Polycentric city networks in Central-Eastern Europe: Existing concepts and empirical findings

Kramar, Hans; Kadi, Justin

doi:10.7163/GPol.2013.18

Przejdź do menu głównego
Przejdź do wyszukiwarki
Przejdź do treści
Przejdź do stopki

Pobierz

Tytuł: Polycentric city networks in Central-Eastern Europe: Existing concepts and empirical findings

Bibliografia:

1. Brakman S., Garretsen H., Van Marrewijk C., van Den Berg M., 1999. The return of Zipf: Towards a further understanding of the rank-size distribution. Journal of Regional Science, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 183-213.
2. Burger M.J., Meijers E., 2012. Form follows function? Linking morphological and functional polycentricity. Urban Studies, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1127-1149.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9787.00129 -
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0042098011407095 -
3. Burger M.J., Van Der Knaap B., Wall R.S., 2013. Polycentricity and the multiplexity of urban networks. European Planning Studies [forthcoming].
4. Cairncross F., 1998. The death of distance: How the communications revolution will change our lives. London: Orion Business, 302 pp.
5. Camagni R., 2009. Territorial capital and regional development. [in:] R. Capello, P. Nijkamp (eds.), Handbook of regional growth and development theories, Cheltenham-Northampton: Elgar, pp. 118-132.
6. Davoudi S., 2003. Polycentricity in European spatial planning: From an analytical tool to a normative agenda. European Planning Studies, vol. 11, iss. 8, pp. 979-999.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0965431032000146169 -
7. ESPON, 2005. Potentials for polycentric development in Europe. Final Report of ESPON 1.1.1. Stockholm: Nordregio, 143 pp. http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/ESPON2006Projects/ThematicProjects/Polycentricity/fr-1.1.1_revised-full.pdf [29 August 2013].
8. EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, 1999. European spatial development perspective: Towards balanced and sustainable development of the territory of the EU. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 87 pp. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/pdf/sum_en.pdf [29 August 2013].
9. EUROPEAN UNION, 2011. Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020: Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions. Agreed at the informal ministerial meeting of Ministers responsible for spatial planning and territorial development on 19th May 2011, Gödöllő, 12 pp. http://www.eu2011.hu/files/bveu/documents/TA2020.pdf [29 September 2013].
10. Friedmann J., 1986. The world city hypothesis. Development and Change, vol. 17, iss. 1, pp. 69-84.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1986.tb00231.x -
11. Green N., 2007. Functional polycentricity: A formal definition in terms of social network analysis. Urban Studies, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 2077-2103.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00420980701518941 -
12. Hall P., Pain K., 2006. The polycentric metropolis: Learning from mega-city regions in Europe. London: Earthscan, 228 pp.
13. Hoyler M., 2011. External relations of German cities through intra-firm networks – a global perspective. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 147-159.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13147-011-0100-8 -
14. Kloosterman R., Musterd S., 2001. The polycentric urban region: Towards a research agenda. Urban Studies, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 623-633.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00420980120035259 -
15. Komornicki T., Siłka P., (eds.) 2011, Functional linkages between Polish metropolises. Studia Regionalia, vol. 29, Warsaw: Polish Academy of Sciences. Committee for Spatial Economy and Regional Planning, 170 pp.
16. Komornicki T., 2011, Transport connections between Polish metropolises. [in:] T. Komornicki, P. Siłka (eds.), Functional linkages between Polish metropolises, Studia Regionalia, vol. 29, Warsaw: Polish Academy of Sciences. Committee for Spatial Economy and Regional Planning, pp. 94-112.
17. Kramar H., 2010. Standortfaktoren von Innovation: Räumliche Aspekte der Wissensproduktion. Saarbrücken: Südwestdeutscher Verlag für Hochschulschriften, 184 pp.
18. Lüthi S., Thierstein A., Bentlage M., 2012. The relational geography of the knowledge economy in Germany: On functional urban hierarchies and localised value chain systems. Urban Studies, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 276-293.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0042098012452325 -
19. Sassen S., 1991. The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 397 pp.
20. Schindegger F., Tatzberger G., 2002. Polyzentrismus –ein europäisches Leitbild für die räumliche Entwicklung. Wien: Österreichisches Institut für Raumplanung, 74 pp.
21. Śleszyński P., 2011a. Economic linkages. [in:] T. Komornicki, P. Siłka. (eds.), Functional linkages between Polish metropolises. Studia Regionalia, vol. 29. Warsaw: Polish Academy of Sciences. Committee for Spatial Economy and Regional Planning, pp. 48-62.
22. Śleszyński P., 2011b. Social linkages. [in:] T. Komornicki, P. Siłka (eds.), Functional linkages between Polish metropolises, Studia Regionalia, vol. 29. Warsaw: Polish Academy of Sciences. Committee for Spatial Economy and Regional Planning, pp. 63-78.
23. Smętkowski M., 2011. Linkages of the Polish metropolises from the European perspective – ESPON project: Future Orientations of Cities. [in:] T. Komornicki, P. Siłka (eds.), Functional linkages between Polish metropolises. Studia Regionalia, vol. 29. Warsaw: Polish Academy of Sciences. Committee for Spatial Economy and Regional Planning, pp. 35-47.
24. Taylor P. J., 2004. World city network: A global urban analysis. London-New York: Routledge, 241 pp.
25. Taylor P. J., Walker D.R.F., 2001. World cities: A first multivariate analysis of their service complexes. Urban Studies, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 23-47.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00420980125400 -
26. Vandermotten C., Halbert L., Roelandts M., Cornut P., 2008. European planning and the polycentric consensus: Wishful thinking? Regional Studies, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1205-1217.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343400701874206 -
27. Waterhout B., 2002. Polycentricity: What's behind it? [in:] A. Faludi (ed.), European spatial planning. Cambridge (Massachussetts): Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, pp. 83-103.