Rural economic development in the post-agricultural era: policy recommendations

Hruška, Vladan; Czapiewski, Konrad Ł.; Kovács, Zoltán

doi:1642-4689

- ris
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Csv

Rural economic development in the post-agricultural era: policy recommendations Hruška, VladanCzapiewski, Konrad Ł.Kovács, Zoltán

Object structure

Rural economic development in the post-agricultural era: policy recommendations

Post-agricultural rural space of the Visegrad countries: economies, entrepreneurship and policies ; Studia Obszarów Wiejskich = Rural Studies, t. 39

Hruška, Vladan ; Czapiewski, Konrad Ł. ; Kovács, Zoltán

rural economic development ; entrepreneurship ; policy recommendations ; rural planning

Present rural economies of developed countries are no more dominated by agriculture. However, in policies of rural economic development the position of farming remains very strong due to the persisiting productivist thinking. Consequently, the tools of such policies are strongly related to agriculture, despite its minor contribution to rural economies of developed countries. The aim of this article is to offer recommendations for more efficient policies of rural economic development which are not based only on agriculture. These policy recommendations for European or national, regional and local authorities are key research findings of the project Non-agricultural and non-tourism economic industries in rural peripheries of the Visegrad countries funded by the International Visegrad Fund.

1. Asheim B., Isaksen A., Nauwelaers C., Tödtling F., 2003, Regional innovation policy for small-medium enterprises, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781781009659 -
2. Beauregard A., Basile K., Canonico E., 2013, Home is where the work is: A new study of homeworking in Acas – and beyond: Research Paper, LSE Enterprise, ACAS, [cit. 2015-03-27]: URL: http://www.acas.org.uk/media/pdf/f/2/Home-is-where-the-work-is-a-new-study-of-homeworking-inAcas_and-beyond.pdf
3. Blažek J., Uhlíř D., 2011, Teorie regionálního rozvoje: nástin, kritika, implikace, Praha, Karolinum.
4. Capello R., Nijkamp P. (eds), 2009, Handbook of Regional Growth and Development Theories, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781848445987 -
5. Chromý P., Jančák V., Marada M., Havlíček T., 2011, Venkov – žitý prostor: regionální diferenciace percepce venkova představiteli venkovských obcí v Česku, Geografie, 116, pp. 23–45.
6. Hruška V., Czapiewski K., 2015, Changing rural economies: theoretical background and empirical evidence, Studia Obszarów Wiejskich, 39, pp. 59–76.
7. Kovács Z., Boros L., Hegedűs G., Lados G., 2013, Returning people to the homeland: tools and methods supporting remigrants in a European context. [in]: Lang, T. (ed.) Return migration in Central Europe: current trends and an analysis of policies supporting returning migrants. Forum IfL 21. Leipzig: Leibniz-Institut für Länderkunde, pp. 58–94.
8. Moseley M. J., 2003, Rural Development: Principles and Practice, London, SAGE.
9. Office for National Statistics, 2014, Characteristics of Home Workers, [cit. 2015-03-20]: URL: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171776_365592.pdf
10. Pike A., Rodriguez-Pose A., Tomaney J. (eds), 2011, Handbook of Local and Regional Development, London, Routledge.
11. Salamon S., MacTavish K. A., 2009, Rural Communities. [in:] Kitchin R., Thrift N. (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, Oxford, Elsevier, pp. 423-428.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-008044910-4.00897-x -
12. Smallbone D., 2005, Fostering Entrepreneurship in Rural Areas, [cit. 2015-10-03]: URL: http://www.oecd.org/site/cfecpr/42203059.pdf.
13. Woods M., 2011, Rural, London, Routledge.