Self-Silencing Strategies in Casual Conversations about Politics in Rural Poland

Malewska-Szałygin, Anna

doi:0137-4079

Skip to main menu
Skip to search engine
Skip to content
Skip to footer

Download

Title: Self-Silencing Strategies in Casual Conversations about Politics in Rural Poland

Abstract:

Self-silencing can be a discursive strategy for presenting personal opinions in casual conversations about politics, especially when these take place in an unpredictable or hostile socio-political environment. In such situations, political identities may be performed through the use of inferred forms, such as allusion, irony or implicit suggestion. In this article, forms of muting one’s voice by using indirect speech are tracked in interviews conducted among villagers in the mountainous Nowy Targ county in southern Poland at the beginning of the 21st century. The aim in presenting these examples is to show that sometimes selfsilencing can serve to make an adversary’s voice more audible, to help avoid definitive judgement and to create space for an exchange of opinions

References:

Berezin, Mabel. 2001. “Emotions and Political Identity: Mobilizing Affection for the Polity”. In Passionate Politics. Emotions and Social Movement, edited by Jeff Goodwin, James M. Jasper and Francesca Polletta, 83–99. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press
Edison, John R., Dereje Feyissa, Veronika Fuest, Markus V. Hoehne, Boris Nieswand, Günter Schlee, and Olaf Zenker. 2017. “From Identification to Framing and Alignment. A New Approach to the Comparative Analysis of Collective Identities.” Current Anthropology 59 (3): 340–359
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis. The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman
Geertz, Clifford. 1983. Local Knowledge: Further Essays on Interpretive Anthropology. Chicago: Basic Books
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay in the Organisation of Experience. Boston: North-eastern University Press
Gumperz, John J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Hammersley, Martin, and Paul Atkinson. 1995. Ethnography, Principles in Practice. London: Routledge
Herzfeld, Michael. 1996. Cultural Intimacy. Social Poetics in the Nation-State. New York, London: Routledge
Hymes, Dell. 1962. “The Ethnography of Speaking.” In Anthropology and Human Behaviour, edited by Thomas Gladwin and William C. Sturtevant, 13–53. Washington, D.C.: Anthropology Society of Washington
Hymes, D.H. 1963. “Toward a History of Linguistic Anthropology.” Anthropological Linguistics 5 (1): 59–103
Hymes, Dell. 2003. Now I Know Only so Far: Essays in Ethnopoetics. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press
Kvale, Steinar. 2007. Doing Interviews. London, Los Angeles, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington D. C.: SAGE Publication
Mouffe, Chantal. 1992. “Citizenship and Political Identity. The Identity in Question.” October 61: 28–32
Mouffe, Chantal. 2005. On the Political. Thinking in Action. London, New York: Routledge
Oesterreich, L. Peter. 2001. “Irony.” In Encyclopaedia of Rhetoric, edited by Thomas O. Sloane, 404–406. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Pasieka, Agnieszka. 2017. “Taking Far-Right Claims Seriously and Literally Anthropology and the Study of Right-Wing Radicalism.” Slavic Review 76: 19–30
Pipes, Daniel. 1997. Conspiracy: How the Paranoid Style Flourishes and Where It Comes From. Touchstone: Free Press
Scott, James. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press
Tyler, Stephen A. 1978. The Said and The Unsaid: Mind, Meaning and Culture. New York: Academic Press
Tyler, Stephen A. 1987. The Unspeakable: Discourse, Dialogue and Rhetoric in the Postmodern World. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth, Wodak. 2016. “The Discourse-Historical Approach”. In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 23–61. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications
Van Dijk, Teun. 1998. Discourse as Structure and Process. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications