Dichtung and Wahrheit of spatial planning: Legal frameworks versus their application in Central Europe

Maier, Karel; Řezáč, Vít

doi:1429-7132 (print)

Przejdź do menu głównego
Przejdź do wyszukiwarki
Przejdź do treści
Przejdź do stopki

Pobierz

Tytuł: Dichtung and Wahrheit of spatial planning: Legal frameworks versus their application in Central Europe

Abstrakt:

The countries of Central Europe share a common tradition of urban planning and settlement, and their history of governance also shows a number of intersections. Many common features survived after the Great War, nevertheless the division of Central Europe by the Iron Curtain influenced the eastern part of the region dramatically. However, the return of open market to former socialist states was manifested also in legal environment, including the spatial planning system. Governments sought the inspiration in countries that experienced continuous development, but the differences in the legal and cultural environment led to dead ends in many cases . Eventually the main source of inspiration for spatial planning reform logically became the German-speaking countries of Central Europe. Overview in the initial part of the text, aim and method is clarified. Further on, tiers on which spatial planning tools are elaborated, with regards to specifics of unitary and federal states. Following this basic orientation, the legal frameworks in each of the countries in question are described and their specific features, namely their connection to the overall legal environment, are analysed. The conclusion shows certain gap between a first-sight similarity among the national spatial planning arrangement and its practice in spatial management, particularly on the local level of municipalities.

Bibliografia:

BD (2008). Raumordnungsgesetz vom 22. Dezember 2008 (BGBl. I S. 2986), das zuletzt durch Artikel 2 Absatz 15 des Gesetzes vom 20. Juli 2017 (BGBl. I S. 2808) geändert. Bundesrepublik Deutschland.
ČR (2021). Zákon č. 283/2021 Sb. Poslanecká sněmovna Parlementu České republiky. Retrieved from https://mmr.gov.cz/cs/ministerstvo/stavebni-pravo/pravo-a-legislativa/novy-stavebni-zakon
ESPON (2018). COMPASS - Comparative Analysis of Territorial Governance and Spatial Planning Systems in Europe. Final Report. Luxembourg: ESPON EGTC. Retrieved from https://www.espon.eu/planning-systems
Maier, K. (2020). Country profiles: Czech Republic. ČVUT v Praze, Fakulta architektury.
Maier, K., & Řezáč, V. (2019). Spoluúčast privátního sektoru na veřejných výdajích. ČVUT v Praze, Fakulta architektury.
Nowak, M. J., Mitrea, A., Lukstiņa, G., Petrişor, A.-I., Kovács, K. F., Simeonova, V., Yanchev, P., Jürgenson, E., Põdra, K., Řezáč, V., Mikalauskaite, K., Pranevičienė, B., Ladzianska, Z., Baloga, M. (2023). Spatial Planning Systems in Central and Eastern European Countries. Review and Comparison of Selected Issues. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42722-0
ÖROK (2018). Spatial Planning in Austria with References to Spatial Development and Regional Policy. Office of the Austrian Conference on Spatial Planning Vienna. https://www.oerok.gv.at//fileadmin/user_upload/Bilder/5.Reiter-Publikationen/_%C3%96ROK_202_en_klein_HP.pdf
Schifferdeckerová, M., & Miklóssyová, L. (2018). Changes brought by the new Building act. KPMG. Retrieved from https://www.danovky.sk/en/changes-brought-by-the-new-building-act
SR (2022). Zákon č. 200/2022 Z.z, o územnom plánovaní. Národná rada Slovenskej republiky.
UmK (2024). Lista planów obowiązujących. Urząd miasta Krakowa. Retrieved from https://www.bip.krakow.pl/?mmi=417
UmstW (2024). Miejscowe plany zagospodarowania przestrzennego. Statystyka planów miejscowych - stan na 29 lutego 2024. Urząd m. st. Warszawy. Retrieved from https://architektura.um.warszawa.pl/informacje-o-planach
ÚUPaV (2023). Úrad pro územné plánovanie a výstavbu SROV. Retrieved from https://stavebnyurad.gov.sk/uzemne-planovanie
ÚÚR (2024). Portál územního plánování. Retrieved from https://portal.uur.cz/obecne-informace-o-uzemi/evidence-uzemne-planovaci-cinnosti.asp