Przegląd Archeologiczny T. 55 (2007)
Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii Polskiej Akademii Nauk
The Author considers burials of people from Przeworsk culture, in which disagreement of sex valuation was found on datum of two criterions: 1) archeological valuation of sex isn’t the same with anthropological valuation, 2) in one grave inventory presence of both: male and female archeological determinants of sex. Rested on dependence, that most of consideratedcases are situated in frames of recrudesced types of equipment, Author says that only with respect to small number of burials there is possibility of acceptation incorrect anthropological evaluation. Burials with this specific characteristic appeared on whole range of Przeworsk culture and during whole time of its duration. Author is pointing a large variety of interpretation possibilities a purposeful equipping death people in meaning that different than conventional standards, which can point that in particular circumstances archeological determinants of sex could have besides usable also symbolic character
oai:rcin.org.pl:60143 ; 0079-7138
IAiE PAN, call no. P III 149 ; IAiE PAN, call no. P III 272 ; IAiE PAN, call no. P III 353 ; click here to follow the link
Copyright-protected material. May be used within the limits of statutory user freedoms
Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences
Library of the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences
Ministry of Science and Higher Education ; Activities popularizing science (DUN)
Feb 2, 2022
Nov 19, 2016
294
https://rcin.org.pl./publication/79830
Ginalski, Jerzy
Woźniak, Zenon (1931– )
Jadczyk, Irena