Inny tytuł:

Europa XXI 46 (2024)

Wydawca:

IGiPZ PAN

Miejsce wydania:

Warszawa

Opis:

29 cm ; Każdy numer posiada własny tytuł.

Abstrakt:

Since 2000, a rapid but poorly planned and managed urban expansion process has been observed around Riga, the capital of Latvia. The article reflects the opinions and efforts of municipalities in spatial and social transformation, residents’ rating of the urban and social environment and the results of spatial and morphological analysis, studying three suburban areas. It states that the spatial development policies of all levels have not been adequately implemented in local government spatial plans, creating a suburban built environment with low accessibility, availability, density, diversity and nodality, and outlines the first attempts of urban sprawl repair, calling for planning at the neighbourhood scale and activation of communities.

Bibliografia:

Bērziņš, M. (2009). Apdzīvojuma cikliskā attīstība [Cyclical development of population]. Scientific Papers University of Latvia, 67, 21-23.
Bērziņš, M., Krišjāne, Z., & Krūzmētra, Ž. (2010). Peri-urbānās attīstības iezīmes Pierīgā [Features of peri-urban development in Pieriga]. Scientific Papers University of Latvia, 752, 253-267.
Çalişkan, O., & Şevik, E. (2022). Urban Form and Liveability: Towards a Socio-Morphological Perspective. Built Environment, 48(3), 301-316. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.48.3.301
Chazdon, S. A., & Lott, S. (2010). Ready for engagement: Using key informant interviews to measure community social capacity. Community Development, 41(2), 156-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575331003646173
Cimdiņš, R. (2013). Social potential: Cooperation and communicative aspects in development planning. In S., Rajalo, K., Putane & M., Vadi. (Eds.). Management Theory and Practice: Synergy in Organizations (pp. 92-108). Tartu: University of Tartu.
Cirtautas, M. (2014). Changing form of the Baltic cities: resurrection of the suburbs. 21st International Seminar on Urban Form: Our common future in Urban Morphology, 2, 121-133.
Cocheci, R.M., & Petrisor, A.I. (2023). Assessing the Negative Effects of Suburbanization: The Urban Sprawl Restrictiveness Index in Romania's Metropolitan Areas. Land, 12(5), 966. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12050966
Cocheci, R.M., & Petrisor, A.I. (2023). Extended suburbanisation and land cover dynamics in post-socialist metropolitan areas. Evidence from Romania. disP - The Planning Review, 59(2), 88-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2023.2257490
Couch, C., Petschel-Held, G., & Leontidou, L. (Eds.). (2007). Urban Sprawl in Europe: Landscape, LandUse Change and Policy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
De Vidovich, L. (2019). Suburban studies: State of the field and unsolved knots. Geography Compass, 13(5), e12440. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12440
Dinić, M., & Mitković, P. (2016). Suburban design: from "bedroom communities" to sustainable neighborhoods. Geodetski vestnik, 60(1), 98-113. https://doi.org/10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2016.01.98-113
Dunham-Jones, E., & Williamson, J. (2011). Retrofitting Suburbia: Urban Design Solutions for Redesigning Suburbs (Updated edition). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons
EC (2020). New Leipzig Charter - The transformative power of cities for the common good. European Commission. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/whats-new/newsroom/12-08-2020-new-leipzig-charter-the-transformative-power-of-cities-for-the-common-good_en (accessed 18.12.2023)
Ence, A., Bojārs, M., Kārkliņš, V., Ločs, K., Bērziņa, I., Osītis, A., Kadiģe, L., Dūduma, I., Krēmere, I., Punculis, I., Puide, A., Liepa, V., Žīgure, D., Kamoliņa, I., Levanoviča, L., Zadovskis, G., Kursiša, J., Lontone-Ieviņa, A., Pikše, P., Štolcers, G., Cvetkova, D., & Vilciņa-Rugāja, M. (2022, January 26). Mārupes novada ilgtspējīgas attīstības stratēģija 2022-2034.gadam [Mārupe county sustainable development strategy 2022-2034]. Municipality of Mārupe County. Retrieved from https://www.marupe.lv/sites/default/files/inline-files/STRATEGIJA_gala_dokuments.17.01.2022.pdf (accessed 09.12.2023)
Felcis, R., Ņikišins, J., & Zača, E. (2014). Pētījuma rezultātu atskaite "Pierīgas iedzīvotāju dzīves vietas izvēles kritēriji". Latvijas Universitāte Sociālo zinātņu fakultāte Socioloģijas nodaļa. Retrieved from https://sus.lv/sites/default/files/media/faili/lu_szf_rd_pierigas_iedzivotaji_atskaite_par_petijumu. pdf (accessed 09.12.2023)
Keil, R., & Wu, F. (Eds.). (2022). After suburbia: urbanization in the twenty-first century. Global suburbanisms. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Krisjane, Z., & Berzins, M. (2012). Post-socialist Urban Trends: New Patterns and Motivations for Migration in the Suburban Areas of Rīga, Latvia. Urban Studies, 49(2), 289-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980114022
Lang, T., Burneika, D., Noorkõiv, R., Plüschke-Altof, B., Pociūtė-Sereikienė, G., & Sechi, G. (2022). Socio-spatial polarisation and policy response: Perspectives for regional development in the Baltic States. European Urban and Regional Studies, 29(1), 21-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697764211023553
Leontidou, L., & Couch, C. (2007). Urban Sprawl and Hybrid Cityscapes in Europe: Comparisons, Theory Construction and Conclusions. In C., Couch, G., Petschel-Held & L., Leontidou (Eds.). The Urban Sprawl in Europe Landscapes, Land-Use Change and Policy (pp. 242-268). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
LR CSP (2022). Iedzīvotāju skaits gada sākumā, tā izmaiņas un dabiskās kustības galvenie rādītāji reģionos, pilsētās un novados 1967 - 2022. [Population at the beginning of the year, its changes and main indicators of natural movement in regions, cities and counties 1967 - 2022.]. Latvijas Republikas Centrālās statistikas pārvalde [Central Statistical Office of the Republic of Latvia]. Retrieved from https://data.stat.gov.lv/pxweb/lv/OSP_PUB/START__POP__IR__IRS/IRS030 (accessed 09.12.2023)
Mandell, J. (2010). Picnics, participation and power: Linking community building to social change. Community Development, 41(2), 269-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330903548760
Mantey, D. (2021). Objective and Subjective Determinants of Neighborhood Satisfaction in the Context of Retrofitting Suburbs. Sustainability, 13(21), 11954. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111954
Mantey, D., & Pokojski, W. (2020). New Indicators of Spatial Chaos in the Context of the Need for Retrofitting Suburbs. Land, 9(8), 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9080276
MoAC (2018, March 27). Ādažu novada teritorijas plānojums [Adaži County Spatial Plan]. Municipality of Adaži County. Retrieved from https://geolatvija.lv/geo/tapis#document_11127 (accessed 09.12.2023)
MoAC (2021, July 27). Ādažu novada ilgtspējīgas attīstības stratēģija 2013-2037 (2021. gada aktualizācija) [Sustainable Development Strategy of Ādaži County 2013-2037 (2021 update)]. Municipality of Adaži County. Retrieved from https://www.adazunovads.lv/lv/media/517/download?attachment (accessed 09.12.2023)
MoKC (2013, June 11). Ķekavas pagasta teritorijas plānojums 2009.-2021. 2013. gada grozījumi. Municipality of Ķekava County. Retrieved from http://kekava.lv/uploads/filedir/arturs/Kekavas_AN_konsolid_ar2013groz_1.pdf (accessed 09.12.2023)
MoKC (2022, October 12) Ķekavas novada Ilgtspējīgas attīstības stratēģija līdz 2030.gadam (2021. gada aktualizācija) [Sustainable development strategy of Ķekava county until 2030 (2021 update)]. Municipality of Ķekava County. Retrieved from https://kekava.lv/ilgtspejigas-attistibas-strategija-lidz-2030-gadam/ (accessed 09.12.2023)
MoKC (2023, July 19). Ķekavas novada labiekārtošanas plāns. Alternatīvas un rīcības plāns (2023. gada aktualizācija) [Public space plan of Kekava county. Alternatives and Action Plan (2023 update).] Municipality of Ķekava County. Retrieved from https://kekava.lv/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/alternativs-2_sej_Labiekart_plans.pdf (accessed 09.12.2023)
MoKC (2023, March 22). Ķekavas novada teritorijas plānojums (administratīvā teritorija līdz 01.07.2021.) [Ķekava Municipality Spatial Plan (administrative territory until 01.07.2021)]. Municipality of Ķekava County. Retrieved from https://geolatvija.lv/geo/tapis#document_26747 (accessed 09.12.2023)
Mouratidis, K. (2021). Urban planning and quality of life: A review of pathways linking the built environment to subjective well-being. Cities, 115, 103229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103229
Mulliner, E., & Maliene, V. (2011). An introductory review to the Special Issue: Attractive Places to Live. URBAN DESIGN International, 16(3), 147-152. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2011.11
Muminovic, M., & Caton, H. (2018). Sustaining Suburbia - the Importance of the Public Private Interface in the Case of Canberra, Australia. ArchNet-IJAR, 12(3), 11-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v12i3.1793
Narbuts, I. (2018). Apdzīvoto vietu veidošanās un plānošanas principi Pierīgā (Publications No. 66138) [Master Thesis, University of Latvija]. E-resource repository of the University of Latvia. Retrieved from https://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/38978 (accessed 09.12.2023)
Nuissl, H., & Couch, C. (2007). Lines of Defence: Policies for the Control of Urban Sprawl. In C., Couch L., Leontidou & G., Petschel-Held (Eds.). The Urban Sprawl in Europe Landscapes, Land-Use Change and Policy (pp. 217-241). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Nuissl, H. & Rink, D. (2005). The 'production' of urban sprawl in eastern Germany as a phenomenon of post-socialist transformation. Cities, 22(2), 123-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2005.01.002
OECD (2018). Rethinking Urban Sprawl: Moving Towards Sustainable Cities. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264189881-en
Pichler-Milanovič, N. (1994). The role of housing policy in the transformation process of central-east European cities. Urban Studies, 31(7), 1097-1115. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989420080
Pichler-Milanovič, N., Gutry-Korycka, M., & Rink, D. (2007). Sprawl in the Post-Socialist City: The Changing Economic and Institutional Context of Central and Eastern European Cities. In C., Couch, L., Leontidou & G., Petschel-Held (Eds.). The Urban Sprawl in Europe Landscapes, Land-Use Change and Policy (pp. 102-135). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470692066.ch4
PMLP (2023). Population Register. The Office of Citizenship and Migration Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.pmlp.gov.lv/en/services/population-register-0 (accessed 26.01.2024)
Putnam, R.D., & Goss, K. (2000, September 24). It's about time: Who has time to enjoy family life, connect with the community or be an active citizen? The San Francisco Chronicle.
Pužulis, A., & Šķiņķis, P. (2009). Pierīgas apdzīvojuma struktūras izpēte [Study of the population structure of Pieriga]. Rīga. Rīgas plānošanas reģions [Riga planning region].
Pužulis, A., & Šķiņķis, P. (2011). Representations of boundaries in the context of private and public relationships: Latvian example. European Integration Studies, 5, 97-101. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.eis.0.5.1083
Radzinski, A., & Mickiewicz, A. (2015). Post-socialist cities between suburbanisation and reurbanisation. In J., Condie & A.M., Copper (Eds.). Dialogees of Sustainable Urbanisation, Social Science, Research and Transitions to Urban Contexts (pp. 317-319). Penrith: University of Western Sydney. Retrieved from https://ugec.org/files/2015/08/Dialogues-of-sustainable-urbanisation-Social-science-research-and-transitions-to-urban-contexts-6.pdf (accessed 09.12.2023)
Rice, L. (2010). Retrofitting suburbia: is the compact city feasible? Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Urban Design and Planning, 163(4), 193-204. https://doi.org/10.1680/udap.2010.163.4.193
RPR (2020, January 10). Action Plan for the Development of the Riga Metropolitan Area. Riga Planning Region. Retrieved from https://rpr.gov.lv/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Action-Plan-for-the-Development-of-the-RMA_Web-1.pdf
RPR (2023). Rīgas plānošanas reģiona ilgtspējīgas attīstības stratēģija 2014-2030. [Riga Planning Region Sustainable Development Strategy 2030]. Riga Planning Region. Retrieved from https://rpr.gov.lv/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/RPR-Strategija_2030.pdf
Saeima (2010, June 10). Latvijas ilgtspējīgas attīstības stratēģija līdz 2030.gadam [Sustainable Development Strategy of Latvia until 2030]. Parliament of the Republic of Latvia.
Šavraka, I. (2023). Priekšlikumi piepilsētu urbānās izplešanās pārvaldībai un dzīvojamās vides transformācijām (Publications No. 95804) [Master Thesis, University of Latvija]. E-resource repository of the University of Latvia. Retrieved from https://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/63481 (accessed 09.12.2023)
Sechi, G., Zhitin, D., Krisjane, Z., & Berzins, M. (2022). Post-Soviet Suburbanization as Part of Broader Metropolitan Change: A Comparative Analysis of Saint Petersburg and Riga. Sustainability, 14(13), 8201. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138201
Sharifi, A. (2016). From Garden City to Eco-urbanism: The quest for sustainable neighborhood development. Sustainable Cities and Society, 20, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2015.09.002
Šķiņķis, P., & Cimdiņš, R. (2015, May 25-27). The socio-spatial structuration in Riga metropolitan region. Regional Studies Association Annual Conference 'Global Growth Agendas: Regions, Institutions and Sustainability'. Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy.
Streimikiene, D. (2015). Quality of life and housing. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(2), 140-145. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2015.V5.491
Sýkora, L. (1998). Commercial property development: Budapest, Prague and Warsaw. In G., Enyedi (Ed.). Social Change and Urban Restructuring in Central Europe (pp. 109-136). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Tachieva, G. (2010). Sprawl repair manual. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Talen, E. (2011). Sprawl Retrofit: Sustainable Urban Form in Unsustainable Places. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 38(6), 952-978. https://doi.org/10.1068/b37048
Talen, E. (Ed.). (2015). Retrofitting Sprawl: Addressing Seventy Years of Failed Urban Form. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
Tsenkova, S. (Ed.). (2006). Places and People: Planning New Communities. Calgary: University of Calgary.
Uribe, F. A., Sandalack, B., McCormack, G., Doyle-Baker, P., & Shiell, A. (2017). Walkability Makeover for Suburbia: Retrofitting Calgary's Suburbs, an Economic Evaluation (breakout presentation). Journal of Transport & Health, 7, S55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.11.090
Vall-Casas, P., Koschinsky, J., Mendoza-Arroyo, C., & Benages-Albert, M. (2016). Retrofitting Suburbia Through Systemic Densification: The Case of the Metropolitan Region of Barcelona. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 33(1), 45-70. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2011.9
Wilson, L.-A. M., Giles-Corti, B., Burton, N. W., Giskes, K., Haynes, M., & Turrell, G. (2011). The Association between Objectively Measured Neighborhood Features and Walking in Middle-Aged Adults. American Journal of Health Promotion, 25(4), 12-21. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.090421-QUAN-144
Winston, N., & Eastaway, M. (2008). Sustainable housing in the urban context: International sustainable development indicator sets and housing. Social Indicators Research, 87(2), 211-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9165-8

Czasopismo/Seria/cykl:

Europa XXI

Tom:

46

Szczegółowy typ zasobu:

Artykuł

Format:

application/octet-stream

Identyfikator zasobu:

oai:rcin.org.pl:242425 ; 1429-7132 (print) ; 2300-8547 (online) ; 10.7163/Eu21.2024.46.5

Źródło:

CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407 ; kliknij tutaj, żeby przejść

Język:

eng

Język streszczenia:

eng

Prawa:

Licencja Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0

Zasady wykorzystania:

Zasób chroniony prawem autorskim. [CC BY 4.0 Międzynarodowe] Korzystanie dozwolone zgodnie z licencją Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0, której pełne postanowienia dostępne są pod adresem: ; -

Digitalizacja:

Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Polskiej Akademii Nauk

Lokalizacja oryginału:

Centralna Biblioteka Geografii i Ochrony Środowiska Instytutu Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania PAN

Dofinansowane ze środków:

Unia Europejska. Europejski Fundusz Rozwoju Regionalnego ; Program Operacyjny Innowacyjna Gospodarka, lata 2010-2014, Priorytet 2. Infrastruktura strefy B + R

Dostęp:

Otwarty