Population age structure transformation in the capitals of the Visegrad Group countries

Ondačková, Jana; Káčerová, Marcela; Mládek, Jozef; Popjaková, Dagmar; Vančura, Michal

doi:0016-7282 (print)

Tytuł: Population age structure transformation in the capitals of the Visegrad Group countries

Abstrakt:

The study provides a compact view of population ageing in the capitals of the Visegrad Group (V4). The transformation of the age structure of urban populations is quantified within the context of the V4 countries – Czechia, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia. This assessment of the age structure transformation in the V4 capitals between 1980 and 2013 was carried out using Webb’s chart and hexagonal diagram methods. The evaluation of the demographic ageing of the urban populations brings substantial knowledge of the immanent differences of the capitals. The similarities between Prague, Budapest and Warsaw and the specific development of Bratislava, was revealed.

Bibliografia:

1. Andorka R., Kolosi T., Rose R., Vukovich G. (eds.), 1999. A society transformed: Hungary in time-space perspective. Budapest: Central European University Press.
2. Arltová M., Langhamrová J., 2010. Migration and ageing of the population of the Czech Republic and the EU countries. Prague Economic Papers, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 54‑73. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.364
3. Bičík I., Anděl J., Havlíček T., 2010. Makroregiony světa: regionální geografie pro gymnázia. Praha: Nakladatelství České geografické společnosti.
4. Bijak J., Kupiszewska D., Kupiszewski M., Saczuk K., Kicinger A., 2007. Population and labour force projections for 27 European countries, 2002-052: Impact of international migration on population ageing. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1-31.
5. Bleha B., Šprocha, B., Vaňo, B., n.d. Štúdia demografického potenciálu hlavného mesta Slovenskej republiky Bratislavy do roku 2050. http://www.bratislava.sk/assets/File.ashx? id_org-=700000&id_dokumenty=11054133 [6 January 2018].
6. Bleha B., Popjaková D., 2007. Migrácia ako dôležitý determinant budúceho vývoja na lokálnej úrovni – príklad Petržalky. Geografický časopis, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 265‑291.
7. Borrell C., Marí-Dell'olmo M., Palència L., Gotsens M., Burström B.O., Domínguez-Berjón F., Rodríguez-Sanz M., Dzúrová D., Gandarillas A., Hoffmann R., Kovacs K., Marinacci C., Martikainen P., Pikhart H., Corman D., Rosicova K., Saez M., Santana P., Tarkiainen L., Puigpinós R., Morrison J., Pasarín M.I., Díez È., 2014. Socioeconomic inequalities in mortality in 16 European cities. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 245‑254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494814522556
8. Bucher S., 2012. Aspects of the phenomenon of demographic population aging in Czechia and Slovakia: Time and regional dimensions. Human Geographers – Journal of Studies and Research in Human Geography, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 33-25.
9. Bucher S., 2014. Selected indicators of population ageing in new member states of the European Union. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 545‑552.
10. Conrad C., Lechner M., Werner W., 1996. East German fertility after unification: Crisis or adaptation?. Population and Development Review, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 331-358. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137438
11. CZSO, 1991‑2014. Pohyb obyvatelstva v České republice 1990-2004. Demografická ročenka České republiky 2005‑2013, https://www.czso.cz/[12 November 2016].
12. CZSO, 2015. Age distribution of Prague's population. 31st December, in 1961-2013, territorial breakdown of the given year, https://www.czso.cz/[12 November 2016].
13. de Blij H.J., Muller P.O., 1988. Geography: Regions and concepts. New York: John Wiley.
14. Divinský B., 2001. Postavenie Bratislavy v Stredoeurópskom metropolitnom systéme z populačného hľadiska. Geografický časopis, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 171-190.
15. Długosz Z., 2007. Present state and the perspectives of the ageing of European population. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, vol. 8, pp. 17-28.
16. Egedy T., Kovács Z., 2011. Budapest as a destination of migration: The view of transnational creative workers. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 161-188.
17. Enyedi G., 2009. Welcoming address at the International Conference on 'Challenges of Ageing in Villages and Cities: The Central European Experience'. http://www.human.geo.u-szeged.hu/files/c/Aging/Fejezetek_web_01.pdf [20 March 2016].
18. Fialová L., Vágner J., 2005. Druhé bydlení v periférních oblastech [in:] M. Novotná (ed.), Problémy periférních oblastí, Praha: Univerzita Karlova v Praze, pp. 74‑80, http://www.periphery. cz/download/nectiny.pdf [22 January 2011].
19. Gerőházi É., Hegedüs J., Szemző H., Tosics I., 2011. The impact of European demographic trends on regional and urban development. Synthesis Report (Hungarian Presidency of the Council of the European Union), Budapest: Metropolitan Research Institute.
20. Gödri I., 2012. International migration [in:] P. Őri, Z. Spéder (eds.), Demographic portrait of Hungary: 2012: Report on the conditions of the Hungarian Population, Budapest: Demographic Research Institute, HCSO, pp. 135‑152.
21. Gödri I., Soltész B., Bodacz-Nagy B., 2014. Immigration or emigration country? Migration trends and their socio-economic background in Hungary: A longer-term historical perspective. Working Papers on Population, Family and Welfare, vol. 19, Budapest: Hungarian Demographic Research Institute.
22. Górczyńska M., 2014. Unique or universal? Mechanisms and processes of social change in post-socialist Warsaw. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 255-270.https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.63.3.2
23. GUS, 2005‑2014. Statistical Yearbook of Warsaw 2004-2013. http://stat.gov.pl/en/ [15 November 2016].
24. GUS, 2007. Ludność Łodzi i innych wielkich miast w Polsce w latach 1984-2006, http://stat.gov.pl/en/[15 November 2016].
25. Józan P., 2008. Main features of epidemiological development in Hungary after the Second World War. Hungarian Statistical Review, Special Number 12, pp. 139‑154.
26. Jurkovičová J., 2005. Vieme zdravo žiť?: Zdravotný stav slovenskej populácie 1999 – 2004 a prevencia kardiovaskulárnych a civilizačných ochorení. Bratislava: Lekárska fakulta Univerzity Komenského.
27. Káčerová M., Ondačková J., 2015. The process of population ageing in countries of the Visegrad Group (V4). Erdkunde, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 49‑68. https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.2015.01.04
28. Kovács Z., 2005. Population and housing dynamics in Budapest metropolitan region after 1990 (draft paper). https://borg.hi.is/enhr2005iceland/ppr/Kovacs.pdf [3 January 2018].
29. Krejčí T., Martinát S., Klusáček P., 2011. Spatial differentiation of selected processes connected to the second demographic transition in postsocialist cities (the examples of Brno and Ostrava, Czech Republic). Moravian Geographical Reports, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 39-50.
30. KSH, 2003‑2014. Budapesti Statisztikai Tájékoztató 2002-2013 – Budapest Statistical Information 2002-2013. https://www.ksh.hu/ [13 November 2016].
31. KSH, 2005. Demographic trends in East-central capitals. https://www.ksh.hu/ [13 November 2016].
32. KSH, 2015. Internal migration (from 1990), Vital events (from 2001), Population by age group and sex. https://www.ksh.hu/ [14 November 2016].
33. Kupiszewski M., Durham H., Rees P., 1998. Internal migration and urban change in Poland. European Journal of Population, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 265‑290. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006058712865
34. Kurek S., 2008. Spatial disparities in the changes in the population age structure of Poland in the context of the second demographic transition. Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft, vol. 33, no. 3‑4, pp. 271‑292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12523-009-0017-2
35. Langhamrová J., 2010. Střední délka života v České republice a v zemích EU: Life expectancy in the Czech Republic and EU countries. Reprodukce lidského kapitálu 2010. Praha: VŠE, http://kdem.vse.cz/resources/relik10/PDFstudenti/Langhamrova.pdf [5 May 2016].
36. Lisowski A., 2004. Zmiany warunków życia w aglomeracji warszawskiej w latach 1995-2000 [in:] I. Jażdżewska (ed.), Zróżnicowanie warunków życia ludności w mieście. XVII Konwersatorium Wiedzy o Mieście. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódźkiego, pp. 67‑76.
37. Macura M., 2000. Fertility decline in the transition economies, 1989-1998: Economic and social factors revisited. Economic Survey of Europe, no. 1, pp. 189-207.
38. Marmot M., Allen J., Bell R., Bloomer E., Goldblatt P., 2012. WHO European review of social determinants of health and the health divide. The Lancet, vol. 380, no. 9846, pp. 1011‑1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61228-8
39. Meslé F., Vallin J., 2002. Mortality in Europe: The divergence between East and West. Population (English Edition, 2002-), vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 157-197.
40. Mládek J., Čupeľová K., 2010. Population processes and structures in the urban and rural spaces of Slovakia. European Countryside, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 72-93. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10091-010-0006-4
41. Mládek J., Káčerová M., 2008. Analysis of population ageing in Slovakia: Time and regional dimensions. Geografický časopis, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 179-197.
42. Morris J.W. (ed.), 1972. World Geography. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
43. Musil J., 1997. Potentials and limits of Prague's future in the context of long-term development. Czech Sociological Review, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 23-38.
45. OECD, 2015. Ageing in cities. Paris: OECD Publishing, http://www.oecd.org/ [16 November 2016].
46. Oliveri M. (ed.), 2015. Shaping ageing cities: 10 Europe case studies. Arup, Help Age International, Intel, Systematica.
47. Ouředníček M., 2007. Differential suburban development in Prague urban region. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 111-125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00243.x
48. Popjaková D., Blažek M., 2015. Verification of counterurbanisation processes: Example of the České Budějovice region. Bulletin of Geography Socio-economic Series, vol. 27, no. 27, pp. 153-169. https://doi.org/10.1515/bog-2015-0010
49. PRB, 2015. 2015 World Population Data Sheet. http://www.prb.org/pdf15/2015-world-population-data-sheet_eng.pdf [14 November 2016].
50. Ptáček P., 1998. Suburbanizace – měnící se tvář zázemí velkoměst. Geografické rozhledy, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 134‑137.
51. Ruoppila S., 2004. Processes of residential differentiation in socialist cities. European Journal of Spatial Development, no. 9, 24 pp.
52. Sonis M., 1981. Space and time in the geography of aging [in:] D.A. Griffith, R.D. Mackinnon (eds.), Dynamic Spatial Models: Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Dynamical Spatial Models, Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff & Noordhoff, pp. 132‑156.
53. Soos G., Ignits G., 2003. Suburbanization and its consequences in the Budapest Metropolitan Area. Third EuroConference The European City in Transition, The City and the Region, Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, Germany, Supported by the European Commission.
54. SOSR, 1992-1997. Štatistická ročenka hlavného mesta SR Bratislavy 1991-1996. Statistical Yearbook of the Capital of the Slovak Republic Bratislava.
55. SOSR, 1993‑2014. Pohyb obyvateľstva v Slovenskej republike 1992-2013. The Population Change in the Slovak Republic (´Source Publication´) in 1992-2013.
56. SOSR, 2015. Vekové zloženie – SR, oblasti, kraje, okresy, mesto, vidiek. Age Structure – SR, Areas, Regions, Districts, Urban, Rural.
57. Šveda M., 2011. Suburbanizácia v zázemí Bratislavy z hľadiska analýzy zmien krajinnej pokrývky. Geografický časopis, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 155-173.
58. Szymańska D., Biegańska J., GIL A., 2009. Rural areas in Poland in the context of changes in population age structure in 1996, 2001 and 2006. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 91‑107.
59. UNData, 2014. Standard country or area codes for statistical use. New York: Statistical Services Branch Statistics Division United Nations, http://data.un.org/[15 November 2016].
60. Vlahov D., Freudenberg N., Proietti F., Ompad D., Quinn A., Nandi V., Galea S., 2007. Urban as a determinant of health. Journal of Urban Health, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 16‑26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-007-9169-3