Geographia Polonica Vol. 94 No. 4 (2021)
This paper demonstrates a way to examine the transformation of the territorial shape of the region. The official symbols (flags and emblems) of modern administrative units of Ukraine were analyzed for the usage of heraldic symbols of historical regions that lost their administrative status a century before. The results confirm more or less constant symbolic reproduction of historical regions, but their spatial shapes has changed under the influence of new administrative boundaries. Simultaneously, in certain cases historical heraldry loses its former meaning and is involved into the development and strengthening of identities with new administrative regions rather than historical ones.
Chalupa, J. (2015). Historickogeografická česko-moravská zemská hranice: rekonstrukce, percepce, významy. (Master's thesis). Praha: Charles University.
Chromý, P. (2003). Formování regionální identity: nezbytná součást geografických výzkumů. In V. Jančák, P. Chromý, M. Marada (Eds.), Geografie na cestách poznání (pp. 163-178). Praha: Charles University.
Chromý, P., Kučerová, S., Kučera, Z. (2009). Regional identity, contemporary and historical regions and the issue of relict borders - the case of Czechia. Regions and Regionalism, 9(2), 9-19.
Cresswell, T. (2013). Geographic thought. A critical introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Dobysh, M., Yatsenko, B. (2020). Borders, constituency politics, and "our man" voting in electoral geography of Ukraine. Belgeo, 2. https://doi.org/10.4000/belgeo.38851
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gnatiuk, O. (2014). Nazvi pìdpriêmstv ta organìzacìj Ukraïni âk marker teritorìal'noï ìdentičnostì naselennâ (The names of enterprises and organizations of Ukraine as a marker of the territorial identity). Kiïvs'kij geografìčnij ŝorìčnik / Kyiv Geographical Almanac, 9, 67-77. [in Ukrainian]
Gnatiuk, O., Melnychuk, A. (2019). Identities with historical regions - are they adapting to modern administrative division? The case of Ukraine. European Spatial Research and Policy, 26(1), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.26.1.09
Graham, B. (2000): The past in place: Historical geographies of identity. In B. Graham and C. Nash (Eds.), Modern historical geographies (pp. 70-99). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Grechylo, A. (2000). Teritorіalʹnі simvoli Galicʹko-Volinsʹkoї deržavi drugoї polovini XІІІ - počatku XIV stolіtʹ (Territorial symbols of the Galicia-Volhynia State in the second half of the XIII - beginning of the XIV centuries). Zapiski Naukovogo tovaristva ìmenì Ševčenka / Notes of Shevchenko Scientific Society, 240, 255-263. [in Ukrainian]
Grechylo, A. (2004). Contemporary flags of the Ukrainian regions: Old traditions and new designs. In Proceedings of the XX International Congress of Vexillology. Stockholm, 27th July to 1st August 2003 (pp. 233-255). Bergen.
Grechylo, A. (2008). Sučasnì simvoli oblastej Ukraïni (Contemporary symbols of Ukrainian Regions. Kyiv-Lviv). [in Ukrainian]
Grechylo, A. (2010). Ukraïns'ka teritorìal'na geral'dika (Ukrainian Territorial Heraldry). Lviv. [in Ukrainian]
Homanyuk, M. (2016). Zatavrovanij Pìvden': vìd Gerodota do dekomunìzacìï (The Tavria-marked South: From Herodotus to decommunization). Kritika, 1-2 (219-220), 2-7. [in Ukrainian]
Homanyuk, M. (2017). Panaceâ tavrii: toponim "Priâtnyj vo vseh otnošeniâh" (Tavria as a panacea: A toponym "pleasant in all respects"). Vìsnik Harkìvs'kogo nacìonal'nogo unìversitetu ìmenì V.N. Karazìna. Serìâ "Socìologìčnì doslìdžennâ sučasnogo suspìl'stva: metodologìâ, teorìâ, metodi" / Visnyk of V. N. Karazin National University. Series "Sociological Studies of Contemporary Society: Methodology, Theory, Methods", 39, 209-214. [in Russian]
Homanyuk, M. (2019). "Battle for Tavria": A historical region in politics and in the market of goods and services. Ekonomichna ta Sotsialna Geografiya, 82, 20-26. https://doi.org/10.17721/2413-7154/2019.82.20-26
Homanyuk, M. (2020). Vernakulârnye regiony i gosudarstvennye ideologii. Tavrijskij kejs (Vernacular regions and state ideologies: the Tavria case). Ideology and Politics Journal, 1(15): 12-32. https://doi.org/10.36169/2227-6068.2020.01.00002 [In Russian]
Jańczak, J. (2015). Phantom borders and electoral behavior in Poland historical legacies, political culture and their influence on contemporary politics. Erdkunde, 69(2), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.2015.02.03
Kasala, K., Šifta, M. (2017). The region as a concept: traditional and constructivist view. AUC Geographica, 52(2), 111-121. https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2017.17
Kašková, M., Chromý, P. (2014). Regional product labelling as part of the region formation process. The case of Czechia. AUC Geographica, 49(2), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2014.18
Kolosov, V., Więckowski, M. (2018). Border changes in Central and Eastern Europe: An introduction. Geographica Polonica, 91(1), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0106
Kowalski, M. (1999). Electoral geography in Poland. In Spatial Research in Support of the EuropeanIntegration (pp. 87-95). Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies.
Kowalski, M. (2019). Spatial differences in voting behaviour among the inhabitants of rural areas in Eastern Europe. In J. Bański (Ed.), Three Decades of Transformation in the East-Central European Countryside (pp. 143-163). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21237-7_7
Kowalski, M. (2020). The Early Mediaeval Slav-German border (Limes Sorabicus) in the light of research into Y-chromosome polymorphism in contemporary and historical German populations. Geographia Polonica, 93(4), 569-596. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0190
Krykun, M. (1993). Admìnìstrativno-teritorìal'nij ustrìj Pravoberežnoï Ukraïni v XV-XVIII st. Kordoni voêvodstv u svìtlì džerel (Administrative territorial division of the right-bank Ukraine in XV-XVIII Centuries. The boundaries of voivodeships in view of sources). Kyiv: MP Ofort. [in Ukrainian]
Kysliak, V., Neskoromnyi, O. (Eds.). (2010). Ukraïna: herby ta prapory (Ukraine: Coats of arms and flags). Kyiv: Parliamentary Publishing House. [in Ukrainian]
Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Marek, P. (2015). Vnímání reliktní hranice na příkladu severní části česko-moravské zemské hranice. (Master's thesis). Brno: Masaryk University.
Marek, P. (2020). Region as a social construct and the critical discussion of the Paasi's conceptualization of regional identity. Geografie, 125(1), 47-68. https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2020125010047
Marek, P. (2020). Transformation of the identity of a region: Theory and the empirical case of the perceptual regions of Bohemia and Moravia, Czech Republic. Moravian Geographical Reports, 28(3), 154-169. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2020-0012
Markeliuk, A., Homanyuk, M., Sarkisov, A. (2019). Kartografìčna ìnterpretacìâ danih socìologìčnogo doslìdžennâ pri vivčennì socìal'noï percepcìï prostoru (Cartographic interpretation of sociological data in the study of social perception of space). Naukovì zapiski Hersons'kogo vìddìlu Ukraïns'kogo geografìčnogo tovaristva / Scientific Notes of the Kherson Department of the Ukrainian Geographical Society, 11, 97-104. [in Ukrainian]
Melnychuk, A., Gnatiuk, O. (2018). Regional identity and the renewal of spatial administrative structures: The case of Podolia, Ukraine. Moravian Geographical Reports, 26(1), 42-54. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2018-0004
Melnychuk, A., Gnatiuk, O., Rastvorova, M. (2014). Use of territorial identity markers in geographical researches. Scientific Annals of "Alexandru Ioan Cuza" University of Iasi - Geography Series, 60(1), 157-184.
Mezentseva, N., Mezentsev, K. (2005). Percepcìjnì portreti regìonìv Ukraïni (Perceptual portraits of Ukrainian regions). In Regìonal'nì problemi Ukraïni: geografìčnij analìz ta pošuk šlâhìv virìšennâ (Regional problems of Ukraine: geographical analysis and search for solutions) (pp. 208-213). Kherson: PP Vyshemyrskyi. [in Ukrainian]
Rudenko, L., Paton, B. (Eds.). (2007). Nacìonal'nij Atlas Ukraïni (National Atlas of Ukraine). Kyiv: DNVP Kartohrafija. [In Ukrainian].
Neumann, I.B. (1994). A region-building approach to Northern Europe. Review of International Studies, 20(1), 53-74.
Nowak, K. (2018). The impact of the voivodeship boundaries on regional identity and perception of the Małopolska and Śląsk regions. Studia Regionalne i Lokalne, 1(71), 62-81. https://doi.org/10.7366/1509499517104
Oliinyk, Ya., Gnatiuk, O. (2013). Metodičnì pìdhodi do doslìdžennâ teritorìal'noï ìdentičnostì naselennâ (Methodical approaches to the study of population territorial identity). Ukraïns'kij Geografìčnij žurnal / Ukrainian Geographical Journal, 3, 34-40. [In Ukrainian]
Paasi, A. (1986). The institutionalization of regions: a theoretical framework for understanding the emergence of regions and the constitution of regional identity. Fennia, 164(1), 105-146.
Paasi, A. (1991). Deconstructing regions: notes on the scales of spatial life. Environment and Planning A, 23(2), 239-256. https://doi.org/10.1068/a230239
Paasi, A. (2001). Europe as a social process and discourse: considerations of place, boundaries and identity. European Urban and Regional Studies, 8(1), 7-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/096977640100800102
Paasi, A. (2002). Bounded spaces in the mobile world: deconstructing "regional identity". Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 93(2), 137-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00190
Paasi, A. (2009). The resurgence of the "region" and "regional identity": theoretical perspectives and empirical observations on regional dynamics in Europe. Review of International Studies, 35(11), 121-146. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210509008456
Paasi, A. (2011). The region, identity, and power. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 14, 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.011
Paasi, A., Metzger, J. (2017). Foregrounding the region. Regional Studies, 51(1), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1239818
Paasi, A., Zimmerbauer, K. (2011). Theory and practice of the region: a contextual analysis of the transformation of Finnish regions. Treballs de la SCG, 71-72, 163-178.
Pred, A. (1984). Place as historically contingent process: Structuration and the time- geography of becoming places. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 74(2), 279-297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1984.tb01453.x
Raagmaa, G. (2002). Regional identity in regional development and planning. European Planning Studies, 10(1), 55-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310120099263
Reed, J.S., Kohls, J., Hanchette, C. (1990). The dissolution of Dixie and the changing shape of the South. Social Forces, 69(1), 221-233. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/69.1.221
Semian, M. (2012). Searching for the territorial shape of a region in regional consciousness: The Český ráj (Bohemian Paradise), Czech Republic. Moravian Geographical Reports, 20(2), 25-35.
Semian, M. (2016). Region in its complexity: A discussion on constructivist approaches. AUC Geographica, 51(2), 179-188. https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2016.15
Semian, M., Chromý, P., Kučera, Z. (2016). Name as a regional brand: The case of local action groups in Czechia. Journal of Language and Politics, 15, 768-789. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.6.06sem
Šerý, M. (2014). The identification of residents with their region and the continuity of socio-historical development. Moravian Geographical Reports, 22, 53-64. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2014-0018
Šerý, M., Šimáček, P. (2012). Perception of the historical border between Moravia and Silesia by residents of the Jeseník area as a partial aspect of their regional identity (Czech Republic). Moravian Geographical Reports, 20(2), 36-46.
Simon, C., Huigen, P., Groote, P. (2010). Analysing regional identities in the Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 101(4), 409-421. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2009.00564.x
Siwek, T., Kaňok, J. (2000). Mapping Silesian identity in Czechia. Geografie, 105(2), 190-200.
Šifta, M. (2016). Graphic symbols and local identity: the case of use and perception of municipal emblems in the Liberec Region (Czechia). Geografisk Tidsskrift - Danish Journal of Geography, 116(2), 147-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167223.2016.1188021
Šifta, M., Chromý, P. (2017). The importance of symbols in the region formation process. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography, 71(2), 98-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2017.1317285
UHS. (2020). Territorial symbols. Ukrainian Heraldry Society. [20 October 2020] http://uht.org.ua/en/part/terytot/
Vaishar, A., Zapletalová, J. (2016). Regional identities of Czech historical lands, Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 65, 15-25. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.65.1.2
Vukosav, B. (2011). Geographic name Zagora and its reference to areas in the Dalmatian hinterland in the selected newspaper medium. Geoadria, 16(2), 261-281. https://doi.org/10.15291/geoadria.289
Vukosav, B., Fuerst-Bjeliš, B. (2016). Labels of interest groups as indicators of a vernacular region: A case study in Croatia. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 107(4), 454-467. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12168
Więckowski, M. (2021). How border tripoints offer opportunities for transboundary tourism development. Tourism Geographies, https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2021.1878268
Zarycki, T. (1999). The persistence of the borders on the territory of Poland. In O. Brednikova, V. Voronkov (Eds.), Nomadic Borders (pp. 141-145). St. Petersburg: Centre for Independent Social Research. 53-57.
Zarycki, T. (2015). The electoral geography of Poland: Between stable spatial structures and their changing interpretations. Erdkunde, 69(2), 107-124. https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.2015.02.02
Zelinsky, W. (1980). North America's vernacular regions. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 70(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01293.x
Zimmerbauer, K. (2011). From image to identity: Building regions by place promotion. European Planning Studies, 19(2), 243-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.532667
Zimmerbauer, K., Paasi, A. (2013). When old and new regionalism collide: Deinstitutionalization of regions and resistance identity in municipality amalgamations. Journal of Rural Studies, 30, 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.11.004
Zimmerbauer, K., Riukulehto, S., Suutari, T. (2017). Killing the regional Leviathan? Deinstitutionalization and stickiness of regions. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(4), 676-693. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12547
Zimmerbauer, K., Suutari, T., Saartenoja, A. (2012). Resistance to the deinstitutionalization of a region. Borders, identity and activism in municipality merger. Geoforum, 43(6), 1065-1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.06.009
oai:rcin.org.pl:232793 ; 0016-7282 (print) ; 2300-7362 (online) ; 10.7163/GPol.0222
CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.2085, Cz.2173, Cz.2406 ; kliknij tutaj, żeby przejść
Licencja Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0
Zasób chroniony prawem autorskim. [CC BY 4.0 Międzynarodowe] Korzystanie dozwolone zgodnie z licencją Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0, której pełne postanowienia dostępne są pod adresem: ; -
Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Polskiej Akademii Nauk
Unia Europejska. Europejski Fundusz Rozwoju Regionalnego ; Program Operacyjny Innowacyjna Gospodarka, lata 2010-2014, Priorytet 2. Infrastruktura strefy B + R
28 gru 2021
28 gru 2021
417
https://rcin.org.pl./publication/269719
Hohol, Tetiana Tsybulska, Julia
Gnatiuk, Oleksiy Glybovets, Victoria
Sawicki, Ludwik (1893–1972)
Zawitkowska, Wioletta
Ivanov, Tatʹâna