Subtitle:

Europa XXI 45 (2023)

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

29 cm ; Każdy numer posiada własny tytuł.

Abstract:

Local-level spatial policies in Poland are determined by diverse social, economic, political and environmental factors. On the one hand, they result from the specific characteristics of individual areas. On the other, however, supra-local factors are found to be playing an increasingly important role. These can include trends related to the Europeanisation of spatial planning and the associated promoted institutional changes and changes in planning practices. However, from February 2022 onwards, certain European countries in particular have seen another important factor has come into play, i.e. the war in Ukraine. It thus seems legitimate to verify how the fundamental change in the geopolitical situation, i.e. the location in the immediate vicinity of a victim state (Ukraine), an aggressor state (Russia) and an aggressor-friendly state (Belarus), along with a number of related consequences (including a change in the nature of border capacity, a sense of insecurity, potential changes in investment policy, etc.) determine the directions local spatial policies have been taking. The main purpose of the article is to diagnose the current planning situation of units of local government administration along Poland’s eastern border by reference to two groups of issues: (1) concerning the state of progress of planning work, as well as (2) the impact of the outbreak of war in Ukraine on changes in spatial policy (perforce ancillary, given the small number of responses received). The source of the data were annual surveys of the Ministry of Development and Technology and Statistics Poland regarding the advancement of planning work at the level of the Polish gmina, as well and a survey addressed to all 77 such units of local administration located by the border. Particular reference was made to the application of spatial-planning instruments at the local level (studies of spatial planning conditions and directions, local spatial development plans and decisions on development conditions – with the analyses concerning the period before the major July 2023 amendment of spatial planning law). Particular attention was paid to the frequency of enactment of individual acts, with this being related to both earlier periods and trends in Poland as a whole. The research finds that the relatively high level of activity shown by some of the surveyed gminas in amending/updating spatial planning studies and spatial/physical development plans may not be related to the outbreak of war in Ukraine. The Polish spatial-planning system in fact lacks instruments by which to react flexibly and ensure the integration of development policies (as is particularly necessary when a crisis erupts).

References:

Akhgar, H., Shaker Ardekani, R., & Zabihi, H. (2014). Spatial planning in border areas with an emphasison passive defence considerations (case study: from Konarak to Guater Gulf, Iran). International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, 4(3), 51-64.
Balla, E. (2016). Land Readjustment as a tool for Urban Development in Greece: the implementation gap between Laws, Policies and Practice. Symposium on Land Consolidation and Readjustment for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/139199072/LC_2016_E.Balla_Greece_Final.pdf
Bański, J., Kowalski, M., & Konopski, M. (2023). Nierówności przestrzenne a geografia niezadowolenia. Przykład preferencji wyborczych na obszarach problemowych w Polsce. Przegląd Geograficzny, 95(4), 421-446. https://doi.org/10.7163/PrzG.2023.4.4
Berglund-Snodgrass, L. (2016). Demanding Certainty: A Critical Examination of Swedish Spatial Planning for Safety. Doctoral Dissertation Series No. 2016:02. Blekinge: Blekinge Institute of Technology, Department of Spatial Planning.
Boonstra, B. (2020). Self-organization and spatial planning in the face of the European refugee crisis. In G., de Roo, C., Yamu & Ch., Zuidema (Eds.). Handbook on Planning and Complexity (pp. 220-236). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Borhani, K., & Esmaeili, S. (2021). Defense-security planning of cities using spatial analysis of physical and military vulnerability (Case study: Zahedan). National Security, 11(39), 405-430.
Cerić, D. (2023). Przestrzenne cechy transgranicznej współpracy turystycznej w regionie Morza Bałtyckiego. Przegląd Geograficzny, 95(1), 85-112. https://doi.org/10.7163/PrzG.2023.1.4
Fathi, A., Mitrehii, M., Zayyari, K., Alipoure., A., & Hashemi, M. (2016). An Analysis of Political, Security and Defense Threats in Alborz Province Employing Spatial Planning Approach. Research Political Geography Quarterly, 1(3), 187-211. https://doi.org/10.22067/pg.v3i3.59375
Guzik, R., & Kołoś, A. (2021). Dostępność obszarów wiejskich do miast powiatowych w Polsce transportem publicznym w 2019 r.. Przegląd Geograficzny, 93(2), 181-206. https://doi.org/10.7163/PrzG.2021.2.3
Hashemi, S. M., Alipour, A., & Fathi, A. (2019). Correlation between Security-Defense Threats with Developmental Levels in Kurdistan Province Using Spatial Planning Approach. Quarterly Journal of Geography Environment Preparation, 12(45), 199-223.
Hashi, H. M., Momeni, M., & Bagheri, M. (2014). The Preparation of Spatial Planning Strategies for Border Areas Border Areas (Case Study: Eastern Borders of Iran). Geographical Research, 29(114), 237-254.
Ilnicki, D., & Janc, K. (2021). Obszary intensywnych powiązań funkcjonalnych miast na prawach powiatu w Polsce - autorska metoda delimitacji. Przegląd Geograficzny, 93(2), 141-160. https://doi.org/10.7163/PrzG.2021.2.1
Jacobs, J. (2016). Spatial planning in cross-border regions: A systems-theoretical perspective. Planning Theory, 15(1), 68-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095214547149
Johansson, A. (2013). Societal risk and safety management - Policy diffusion, management structures and perspectives at the municipal level in Sweden. Doctoral Dissertation. Karlstad: Karlstad University Press. Retrieved from https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:618234/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Kociuba, D. (2012). Territorial cohesion of Polish border areas - Spatial planning aspect. Studia Regionalia, 33, 97-113.
Komornicki, T., Wiśniewski, R., & Miszczuk, A. (2019). Delimitacja przygranicznych obszarów problemowych. Przegląd Geograficzny, 91(4), 467-486. https://doi.org/10.7163/PrzG.2019.4.2
Miszczuk, A. (2013). Uwarunkowania peryferyjności regionu przygranicznego. Lublin: Norbertinum.
Namyślak, B., & Spallek, W. (2021). Koncentracja przestrzenna działalności twórczych a lokalizacja klastrów kreatywnych w Polsce. Przegląd Geograficzny, 93(4), 515-531. https://doi.org/10.7163/PrzG.2021.4.2
Nowak, M. (2023). Problemy polskiego system planowania przestrzennego w świetle dyskusji międzynarodowej na temat porównań krajowych systemów planowania przestrzennego. Kluczowe tezy i wnioski. Studia BAS, 1(73), 9-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.31268/StudiaBAS.2023.02
Nowak, M., Śleszyński, P., & Legutko-Kobus, P. (2022). Spatial Planning in Poland: Law, Property Market and Planning Practice. Cham: Springer.
Pallagst, K., & Hartz, A. (2022). Spatial planning in border regions: A balancing act between new guiding principles and old planning traditions? In K., Pallagst, A., Hartz & B., Caesar (Eds.). Border Futures - Zukunft Grenze - Avenir Frontière: The future viability of cross-border cooperation (pp. 77-95). Hannover: ARL - Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
Pallagst, K.M. (2016). Spatial planning for border regions: Different planning problems - different planning styles? Conference Paper.
Perperidou, D.-G. (2021). Spatial planning in Greece: From the past to the economic crisis & the future. Proceedings of the FIG-e-Working Week 2021. Smart Surveyors for Land and Water Management - Challenges in a New Reality. Virtually in the Netherlands, 21-25 June 2021.
Peyrony, J., & Denert, O. (2012). Planning for cross-border territories: The Role played by spatial information. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, Spatial Research and Planning, 70(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-012-0156-0
Pineo, H., Zimmermann, N., & Davies, M. (2020). Integrating health into the complex urban planning policy and decision-making context: A systems thinking analysis. Palgrave Communications, 6(21). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0398-3
Rosner, A., & Wesołowska, M. (2022). Zmiany zaludnienia obszarów wiejskich w Polsce a ich poziom rozwoju społeczno-gospodarczego. Przegląd Geograficzny, 94(2), 175-198. https://doi.org/10.7163/PrzG.2022.2.1
Sharifi, A., & Khavarian-Garmsir, A. R. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic: Impacts on cities and major lessons for urban planning, design, and management. Science of The Total Environment, 749, 142391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142391
Sitek, S. (2016). Uwarunkowania rozwoju lokalnego na obszarach przygranicznych. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Statistics Poland (2023). Local Data Bank. Retrieved from https://bdl.stat.gov.pl/bdl/start
Śleszyński, P. (2017). Wyznaczenie i typologia miast średnich tracących funkcje społeczno-gospodarcze. Przegląd Geograficzny, 89(4), 565-593. https://doi.org/10.7163/PrzG.2017.4.3
Śleszyński, P. (2021). Syntetyczny Wskaźnik Jakości Życia w gminach Polski na początku trzeciej dekady XXI wieku. Czasopismo Geograficzne, 92(2), 325-352. https://doi.org/10.12657/czageo-92-14
Śleszyński, P., Bański, J., Degórski, M., & Komornicki, T. (2017). Delimitation of problem areas in Poland. Geographia Polonica, 90(2), 131-138. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0088
Śleszyński, P., Herbst, M., Komornicki, T., Wiśniewski, R., Bański, J., Biedka, W., Celińska-Janowicz, D., Degórski, M., Goch, K., Goliszek, S., Grabowska, M., Mazur, M., Olechnicka, A., Otmianowski, M., Piotrowski, F., Płoszaj, A., Rok, J., Smętkowski, M., Stępień, M., Śliwowski, P., Więckowski, M., & Wojnar, K. (2020). Studia nad obszarami problemowymi w Polsce. Studia. Cykl Monografii, 7/199. Warsaw: Komitet Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Kraju PAN.
Śleszyński, P., Khavarian-Garmsir, A. R., Nowak, M., Legutko-Kobus, P., Abadi, M. H. H., & Nasiri, N. A. (2023). COVID-19 spatial policy: A Comparative review of urban policies in the European Union and the Middle East. Sustainability, 15(3), 2286. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032286
Śleszyński, P., Legutko-Kobus, P., Rosenberg, M., Pantyley, V., & Nowak, M. J. (2022). Assessing urban policies in a COVID-19 world. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 5322. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095322
Thoidou, E. (2013). Strategic spatial planning in the era of crisis: Current trends and evidence from the metropolitan area of Thessaloniki. Spatium, 30, 12-17. https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT1330012T
Vezyriannidou, S., & Portokalidis, K. (2018). Special Spatial Plans VS Local Spatial Plans. Towards a new vision of planning system at the local level in Greece, during the period of economic crisis. RELAND: International Journal of Real Estate & Land Planning, 1, 402-408. https://doi.org/10.26262/reland.v1i0.6504
Xenia, K., & Pavlos-Marinos, D. (2017). The Interrelation between spatial planning policies and safety in the multi-risk insular setting of Santorini. Conference 'Cities and regions in a changing Europe: Challenges and prospects. 54th Colloquium of the ASRDLF, 15th Conference of the ERSA Greek section, Athens.
Yang, Y., Zhang, W., Cao, W., & Mu, Y. (2021). Territory spatial planning of Western China from the perspective of national security: Perfect system and basic orientation. Journal of Natural Resources, 36, 2264-2280. https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20210907

Relation:

Europa XXI

Volume:

45

Start page:

61

End page:

76

Detailed Resource Type:

Artykuł

Format:

application/octet-stream

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:240995 ; 1429-7132 (print) ; 2300-8547 (online) ; 10.7163/Eu21.2023.45.5

Source:

CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Language of abstract:

eng

Rights:

Licencja Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0

Terms of use:

Zasób chroniony prawem autorskim. [CC BY 4.0 Międzynarodowe] Korzystanie dozwolone zgodnie z licencją Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0, której pełne postanowienia dostępne są pod adresem: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Polskiej Akademii Nauk

Original in:

Centralna Biblioteka Geografii i Ochrony Środowiska Instytutu Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania PAN

Projects co-financed by:

Unia Europejska. Europejski Fundusz Rozwoju Regionalnego ; Program Operacyjny Innowacyjna Gospodarka, lata 2010-2014, Priorytet 2. Infrastruktura strefy B + R

Access:

Otwarty