Comparing the development of border regions with the use of GIS (the case of Russia)

Kolosov, Vladimir; Medvedev, Andrei; Zotova, Maria

doi:0016-7282

- ris
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Csv

Comparing the development of border regions with the use of GIS (the case of Russia) Kolosov, VladimirMedvedev, AndreiZotova, Maria

Object structure

Comparing the development of border regions with the use of GIS (the case of Russia)

Geographia Polonica Vol. 91 No. 1 (2018)

Kolosov, Vladimir : Autor ; Medvedev, Andrei : Autor ; Zotova, Maria : Autor

granice ; teledetekcja ; analiza przestrzenna ; kartografia ; ocena ; rozwój społeczno-gospodarczy ; Rosja

The objective of the paper is to analyze the trends and the dynamics of socio-economic development in the areas on both sides of all Russia’s land boundaries (more than 22,000 km long) using remote sensing data and GIS applications at different scales. The originality of this research is in the processing of large amounts of data (30 meters resolution images and medium-scale topographic maps) on vast areas and the construction of maps allowing analyzing the data on a new scale. The peripheral character of most border areas is a serious challenge for the development of cross-border cooperation. Depopulation and the depressed state of their economy do not stimulate contacts between neighboring territories. The authors assess the socio-economic situation on both sides of Russian borders and the contrasts between neighboring territories in the mirror of the structure and the dynamics of land use and the density of settlements and roads. The authors come to the conclusion that the border space experiences further fragmentation. The processes on the ‘new’ (post-Soviet) and ‘old’ borders differ by their speed and the character of transformations. Their asynchrony is quickly increasing the asymmetry of cross-border interactions.

1. Alcantara C., Kuemmerle T., Baumann M., Bragina E.V., Griffiths B., Hostert P., Knorn J., Müller D., Prishchepov A.V., Schierhorn F., 2013. Mapping the extent of abandoned farmland in Central and Eastern Europe using MODIS time series satellite data. Environmental Research Letters, vol. 8, no. 3, http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035035/meta [12 December 2016]. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035035
2. Ancel J., 1938. Géographie des frontières. Paris: Gallimard.
3. AZARIN A., 2010. Hèjlunczjan i Czilin': issledovanie vozmožnostej po organizacii biznesa i investirovaniû v prigraničnyh s Rossiej provincijah SeveroVostočnogo Kitaâ. General Consulate of Russian Federation in Shenyang, http://rcsy.org/documents/research.pdf [5 Decmeber 2016].
4. BELÂEV I., MARTYNOV V., 2015. Udarit' berezoi po Finlandii. http://www.svoboda.org/content/article/27118120.html. [10 July 2015].
5. CYPLENKOV S., 2014. The farewell with Russian forest. Priroda – veliky genii. http://biogeniy.ru/archives/867. 30.04.2014 [1 March 2016].
6. Chibilev A.A. (ed.), 2011. Rossijsko-Kazahstanskij transgraničnyj region: istorija, geoèkologija i ustojčivoe razvitie. Ekaterinburg: Urals Regional Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences.
7. DELL'AGNESE E., 2015. New geo-graphies of border(land)-scapes [in:] C. Brambilla, J. Laine, J.W. Scott, G. Bocchi (eds.), Borderscaping: Imaginations and practices of border making. Franham: Ashgate, pp. 53-64.
8. Golunov S.V., 2005. Rossijsko-kazahstanskaâ granica: Problemy bezopasnosti i meždunarodnogo sotrudničestva.Volgograd: Izdatel'stvo VolGU.
9. Grundy-Warr C., Schofield C., 2005. Reflections on the relevance of classic approaches and contemporary priorities in boundary studies. Geopolitics, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 650-662. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040500318548
10. Hartshorne R., 1933. Geographic and political boundaries in Upper Silesia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 195-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045603309357073
11. Hartshorne R., 1936. Suggestions on the terminology of political boundaries, titles and abstracts of papers. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 38-39.
12. KAREL'SKAÂ REGIONAL'NAÂ OBSˆESTVENNAÂ ORGANIZACIÂ "ASSOCIACIÂ ZELENYH KARELII", 07.04. 2010. http:// www.ladoga-park.ru/a100409123735.html. [5 March 2015].
13. KARVINEN S., VÄLKKY E., GERASIMOV Y., DOBROVOLSKY A., 2011. Northwest Russian forest sector in a nutshell. Sastamala: Vammalan kirjapaino.
14. KATROVSKIJ A.P., KOVALEV JU.P. (eds.), 2012. Rossijskobelorusskoe prigranič'e: dvadcat' let peremen. Smolensk: Smolenskij gumanitarnyj universitet.
15. Kolosov V., O'Loughlin J., 1998. New borders for new world orders: Territorialities at the fin-desiecle. GeoJournal, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 259-273. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006846322508
16. KOLOSOV V., 2005., Border studies: Changing perspectives and theoretical approaches. Geopolitics, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040500318415
17. KOLOSOV V., 2011. Post-Soviet boundaries: Territoriality, identity, security, circulation [in:] D. WastlWalter (ed.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Border Studies Farnham, UK: Ashgate, pp. 171-194.
18. KOLOSOV V., TIKUNOV V.S., 2005. Politikogeografičeskoe kartografirovanie i geoinformatika: Dostiženiâ i novye zadači. Izvestia RAN, seriâ geografičeskaâ, 1, pp. 17-23.
19. KOLOSOV V., VENDINA O.I. (eds.), 2011. Rossijskoukrainskoe pogranič'e: dvadcat' let razdelennogo edinstva. Moskva: Novyj chronograf.
20. KRASTEVA A., 2015. Spaces, lines, borders: Imagineries and images [in:] C. Brambilla, J. Laine, J.W. Scott, G. Bocchi (eds.), Borderscaping: Imaginations and practices of border making, Franham: Ashgate. pp. 11-26.
22. Martinez O., 1994. Border people: Life and society in the US-Mexico borderlands. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
23. Minghi J., 1963. Boundary studies in political geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 15-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1963.tb00457.x
24. MORACHEVSKAYA K.A., 2010. Prigraničnost' i perifeiinost' kak factory sotsialno-ekonomičeskogo razvitia prigraničnykh c Belorussiei raionov Rossii. Regionalnye issledovania, vol. 4, no. 30, pp. 61-69.
25. Prescott J.R.V., 1987. Political frontiers and boundaries. London: Allen and Unwin.
26. ROSSIJSKO-KITAJSKOE VZAIMODEJSTVIE: TORGOVLJA LESOMATERIALAMI S KITAEM I NELEGAL'NYE RUBKI, 2010. http://www.wwf.ru/about/what_we_do/forests/curbing-illegal-logging/russia-china [1 March 2016]
27. RYSIN L.P., 2013. Monitoring dinamiki lesov rossijskogo Dal'nego Vostoka. V Vserossijskaâ konferenciâ «Lesa rossijskogo Dal'nego Vostoka». Vladivostok, 18-20 sentjabrja 2012 g. Lesovednie, no. 4, pp. 68-71.
28. Tamminen T., 2004. Cross-border cooperation in southern Balkans: Local, national or European identity politics? Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 399-418. https://doi.org/10.1080/1468385042000281620
29. THOREZ J., 2011. Les nouvelles frontières de l'Asie centrale : États, nations et régions en recomposition. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography, http://cybergeo.revues.org/23707 [10 November 2016].
30. Van Houtum H., Van Naerssen T., 2002. Bordering, ordering and othering. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 125-136. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00189
31. Von Hirschhausen B., Grandits H., Kraft C., Müller D., Serrier T., 2015. Phantomgrenzen. Räume und Akteure in der Zeit neu denken. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag.
32. Więckowski M., Michniak D., Bednarek-Szczepańska M., Chrenka B, Ira V., Komornicki T., Rosik P., Stępniak M., Szekely V., Śleszyński P., Świątek D., Wiśniewski R., 2014. Road accessibility to tourist destinations of the Polish-Slovak borderland: 2010-2030 prediction and planning. Geographia Polonica, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 5-26. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.2014.1
33. ZABROŠENNYE SEL'HOZUGOD'Â V CENTRAL'NOJ I VOSTOČNOJ EVROPE, 31.12.2013. http://www.agritimes.ru/news/13399/zabroshennye-selhozugodya-v-centralnoj-i-vostochnoj-evrope/#sthash.N980ovMO.dpuf [5 March 2016].