Metody ścisłe w literaturoznawstwie i pułapki pozornego obiektywizmu – przykład stylometrii

Eder, Maciej

doi:0867-0633

- ris
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Csv

Metody ścisłe w literaturoznawstwie i pułapki pozornego obiektywizmu – przykład stylometrii Eder, Maciej

Object structure

Metody ścisłe w literaturoznawstwie i pułapki pozornego obiektywizmu – przykład stylometrii

Teksty Drugie Nr 2 (2014)

21 cm ; Pol. text, eng. summary

Journal/Article

scientific methods ; literary studies ; stylometry

1. J. Woronczak, Z badań nad wierszem Biernata z Lublina, „Pamiętnik Literacki” 1958 z. 3, s. 97-118.
2. J. Woronczak, Zasada budowy wiersza „Kroniki Dalimila”, „Pamiętnik Literacki” 1963 z. 2, s. 469-478.
3. J. Sambor. Słowa i liczby, Ossolineum, Wrocław 1972.
4. Poetyka i matematyka, red. M.R. Mayenowa, PIW, Warszawa 1965.
5. B. Ycart, Alberti’s letter counts, „Literary and Linguisting Computing” (2013), doi: 10.1093/llc/ fqt034. First published online: June 22, 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqt034
6. H. Love, Attributing authorship: an introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2002, s. 18-19.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511483165
7. S.I. Camporeale, Lorenzo Valla i jego traktat o donacji Konstantyna, przeł. A. Dudzińska-Facca, Wydawnictwo IFiS. PAN, Warszawa 1997
8. W. Lutosławki, The origin and growth of Plato’s logic: with an account of Plato’s style and of the chronology of his writings, Longmans, London 1897.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0009840x00030651
9. A. Pawłowski, A. Pacewicz Wincenty Lutosławski (1863-1954). Philosophe, helléniste ou fondateur sous-estimé de la stylométrie?, „Historiographia Linguistica” 2004 no. 21, s. 423-447.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hl.31.2-3.10paw
10. J. Burrows, Computation into criticism: A study of Jane Austen’s novels and an experiment in method, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1987.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3508082
11. F. Moretti, Graphs, maps, trees: abstract models for a literary history, Verso, London–New York 2005; F. Moretti Distant Reading, Verso, London–New York 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fmls/cql045
12. M. Jockers, Macroanalysis: digital methods and literary history, University of Illinois Press, Urbana–Chicago–Springfield 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqt056
13. C. Stamou, Stylochronometry: stylistic development, sequence of composition, and relative dating, „Literary and Linguistic Computing” 2008 no. 23, s. 181-199.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqm029
14. D. Hoover, Modes of composition in Henry James: dictation, style, and ‘What Maisie Knew’, w: Digital Humanities 2009: Conference Abstracts, University of Maryland, College Park 2009.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hjr.2014.0024
15. J. Burrows, The Englishing of Juvenal: computational stylistics and translated texts, „Style” 2002 no. 36, s. 677-699.
16. J. Rybicki, The great mystery of the (almost) invisible translator: stylometry in translation, w: Quantitative Methods in Corpus-Based Translation Studies, ed. M. Oakes, M,. Ji, John Benjamins, Amsterdam 2012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/scl.51.09ryb
17. J. Rybicki, Stylometryczna niewidzialność tłumacza, „Przekładaniec” 2013, s. 61-87.
18. C. Schöch, Fine-tuning stylometric tools: investigating authorship and genre in French classical theater, w: Digital Humanities 2013: Book of Abstracts, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln 2013.
19. M. Kestemont, K. Luyckx, W. Daelemans, T. Crombez, Cross-genre authorship verification using unmasking, „English Studies” 2012 no. 93, s. 340-356.
20. N. Chomsky, Syntactic structures, Mouton, The Hague 1975.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110218329
21. J.W. Pennabaker The secret life of pronouns: what our words say about us, Bloomsbury Press, New York etc. 2011.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0262-4079(11)62167-2
22. M. Eder, Mind your corpus: systematic errors in authorship attribution, „Literary and Linguistic Computing” 2013 no. 28, s. 603-614.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqt039
23. F. Mosteller, D.L. Wallace, Inference and disputed authorship: the federalist. Addison-Wesley, Reading (Mass.) 1964.
http://dx.doi.org/10.23,.07/202633
24. E. Stamatatos, A survey of modern authorship attribution methods, „Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology” 2009 no. 60, s. 538-556.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21001
25. M. Eder. Style-markers in authorship attribution: a cross-language study of the authorial fingerprint, „Studies in Polish Linguistics” 2011 no. 6, s. 99-114.
26. D. Hoover, Statistical stylistic and authorship attribution: an empirical investigation, „Literary and Linguistic Computing” 2001 no. 16, s. 421-444.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/16.4.421
27. J. Burrows, ‘Delta’: a measure of stylistic difference and a guide to likely authorship, „Literary and Linguistic Computing” 2002 no. 17, 267- -287.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/17.3.267
28. P. Juola, Authorship attribution, „Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval” 2006 no. 1, s. 233-334.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1500000005
29. M. Koppel, J. Schler, S. Argamon, Computational methods in authorship attribution, „Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology” 2009 no. 60, s. 9-26.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20961
30. E. Paradis, J. Claude, K. Strimmer, APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language, „Bioinformatics” 2004 no. 20, s. 289-290.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412
31. M. Dunn, A. Terril, G. Reesink, R.A. Foley, S.C. Levinson, Structural phylogenetics and the reconstruction of ancient language history, „Science” 2005 no. 309, s. 2072-2075.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1114615
32. M. Eder, Computational stylistics and Biblical translation: how reliable can a dendrogram be?, w: The translator and the computer, ed. T. Piotrowski, Ł. Grabowski, Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Filologicznej, Wrocław 2013.
33. J. Rybicki, M. Heydel, The stylistics and stylometry of collaborative translation: Woolf’s Night and Day in Polish, „Literary and Linguistic Computing” 2013 no. 28, s. 708-717.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqt027
34. K. van Dalen-Oskam, Epistolary voices: the case of Elisabeth Wolff and Agatha Dekken, w: Digital Humanities 2013: Book of Abstracts, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln 2013, s. 451-453.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqu023
35. A.-L. Barabási, Linked: How everything is connected to everything else and what it means for business, science, and everyday life, Plume, New York 2003.
36. M.E. Newman, A.-L. Barabási, D.J. Watts, The structure and dynamics of networks, Princeton University Press, Princeton 2006.
37. R. Ferrer i Cancho, The structure of syntactic dependency networks: insights from recent advances in network theory, w: Problems of Quantitative Linguistics, ed. G. Altmann, V. Levickij, V. Perebyinis, RAM-Verlag, Lüdenscheld 2005, s. 60-75.
38. R. Ferrer i Cancho, R.V. Solé, R. Köhler Patterns in syntactic dependency networks, „Physical Review E” 2004 no. 69, 051915, s. 1-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreve.69.051915
39. M.E. Newman, Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices, „Physical Review E” 2006 no. 74, 036104, s. 14.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreve.74.036104
40. A. Lancichinetti, R. Radicchi, J.J. Ramasco, S. Fortunato, Finding statistically significant communities in networks, „PLoS ONE” 2011 no. 6, s. 17.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018961
41. M. Eder, Visualization in stylometry: some reliability issues (w druku).
42. J. Rybicki, Pierwszy rzut oka na stylometryczną mapę literatury polskiej, „Teksty Drugie” 2014 nr 2.