Archaeologia Polona Vol. 44 (2006)
Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology Polish Academy of Sciences
This is a follow-up on Ewa Domańska's reflections on the "return to things" treated as a challenge directed against theoretical discourse within the historical sciences, which have been dominated until now by an approach concentrated almost exclusively on thoughts, mean-ings, symbols, signs, etc. This article searches for the reasons and outcomes of the prolonged tension and "intellectual stagnation" that occurred almost simultaneously, but independently, in various research milieux. The essence of the reflection is based on the author's thoughts and observations on theore-tical reflection in archaeology and how they relate not only to the current excavations and narrations, but also to the widely understood historical sciences. By rejecting clear paradigmatic description derived a multi-directional theoretical reflection, the author seeks to emphasize the progressive hybridization of the theoretical consciousness of related disciplines (history, anthropology, archaeology, etc.) that use similar concepts and turn to each other seeking inspi-ration. Also, the new situation where archaeology is viewed as a contributor, not merely a recipient of new and inspiring ideas is stressed
Domańska, E. 2005a. Towards the archaeontology of the dead body. Rethinking History 9: 389—413
Domańska, E. 2005b. Powrót do rzeczy. MS of a paper read at the session organized in Warsaw in the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology on January 26th 2005
Domańska, E. 2006. The return to things. Archaeologia Polona 44: 171—85
Gell, A. 1998. Art and agency. Oxford
Jones, A. 2002. Archaeological theory and scientific practice. Topics in contemporary archaeology. Cambridge
Karlsson, H. 2000. Why is there material culture rather than nothing? Heideggerian thoughts and archaeology. In Philosophy and archaeological practice. Perspectives for the 21st century, C. Holtorf and H. Karlsson (eds), 69—86. Göteborg
Majewski, K. 1953. Historia kultury materialnej. Kwartalnik Historii Kultury Materialnej 1 (1): 3—27
Majewski, K. 1973. Nowe uwagi do badań nad historią antycznej kultury materialnej. Kwartalnik Historii Kultury Materialnej 21 (3): 393-409
Majewski, K. 1976. Dalsze uwagi o badaniu historii rzeczy. Kwartalnik Historii Kultury Materialnej 24 (1): 109—15
Mamzer, H. 2001. Archeologia jako metafora. In Kultura jako przedmiot badań. Studia filozoficzno-kulturoznawcze", B. Kotowa, J. Sójka and K. Zamiara (eds), 103—21. Poznań
Mamzer, H. 2004. Archeologia i dyskurs. Rozważania metaarcheologiczne. Poznań
Olsen, B. 2003. Material culture after text: re-membering things. Norwegian Archaeological Review 36 (2): 88—104
Topolski, J. 1994. Fernand Braudel a koncepcja historii kultury materialnej. Kwartalnik Historii Kultury Materialnej 30 (1): 159—65
Urbańczyk, P. 2004. Procesy depozycyjne ipodepozycyjne na stanowiskach archeologicznych (typescript in the Archive of the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences)
Wrzosek, W. 1994. Braudelowska idea kultury materialnej. Kwartalnik Historii Kultury Materialnej 30 (1): 167—72
IAiE PAN, call no. P 357 ; IAiE PAN, call no. P 358 ; IAiE PAN, call no. P 356 ; click here to follow the link
Copyright-protected material. May be used within the limits of statutory user freedoms
Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences
Library of the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences
Mar 3, 2023
https://rcin.org.pl./publication/77325
Edition name | Date |
---|