninetti J.M., 2009. Sustainable development in the USA. London: Wiley.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470611982 -
77. ŽILYS A., 2013. Rezidencinė diferenciacija ir skirtumai Lietuvos moderniąjame mieste: (po)sovietinis ar Vakarų miestas? Kultūra ir visuomenė. Socialinių tyrimų žurnalas, vol. 4, pp. 67-101.
78. Žilys A., 2015. Modernios visuomenės miesto plėtra: Rezidencinė diferenciacija Lietuvos didmiesčiuose. VDU: Kaunas [PhD thesis].

Relation:

Geographia Polonica

Volume:

90

Issue:

2

Start page:

87

End page:

110

Detailed Resource Type:

Article

Format:

File size 4,2 MB ; application/pdf

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:62831 ; 0016-7282 ; 10.7163/GPol.0089

Source:

CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.2085, Cz.2173, Cz.2406 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Rights:

Creative Commons Attribution BY-SA 3.0 PL license

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. [CC BY-SA 3.0 PL] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY-SA 3.0 PL license, full text available at: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

European Union. European Regional Development Fund ; Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure

Access:

Open