Border politics in Central Europe: Hungary and the role of national scale and nation-building

Scott, James Wesley

doi:0016-7282

- ris
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Csv

Border politics in Central Europe: Hungary and the role of national scale and nation-building Scott, James Wesley

Object structure

Border politics in Central Europe: Hungary and the role of national scale and nation-building

Geographia Polonica Vol. 91 No. 1 (2018)

Scott, James Wesley : Autor

Europa Środkowa ; Węgry ; granice ; polityka graniczna ; skala krajowa ; współpraca transgraniczna

This essay focuses attention on aspects of border politics that give evidence of nation-building and national consolidation processes in Central Europe. In a normative, policy-oriented sense this is a question of borders as framing conditions for regional development. In a more critical and analytical sense this involves interrogating the actual use of borders in politically and ideologically framing national interests within a wider European context. The essay begins with a brief discussion of Europeanisation processes understood in terms of the promotion of cross-border cooperation (CBC) in Central Europe. Here, the significance of national structural conditions for implementation of Cohesion and regional policies and hence CBC will be discussed. One result that emerges is that while EU-European principles of cross-border cooperation have been partly mainstreamed into regional development policies they have at the same time been superimposed by the domestication of EU policies in the interest of nation-building. More specific evidence is then provided by Hungarian experience where national scale and nation-building have played key roles in conditioning the quality of cross-border cooperation and in the framing of state borders as resources. Attention will focus on: (1) Hungarian exploitation of CBC in the service of ethnopolitical development objectives and (2) Hungary’s recent policy of border securitisation which essentially entails a re-nationalisation of its border regime and a framing of the physical border as a protective barrier against threats to national and European identity.

1. ARRAIZA J.-M., 2015. Good neighbourliness as a limit to extraterritorial citizenship: The case of Hungary and Slovakia [in:] D. Kochenov, E. Basheska (eds.), Good neighbourly relations in the European legal context, Amsterdam: Brill Nijhoff, pp. 114-135.
2. Bakk M., Öllös L. 2010. Politikai közösség és kulturális identitás Magyarország és a szomsédos országok magyar kisebbségeinek viszonyban [in:] B. Bitskey (ed.), Határon túli magyarság a 21 szazadban, Budapest: Koztársasági Elnöki Hivatal, pp. 41-68.
3. Balogh P., 2014. Perpetual borders: German-Polish cross-border contacts in the Szczecin Area. Stockholm: Stockholm University.
4. BARANYI B., 2001. A periféria perifériájá – egy kérdőives vizsgálat eredményei és tanulságai az Északkelet-Alföldi határ menti területein [in:] B. Baranyi (ed.) A Határmentiség kérdőjelei az Északkelet-Alföldön, Pécs: MTA Regioná lis Kutatá sok Kö zpontja, pp. 55-86.
5. Baranyi B., 2008. Magyar–ukrán határrégió: Magyar–ukrán határrégió. Debrecen: MTA Regionális Kutatások Központja.
6. Barta G., 2006. Hungary – the new border of the European Union. Discussion Papers of the Centre for Regional Studies, no. 54, Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
7. Batory A., 2010. Kin-state identity in the European context: Citizenship, nationalism and constitutionalism in Hungary. Nations and Nationalism, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 31-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8129.2010.00433.x
8. BIHARI Z., KOVÁCS K., 2005. Slopes and slides: Spatial inequalities in employment opportunities at the turn of the millennium [in:] G. Barta, É .G. Fekete, I. Kukorelli Szö ré nyiné , J. Timár (eds.), Hungarian spaces and places: Patterns of transition, Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies, pp. 360-378.
9. Blatter J., 2001. Debordering the world of states: Toward a multi-level system in Europe and a multi-polity system in North America? Insights from border regions. European Journal of International Relations, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 175-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066101007002002
10. BÖHM H., 2015. Czech-Polish borders: Comparison of the EU funds for cross-border co-operation of schools in selected Euroregions. Cross-Border Review Yearbook 2015, pp. 59-74, http://institute.cesci-net.eu/en/crossborder-review-2015 [01 April 2016].
11. Bojar E., 2008. Euroregions in Poland. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 442-447. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.1998.tb01576.x
12. Boldizsar I., 1988. In a good cause. New Hungarian Quarterly, vol. 29, no. 111, pp. 52-56.
13. Brubaker R., 1996. Nationalism reframed. nationhood and the national question in the new Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511558764
14. Brusis M., 2005. The instrumental use of European Union conditionality: Regionalization in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. East European Politics & Societies, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 291-316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325404272063
15. BUFON M., MARKELJ V., 2010. Regional policies and cross-border cooperation: New challenges and new development models in Central Europe. Revista Romana de Geografia Politica, year XII, no. 1. pp. 18-28.
16. De Sousa L., 2013. Understanding European crossborder cooperation: A framework for analysis. Journal of European Integration, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 669-687. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2012.711827
17. Dołzbłasz S., 2013. Cross-border co-operation in the Euroregions at the Polish-Czech and Polish-Slovak borders. European Countryside, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 102-114. https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2013-0007
18. Dołzbłasz S., 2015. Symmetry or asymmetry? Cross-border openness of service providers in Polish-Czech and Polish-German border towns. Moravian Geographical Reports, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 2-12. https://doi.org/10.1515/mgr-2015-0001
19. Domaniewski S., Studzińska D., 2016. The small border traffic zone between Poland and Kaliningrad Region (Russia): The impact of a local visafree border regime. Geopolitics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 538-555. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2016.1176916
20. Eger G., 2000. Regionalism, the Euroregion as the specific spatial form of integration, Budapest: Osiris.
21. Gorzelak G., Smętkowski M., 2007. Regional dynamics in Central and Eastern Europe. Paper presented at the International Conference "Regional Development in Central and Easter Europe", 20-22 September 2007, University of Warsaw, Poland.
22. Gorzelak G., Smętkowski M., 2010. Regional development dynamics in Central and Eastern European countries [in:] G. Gorzelak, J. Bachtler, M. Smetkowski (eds.), Regional development in Central and Eastern Europe, London, New York: Routledge, pp. 34-58.
23. HAJDÚ Z., 1995. A magyar államtér változásainak történeti és politikai földrajzi szemlélete a magyar földrajztudományban 1948-ig. Tér és Társadalom, vol. 9, no. 3-4, pp. 111-132.
24. Hajdú Z., 1998. Changes in the politico-geographical position of Hungary in the 20th century. Discussion Papers, no. 22, Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies.
25. Hajdú Z., 2008. Kárpát-medence államosodási folyamatainak változásai és történeti földrajzi elemzésük. Korall, 31, pp. 75-100.
26. Hajdú Z., Lux G., Kovács Pálné I., Somolyódné Pfeil E., 2009. Local dimensions of a wider European neighbourhood: Cross-border relations and civil society in the Hungarian–Ukrainian border area. Discussion Papers, no. 71, Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies.
27. HAKSZER R., 2017. A 2007-2013-as Magyarország-Szlovákia Határon Átnyúló Együttmüködési Program regionális aspektusai, megválositásának tapasztalatai. Tér és Társadalom, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 107-123.
28. Hardi T., 2003. Az EU-csatlakozás hatása a határ menti térségek fejlődésére a Nyugat-Dunántúlon [in:] M. Kis, L. Gulyás, E. Erdélyi (eds.), Európai kihívások 2. Tudományos konferencia, Szeged: Szegedi Tudományegyetem Szegedi Élelmiszeripari Főiskolai Kar, pp, 158-162.
29. Hardi T., 2010. Határ menti térségek, határon átnyúló kapcsolatok [in:] V. Szirmai (ed.), Közép-Dunántúl, Pécs–Budapest: MTA Regionális Kutatások Központja – Dialóg Campus Kiadó.
30. Herrschel T., 2011. Borders in post-socialist Europe: Territory, scale, society. Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate.
31. Horváth G. 2010. Territorial cohesion in the Carpathian Basin: Trends and tasks. Discussion Papers, no. 81, Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies.
32. Jacobs J., Varró K., 2014. Rethinking cross-border Euregionalism as a self-organising system. Space and Polity, vol. 18, no. 1, pp.1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2013.880009
33. Jańczak J., 2013. Revised boundaries and re-frontierization. Border twin towns in Central Europe. Revue d'études comparatives Est-Ouest, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 53-92. https://doi.org/10.4074/S0338059913004026
34. Jańczak J., 2014. Border twin towns in Europe Cross-border cooperation at a local level. Berlin: LogosVerlag.
35. Jessop B., 2002. The political economy of scale and the construction of cross-border micro-regions [in:] F. Söderbaum, T. Shaw (eds), Theories of New Regionalism, pp. 179-196.
36. KEMÉNYFI R., 2006. Az "ezeréves határok" etnikai területek legitimaciós eszközei a 20. század első felének földrajzban [in:] B. Bakó, R. Papp, L. Szarka (eds.), Mindennapi előítéletek. Társadalmi távolságok és etnikai sztereotípiák, Budapest: Balassi Kiádó, pp. 325-344.
37. KOZAK M., 2014. Subregion Jelenia Góra as an example of border region – Case study report. GRINCOH Working Paper Series, Paper No. 6.03.02.01, http://www.grincoh.eu/media/serie_6_spaces__territories_and_regions/grincoh_wp6.03.02.01_kozak.pdf [23 May 2017]. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2000.9695548
39. Lados M., 2005. A határmentiségtől az integrált határrégióig. Tér és Társadalom, vol. 19, no. 2, pp, 1-5.
40. Leibenath M., Korcelli-Olejniczak E., Knippschild R. (eds.), 2008. Cross-border Governance and Sustainable Spatial Development. Berlin: Springer.
41. Lepik K., 2012. Cross-border cooperation institutional organization. Saarbrücken: Lampert Publishing.
42. Lepik K., 2009. Euroregions as mechanisms for strengthening of cross-border cooperation in the Baltic Sea region. TRAMES, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 265-284. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2009.3.05
43. LUX G. (ed.), 2010. Environmental policy and the institutional system of environmental protection in the Carpathian Basin. Discussion Papers, no. 79, Environmental Policy and the Institutional System of Environment Protection in the Carpathian Basin, Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
44. Medve-Bálint G., 2013. Incentives and obstacles to cross-border cooperation in post-communist Central Europe [in:] N. Bellini, U. Hilpert (eds.), Europe's changing geography: The impact of inter-regional networks, London-New York: Routledge, pp. 145-170.
45. Medve-Bálint G., Svensson S., 2013. Diversity and development: Policy entrepreneurship of Euroregional initiatives in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Borderlands Studies, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2013.770630
46. Mezei I., 2008. Városok Szlovákiában és a magyar határ mentén. Somorja-Pécs: MTA Regionális Kutatások Központja, Fórum Kisebbségkutató Intézet.
47. Mønnesland J., 1999. Cross border programmes versus regional development programmes. The population density influence. Paper presented at the Regional Studies Association Conference, 21-24 September, Bilbao, Spain.
48. NAGY G. 2011. Gyula – város a határon. A központi funkciók határon átnyúló hatása. Tér és Tarsadalom, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 127-147.
49. NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, 2007. New Hungary Development Plan. National Strategic Reference Framework 2007-2013. Budapest: NDA.
50. NEWMAN D., 2011. Contemporary research agendas in border studies: An overview [in:] D. WastlWalter (ed.), The Ashgate research companion to border studies. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 33-47.
51. NAGY G., 2011. Gyula – város a határon. A központi funkciók határon átnyúló hatása. Tér és Tarsadalom, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 127-147.
52. NAGY E., NAGY G., 2013. The layers of dependence and the changing role of the state – Conceptualising urban change in the East of Europe [in:] RC21 Conference – Resourceful cities. Konferencia helye, ideje: Berlin, Németország, 2013.08.29-2013.08.30. Berlin: Humboldt-Universität, Institute for Social Science, Department of Social Sciences Urban http://www.rc21.org/conferences/berlin2013/RC21-Berlin-Papers-3/03_2_enagy_gnagy.pdf. [15 October 2015].
53. O'Dowd L., 2002. The changing significance of European borders. Regional and Federal Studies, vol. 12, no. 4), pp. 13-36.
54. O'Dowd L., 2010. From a 'borderless world' to a 'world of borders': Bringing history back in. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1031-1050. https://doi.org/10.1068/d2009
55. Orlowski W., 2010. The puzzles of convergence [in:] G. Gorzelak, J. Bachtler, M. Smętkowski (eds.), Regional Development in Central and Eastern Europe: Development processes and policy challenges, London-New York: Routledge, pp. 7-18.
56. Paasi A., 2012. Border studies reanimated: Going beyond the territorial/relational divide. Environment and Planning A, vol. 44, pp. 2303-2309. https://doi.org/10.1068/a45282
57. PAASI A., 2013. 2007-2013 Hungarian multilevel governance. With or without regions? [in:] I. Pálné Kovács, J W. Scott, Z. Gál (eds.), Territorial Cohesion in Europe, Budapest: Institute for Regional Studies Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, pp. 455-466.
58. Perkmann M., 2007. Policy entrepreneurship and multilevel governance: A comparative study of European cross-border regions. Environment and Planning C, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 861-879. https://doi.org/10.1068/c60m
59. PERKMANN M., 2002. The rise of the Euroregion. A bird's eye perspective on European crossborder co-operation. Department of Sociology at Lancaster University http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/resources/sociology-online-papers/papers/perkmann-rise-of-euroregion.pdf [15 August 2017].
60. Pickles J., 2010. The spirit of post-socialism: Common spaces and the production of diversity. European Urban and Regional Studies, vol. 17, no. 2, p. 127-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776409356492
61. Popescu G., 2008. The conflicting logics of crossborder reterritorialization: Geopolitics of Euroregions in Eastern Europe. Political Geography, vol. 27, no. 4, pp.418-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2008.03.002
62. POPESCU G., 2006. Geopolitics of scale and crossborder cooperation in Eastern Europe: The case of the Romanian-Ukrainian-Moldovan borderlands [in:] J. Scott (ed.), EU enlargement, region building and shifting borders of inclusion and exclusion, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 35-51.
63. Popescu G., 2011. Bordering and ordering the twenty-first century: Understanding borders. Lathham (MD): Rowman and Littlefield.
64. Rácz S. (ed.), 2006. Regionális átalakulás a Kárpát medencében. Pécs: MTA Magyar Regionális Tudományi Társáság.
65. Rechnitzer J., 2001. Border regions and national strat egy. Győr, Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies.
66. Rechnitzer J. (ed.), 1990. A nyitott határ. Győr: MTA Regionális Kutatá sok Központja.
67. Sarmiento-Mirwaldt K., Roman-Kamphaus U., 2013. Crossborder cooperation in Central Europe: A comparison of culture and policy effectiveness in the Polish–German and Polish–Slovak border regions. Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 1621-1641. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2013.832997
68. SCOTT J.W., 2012. European politics of borders, border symbolism and cross-border cooperation [in:] T. Wilson, H. Donnan (eds.), A Companion to Border Studies, Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, pp 83-99. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118255223.ch5
69. SCOTT J.W., SZALAI B., 2014. Case study report: Central Hungarian Region and Budapest Agglomeration. Working Paper Series, GRINCOH, Paper No. 6.06.01. http://www.grincoh.eu/media/serie_6_spaces__territories_and_regions/grincoh_wp6.06.01_scott_szalai.pdf [23 May 2017].
70. Sohn C., 2014. The border as a resource in the global urban space: A contribution to the crossborder metropolis hypothesis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1697-1711. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12071
71. Soós E., 2014. Endeavours to establish EGCTs on Hungary’s external borders [in:] L. Domínguez, I. Pires (eds.), Cross-border cooperation structures in Europe: Learning from the past, looking to the future, Brussels: P.I.E: Lang, pp, 213-227.
72. SOÓS E., FEJES, Z., 2008. Hungarian experiences of cross-border cooperation. Fundamentum, no. 5, pp. 123-157.
73. SOÓS E., FEJES, Z., 2007. The institutionalisation of cross-border cooperation systems in Hungary. Európai Tükör (June), pp. 104-121.
74. Süli-Zakar I., (ed.), 2002. Borders and cross-border co-operations in the Central European transformation countries: Papers presented at the international workshop, Debrecen (Hungary) 1-2 October 2001. Debrecen: Kossuth Egyetemi K.
75. SÜLI-ZAKAR I., CZIMRE K., (eds.) 2001. Carpathian Euroregion: Borders in the region, cross-border cooperation: European Study Centre Programme of the University of Debrecen: International workshop: Debrecen, Hungary, Oradea, Salonta, Romania, 16-17 December 1999. Debrecen: Kossuth Egy. K.
76. Svensson S., 2015. The bordered world of crossborder cooperation: The determinants of local government contact networks within Euroregions. Regional & Federal Studies, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 277-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2015.1043995
77. SVENSSON S., MEDVE-BÁLINT G., 2012. Explaining coverage: Why local governments in Central Europe do or do not join Euroregions? [in:] D.J. Andersen, M. Klatt, M. Sandberg (eds.), The border multiple: The practicing of borders between public policy and everyday life in a re-scaling Europe, Furnham: Ashgate, pp. 219-245.
78. Van Houtum H., Van Naerssen T., 2002. Bordering, ordering and othering. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 125-136. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00189
79. Varró K., 2008. Changing narratives on EU multi-level space in a globalizing era: How Hungary as a national space became part of the story. European Planning Studies, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 955- 969. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310802163751