• Search in all Repository
  • Literature and maps
  • Archeology
  • Mills database
  • Natural sciences

Search in Repository

How to search...

Advanced search

Search in Literature and maps

How to search...

Advanced search

Search in Archeology

How to search...

Advanced search

Search in Mills database

How to search...

Advanced search

Search in Natural sciences

How to search...

Advanced search

RCIN and OZwRCIN projects

Object

Title: Perception of the (post-)socialist mass housing in Kyiv by the student youth

Subtitle:

Geographia Polonica Vol. 96 No. 2 (2023)

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

24 cm

Abstract:

This paper describes and analyses the imageability and the perceptual portraits of the (post-)socialist largescale housing estates in Kyiv in the eyes of young people (university students). The research is based on the analysis of Lynch-type mental maps focusing on urban vernacular districts among the other their principal elements. The results show that mass housing areas still constitute an important part of the city’s image. However, apparently similar neighbourhoods differ significantly in terms of their imageability and likeability depending on their location in the city and the trajectory of the post-socialist development. Consequently, individual approaches to positive image change based on the complex evaluation of development factors are needed to response the challenges faced by the different types of the (post-)socialist mass housing.

References:

Abercrombie, P. (1944). Greater London Plan. London: H.M. Stationery Office.
Balducci, A., Dugény, F., & Selmini, R. (Eds.) (2007). Planning and urban design for crime prevention. Milano.
Belli, N. (2020). From construction to deconstruction. The heritage of post-war modern mass housing. Architecture and Urban Planning, 16, 93-98. https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2020-0014 DOI
Belogolovsky, V., & Novikov, F. (2010). Sovietskij Modernizm, 1955-1985 (Soviet Modernism, 1955-1985). Ekaterinburg: Tatlin. [in Russian]
Benkő, M. (2012). Evaluating factors in the image of housing estates. Architecture, 43(1), 33-36. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPar.7155 DOI
Bernt, M. (2007). Neither normalisation, nor decay: housing estates in Eastern Germany. In B. Komar & B. Kucharczyk-Brus (Eds.), Housing and Environmental Conditions in Post-Communist Countries (pp. 41-55). Gliwice: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej.
Bolt, G. (2018). Who is to blame for the decline of large housing estates? An exploration of socio-demographic and ethnic change. In D. Hess, T. Tammaru, T., M. van Ham (Eds.), Housing Estates in Europe (pp. 57-74). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92813-5_3 DOI
Borén, T., & Gentile, M. (2007). Metropolitan processes in post-Communist states: An introduction. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 89(2), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00242.x DOI
Breitbart, M. (1995). Banners for the street: Reclaiming space and designing change with urban youth. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 15, 35-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9501500103 DOI
Brunn, S. D., Dronova, O., & Kononenko, O. (2021). Slavutych atomograd as the last ideal city of the USSR: Challenges and adaptation mechanisms of resilience. GeoJournal, 86, 2887-2903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10236-x DOI
Buriak, O., Vihdorovich, O., Gayevyi, Y., & Golovchenko, A. (2020). Innovative approaches in the period of mass industrial development (on the example of residential areas of Kharkiv). IOP Conference. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 907. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/907/1/012013 DOI
Christensen, C. (1986). The American garden city and the New Towns movement. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Research Press.
Czepczyński, M. (2008). Cultural landscapes of post-socialist cities. Representation of powers and needs. Burlington: Ashgate. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315575315 DOI
Dekker, K., & Van Kempen, R. (2004). Large housing estates in Europe: Current situation and developments. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 95(5), 570-577. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0040-747x.2004.00340.x DOI
Dillabough, J. A., & Kennelly, J. (2010). Lost youth in the global city: Class, culture, and the urban imaginary. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203858332 DOI
Dolata, M., & Kotus, J. (2006). Social production of urban space (a case study of 'bad' areas in Poznań). Geographia Polonica, 79(2), 5-22.
Drėmaitė, M. (2017). Baltic modernism: Architecture and housing in Soviet Lithuania. Berlin: DOM Publishers.
Dronova, O., & Brunn, S. D. (2018). How neoliberal globalization processes are transforming Kyiv's nodal areas. Urbani Izziv, 29(2), 96-110. https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2018-29-02-003 DOI
Dronova, O., Klyui, K., & Khomenko, D. (2021). From neoliberal practices to the participative democracy of integrated urban development: The path of residential housing in "Liko-Grad" Kyiv. Ekonomichna ta Sotsialna Geografiya, 85, 72-85. https://doi.org/10.17721/2413-7154/2021.85.72-85 DOI
Dronova, O., & Maruniak, E. (2018). Changing the symbolic language of the urban landscape: Post-socialist transformation in Kyiv. In S. D. Brunn, & R. Kehrein (Eds.) Handbook of the changing world language map (pp. 2941-2972). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02438-3_117 DOI
Džervus, P. (2013). Postmodern discourse of post-Soviet large housing districts: Modelling the possibilities. Architecture and Urban Planning, 7, 51-58. https://doi.org/10.7250/aup.2013.006
Freestone, R., & Liu, E. (Eds). (2016). Place and placelessness revisited. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676456 DOI
French, R. A. (1995). Plans, pragmatism and people. The legacy of Soviet planning for today's cities. London: UCL Press.
Gerodimos, R. (2018). Youth and the city: Reflective photography as a tool of urban voice. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 10(1), 82-103. DOI
Gnatiuk, O., Kononenko, O., & Mezentsev, K. (2022). Kyiv metro and urban imageability: A student youth vision. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Geographia, 57(1), 255-268. https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2022.2 DOI
Gnatiuk, O., & Kryvets, O. (2018). Post-Soviet residential neighbourhoods in two second-order Ukrainian cities: Factors and models of spatial transformation. Geographica Pannonica, 22(2), 104-120. https://doi.org/10.5937/22-17037 DOI
Gold, J. R. (2019). Athens Charter (C.I.A.M.), 1933. In A. M. Orum (Ed.), The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118568446.eurs0013 DOI
Golubchikov, O. (2016). The urbanization of transition: Ideology and the urban experience. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 57(4-5), 607-623. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2016.1248461 DOI
Golubchikov, O., Badyina, A., & Makhrova, A. (2014). The hybrid spatialities of transition: Capitalism, legacy and uneven urban economic restructuring. Urban Studies, 51(4), 617-633. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013493022 DOI
Gorbunova, L. A., Ambrasat, J., & Von Scheve, C. (2015). Neighborhood stereotypes and interpersonal trust in social exchange: An experimental study. City & Community, 14(2), 206-225. https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12112 DOI
Gunko, M., Bogacheva, P., Medvedev, A., & Kashnitsky, I. (2018). Path-dependent development of mass housing in Moscow, Russia. In D. Hess, T. Tammaru, T., M. van Ham (Eds.), Housing Estates in Europe (289-331). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92813-5_13 DOI
Hall, T., & Viden, S. (2005). The Million Homes Programme: A review of the great Swedish planning project. Planning Perspectives, 20, 301-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665430500130233 DOI
Havryliuk, O. (2022). Neighbourhood (dis)satisfaction in a former closed Soviet city: The case of Dnipro(petrovsk), Ukraine. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series, 57, 23-44. https://doi.org/10.12775/bgss-2022-0021 DOI
Herfert, G., Neugebauer, C. S., & Smigiel, C. (2013). Living in residential satisfaction? Insights from large-scale housing estates in Central and Eastern Europe. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 104(1), 57-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2012.00727.x DOI
Hess, D. B. (2018). Transport in mikrorayons: Accessibility and proximity to centrally planned residential districts during the socialist era, 1957-1989. Journal of Planning History, 17(3), 184-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538513217707082 DOI
Hirt, S., & Stanilov, K. (2009). Twenty years of transition: The evolution of urban planning in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, 1989-2009. Nairobi: UNON Print Shop.
Kährik, A., & Tammaru, T. (2010). Soviet prefabricated panel housing estates: Areas of continued social mix or decline? The Case of Tallinn. Housing Studies, 25(2), 201-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030903561818 DOI
Kempen, R., Musterd, S., & Rowlands, R. (2009). Deepening crisis or homes for the future? Some reflections and implications for policies in large housing estates. In R. Rowlands, S. Musterd, & R. Kempen (Eds.), Mass Housing in Europe (pp. 265-278). https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274723_11 DOI
Kononenko, O., & Gnatiuk, O. (2022). Miski vernakularni rajony: metodyka vydilennia na osnovi analizu mentalnykh kart (Urban vernacular districts: methodology of identification based on the analysis of mental maps). Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Series "Geographical Sciences", 17, 36-49. [in Ukrainian] https://doi.org/10.32999/ksu2413-7391/2022-17-3 DOI
Kovács, Z., & Douglas, M. (2004). Hungary: From socialist ideology to market reality. In R. Turkington, R. van Kempen, & F. Wassenber (Eds.), Highrise Housing in Europe: Current Trends and Future Prospects. Housing and Urban Policy Studies (pp. 231-248). Delft: University Press.
Kovács, Z., & Herfert, G. (2012). Development pathways of large housing estates in post-socialist cities: An international comparison. Housing Studies, 27(3), 324-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2012.651105 DOI
Lelévrier, C., & Melic, T. (2018). Impoverishment and social fragmentation in housing estates of the Paris region, France. In D. Hess, T. Tammaru, T., M. van Ham (Eds.), Housing Estates in Europe (pp. 313-338). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92813-5_14 DOI
Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Marin, V., & Chelcea, L. (2018). The many (still) functional housing estates of Bucharest, Romania: A viable housing provider in Europe's densest capital city. In D. Hess, T. Tammaru, T., M. van Ham (Eds.), Housing Estates in Europe (167-190). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92813-5_8 DOI
Mezentsev, K., Gentile, M., Mezentseva, N., & Stebletska, I. (2019). An island of civilization in a sea of delay? Indifference and fragmentation along the rugged shorelines of Kiev's newbuild archipelago. Journal of Urban Affairs, 41(5), 654-678. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1503544 DOI
Mezentsev, K., & Stebletska, Y. (2017). Zhytlovi masyvy sotsialistychnoho mista: mynule ta majbutnie "khruschovok" Kyjeva (Residential neighbourhoods of a socialist city: the past and future of "khrushchevkas" in Kyiv). In K. Mezentsev, Y. Oliynyk, & N. Mezentseva (Eds.), Urbanistychna Ukrajina: v epitsentri prostorovykh zmin (Urban Ukraine: In the epicentre of spatial changes) (pp. 227-240). Kyiv: Feniks. [in Ukrainian]
Mezentseva, N., & Mezentsev, K. (2017). Vstup: zminy miskoho prostoru stolytsi (Introduction: Changes of the urban space in the capital). In K. Mezentsev, Y. Oliynyk, & N. Mezentseva (Eds.), Urbanistychna Ukrajina: v epitsentri prostorovykh zmin (Urban Ukraine: In the epicentre of spatial changes) (pp. 181-184). Kyiv: Feniks. [in Ukrainian]
Moffatt, S., & Kohler, N. (2008). Conceptualizing the built environment as a social-ecological system. Building Research & Information, 36(3), 248-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210801928131 DOI
Monclús, J., & Díez Medina, C. (2018). Modern urban planning and modernist urbanism. In C. Díez Medina & J. Monclús (Eds.), Urban Visions (pp. 33-46). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59047-9_4 DOI
Monclús, J., Díez Medina, C., & García-Pérez, S. (2018). Modernist mass housing in Europe: Comparative perspectives in Western and Eastern cities (1950s-1970s). In C. Díez Medina & J. Monclús (Eds.), Urban Visions (pp. 67-78). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59047-9_7 DOI
Morello, E., & Ratti, C. (2009). A digital image of the city: 3D isovists in Lynch's urban analysis. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36(5), 837-853. https://doi.org/10.1068/b34144t DOI
Murie, A., Tosics, I., Aalbers, M., Sendi, R., & Cernic Mali, B. (2005). Privatisation and after. In R. van Kempen, K. Dekker, S. Hall, & I. Tosics (Eds.), Restructuring Large Housing Estates in Europe: Restructuring and Resistance inside the Welfare Industry (pp. 84-103). Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9qgmvx.10 DOI
Musterd, S., & van Kempen, R. (2007). Trapped or on the springboard? Housing careers in large housing estates in European cities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 29(3), 311-329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2007.00345.x DOI
Nasar, L. J. (1998). The evaluative image of the city. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.
Nawrocki, T. (2017). The usefulness of mental maps for sociological research of the city. Architecture, Civil Engineering, Environment, 10(3), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.21307/acee-2017-032 DOI
Pleshkanovska, A., & Biriuk, S. (2021). "Outdated housing stock" as an object of complex reconstruction programs and projects: Challenges for Ukraine. Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis, 13(2), 257-280. https://doi.org/10.37043/JURA.2021.13.2.4 DOI
Prigge, W. (2008). Reading the urban revolution: Space and representation. In K. Goonewardena, S. Kipfer, R. Milgrom, & Ch. Schmid (Eds.), Space, Difference, Everyday Life (pp. 60-75). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203933213 DOI
Ruoppila, S., & Kährik, A. (2003). Socio-economic residential differentiation in postsocialist Tallinn. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 18(1), 49-73. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022435000258 DOI
Santo, C. A., Ferguson, N., & Trippel, A. (2010). Engaging urban youth through technology: The youth neighborhood mapping initiative. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 30(1), 52-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X10366427 DOI
Stebletska, Yu. (2014). Planuvannia rozvytku mista Kyjeva: istoryko-heohrafichni aspekty (Planning of Kyiv development: historical-geographical aspects). Visnyk kyivskogo natsionalnogo universytetu, Geografiya / Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Geography, 62(1), 70-73. [in Ukrainian] https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2721.2014.62.17 DOI
Sýkora, L., & Bouzarovski, S. (2012). Multiple transformations: Conceptualising the post-communist urban transition. Urban Studies, 49(1), 43-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010397402 DOI
Szelényi, I. (1996). Cities under socialism and after. In G. Andrusz, M. Harloe, & I. Szelényi (Eds.), Cities after Socialism: Urban and Regional Change and Conflict in Post-Socialist Societies (pp. 286-317). Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470712733.ch10 DOI
Temelová, J., Novák, J., Ourednícek, M., & Puldová, P. (2011). Housing estates in the Czech Republic after Socialism: Various trajectories and inner differentiation. Urban Studies, 48(9), 1811-1834. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010379279 DOI
Ušča, M. (2010). Urban activity spaces: The case of a post-Soviet neighbourhood in Riga. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 121, 583-593. https://doi.org/10.2495/sc100491 DOI
van Altena, V., Meijboom, J., & Tiessens, W. (2007). The Image Project - New tools for neighbourhood regeneration. City of Delft: Delft.
Wassenberg, F. (2013). Large housing estates: Ideas, rise, fall and recovery. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Węcławowicz, G. (1998). Social polarisation in postsocialist cities: Budapest, Prague and Warsaw. In G. Enyedi (Ed.), Social Change and Urban Restructuring in Central Europe (pp. 55-66). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Yargina, Z., & Khachatryants, K. (1990). Sotsyal'nyje osnovy arkhitekturnogo proektirovanija (Social fundamentals of architectural design). Moscow: Strojizdat. [in Russian].

Relation:

Geographia Polonica

Volume:

96

Issue:

2

Start page:

199

End page:

220

Detailed Resource Type:

Article

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:239073 ; doi:10.7163/GPol.0253 ; 0016-7282 (print) ; 2300-7362 (online) ; 10.7163/GPol.0253

Source:

CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.2085, Cz.2173, Cz.2406 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Language of abstract:

eng

Rights:

Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. [CC BY 4.0] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license, full text available at: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

European Union. European Regional Development Fund ; Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure

Access:

Open

×

Citation

Citation style:

This page uses 'cookies'. More information