Planning and development activities in functional regions – the Hungarian case

Perger, Éva

doi:1429-7132 (print)

- ris
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Csv

Planning and development activities in functional regions – the Hungarian case Perger, Éva

Object structure

Planning and development activities in functional regions – the Hungarian case

29 cm ; Każdy numer posiada własny tytuł.

Czasopismo/Artykuł

regiony funkcjonalne ; polityka spójności Unii Europejskiej ; polityka regionalna na Węgrzech ; struktury planowania i zarządzania ; aglomeracja Budapesztu ; obszar uzdrowiskowy Balatonu

The paper provides a short overview of the legal and institutional background of functional regions in Hungary, analyses the impact of EU cohesion policy and presents dilemmas concerning the management structures in territorial units crossing administrative borders. The Hungarian case demonstrates that although the need for a place based, territorially sensitive and integrated approach has become one of the most highlighted issues over the last decade, the overall impacts of EU cohesion policy on planning and development activities in functional regions have proved to be controversial. The paper partly relies on the case study of Central Hungary developed in the framework of the ESPON COMPASS project. -

Boldizsár A., Kékesi Z., Koroknai P., Sisak B., 2016. Review of Hungarian EU transfers - at the border of two fiscal periods. Financial and Economic Review, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 59-87.
Brusis M., 2014. Paths and Constraints of Subnational Government Mobilization in East-Central Europe. Regional and Federal Studies, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 301-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2014.911736
Dąbrowski M., 2013. EU cohesion policy, horizontal partnership and the patterns of sub-national governance: Insights from Central and Eastern Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 364-383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776413481983
Dąbrowski M., 2014. Towards place-based regional and local development strategies in Central and Eastern Europe? EU cohesion policy and strategic planning capacity at the sub-national level. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy, vol. 29, no. 4-5, pp. 378-393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094214535715
Falu-Város-Régió, 2016. Fókuszban a területi együttműködések [Territorial Cooperation is in Focus], vol. 1.
Kabai G., 2012. The Possibilities Of Lake Balaton Resort Area in the System of the Development Policy 2006-2012. DETUROPE - The Central European Journal of Regional Development and Tourism, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 60-82.
Kabai G., 2016. Regionalizmus és területi politika a Balaton térségében [Regionalism and regional policy in the Balaton Region]. PhD Theses, Pécsi Tudományegyetem Bölcsészettudományi Kar Interdiszciplináris Doktori Iskola, Pécs.
Magyarország Partnerségi Megállapodása a 2014-2020-as fejlesztési időszakra [Partnership Agreement for Hungary, 2014-2020].
Mendez C., Batchler J., Wishlade F., 2011. Comparative study on the visions and options for cohesion policy after 2013. Brussels, European Parliament, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies [6 November 2018].
Mezei C., 2013. Case study report. Building Structural Fund management systems: Learning by doing or imitating? [in:] ESPON TANGO - Territorial Approaches for New Governance: Annex A: Case Studies. ESPON, Luxemburg, pp. 91-110, http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/AppliedResearch/TANGO/ESPON_TANGO_Case_Study_Annex_A_final.pdf [6 November 2018].
Mezei C., 2016. Limited involvement: the role of local and regional actors in the Hungarian Structural Fund management. [in:] P. Schmitt, L. V. Well (ed.) Territorial Governance across Europe: Pathways, Practices and Prospects. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 157-170.
Pálné Kovács I. (ed.), 2016. A magyar decentralizáció kudarcának nyomában [In the wake of Hungarian decentralization failure]. Dialóg Campus Kiadó.
Pálné Kovács I., Mezei C., 2016. Regionális politikai és területi kormányzási ciklusok Közép- és Kelet-Európában [Cycles of regional policy and territorial governance in Central and Eastern Europe]. Tér és Társadalom, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 54-69. https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.30.4.2810
Perger É., 2010. Az EU kohéziós politika kormányzati irányításának magyar sajátosságai [Characteristics of the Management System for EU Cohesion Policy in Hungary]. Tér és Társadalom, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 119-136, http://tet.rkk.hu/index.php/TeT/article/view/1299/2594 [6 November 2018]. https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.24.1.1299
Perger É., 2010. Az EU regionális támogatások hatása a területi decentralizáció folyamataira [The impact of EU Structural Policy on the processes of territorial decentralization]. Comitatus: Önkormányzati szemle, vol. 20, no. 1-2, pp. 3-20.
Perger É., 2016. Local Responses to the Structural Changes of National Development Policy in Hungarian Rural Regions. Eastern European Countryside, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 69-83. https://doi.org/10.1515/eec-2016-0004
Perger É., Kovács A. D., Lennert J., 2014. Fejlesztési tapasztalatok vidéki térségekben [Development experiences in rural areas]. A FALU, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 39-50.
Salamin G., 2018. A földrajzi tér alakításának európaizálódása [The Europeanization of the transformation of the geographical space]. PhD Theses, Szent István Egyetem, Gödöllő.
Stead D., Pálné Kovács I., 2016. Shifts in governance and government across Europe. [in:] P. Schmitt, L. V. Well (ed.) Territorial Governance across Europe: Pathways, Practices and Prospects. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 21-35.
Svensson S., Ocskay Gy. (eds.), 2016. Overview of the EGTCs around Hungary. Central European Service for Cross-Border Initiatives Budapest Observatory of Borders, Budapest.
The New Hungary Development Plan - National Strategic Reference Framework for Hungary 2007-2013.
XXI/1996. Act on Regional Development and Physical Planning, and its amendments in 1999, 2003, 2004, 2011, 2013, 2016.
35/1998. (III. 20.) Parliament Resolution on the National Spatial Development Concept.
97/2005. (XII. 25.) Parliament Resolution on the National Spatial Development Concept.
1/2014. (I. 3.) Parliament Resolution on National Development 2030 - National Development and Territorial Development Concept.
2012, B/31. Government Report to the Parliament on the developments of the country's territorial processes, the effects of the regional development policy and the implementation of the physical plans, the revision of the National Spatial Development Concept and the situation of the Hungarian settlement network.
2016, B/13058. Government Report to the Parliament on the evolution of the country's territorial processes between 2009 and 2014, the effects of the regional development policy, the implementation of the physical plans, the use of funds for spatial development and the international and cross-border development and spatial planning activities.