Metadata language
Territorial capital – a fuzzy policy-driven concept: context, issues, and perspectives
Subtitle: Creator: Publisher: Place of publishing: Date issued/created: Description: Type of object: Subject and Keywords:territorial capital ; conceptual merits ; analytical limits ; policy perspectives ; strategic planning
Abstract:The interest in the concept of territorial capital has considerably increased in the past few years. The first goal of the study is to give an overview of the possible interpretations and elements of territorial capital. Second, it is aimed at giving a summary of the circumstances that have encouraged the emergence of the territorial capital approach. The third goal is to go beyond the description of current issues by presenting how the concept has been used to verify development issues, while also by highlighting some challenges of empirical investigations on the research topic. Finally, the chances that territorial capital will be used as a strategic planning approach is detailed in addition to a decision support tool. The main result of the study is an own view of the concept of territorial capital which synthesises the up till now state of the research issue and points out its potentials for both scholars and policy-makers.
References:
1. Affuso A., Camagni R., 2010. Territorial capital and province performance in the Latin Arch: an econometric approach. Milan: Italian Association of Regional Sciences.
2. Assembly of European Regions (AER), 2008. AER Contribution to Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion. Wroclaw: Adopted on 11th June 2008 AER Bureau Meeting.
3. Barca F., 2009. An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. A Placed-based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations. Independent Report Prepared at the Request of the European Commissioner for Regional Policy. Danuta Hübner. Brussels: European Commission.
4. Barca F., 2011. Alternative Approaches to Development Policy: Intersections and Divergence. OECD Regional Outlook 2011. Building resilient regions for stronger economies. Paris: OECD, pp. 215–225.
https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264120983-17-en -
5. Bogdanov N., Janković D., 2013. Territorial Capital of Rural Areas: An Example of Analysis of the Potential for Rural Tourism Development in Serbia [in:] D. Škorić, D. Tomić, V. Popović (eds.), Agri-Food Sector in Serbia. State and Challenges. Belgrade: Serbian Association of Agricultural Economics, pp. 201–232.
6. Barzotto M., Corò G., Volpe M., 2016. Territorial capital as a company intangible. Exploratory evidence from ten Italian multinational corporations. Journal of Intellectual Capital, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 148–167.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-09-2015-0077 -
7. Brodzicki T., Ciołek D., 2015. Territorial Capital and Polish Regional Development. Institute for Development Working Papers, no. 011/2015, Sopot: Institute for Development.
8. Camagni R., 2008. Regional Competitiveness: Towards a Concept of Territorial Capital. [in:] R. Capello, R. Camagni, B. Chizzolini, U. Fratesi (eds.), Modelling Regional Scenarios for the Enlarged Europe. European Competitiveness and Global Strategies. Berlin–Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 33–46.
9. Camagni R., 2016. Towards Creativity-Oriented Innovation Policies Based on aHermeneutic Approach to the Knowledge-Space Nexus [in:] A. Cusinato, A. Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos (eds.), Knowledgecreating Milieus in Europe. Berlin–Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 341–358.
10. Camagni R., Capello R., 2013. Regional Competitiveness and Territorial Capital: A Conceptual Approach and Empirical Evidence from the European Union. Regional Studies, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 1383–1402.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.681640 -
11. Capello R., 2016. Regional Economics. London–New York: Routledge.
12. Capello R., Caragliu A., Nijkamp P., 2011. Territorial Capital and Regional Growth: Increasing Returns in Cognitive Knowledge Use. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 385–405.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2010.00613.x -
13. Caragliu A., Nijkamp P., 2012. The Impact of Regional Absorptive Capacity on Spatial Knowledge Spillovers: the Cohen and Levithan model revisited. Applied Economics, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 1363–1374.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2010.539549 -
14. Carayannis E.G., Barth T.D., Campbell D.F.J., 2012. The Quintuple Helix Innovation Model: Global Warming as Challange and Driver for Innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–12.
https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-1 -
15. Churski P., Perdał R., 2016. Where Do Cohesion Policy Funds Flow and Do They Have any Impact? The Polish Lesson. Barometr Regionalny, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 7–24.
16. Copus A.K., Shucksmith M., Dax T., Meredith, D., 2011. Cohesion Policy for rural areas after 2013. A rationale derived from the EDORA project (European Development Opportunities in Rural Areas) – ESPON 2013 Project 2013/1/2. Studies in Agricultural Economics, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 121–132.
https://doi.org/10.7896/j.1113 -
17. Emery M., Flora C., 2006. Spiraling-up: Mapping Community Transformation with Community Capital Framework. Journal of Community Development Society, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 19–35.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330609490152 -
18. European Commission (EC), 2005. The Territorial State and Perspectives of the European Union. Towards a Stronger European Territorial Cohesion in the Light of the Lisbon and Gothenburg Ambitions. First Draft. Brussels: European Commission.
19. ESPON, 2012. ATTREG. The Attractiveness of European Regions and Cities for Residents and Visitors. Final Report. Applied Research 2013/1/7. Luxembourg–Tarragona: ESPON–Univeristy of Rovira i Virgili.
20. Fischer T.B., Skyes O., 2009. The Territorial Agenda of the European Union. Progress for Climate Change Mitigation and Adaption? The Town Planning Review, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 57–82.
https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.80.1.4 -
21. Fratesi U., Perucca, G., 2014. Territorial Capital and the Effectiveness of Cohesion Policies: an Assessment for CEE Regions. Investigaciones Regionales – Journal of Regional Research, vol. 29, pp. 165–191.
22. Giffinger R., Gudrun H., 2010. Smart Cities Ranking: an Effective Instrument for the Positioning Cities? Architecture, City and Environment, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 7–25.
23. Giffinger R., Hamedinger A., 2013. Borders in Metropolitan Development: The Case of Vienna. Journal of Borderlands Studies, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 205–219.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2013.854655 -
24. Harvey D., 1982. The Limits to Capital. Oxford: Blackwell.
25. Huxham C., 1993. Pursuing Collaborative Advantage. Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 599–611.
https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1993.101 -
https://doi.org/10.2307/2584516 -
26. Kitson M., Martin R., Tyler P., 2004. Regional Competitiveness: An Elusive yet Key Concept? Regional Studies, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 991–999.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340042000320816 -
27. Komornicki T., Ciołek, D., 2015. Measurement of Territorial Cohesion. Defining the Measures of Measurable Aspects of this Concept. The Case of Poland. Institute for Development Working Papers. No. 012/2015. Sopot: Institute for Development.
28. Komornicki T., Zaucha J., 2015. Territorial Cohesion in Polish Regional Development Policy. The Results of Surveys and In Depth Inquiries Covering Regional Authorities in Poland. Institute for Development Working Papers. No. 013/2015. Sopot: Institute for Development.
29. Lakshmi G., de Zeeuw G., Vahl M., Vilalta-Perdomo E., 2015. Making Friends with Windmills: Building Territorial Capital. Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 100–108.
30. LEADER European Observatory (LEADER EO), 1999. Territorial competitiveness. Creating a territorial development strategy in light of the LEADER experience. Part 1. LEADER European Observatory "Rural Innovation" Dossier No. 6., Brussels.
31. Martinoia M., Pompili T., 2015. Building synthetic indicators for aspects of territorial capital. Liuc Papers 290, Serie Economia e Impresa 78. Castellanza: Università Carlo Cattaneo.
32. McCann P., 2013. Modern Urban and Regional Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2001. Territorial Outlook. Paris: OECD.
34. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2009. Regions Matter: Economic Recovery, Innovation and Sustainable Growth. Paris: OECD.
35. Perry M., 2010. Controversies in Local Economic Development. Stories, Strategies, Solutions. Abingdon–New York: Routledge.
36. Perucca G., 2014. The Role of Territorial Capital in Local Economic Growth: Evidence from Italy. European Planning Studies, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 537–562.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.771626 -
37. Prezioso M., Coronato, M., 2014. Entrepreneurship and Territorial Behavior. How to Exercise Competitiveness in Sustainability in Europe. Social Sciences, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 28–45.
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.s.2014030401.14 -
38. Servillo L., Atkinson R., Russo A.P., 2012. Territorial attractiveness in EU urban and spatial policy: a critical review and future research agenda. European Urban and Regional Studies, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 349–365.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776411430289 -
39. Stimson R.J., Stough R.R., Roberts B.H., 2006. Regional Economic Development. Analysis and Planning Strategy. Berlin–Heidelberg: Springer.
40. Swagemakers P., Rodríguez D.C., García M.D.D., Fernández X.S. 2014. Fighting for a future: an actororiented planning approach to landscape preservation in Galicia. Geografisk Tidsskrift – Danish Journal of Geography, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 109–118.
41. Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020. Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe Diverse Regions, 2011. Agreed at the Informal Ministerial Meeting of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development on 19th May 2011 Gödöllő, Hungary.
42. Tortora M., Randelli F., Romei P., 2014. A Conceptual Framework for Tourism Transition Areas Based on Territorial Capital: a Case Study of Vinci. Journal of Tourism & Hospitality, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1–11.
https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0269.1000135 -
43. Tóth B.I., 2015. Territorial Capital: Theory, Empirics and Critical Remarks. European Planning Studies, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 1327–1344.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2014.928675 -
44. Ventura F., Brunori G., Milone P., Berti G., 2008. The Rural Web: A Synthesis. [in:] J. D. van der Ploeg, T. Marsden (eds.), Unfolding webs: The dynamics of regional rural development. Assen: Van Gorcum, pp. 149–174.
45. Zasada I., Reutter M., Piorr A., Lefebvre M., Paloma S.G.y., 2015. Between capital investments and capacity building – Development and application of a conceptual framework towards a placebased rural development policy. Land Use Policy, vol. 46, pp. 178–188.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.023 -
46. Zaucha J., 2015. Key Dimensions of Territorial Cohesion. A Review of The Existing Sources of Information on Territorial Cohesion. Institute for Development Working Papers. No. 008/2015. Sopot: Institute for Development.
47. Zonneveld W., Waterhout B., 2010. Implications of territorial cohesion: an essay. Paper presented at the Regional Studies Association Annual International Conference, May, Pécs, Hungary.
File size 0,9 MB ; application/pdf
Resource Identifier:1429-7132 ; 10.7163/Eu21.2017.33.1
Source:CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407 ; click here to follow the link
Language: Rights:Creative Commons Attribution BY 3.0 PL license
Terms of use: Digitizing institution:Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences
Original in: Projects co-financed by:European Union. European Regional Development Fund ; Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure
Access: