Metadata language
Were Bohemus and haereticus used as synonymous designations?
Creator:Rzepiela, Michał (1965– ) ; Mazalová, Lucie
Publisher: Place of publishing: Date issued/created: Date on-line publ.: Type of object: References:
Adams, J.N. (1983). Words for ‘prostitute’ in Latin. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, 126, 321–358.
Apresjan, Ju.D. (1995). Semantyka leksykalna. Synonimiczne środki języka. Tłum. Z. Kozłowska, A. Markowski.
Burstein, J., & Pedersen, T. (2010). Towards Improving Synonym Options in a Text Modification Application. University of Minnesota Supercomputing Institute Research Report UMSI2010/165, 20.
Bylina, S. (2013). Image of a Heretic in Late Medieval Poland. Odrodzenie i Reformacja w Polsce, 57, 5–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/OiRwP.SI.2013.01 First published as: Wizerunek heretyka w Polsce późnośredniowiecznej. Odrodzenie i Reformacja w Polsce, 30 (1985), 5–24.
Cruse, D.A. (2002). Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fruyt, M. (1994). Typologie des cas de synonymie en latin. In C. Moussy (ed.), Les problèmes de la synon ymie en latin (pp. 25–46). Paris: Presses de l’université Paris-Sorbonne.
Kocourek, R. (1968). Synonymy and Semantic Structure of Terminology. Travaux linguistique de Prague, 3, 131–141.
Kras, P. (1998). Husyci w piętnastowiecznej Polsce. Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL.
Kras, P. (2018). The Imagined Communities of Heretics: Constructing the Identity of the Religious Enemy in the Late Middle Ages. In A. Pleszczyński et al. (Eds.), Imagined Communities: Constructing Collective Identities in Medieval Europe (pp. 364–387). Leiden: Brill.
Lyons, J. (1981). Language and Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Manukyan , N., & Nikoghosyan, H. (2016). On Some Issues of Synonymy . Օտար լեզուները բարձրագույն դպրոցում [Foreign languages in high school], 1–2(20), 26–30.
Moussy, C. (2010). Synonymie et antonymie en latin. Paris: L’Harmatann (Collection: Kubaba-Grammaire et linguistique).
Nodl, M. (2018). Corporative Interests Versus Nationalism: Prague University at the Turn of the 15th Century. In A. Pleszczyński et al. (Eds.), Imagined Communities: Constructing Collective Identities in Medieval Europe (pp. 335–363). Leiden: Brill.
Nodl, M. (2015). Národ sobě: Ryzí Čechové a moderní nacionalismus. In M. Nodl (Ed.) Středověk v nás (pp. 168–174), Praha: Argo.
Pinkster, H. (2015). The Oxford Latin Syntax (vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Soukup, P. (2017). The Waning of the “Wycliffites”: Giving Names to Hussite Heresy. In J.P. Hornbeck II, & M. von Dussen (Eds.), Europe after Wycliffe (pp. 196–226). New York: Fordham University Press.Spevak, O. (2014). The Noun Phrase in Classical Latin Prose. Leiden, Boston: Brill.Stachura, M. (2010). Wrogowie porządku rzymskiego Studium zjawiska agresji językowej w Kodeksie Teodozjusza, Nowelach Postteodozjańskich i konstytucjach. Kraków: Historia Iagellonica.Šmahel, F. (2000). Idea národa v husitských Čechách. Praha: Argo.
Wilde de, M. (2018). Enemy of All Humanity. The Dehumanizing Effects of a Dangerous Concept. Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, 2(47), 158–175.
Zeng, X. (2007). Semantic relations between contextual synonyms. UsChina Education Review, 4(9), 33–37.
Licencja Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa-Bez utworów zależnych 4.0
Terms of use: Access: