RCIN and OZwRCIN projects

Object

Title: A Holistic Self-Assessment Tool for Circular Economy Transitions in Cities and Regions

Subtitle:

Europa XXI 44 (2023)

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

29 cm

Abstract:

In the European context, cities and regions play a key role in boosting circularity and achieve the European Green Deal action plan mbition to ‘boost the efficient use of resources by moving to a clean, circular economy’. To this end, cities and regions will be instrumental in promoting circularity through engagement with key actors and integration of circular economy (CE) goals within their policies and spatial plans. To support this effort, it is essential to develop appropriate metrics and tools for evaluating the progress and transition towards a circular economy. Although numerous new assessment methodologies have been suggested (Corona et al., 2019), they generally focus on quantitatively assessing how circular a project, system, or business is, or on evaluating the extent to which circular strategies align with the principles of a circular economy. Current metrics rarely extend beyond material sustainability assessments, which means they often do not capture the complexity of the CE transition and lack a comprehensive, integrated perspective. In particular, what they omit are the spatial (Williams, 2020), the governance (Korhonen et al., 2018) and the social dimensions (Pitkänen et al., 2020). In this paper, we propose a holistic transition assessment tool developed and tested across several metropolitan regions, including Amsterdam, Naples, Łódź, Hamburg and Pécs, being at different stages of the circular economy transition. The final version of the tool was applied in two cases, the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area and the city of Tomaszów Mazowiecki. The tool focuses on five dimensions: (1) governance structures, (2) awareness, comprehensiveness of the sustainability assessment, (3) tools for measuring material stocks and flows as well as (4) for co-creation of solutions and strategies with stakeholders, and (5) circular built environment. The results of applying the tool in a series of workshops with regional CE stakeholders allow for exploring the following questions: What is the state of the transition towards CE in European urban regions from a holistic perspective? What hinders these transitions? And how to identify means to overcome those barriers? The assessment tool is of interest for regional and urban policy-makers, planners and stakeholders engaged in development of CE strategies and policies. What is more, the results presented in the paper allow for comparative insights into the state of transition towards CE and for drawing lessons on what it takes to nudge the development of regions and cities towards circularity.

References:

Alhola, K., Ryding, S. O., Salmenperä, H., & Busch, N. J. (2019). Exploiting the potential of public procurement: Opportunities for circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23(1), 96-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12770 DOI
Allesch, A., & Brunner, P. H. (2015). Material flow analysis as a decision support tool for waste management: A literature review. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19(5), 753-764. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12354 DOI
Amenta, L., & van Timmeren, A. (2018). Beyond Wastescapes: Towards Circular Landscapes. Addressing the Spatial Dimension of Circularity through the Regeneration of Wastescapes. Sustainability, 10(12), 4740. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU10124740 DOI
Amenta, L., Attademo, A., Remøy, H., Berruti, G., Cerreta, M., Formato, E., Palestino, M. F., & Russo, M. (2019). Managing the Transition towards Circular Metabolism: Living Labs as a Co-Creation Approach. Urban Planning, 4(3), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i3.2170 DOI
Arciniegas, G., Šileryté, R., Dąbrowski, M., Wandl, A., Dukai, B., Bohnet, M., & Gutsche, J. M. (2019). A geodesign decision support environment for integrating management of resource flows in spatial planning. Urban Planning, 4(3), 32-51. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i3.2173 DOI
Avdiushchenko, A. (2018). Toward a Circular Economy Regional Monitoring Framework for European Regions: Conceptual Approach. Sustainability, 10(12), 4398. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124398 DOI
Baccini, P., & Brunner, P. H. (2012). Analysis and assessment of metabolic processes. In P., Baccini & P. H., Brunner (Eds.). Metabolism of the Anthroposphere: Analysis, Evaluation, Design (pp. 81-172). Cambridge, CA: MIT Press. DOI
Banerjee, S. B. (2002). Corporate environmentalism: The construct and its measurement. Journal of Business Research, 55(3), 177-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00135-1 DOI
Bîrgovan, A. L., Lakatos, E. S., Szilagyi, A., Cioca, L. I., Pacurariu, R. L., Ciobanu, G., & Rada, E. C. (2022). How Should We Measure? A Review of Circular Cities Indicators. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 5177. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH19095177 DOI
Broto, V. C., Allen, A., & Rapoport, E. (2012). Interdisciplinary perspectives on urban metabolism. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16(6), 851-861. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00556.x DOI
Brunner, P. H., & Rechberger, H. (2004). Practical Handbook of Material Flow Analysis. Boca Raton, London, New York, Washington, DC: Lewis Publishers. DOI
Bulkeley, H., Coenen, L., Frantzeskaki, N., Hartmann, C., Kronsell, A., Mai, L., Marvin, S., McCormick, K., van Steenbergen, F., & Voytenko, Y. (2016). Urban living labs: Governing urban sustainability transitions. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 22, 13-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.02.003 DOI
Cavaleiro de Ferreira, A, & Fuso-Nerini, F. (2019). A Framework for Implementing and Tracking Circular Economy in Cities: The Case of Porto. Sustainability, 11(6), 1813. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061813 DOI
Circle Economy (2021). The Circularity Gap Report 2021. Amsterdam: Circle Economy.
CCRI (2022). Methodology for the implementation of a circular economy at the local and regional scale. Circular Cities and Regions. Initiative. https://doi.org/10.2777/068045 DOI
Corona, B., Shen, L., Reike, D., Carreón, J. R., & Worrell, E. (2019). Towards sustainable development through the circular economy - A review and critical assessment on current circularity metrics. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 151, 104498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104498 DOI
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
Ecorys (2019). Indicators for circular economy (CE) transition in cities - Issues and mapping paper. Brussels: Ecorys.
Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2013). Toward the circular economy: Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. Vol. 1. Retrieved from https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation. org/assets/downloads/publications/Ellen-MacArthur-Foundation-Towards-the-Circular-Economy-vol.1.pdf
EC (2015). Communication from The Commission to The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of The Regions Closing the loop - An EU action plan for the Circular Economy. Brussels. COM (2015) 614 final.
Frantzeskaki, N., & Rok, A. (2018). Co-producing urban sustainability transitions knowledge with community, policy and science. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 29, 47-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.08.001 DOI
Frantzeskaki, N., Broto, V. C., Coenen, L., & Loorbach, D. (2017). Urban sustainable transition: The dynamics and opportunities of sustainability transitions in cities. In N. Frantzeskaki, V. C. Broto, L. Coenen, & D. Loorbach (Eds.), Urban sustainability transitions (pp. 1-19). New York, London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. DOI
Frantzeskaki, N., Loorbach, D., & Meadowcroft, J. (2012). Governing societal transitions to sustainability. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 15(1/2), 19. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2012.044032 DOI
Fratini, C. F., Georg, S., & Jørgensen, M. S. (2019). Exploring circular economy imaginaries in European cities: A research agenda for the governance of urban sustainability transitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 974-989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.193 DOI
Friant, M. C., Vermeulen, W. J., & Salomone, R. (2021). Analysing European Union circular economy policies: words versus actions. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 337-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.001 DOI
Furlan, C., Wandl, A., Cavalieri, C., Unceta, P.M. (2022). Territorialising Circularity. In L., Amenta, M., Russo & A., van Timmeren (Eds.). Regenerative Territories. Dimensions of Circularity for Healthy Metabolism (pp. 31-49). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78536-9_2 DOI
Geels, F. W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 24-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002 DOI
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N., & Hultink, E. (2017). The Circular Economy: A New Sustainability Paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757-768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 DOI
Harris, S., Martin, M., & Diener, D. (2021). Circularity for circularity's sake? Scoping review of assessment methods for environmental performance in the circular economy. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 172-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SPC.2020.09.018 DOI
Hausleitner, B., Hill, A., Domenech, T., & Muñoz Sanz, V. (2022). Urban Manufacturing for Circularity: Three Pathways to Move from Linear to Circular Cities. In L., Amenta, M., Russo, & A., van Timmeren (Eds.). Regenerative Territories: Dimensions of Circularity for Healthy Metabolisms (pp. 89-103). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78536-9_5 DOI
Hölscher, K., Wittmayer, J. M., & Loorbach, D. (2018). Transition versus transformation: What's the difference? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 27, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.10.007 DOI
Jambeck, J. R., Maddalene, T., Youngblood, K., Oposa, A., Perello, H., Werner, M., Himelboim, I., Romness, K., Mathis, J., Keisling, C., & Brooks, A. L. (2024). The Circularity Assessment Protocol in cities to reduce plastic pollution. Community Science, 3(1), e2023CSJ000042. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023CSJ000042 DOI
Jonker, J., Kothman, I., Faber, N., & Montenegro Navarro, N. (2018). Organising for the Circular Economy. A workbook for developing Circular Business Models. Doetinchem: OCF 2.0 Foundation.
Kennedy, C., Cuddihy, J., & Engel-Yan, J. (2007). The Changing Metabolism of Cities. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 11(2), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1162/JIE.2007.1107 DOI
Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A., & Seppälä, J. (2018). Circular economy: The concept and its limitations. Ecological Economics, 143, 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041 DOI
Loorbach, D. (2007). Governance for sustainability. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 3(2), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2007.11907996 DOI
Loorbach, D. (2010). Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance, 23(1), 161-183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-491.2009.01471.x DOI
Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., & Avelino, F. (2017). Sustainability transitions research: transforming science and practice for societal change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42, 599-626. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340 DOI
Lucertini, G., & Musco, F. (2020). Circular Urban Metabolism Framework. One Earth, 2(2), 138-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ONEEAR.2020.02.004 DOI
Lyon, T. P., & Maxwell, J. W. (2004). Corporate strategy and the policy life cycle. In T. P., Lyon, A., Arbor & J. W. Maxwell (Eds.). Corporate Environmentalism and Public Policy (pp. 43-44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607080 DOI
Moraga, G., Huysveld, S., Mathieux, F., Blengini, G. A., Alaerts, L., van Acker, K., de Meester, S., & Dewulf, J. (2019). Circular economy indicators: What do they measure? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146, 452-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2019.03.045 DOI
Moreau, V., Sahakian, M., van Griethuysen, P., & Vuille, F. (2017). Coming Full Circle: Why Social and Institutional Dimensions Matter for the Circular Economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 497-506. https://doi.org/10.1111/JIEC.12598 DOI
Neugebauer, F. (2012). EMAS and ISO 14001 in the German industry - complements or substitutes? Journal of Cleaner Production, 37, 249-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2012.07.021 DOI
Obersteg, A., Arlati, A., Acke, A., Berruti, G., Czapiewski, K., Dąbrowski, M., Heurkens, E., Mezei, C., Palestino, M. F., Varjú, V., Wójcik, M., & Knieling, J. (2019). Urban regions shifting to circular economy: Understanding challenges for new ways of governance. Urban Planning, 4(3), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i3.2158 DOI
OECD (2020). The circular economy in cities and regions. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/10ac6ae4-en
OECD (2020). The Circular Economy in Cities and Regions: Synthesis Report. OECD Urban Studies. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/10ac6ae4-en DOI
Parchomenko, A., Nelen, D., Gillabel, J., & Rechberger, H. (2019). Measuring the circular economy - A Multiple Correspondence Analysis of 63 metrics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 200-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.10.357 DOI
Patterson, J., Schulz, K., Vervoort, J., van der Hel, S., Widerberg, O., Adler, C., Hurlbert, M., Anderton, K., Sethi, M., & Barau, A. (2017). Exploring the governance and politics of transformations towards sustainability. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 24, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.09.001 DOI
Pauliuk, S., & Müller, D. B. (2014). The role of in-use stocks in the social metabolism and in climate change mitigation. Global Environmental Change, 24, 132-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.006 DOI
Petit-Boix, A., & Leipold, S. (2018). Circular economy in cities: Reviewing how environmental research aligns with local practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 1270-1281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.281 DOI
Pitkänen, K., Karppinen, T. K. M., Kautto, P., Turunen, S., Judl, J., & Myllymaa, T. (2020). Sex, drugs and the circular economy: the social impacts of the circular economy and how to measure them. In M., Brandão, D., Lazarevic & G., Finnveden (Eds.). Handbook of the Circular Economy (pp. 162-175). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788972727.00021 DOI
Potting, J., Hekkert, M., Worrell, E., & Hanemaaijer, A. (2017). Circular economy: Measuring innovation in product chains. Policy Report. Retrieved from https://www.pbl.nl/uploads/default/downloads/pbl-2016-circular-economy-measuring-innovation-in-product-chains-2544.pdf
Raworth, K. (2017). A Doughnut for the Anthropocene: humanity's compass in the 21st century. The Lancet Planetary Health, 1(2), E48-E49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30028-1 DOI
Remøy, H. T., & Wandl, A. (2022). Challenges for circular urban development. In N. J. A., Buchoud, A., Charlambous, G., Hartmann, K., Karampourniotis, H., Kuhle & M., Molnár (Eds.). Intersecting: Bending the Linear Economy On Urban Metabolism (2022 ed., Vol. 9, pp. 127-130). Berlin: New Dialogues.
Rizos, V., Tuokko, K., & Behrens, A. (2017). The Circular Economy: A review of definitions, processes and impacts. CEPS Research Reports. Retrieved from https://www.ceps.eu/download/publication/?id=9969&pdf=RR2017-08_CircularEconomy_0.pdf
Saidani, M., Yannou, B., Leroy, Y., Cluzel, F., & Kendall, A. (2019). A taxonomy of circular economy indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 542-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.014 DOI
Savini, F. (2021). The circular economy of waste: Recovery, incineration and urban reuse. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(12), 2114-2132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1857226 DOI
Sileryte, R., Sabbe, A., Bouzas, V., Meister, K., Wandl, A., & van Timmeren, A. (2022). European Waste Statistics data for a Circular Economy Monitor: Opportunities and limitations from the Amsterdam Metropolitan Region. Journal of Cleaner Production, 358, 131767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131767 DOI
Silvestri, F., Spigarelli, F., & Tassinari, M. (2020). Regional development of Circular Economy in the European Union: A multidimensional analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 255, 120218. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.120218 DOI
SRC (2016). The SDGs wedding cake. Stockholm Resilience Centre.
Taelman, S.E, Tonini, D., Wandl, A., Dewulf, J. (2018) A Holistic Sustainability Framework for Waste Management in European Cities: Concept Development. Sustainability, 10, 2184. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072184 DOI
Taelman, S.E., Sanjuan-Delmás, D., Tonini, D., & Dewulf, J. (2020). An operational framework for sustainability assessment including local to global impacts: Focus on waste management systems. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 162, 104964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104964 DOI
van den Berghe, K., & Vos, M. (2019). Circular Area Design or Circular Area Functioning? A DiscourseInstitutional Analysis of Circular Area Developments in Amsterdam and Utrecht, The Netherlands. Sustainability, 11(18), 4875. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11184875 DOI
Varjú, V., & Dąbrowski, M. (2018). Transfer of regional circular economy (CE) solutions and knowledge: overcoming the place-based barriers. A World of Flows Labour Mobility, Capital and Knowledge in an Age of Global Reversal and Regional Revival 2018. Lugano, Svájc. RSA. Retrieved from http://open-archive.rkk.hu:8080/jspui/bitstream/11155/1789/1/varju_transfer_2018.pdf
Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2014). A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333-1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.930505 DOI
Voytenko, Y., McCormick, K., Evans, J., & Schliwa, G. (2016). Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: Towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.053 DOI
Weyl, T. (1894). Versuch über den Stoffwechsel Berlins. [Essay on the metabolism of Berlin.] Paper presented at 8th International Congress of Hygiene and Demography, 7-9 September, Budapest.
Williams, J. (2019). Circular cities: Challenges to implementing looping actions. Sustainability, 11(2), 423. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020423 DOI
Williams, J. (2021). Circular cities: What are the benefits of circular development? Sustainability, 13(10), 5725. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105725 DOI
Wittmayer, J. M., & Loorbach, D. (2016). Governing transitions in cities: Fostering alternative ideas, practices, and social relations through transition management. In D., Loorbach, J. M., Wittmayer, H., Shiroyama, J., Fujino & S., Mizuguchi (Eds.). Governance of urban sustainability transitions (pp. 13-32). Tokyo: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55426-4_2 DOI
Wittmayer, J., Roorda, C., & van Steenbergen, F. (2014). REPORT. Governing Urban Sustainability Transitions-Inspiring examples. Retrieved from www.fph.ch
Wolman, A.(1965). The metabolism of cities. Scientific American, 213(3), 179-190. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0965-178 DOI

Relation:

Europa XXI

Volume:

44

Start page:

15

End page:

35

Detailed Resource Type:

Article

Format:

application/octet-stream

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:242277 ; 1429-7132 (print) ; 2300-8547 (online) ; 10.7.7163/Eu21.2023.44.10

Source:

CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Language of abstract:

eng

Rights:

Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. [CC BY 4.0] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license, full text available at: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

European Union. European Regional Development Fund ; Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure

Access:

Open

Objects Similar

×

Citation

Citation style:

This page uses 'cookies'. More information