Scientific foundations of fauna conservation - a glance at the present day

Głowaciński, Zbigniew

- ris
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Csv

Scientific foundations of fauna conservation - a glance at the present day Głowaciński, Zbigniew

Object structure

Scientific foundations of fauna conservation - a glance at the present day

Głowaciński, Zbigniew

Institute of Nature Conservation of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Kraków

1996

21 cm ; bibliografia na stronach 13-15 ; ISSN 0009-6172

Journal/Article

fauna conservation

Nature conservation is an ideology and a kind of human activity of not only practical but also cognitive character. It is based on elementary sciences, and particularly on the ecology. Recently, nature conservation has been considered as a new science of an interdisciplinary and complex character. In United States this scientific discipline develops under the name of "conservation biology" and it is limited to the conservation of living nature, and especially to the problems of biological diversity. The most important concepts and scientific theories in the scope of animal conservation are shown in this paper. In the author's opinion the most constructive theoretical works, important for fauna conservation, are focused on such problems as (1) estimation of minimum viable populations, (2) consequences of a genetic drift (and phenomenon named "genetic bottleneck") initial populations, (3) determination of spatial conditions and a minimum area sufficient to support threatened animal populations, (4) evaluation of the effect of habitat fragmentation on animal populations and communities, (5) concept of conservation in relation to metapopulation, (6) concept of biological diversity, particularly at genetic and species levels, (7) the role of species in ecosystems and their ecological relations of a type "predator-prey", and some other problems. In the light of these leading in the world scientific specializations, the contribution of Poland is only slightly marked in theory but clearly greater in field and experimental studies, and in implementation works. Most of these works are of a regional, documentation, or diagnostic character. The greatest success of Polish nature conservation were studies on the restitution of vanishing species such as the European bison, the European beaver, and some large predators. Important and original achievements of Polish science are also studies on genetic erosion in the European bison, on the functioning of populations exhibiting primitive features, as well as methodological proposals concerning the estimates of the numbers of birds and some mammals. The development of theory and methodology is particularly important for creative protection of animals, as well as for organizational and practical solutions in this respect. New scientific achievements influence international standards and initiatives in the scope of animal conservation (conventions and other agreements), taken also in Poland.

1. Banaszak J. 1993. Ekologia pszczół. PWN, Warszawa-Poznań.
2. Belovsky G.E. 1987. Extinction models and mammalian persistance. In: Viable population for conservation (ed. M.E. Soulé). Univ. Press, Cambridge, p. 35-57.
3. Boyce M.S. 1992. Population viability analysis. Annual Review Ecol. a. Systematics 23: 481-506.
4. Brylińska M. (red.) 1986. Ryby słodkowodne Polski. PWN, Warszawa.
5. Buszko J., Masłowski J. 1993. Atlas motyli Polski. Cz. I . Motyle dzienne (Rhopalocera). Image, Warszawa.
6. Diamond J.M. 1975. The island dilemma: lessons of modern biogeographic studies for the design of natural reserves. Biol. Conserv. 7: 129-146.
7. Diamond J.M. 1978. Critical areas for maintaining viable populations of species. In: The breakdown and restoration of ecosystems (eds M.W. Holgate & M.J. Woodman). Plenum Press, New York.
8. Diamond J.M., May R.M. 1976. Island biogeography and the design of natural reserves. In: Theoretical ecology - principles and applications (ed. R.M. May). Blackwell Sci. Publ., Oxford/London/Edinburgh/Melbourne, p. 163-186.
9. Dobrowolski K.A. (red.) 1982. Ptaki Europy - przewodnik terenowy. PWN, Warszawa.
10. Eberhardt T. 1988. Introduced birds and mammals and their ecological effects. Swedish Wildl. Res.-Viltrevy 13 (4): 1-107.
11. Ehrlih P.R., Ehrlih A.H. 1981. Extinction: the causes and consequences of the disappearance of species. Random House, New York
12. Franklin J.R. 1980. Evolutionary change in small populations. In: Conservation biology: an evolutionary - ecological perspective (eds M.E. Soulé and B.A. Wilcox). Sinauer Assoc. Sunderland, Mass. (USA), p. 135-149.
13. Gipps J.H.W. (ed.) 1991. Beyond captive breeding reintroducing endangered species through captive breeding. Zool. Soc. of London Symposium 62, Claredon Press, Oxford.
14. Głowaciński Z. (red.) 1992. Polska czerwona księga zwierząt. PWRiL, Warszawa.
15. Głowaciński Z. 1994. Zasady ochrony fauny w parkach narodowych. W: Plany ochrony parków narodowych. Wyd. Min. OSZNiL, Warszawa.
16. Goodman D. 1987. The demography of chance extinction. In: Viable populations for conservation (ed. M.E. Soulé). Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, p. 11-34.
17. Gromadzki M., Dyrcz A., Głowaciński Z., Wieloch M. 1994. Ostoje ptaków w Polsce. Wyd. Ogólnopolskiego Tow. Ochr. Ptaków - OTOP, Gdańsk.
18. Hansky J. 1989. Metapopulation dynamics: help to have more of the same? Tree 4 (4): 113-114.
19. Heywood V.H. (ex. ed.) 1995. Global biodiversity assessment. UNEP, Cambridge Univ. Press.
20. Hovestadt T., Roeser J., Mühlenberg M. 1991. Flächenbedarf von Tierpopulationen. Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich.
21. Łomnicki A. 1988. Population ecology of individuals. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
22. MacArthur R.H. 1955. Fluctuations of animal populations, and a measure of community stability. Ecology 36: 533-536.
23. MacArthur R.H., Wilson E.G. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New York.
24. Magurran A.E. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Croom Helm Ltd., London.
25. May R.M. 1973. Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
26. McNaughton S.J. 1977. Diversity and stability of ecological communities: a comment on the role of empiricism in ecology. Amer. Naturalist 111, 979: 515-525.
27. Mills L.S., Soulé M.E., Doak D.F. 1993. The keystone-species concept in ecology and conservation. Bio-Science 43: 219-224.
28. Opdam P. 1991. Metapopulation theory and habitat fragmentation: a review of holarctic breeding bird studies. Landsc. Ecol. 5: 93-106.
29. Peet R.K. 1974. The measurement of species diversity. Ann. Review of Ecology and Systematics 5: 285-307.
30. Pielou E.G. 1975. Ecological diversity. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, London, Sydney, Toronto.
31. Primack R.B. 1993. Essentials of conservation biology. Sinauer Assoc. Inc., Sunderland, Mass., USA.
32. Ryszkowski L., Bałazy S. 1991. Strategia ochrony żywych zasobów przyrody w Polsce. Zakład Badań Środ. Roln. i Leśnego PAN, Poznań.
33. Shaffer M.L. 1981. Minimum population size for species conservation. Bio-Science 31: 131-134.
34. Shaffer M.L. 1990. Minimum viable population: coping with uncertainty. In: Viable populations for conservation (ed. M.E. Soulé). Univ. Press Cambridge, p. 69-86.
35. Simberloff D.S., Abele L.G. 1982. Refuge design and island biogeographic theory: effects on fragmentation. Am. Nat. 120: 41-50.
36. Soulé M.E., Wilcox B.A. (eds) 1980. Conservation biology: an evolutionary - ecological perspective. Sinauer Assoc., Sunderland, Mass. (USA).
37. Terborgh J. 1974. Preservation of natural diversity: the problem of extinction-prone species. Bio-Science 24: 715-722.
38. Terborgh J. 1976. Island biogeography and conservation: strategy and limitations. Science 193: 1028-1030.
39. Tomiałojć L. 1990. Ptaki Polski - rozmieszczenie i liczebność. PWN, Warszawa.
40. Tomiałojć L. 1992. Obawy związane z rozmnażaniem dzikich zwierząt w niewoli jako metoda ochrony gatunków. W: Czynna ochrona zwierząt (red. R. Olaczek i L. Tomiałojć) . Publ. Komitetu Ochrony Przyrody PAN, s. 43-65, PWN, Warszawa.
41. Tucker G.M., Heath M.F., Tomiałojć L., Grimmett R.F.F. (eds) 1994. Birds in Europe: their conservation status. BirdLife Intern., Cambridge.
42. Wiens J.A., Dyer M.J. 1975. Rangeland avifaunas: their composition, energetics, and role in the ecosystem. U.S. Forest Service General Techn. Report WO 1: 146-182.
43. Wilcox B.A. 1984. In situ conservation of genetic resources determinants of minimum area requirements. In: National parks, conservation and development (eds J.A. McNeely, K.R. Miller). lUCN and Smithsonian Inst. Press, Washington, p. 639-647.
44. Wilcox B.A., Murphy D.D. 1985. Conservation strategy: the effects of fragmentation on extinction. Am. Nat. 125: 879-887.
45. Wilson E.O. 1989. Threats to biodiversity. Scientific American 261 (Sept.): 108-116.