• Wyszukaj w całym Repozytorium
  • Piśmiennictwo i mapy
  • Archeologia
  • Baza Młynów
  • Nauki przyrodnicze

Szukaj w Repozytorium

Jak wyszukiwać...

Wyszukiwanie zaawansowane

Szukaj w Piśmiennictwo i mapy

Jak wyszukiwać...

Wyszukiwanie zaawansowane

Szukaj w Archeologia

Jak wyszukiwać...

Wyszukiwanie zaawansowane

Szukaj w Baza Młynów

Jak wyszukiwać...

Wyszukiwanie zaawansowane

Szukaj w Nauki przyrodnicze

Jak wyszukiwać...

Wyszukiwanie zaawansowane

Projekty RCIN i OZwRCIN

Obiekt

Tytuł: Mechanizmy osiedlania się samców rokitniczki Acrocephalus schoenbaenus

Twórca:

Zając, Tadeusz

Data wydania/powstania:

2010

Typ zasobu:

Tekst

Inny tytuł:

Studia Naturae 56

Wydawca:

Instytut Ochrony Przyrody Polskiej Akademii Nauk

Miejsce wydania:

Kraków

Opis:

24 cm ; ilustracje ; bibliografia na stronach 116-128 ; ISSN 0081-6760

Typ obiektu:

Czasopismo/Artykuł

Bibliografia:

lker P.J., Redfern C.P.F. 1996. Double brooding and polygyny in Sedge Warbler Acrocephalus schoenobaenus breeding in north-west England. Bird Study 43: 356–363.
Amrhein V., Kunc H.P., Schmidt R., Naguib M. 2007. Temporal patterns of territory settlement and detectability in mated and unmated Nightingales Luscinia megarhynchos. Ibis 149: 237–244.
Andren H. 1990. Despotic distribution, unequal reproductive success, and population regulation in the Jay Garrulus glandarius L. Ecology 71: 1796–1803.
Andrewartha H.G., Birch L.C. 1954. The distribution and abundance of animals. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Anselin A., Meire P.M. 1989. Habitat selection of sedge warbler Acrocephalus schoenobaenus (Linne, 1758) and Reed Warbler A. scirpaceus (Hermann, 1804) in small reedbeds. Ann. Soc. R. Zool. Belg. 119: 121–136.
Arlt D., Part T. 2007. Post-breeding information gathering and breeding territory shifts in northern wheatears. J. Anim. Ecol. 77: 211–219.
Arnold S.J. 1992. Constraints on phenotypic evolution. Am. Nat. 140: 85–107.
Arnold S.J., Wade M.J. 1984a. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution 38: 709–719.
Arnold S.J., Wade M.J. 1984b. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: applications. Evolution 38: 720–734.
Baggott G.K. 1986. The fat contents and flight ranges of four warbler species on migration in North Wales. Ring. and Migr. 7: 25–36.
Baldi A. 2004. Area requirements of passerine birds in the reed Archipelago of Lake Velence, Hungary. Acta Zool. Acad. Scient. Hungaricae 50: 1–8.
Baldi A., Kisbenedek T. 1999. Species-specific distribution of reed-nesting passerine birds across reed-bed edges: Effects of spatial scale and edge type. Acta Zool. Acad. Scient. Hungaricae 45: 97–114.
Bartnik W, Deńko S., Strużyński A., Zając T. 2004. Renaturyzacja rzeki Nidy dla potrzeb ochrony przyrody w związku z programem „Natura 2000”. Monografia. Drukrol s.c., Kraków. Pp. 200 + 18 map.
Bayly N.J. 2006. Optimality in avian migratory fuelling behaviour: a study of a trans-Saharan migrant. Anim. Behav. 71: 173–182.
Bayly N.J. 2007. Extreme fattening by sedge warblers, Acrocephalus schoenobaenus, not triggered by food availability alone. Anim. Behav. 74: 471–479.
Bell B.D., Borowiec M., McConkey K.R., Ranoszek E. 1997. Settlement, breeding success and song repertoires of monogamous and polygynous Sedge Warblers(Acrocephalus schoenobaenus). Vogelwarte 39: 87–94.
Bensch S., Hasselquist D. 1991. Territory infidelity in the polygynous Great Reed Warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus: the effect of variation in territory attractiveness. J. Anim. Ecol. 60: 857–871.
Bensch S., Nielsen B. 1999. Autumn migration speed of juvenile Reed and Sedge Warblers in relation to date and fat loads. Condor 101: 153–156.
Bibby C.J., Burgess N.D., Hill D.A. 1992. Bird census techniques. Academic Press. London.
Bibby C.J., Green R.E. 1981. Autumn migration strategies of Reed and Sedge Warblers. Ornis Scand. 12: 1–12.
Bibby C.J., Green R.E. 1983. Food and fattening of migrating warblers in some French marshlands. Ring. and Migr. 4: 175–184.
Bibby C.J., Green R.E., Pepler G.R.M., Pepler P.A. 1976. Sedge warbler migration and reed aphids. Brit. Birds 69: 384–399.
Bibby C.J., Thomas D.K. 1985. Breeding and diets of the Reed Warbler at a rich and poor site. Bird Study 32: 19–31.
Bielański W., Solarz W., Zając T. 2005. Patch size effect on habitat loss in sedge warblers Acrocephalus schoenobaenus in middle Nida Wetlands (Southern Poland). Nat. Conserv. 61: 23–29.
Birch L.C., Browning T.O. 1993. Andewartha, Herbert George. Historical Records of Australian Science vol. 9, no. 3.
Birkhead T.R., Buchanan K.L., Devoogd T.J., Pellatt E.J., Szekely T., Catchpole C.K. 1997. Song, sperm quality and tests asymmetry in the sedge warbler. Anim. Behav. 53: 965–971.
Birkhead T.R., Fletcher F. 1995. Male phenotype and ejaculate quality in the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 262: 329–334.
Bolshakov C.V., Bulyuk V.N., Mukhin A., Chernetsov N. 2003. Body mass and fat reserves of Sedge Warblers during vernal nocturnal migration: departure versus arrival. J. Field Ornithol. 74: 81–89.
Borowiec M. 1992. Breeding ethology and ecology of the Reed Warbler, Acrocephalus scirpaceus (HERMANN, 1804) at Milicz, SW Poland. Acta Zool. Cracov. 35: 315–350.
Borowiec M. 1999. Biologia i ekologia lęgowa podwrocławskiej populacji rokitniczki (Acrocephalus schoenobaenus). Zachowanie rozrodcze i strategie ewolucyjne samców i samic. Prace Zoologiczne 33: 1–92.
Borowiec M. Peach W. 1997. Acrocephalus schoenobaenus Sedge Warbler. W: E.J.M. Hagemeijer and M.J. Blair, The EBCC Atlas of European Breeding Birds: their distribution and abundance. T&AD Poyser, London.
Borowiec M., Lontkowski J. 1988. Polygyny in the Sedge Warbler Acrocephalus schoenobaenus. Vogelwelt 109: 222–226.
Borowiec M., Lontkowski J. 2000. Sexual selection and the evolution of song in birds of the genus Acrocephalus. Biological Bulletin of Poznań University 37: 69–78.
Bried J., Jouventin P. 1998. Why do Lesser Sheathbills Chionis minor switch territory? J. Avian Biol. 29: 257–265.
Brown J.L. 1969. Territorial behavior and population regulation in birds. A review and re-evaluation. Wilson Bull. 81: 293–329.
Brown P. E., Davies M. G. 1949. Reed-Warblers: an introduction to their breedingbiology and behaviour. Foy Publications, East Molesey, Surrey.
Buchanan K.L., Catchpole C. K. 1997. Female choice in the sedge warbler Acrocephalus schoenobaenus: multiple cues from song and territory quality. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264: 521–526.
Buchanan K.L., Catchpole C.K. 2000. Extra-pair paternity in the socially monogamous Sedge Warbler Acrocephalus schoenobaenus as revealed by multilocus DNA fingerprinting. Ibis 142: 12–20.
Buchanan K.L., Catchpole C.K., Lewis J.W., Lodge A. 1999. Song as an indicator of parasitism in the sedge warbler. Anim. Behav. 57: 307–314.
Busse P. 1984. Key to sexing and ageing of European Passerines, Beitr. Naturk. Niedersachsen 37 (suppl.).
Catchpole C.K. 1972. A comparative study of territory in the Reed warbler (Acrocephalus scirpaceus) and Sedge warbler (A. schoenobaenus). J. Zool. Lond. 166: 213–231.
Catchpole C.K. 1980. Sexual selection and the evolution of complex songs among European warblers of the genus Acrocephalus. Behaviour 74: 149–166.
Catchpole C.K. 1988. Responses of male Sedge Warblers to playback of different repertoire sizes. Anim. Behav. 37: 1046–1047.
Catchpole C.K. 1996. Song and female choice: good genes and big brains? Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 358–360.
Catchpole C.K. 1973. The functions of advertising song in the sedge warbler and reed warbler. Behaviour 46: 300–320.
Catchpole C.K., Dittami J., Leisler B. 1984. Differential responses to male song repertoires in female songbirds implanted with oestrodiol. Nature 312: 563–564.
Chernetsov N. 1998. On the direction of postnesting dispersal in the Sedge Warbler (Acrocephalus schoenobaenus) (Passeriformes, Sylviidae). Russ. J. Zool. 2: 626–628.
Chernetsov N. 1998. Habitat distribution during the post-breeding and posthedging period in the Reed Warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus and Sedge Warbler A. schoenobaenus depends on food abundance. Ornis Svecica 8: 77–82.
Chernetsov N., Titov N. 2001. Movement patterns of European Reed Warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus and Sedge Warblers A. schoenobaenus before and during autumn migration. Ardea 89: 509–515.
Cichoń M. 2003. Does prior breeding experience improve reproductive success in collared flycatcher females? Oecologia 134: 78–81.
Cody M.L. 1981. Habitat selection in birds: the roles of vegetation structure, competitors, and productivity. BioScience 31: 107–113.
Cramp S. (red.) 1992. The birds of the western palaearctic. Vol. VI. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Crow J. F. 1958. Some possibilities for measuring selection intensities in man. Hum. Biol. 30: 1–13.
Dale S., Steifetten Ø., Osiejuk T.S., Losak K., Cygan J.P. 2006. How do birds search for breeding areas at the landscape level? Interpatch movements of ortolan buntings. Ecography 29: 886–898.
Davies J.M., Stamps J.A. 2004. The effect of natal experience on habitat preferences. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 411–416.
Davies N.B. 1985. Cooperation and conflict among dunnocks, Prunella modularis, in a variable mating system. Anim. Behav. 33: 628–648.
Davies N.B. 1986. Reproductive success of dunnocks, Prunella modularis, in a variable mating system. I. Factors influencing provisioning rate, nestling weight and fledging success. J. Anim. Ecol. 55: 123–138.
Davies N.B. and Lundberg A. 1984. Food distribution and a variable mating system in the dunnock, Prunella modularis. J. Anim. Ecol. 53: 895–912.
Dhondt A.A., Kempenaers B., Adriaensen F. 1992. Density-dependent clutch size caused by habitat heterogeneity. J. Anim. Ecol. 61: 643–648.
Długość i kilometraż rzek Polski. IMGW. 1978, Warszawa.
Doligez B., Danchin E., Clobert J. 2002. Public information and breeding habitat selection in a wild bird population. Science 297: 1168–1170.
Dyrcz A. 1988. Mating systems in Euroepan marsh-nesting passeriformes, W: Quellet, H. (red.), Acta XIX Congressus Internationalis Ornithologici. Ottawa: 2613–2623.
Dyrcz A., Borowiec M., Czapulak A. 1994. Nestling growth and mating system in four Acrocephalus species. Vogelwarte 37: 179–182.
Dyrcz A., Kupczyk M. 2007. Rokitniczka Acrocephalus schoenobaenus, W: A. Sikora, Z. Rohde, M. Gromadzki, G. Neubauer, P. Chylarecki (red.). Atlas rozmieszczenia ptaków lęgowych Polski, 1985–2004. Bogucki Wyd. Nauk., Poznań.
Ekner A., Tryjanowski P. 2008. Do small hole nesting passerines detect cues left by a predator? A test on winter roosting sites. Acta Ornithol. 43: 107–111.
Emlen S.T., Oring L.W. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of animal mating systems. Science 197: 215–223.
Ens B.J., Kersten J.M., Brenninkmeijer A., Hulscher J.B. 1992. Territory quality, parental effort, and reproductive success of oystercatchers (Haematopus ostralegus), J. Anim. Ecol. 61: 703–715.
Ens B.J., Weissing F.J., Drent R.H. 1995. The despotic distribution and deferred maturity: two sides of the same coin. Am. Nat. 146: 625–650.
Foppen R., ter Braak C.J.F., Verboom J., Reijnen R. 1999. Sedge Warblers Acrocephalus schoenobaenus and African rainfall, a low population resilience in fragmented landscape. Ardea 87: 113–127.
Fretwell S., Lucas H.L. 1969. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I.Theoretical development. Acta Biotheor. 19: 45–52.
Garamszegi L.Z. 2005. Bird song and parasites. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 59: 167–180.
Gates J.E., Gysel L.W. 1978. Avian nest dispersion and fledging success in field-forest ecotones. Ecology 59: 871–883.
Gill J.A., Norris K., Potts P.M., Gunnarssons T.G., Atkinson P.W., Sutherland W.J. 2001. The buffer effect and large-scale population regulation in migratory birds. Nature 412: 436–438.
Gilroy J.J., Sutherland W.J. 2007. Beyond ecological traps: perceptual errors and undervalued resources. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22: 351–356.
Graham M.H. 2003. Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology 84: 2809–2815.
Gray E.M. 1997. Female red-winged blackbirds accrue material benefits from copulating with extra-pair males. Anim. Behav. 53: 625–639.
Greenberg R., Gradwohl J. 1997. Territoriality, adult survival, and dispersal in the Checker-throated Antwren in Panama. J. Avian Biol. 28: 103–110.
Griffith S.C., Owens I.P.F., Thuman K.A. 2002. Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Molec. Ecol. 11: 2195–2212.
Grinnell J. 1917. Field tests of theories concerning distributional control. Am. Nat. 51: 115–128.
Haas C.A. 1998. Effects of prior nesting success on site fidelity and breeding dispersal: an experimental approach. Auk 115: 929–936.
Haila Y. 1982. Hypothetico-deductivism and the competition controversy in ecology. Ann. Zool. Fennici 19: 255–263.
Hałupka L. 1996. Breeding ecology of the Sedge Warbler (Acrocephalus schoenobaenus) in the Biebrza marshes (NE Poland). Ornis. Hung. 6: 9–14.
Hamao S., Saito D.S. 2005. Extrapair fertilization in the Black-browed Reed Warbler (Acrocephalus bistrigiceps): effects of mating status and nesting cycle of cucolded and cucolder males. Auk 122: 1086–1096.
Hamilton W.D. 1990. Mate choice near or far. Amer. Zool. 30: 341–352.
Hanski I. 1990. Density dependence, regulation and variability in animal populations. Phil. Trans. R-Soc. Lond. B 330: 141–150.
Hanski I., Woiwod I.P. 1993. Spatial synchrony n the dynamics of moth and aphid populations. J. Anim. Ecol. 62: 656–668.
Harris M.P., Buckland S.T., Russell S.M., Wanless S. 1994. Post fledging survival to breeding age of shags Phalacrocorax aristotelis in relation to year, date of fledging and brood size. J. Avian Biol. 25: 268–274.
Harris M.P., Halley D.J., Wanless S. 1992. The postfledging survival of young guillemots Uria aalge in relation to hatching date and growth. Ibis 134: 335–339.
Hasselquist D., Langefors A. 1998. Variable social mating system in the sedge warbler, Acrocephalus schoenobaenus. Ethology 104: 759–769.
Hasselquist D., Bensch S., Schantz T.V. 1996. Correlation between male song repertoire, extra-pair paternity and offspring survival in the great reed warbler. Nature 381: 229–232.
Hilden O. 1965. Habitat selection in birds. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 2: 53–75.
Hochachka W. 1990. Seasonal decline in reproductive performance of Song Sparrows. Ecology 71: 1279–1288.
Holt R.D. 1985. Population-dynamics in 2-patch environments – some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution. Theor. Popul. Biol. 28: 181–208.
Honza M., Moksnes A., Roskaft E., Oien I.J. 1999. Effect of great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus on the reproductive tactics of the reed warbler A. scirpaceus. Ibis 141: 489–493.
Hoover J.P. 2003. Decision rules for site fidelity in a migratory bird, the Prothonotary warbler. Ecology 84: 416–430.
Horvath G., Malik P., Kriska G., Wildermuth H. 2007. Ecological traps for dragonflies in a cemetery: the attraction of Sympetrum species (Odonata: Libellulidae) by horizontally polarizing black gravestones. Freshwater Biol. 52: 1700–1709.
Howard H.E. 1920. Territory in bird life. John Murray, London.
Huffaker C.B. 1958. Experimental studies on predation: dispersion factors and predatorprey oscillations. Hilgardia 27: 343–383.
Huffaker C.B. 1991. Continuity in natural environments. Curr. Cont. 1991(2): 8.
Huxley J. S. 1934. A natural experiment on the territorial instinct. British Birds 27: 270–277.
Johnson J.B., Omland K.S. 2004. Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecol. Evol. 19: 101–108.
Jones J. 2001. Habitat selection studies in avian ecology: a critical review. Auk 118: 557–562.
Kempenaers B. 1995. Polygyny in the blue tit: intra- and intersexual conflicts. Anim. Behav. 49: 1047–1064.
Kiester A.R. 1979. Conspecifics as cues: a mechanism for habitat selection in the Panamanian grass anole (Anolis auratus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 5: 323–330.
Kingsolver J.G., Pfennig D.W., Servedio M.R. 2002. Migration, local adaptation and the evolution of plasticity. Trends in Ecol. Evol. 17: 540–541.
Klaassen M. 1996. Metabolic constraints on long-distance migration in birds. J. Exp. Biol. 199: 57–64.
Kluyver H.N., Tinbergen L. 1953. Territory and the regulation of density in titmice. Arch. Neerl. Zool. 10: 265–273, 278–287.
Kokko H., Lindstrom J., Alatalo R.V., Rintamaki P.T. 1998. Queuing for territory positions in the lekking black grouse (Tetrao tetrix). Behav. Ecol. 9: 376–383.
Kokko H., Sutherland W. J. 1998. Optimal floating and queuing strategies: consequences for density dependence and habitat loss. Am. Nat. 152: 354–366.
Kokko H., Sutherland W. J. 2001. Ecological traps in changing environments: Ecological and evolutionary consequences of a behaviourally mediated Allee effect. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3: 537–551.
Komdeur J., Edelaar P. 2001. Male Seychelles warblers use territory budding to maximize lifetime fitness in a saturated environment. Behav. Ecol. 12: 706–715.
Korpimaki E. 1993. Does nest-hole quality, poor breeding success or food depletion drive the breeding dispersal of Tengmalm’s owls? J. Anim. Ecol. 62: 606–613.
Koskimies P., Saurola P. 1985. Autumn migration strategies of the sedge warbler Acrocephalus schoenobaenus in Finland: a preliminary report. Orn. Fenn. 62: 145–152.
Krebs C.J. 2002. Beyond population regulation and limitation. Wildl. Res. 29: 1–10.
Krebs J.R. 1971. Territory and breeding density in the Great Tit, Parus major L. Ecology 52: 2–21.
Kriska G., Horvath G., Andrikovics S. 1998. Why do mayflies lay their eggs en masse on dry asphalt roads? Water-imitating polarized light reflected from asphalt attracts Ephemeroptera, J. Exp. Biol. 201: 2273–2286.
Król W., Solarz W., Zając T. 2002. Breeding biology of sedge warbler Acrocephalus schoenobaenus in the river Nida wetlands (Poland). Biologia, Bratisl. 57: 617–625.
Lambrechts M.M., Blondel J., Caizergues A., Dias P.C., Pradel R., Thomas D.W. 1999. Will estimates of lifetime recruitment of breeding offspring on small scale study plots help us to quantify processes underlying adaptation? Oikos 86: 147–151.
Langefors A., Hasselquist D., von Schantz T. 1998. Extra-pair fertilizations in the Sedge Warbler. J. Avian Biol. 29: 134–144.
Lanyon S.M., Thompson C.F. 1986. Site –fidelity and habitat quality as determinants of settlement pattern in male Painted buntings. Condor 88: 206–210.
Lebreton J.D., Clobert J. 1991. Bird population dynamics, management and conservation: the role of mathematical modelling. W: C.M. Perrins, J.D. Lebreton, G.J.M. Hirons (Eds), Bird population studies. Relevance to Conservation and Management. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 104–125.
Leisler B., Catchpole C.K. 1992. The evolution of polygamy in European reed warblers of the genus Acrocephalus: a comparative approach. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 4: 225–243.
Leisler B., Heidrich P., Schulze-Hagen K., Wink M. 1997. Taxonomy and phylogeny of reed warblers (genus Acrocephalus) based on mtDNA sequences and morphology. J. Orn. 138: 469–496.
Leisler B., Ley H.W., Winkler H., 1989. Habitat, behaviour and morphology of Acrocephalus warblers: an integrated analysis. Ornis Scand. 20: 181–186.
Leisler B., Winkler H., Wink M. 2002. Evolution of breeding systems in acrocephaline warblers. Auk 119: 379–390.
Leitner S., Nicholson J., Leisler B., DeVoogd T.J., and Catchpole C.K. 2002. Song and the song control pathway in the brain can develop independently of exposure to song in the sedge warbler. Proc. Royal Soc. Biol. Sci. 269: 2519–24.
Levins R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull. Entomol. Soc. of America 15: 237–240.
Lewartowski Z., Piotrowska M. 1987. Breeding birds in the valley of the Narew river, Poland. Acta Orn. 23: 215–272 (in Polish).
Lindstrom A., Visser G.H., Daan S. 1993. The energetic cost of feather synthesis is proportional to basal metabolic rate. Physiol. Zool. 66: 490–510.
Literak I., Honza M., Kondelka D. 1994. Postbreeding migration of the Sedge Warbler Acrocephalus schoenobaenus in the Czech Republic. Ornis Fenn. 71: 151–155.
Literak I., Pikula J. 1996. The age structures of reed warbler (Acrocephalus scirpaceus) and sedge warbler (Acrocephalus schoenobaenus) populations in the postbreeding period. Folia Zool. 45: 43–47.
Łomnicki A. 1978. Individual differences between animals and the natural regulation of their numbers. J. Anim. Ecol. 47: 461–475.
Łomnicki A. 1980. Regulation of population density due to individual differences and patchy environment. Oikos 35: 185–193.
Lundberg A., Alatalo R.V., Carlson A., Ulfstrand S. 1981. Biometry, habitat distribution, and breeding success in the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Ornis Scand. 12: 68–79.
MacDougall-Shackleton E.A., Derryberry E.P., Foufopoulos J., Dobson A.P., Hahn T.P. 2005. Parasite-mediated heterozygote advantage in an outbred songbird population. Biol. Lett. 1: 105–107.
Mager III J.N., Walcott C., Piper W.H. 2007. Male common loons, Gavia immer, communicate body mass and condition through dominant frequencies of territorial yodels. Anim. Behav. 73: 683–690.
Malthus T. 1798. An essay on the principle of population, as it affects the future improvement of society with remarks on the speculations of Mr. Godwin, M. Condorcet, and other writers. J. Johnson, London.
Marshall R.C., Buchanan K.L., Catchpole C.K. 2003. Sexual selection and individual genetic diversity in a songbird. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B (suppl.) 270: 248–250.
Marshall R.C., Buchanan K.L., Catchpole C.K. 2007. Song and female choice for extrapair copulations in the sedge warbler, Acrocephalus schoenobaenus. Anim. Behav. 73: 629–635.
Martin J.L., Thibault J.C. 1996. Coexistence in Mediterranean warblers: Ecological differences or interspecific territorialism? J. Biogeography 23: 169–178.
Mathevon N., Aubin T. 1997. Reaction to conspecific degraded song by the wren Troglodytes troglodytes: Territorial response and choice of song post. Behav. Process. 39: 77–84.
Matthysen E. 1990. Nonbreeding social organization in Parus. Current Ornithology 7: 209–249.
Mauck R.A., Huntington C.E., Grubb T.C.Jr. 2004. Age-specific reproductive success: evidence for the selection hypothesis. Evolution 58: 880–885.
McPeek M.A., Rodenhouse N.L., Holmes R.T., Sherry T.W. 2001. A general model of the site-dependent population regulation: population level regulation without individual level interaction. Oikos 94: 417–424.
Myers N. 1988. Threatened biotas: Hot spots in tropical forests. Environmentalist 8: 187–208.
Misenhelter M.D., Rotenberry J.T. 2000. Choices and consequences of habitat occupancy and nest site selection in sage sparrows. Ecology 81: 2892–2901.
Moffat C.B. 1903. The spring rivalry of birds: some views on the limit to multiplication. Irish Nat. 12: 152–166.
Møller A.P. 2001. Heritability of arrival date in a migratory bird. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 203–206.
Møller A.P., De Lope F., Saino N. 2004. Parasitism, immunity and arrival date in migratory bird, the barn swallow. Ecology 85: 206–219.
Mook J. H., Wiegers J. 1999. Distribution of the aphid Hyalopterus pruni GEOFFR. within and between habitats of common reed Phragmites australis (CAV.) TRIN. Ex STEUDEL as a result of migration and population growth. Limnologica 29: 64–70.
Morton E.S., Derrickson K.C., Stutchbury B.J.M. 2000. Territory switching behaviour in a sedentary tropical passerine, the dusky antbird (Cercomacra tyrannina). Behav. Ecol. 11: 648–653.
Moskat C., Waliczky Z., Baldi A. 1992. Dispersion and association of some marshlandnesting birds: a matter of scale. Acta Zool. Hungarica 38: 47–62.
Murray B.J.Jr. 1999. Can the population regulation controversy be buried and forgotten? Oikos 84: 148–152.
Naef-Daenzer B. 2000. Patch time allocation and patch sampling by foraging great and blue tits. Anim. Behav. 59: 989–999.
Naef-Daenzer B., Widmer F., Nuber M. 2001. Differential post-fledging survival of great and coal tits in relation to their condition and fledging date. J. Anim. Ecol. 70: 730–738.
Nettleship D.N. 1972. Breeding success of the common puffin (Fratercula arctica L.) on different habitats at Great Island, Newfoundland. Ecol. Monogr. 42: 239–268.
Newton I. 1991. Habitat variation and population regulation in Sparrowhawks. Ibis 133 (suppl.): 76–88.
Newton I. 1998. Population limitation in birds. Elsevier Acad. Press, London.
Newton I. 2004. Population limitation in migrants. Ibis 146: 197–226.
Newton I. 2006. Can conditions experienced during migration limit the population levels of birds? J. Ornithol. 147:146–166.
Nicholson A.J. 1933. The balance of animal populations. J. Anim. EcoL 2: 132–178.
Nicholson A.J. 1954. An outline of the dynamics of animal population. Austr. J. Zool. 2: 551–598.
Nicholson J.S., Buchanan K.L., Marshall R.C., Catchpole C.K. 2007. Song sharing and repertoire size in the sedge warbler, Acrocephalus schoenobaenus: changes within and between years. Anim. Behav. 74: 1585–1592.
Nowak K. 2007. Dyspersja podlotów rokitniczki Acrocephalus schoenobaenus w zależności od struktury roślinności na rozlewiskach środkowej Nidy. Praca magisterska, INOŚ UJ, Kraków.
Oberweger K., Goller F. 2001. The metabolic cost of birdsong production. J. Exp. Biol. 204: 3379–3385.
Orians G.H. 1969. On the evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. Am. Nat. 103: 589–603.
Orians G.H., Wittenberger J.F. 1991. Spatial and temporal scales in habitat selection. Am. Nat. 137 (suppl.): 29–49.
Panov E.N., Nepomnyashchikh V.A., Rubtsov A.S. 2004. Organization of song in the sedge warbler, Acrocephalus schoenobaenus (Aves, Sylviidae). Zool. Zhurnal 83: 464–479.
Parker G.A. 1982. Phenotype limited evolutionary stable strategy. In: King’s College Sociobiology Group (eds.). Current Problems in Sociobiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 173–201.
Parker G.A. 1983. Mate quality and mating decision. W: Bateson P. (ed.). Mate choice. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge: 141–166.
Peach W.J., Baillie S. R., Underhill L. 1991. Survival of British sedge warblers Acrocephalus schoenobaenus in relation to west African rainfall. Ibis 113: 300–305.
Pearl R. 1925. The Biology of Population Growth. A.A. Knopf, R. Pearl – Inc., New York, USA.
Petit L.J., Petit D.R. 1996. Factors governing habitat selection by prothonotary warblers: field tests of the Fretwell-Lucas models. Ecol. Monogr. 66: 367–387.
Pigliucci M. 2005. Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: where are we going now? Trends in Ecol. Evol. 20: 481–486.
Pinowski J., Pinowska B., Barkowska M., Jerzak L., Zduniak P., Tryjanowski P. 2006. Significance of the breeding season for autumnal nest-site selection by Tree Sparrows Passer montanus. Acta Ornithol. 41: 83–87.
Piper W.H., Tischler K.B., Klich M. 2000. Territory acquisition in loons: the importance of take-over. Anim. Behav. 59: 385–394.
Podział hydrograficzny Polski. 1983. IMGW, Warszawa.
Pribil S. 2000. Experimental evidence for the cost of polygyny in the red-winged blackbird Agelaius phoeniceus. Behaviour 137: 1153–1173.
Pribil S., Searcy W. A. 2001. Experimental confirmation of the polygyny threshold model for red-winged blackbirds. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. B 268: 1643–1646.
Price T., Kirkpatrick M., Arnold S. J. 1988. Directional selection and the evolution of breeding date in birds. Science 240: 798–799.
Procházka P., Reif J. 2002. Movements and settling patterns of Sedge Warblers (Acrocephalus schoenobaenus) in the Czech Republic and Slovakia – an analysis of ringing recoveries. Ring 24: 3–13.
Pulliam H. R. 1988. Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am. Nat. 132: 652–661.
Pulliam H. R., Danielson B. J. 1991. Sources, sinks, and habitat selection – a landscape perspective on population-dynamics. Am. Nat. 137: 50–66.
Redfern C.P.F., Alker P.J. 1996. Plumage development and post-juvenile moult in the Sedge Warbler Acrocephalus schoenobaenus. J. Avian Biol. 27: 157–163.
Reynolds J.D. 1996. Animal breeding systems. Trends in Ecol. Evol. 11: 68–72.
Rodenhouse N.L., Sherry T.W., Holmes R.T. 1997. Site-dependent regulation of population size – a new synthesis. Ecology 78: 2025–2042.
Rowe L., Ludwig D., Schluter D. 1994. Time, condition, and the seasonal decline of avian clutch size. Am. Nat. 143: 698–722.
Schaub M., Jenni L. 2000. Fuel deposition of three passerine bird species along the migration route. Oecologia 122: 306–317.
Seather B.E. 1983. Mechanism of interspecific spacing out in a territorial system of the Chiffchaff Phylloscopus collybita and the Willow Warbler P. trochilus. Ornis Scand. 14: 154–160.
Sendecka J., Cichoń M., Gustafsson L. 2007. Age-dependent reproductive costs and the role of breeding skills in the Collared flycatcher. Acta Zool. 88: 95–100.
Sergio F. Newton I. 2003. Occupancy as a measure of territory quality. J. Anim. Ecol. 72: 857–865.
Sheldon B.C. 1994. Male phenotype, fertility, ad the pursuit of extra-pair copulations by female birds. Pro. R. Soc. Lond. B 257: 25–30.
Shennan N.M. 1985. Relationships between morphology and habitat selection by male Sedge Warblers Acrocephaalus schoenobaenus. Ring. Migr. 6: 97–101.
Shennan N.M. 1986. Habitat and its influence on pairing in the Sedge Warbler Acrocephalus schoenobaenus. Bird Study 33: 109.
Shipley B. 1997. Exploratory path analysis with applications in ecology and evolution. Am. Nat. 149: 1113–1138.
Shochat E., Patten M.A., Morris D.W., Reinking D.L., Wolfe D.H., Sherrod S.K. 2005. Ecological traps in isodars: effects of tallgrass prairie management on bird nest success. Oikos 111: 159–169.
Smith C.C. 1968. The adaptive nature of social organization in the genus of tree squirrel, Tamiasciurus. Ecol. Monogr. 38: 31–63.
Spencer K.A., Buchanan K.L., Leitner S., Goldsmith A.R., Catchpole C.K. 2005. Parasites affect song complexity and neural development in a songbird. Proc. R. Soc. B 272: 2037–2043.
Spina F., Bezzi E.M. 1990. Autumn Migration and Orientation of the Sedge Warbler (Acrocephalus schoenobaenus) in Northern Italy. J. Orn. 131: 429–438.
Stephens D.W., Krebs J.R. 1986. Foraging theory. Monographs in behavior and ecology. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
Surmacki A. 2005. Habitat use by three Acrocephalus warblers in an intensively used farmland area: the influence of breeding patch and its surroundings. J. Ornithol. 146: 160–166.
Svardson G. 1949. Competition and habitat selection in birds. Oikos 1: 157–174.
Svensson S.E. 1978. Territorial exclusion of Acrocephalus schoenobaenus by A. scirpaceus in reed beds. Oikos 30: 467–474.
Switzer P.V. 1993. Site fidelity in predictable and unpredictable habitats. Evol. Ecol. 7: 533–555.
Szekely T., Catchpole C.K., Devoogd A., Marchl Z., Devoogd T.J. 1996. Evolutionary changes in a song control area of the brain (HVC) are associated with evolutionary changes in song repertoire among European warblers (Sylviidae). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263: 607–610.
Thomas D.K. 1984. Aspects of habitat selection in the sedge warbler Acrocephalus schoenobaenus. Bird Study 31: 187–194.
Thorpe W.H. 1958. The learning of song patterns by birds, with especial reference to the song of the chaffinch Fringilla coelebs. Ibis 100: 535–570.
Tobias J. 1997. Asymmetric territorial contests in the European robin: the role of settlement costs. Anim. Behav. 54: 9–21.
Tomiałojć L., Stawarczyk T. 2003. Awifauna Polski. Rozmieszczenie, liczebność, zmiany. PTOP „pro Natura”, Wrocław.
Trivers R.L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. W: B. Campbell (ed.). Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971, Chicago: 136–179.
Trombulak S.C. 1990. Assessment of territory value by a tropical hummingbird (Amazilia saucerottei). Biotropica 22: 9–15.
Turchin P. 1995. Population regulation: old arguments and a new synthesis. W: N. Cappuccino and P.W. Price. (Eds.). Population dynamics: new applications and synthesis. Academic Press, New York: 19–40.
Turchin P. 1999. Population regulation: a synthetic view. Oikos 84: 153–159.
Tye A. 1992. Assessment of territory quality and its effects on breeding success in a migrant passerine, the Weatear Oenanthe oenanthe. Ibis 134: 273–285.
Vadasz C., Nemet A., Karcza Z., Lorant M., Biro C., Csorgo T. 2008. Study on breeding site fidelity of Acrocephalus warblers in central Hungary. Acta Zool. Ac. Sci. Hun. 54: 167–175.
Van der Berg L.J.L., Bullock J.M., Clarke R.T., Langston R.H.W., Rose R.J. 2001. Territory selection by the Dartford warbler (Sylvia undata) in Dorset, England: the role of vegetation type, habitat fragmentation and population size. Biol. Conserv. 101: 217–228.
Velando A. 2000. The importance of hatching date for dominance in young shags. Anim. Behav. 60: 181–185.
Verhulst P.F. 1838. Notice sur la loi que la population poursuit dans son accroissement. Correspondance mathematique et physique 10: 113–121.
Verhulst S., van Balen J.H., Tinbergen J.M. 1995. Seasonal decline in reproductive success of the Great Tit: variation in time or quality? Ecology 76: 2392–2403.
Verner J., Willson M.F. 1966. The influence of habitats on mating systems of North American passerine birds. Ecology 47: 143 – 147.
von Haartman L. 1951. Successive polygamy. Behaviour 3: 256–274.
von Haartman L. 1956.Territory in the pied flycatcher Muscicapa hypoleuca. Ibis 98: 460–475.
Watkinson A.R., Sutherland W.J. 1995. Sources, sinks and pseudosinks. J. Anim. Ecol. 64: 126–130.
Wesołowski T. 2002. Antipredator adaptations in nesting marsh tits Parus palustris – the role of nest site security. Ibis 144: 593–601.
Wesołowski T., Czeszczewik D., Rowiński P., Walankiewicz W. 2002. Nest soaking in natural holes – a serious cause of breeding failure? Ornis Fenni. 79: 132–138.
Wiggins D.A., Pärt T., Gustafsson L. 1994. Seasonal decline in Collared Flycatcher Ficedula albicollis reproductive success: an experimental approach. Oikos 70: 359–364.
Wolda H. 1995. The demise of the population regulation controversy? Res. Popul. Ecol. 37: 91–93.
Wolf L.L. 1975. Prostitution behavior in a tropical humming-bird. Condor 77: 140–144.
Woolfenden G.E., Fitzpatrick J.W. 1984. The Florida scrub jay, demography of a cooperative-breeding bird. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
Wynne-Edwards V.C. 1962. Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behavior. Oliver & Boyd, London.
Yosef R., Chernetsov N. 2004. Stopover ecology of migratory Sedge Warblers (Acrocephalus schoenobaenus) at Eliat, Israel. Ostrich 75: 52–56.
Zack S., Stutchbury B.J. 1992. Delayed breeding in avian social systems: the role of territory quality and „floater” tactics. Behaviour 123: 194–219.
Zając K., Zając T. 1998. Zespół Parków Krajobrazowych Ponidzia. Informator przyrodniczo-krajoznawczy. Wyd. Zarz. Świętokrzyskich i Nadnidziańskich Parków Krajobr., Kielce.
Zając T. 1991. Wiarołomstwo u ptaków i metody oceny jego częstości, czyli o mariażu ekologii behawioralnej z biochemią. Wiad. Ekol. 37: 169–180.
Zając T. 1995. Selection on laying date in the Blue Tit Parus caeruleus and the Great Tit Parus major caused by weather condition. Acta Ornithol. 30: 145–151.
Zając T. 1997. Pomiar intensywności doboru kierunkowego cech ilościowych w warunkach naturalnych. Wiadomości Ekologiczne 43 (1): 3–21.
Zając T. 1997. Pomiary i mechanizm działania krótkoterminowych nacisków selekcji na cechy ilościowe u sikory bogatki Parus major. Rozprawa doktorska, IBŚ UJ, Kraków.
Zając T. 1998. Małopolska. W: J. Krogulec (Red.). Ptaki łąk i mokradeł Polski (stan populacji, zagrożenia i perspektywy ochrony). IUCN-Poland, Warszawa: 283–319.
Zając T. 1999. Phenotypic selection in the Great Tit in Niepołomice Forest. Acta Ornithol. 34: 219–226.
Zając T., Korzeniak J., Solarz W., Zając K., Król W., Krzyściak-Kosińska R. 2002. Geomorphic structure and land cover of extensively managed floodplains of the Nida river. Nature Conservation 59: 91–97.
21. Zając T., Solarz W. 2004. Low incidence of polygyny revealed in a long term study of the Sedge Warbler Acrocephalus schoenobaenus in natural wetlands (the Nida river valley, S Poland). Acta Ornithol. 39: 47–50.
Zając T., Solarz W., Bielański W. 2006. Adaptive settlement in sedge warblers Acrocephalus schoenobaenus – focus on the scale of individuals. Acta Oecol. 29: 123–134.
Zajac T., Solarz W., Bielański W. 2008. On the song resumption, polyterritorial behaviour and their population context in sedge warbler Acrocephalus schoenobaenus. J. Ornithol. 149: 49–57.
Zając T., Solarz W., Bielański W. 2008. Site-dependent population dynamics: the influence of spatial habitat heterogeneity on individual fitness in the sedge warbler Acrocephalus schoenobaenus. J. Avian Biol. 39: 206–214.

Czasopismo/Seria/cykl:

Studia Naturae

Tom:

Nr 56

Strona pocz.:

1

Strona końc.:

128

Szczegółowy typ zasobu:

Czasopismo ; Artykuł naukowy oryginalny

Identyfikator zasobu:

oai:rcin.org.pl:183640

Źródło:

Bibl. IOP PAN, sygn. F 11, II 334/cz, II 335/cz

Język:

pol

Język streszczenia:

eng

Prawa:

Licencja Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 3.0 Polska

Zasady wykorzystania:

Zasób chroniony prawem autorskim. [CC BY 3.0 PL] Korzystanie dozwolone zgodnie z licencją Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 3.0 Polska, której pełne postanowienia dostępne są pod adresem: ; -

Digitalizacja:

Instytut Ochrony Przyrody Polskiej Akademii Nauk

Lokalizacja oryginału:

Instytut Ochrony Przyrody Polskiej Akademii Nauk

Dofinansowane ze środków:

Program Operacyjny Polska Cyfrowa, lata 2014-2020, Działanie 2.3 : Cyfrowa dostępność i użyteczność sektora publicznego; środki z Europejskiego Funduszu Rozwoju Regionalnego oraz współfinansowania krajowego z budżetu państwa

Dostęp:

Otwarty

Kolekcje, do których przypisany jest obiekt:

Data ostatniej modyfikacji:

16 kwi 2021

Data dodania obiektu:

16 kwi 2021

Liczba pobrań / odtworzeń:

141

Wszystkie dostępne wersje tego obiektu:

https://rcin.org.pl./publication/125630

Wyświetl opis w formacie RDF:

RDF

Wyświetl opis w formacie RDFa:

RDFa

Wyświetl opis w formacie OAI-PMH:

OAI-PMH

×

Cytowanie

Styl cytowania:

Ta strona wykorzystuje pliki 'cookies'. Więcej informacji