Metadata language
How big is the digital divide between rural and urban areas in Poland?
Subtitle:Studia Obszarów Wiejskich = Rural Studies, t. 43
Creator:Janc, Krzysztof ; Siłka, Piotr
Publisher: Place of publishing: Date issued/created: Description: Type of object: Subject and Keywords:information society ; digital divide ; internet ; rural areas
Abstract:In view of the development opportunities, the rural areas have a lower potential when compared to cities and towns. This disadvantage is caused mainly by smaller population densities, greater distances from urban markets as well as information, work, education, and most other resources. Seen from the perspective of the rural areas the Internet means a possibility of equal development chances between the rural and city inhabitants. Access to the Internet means availability of work (telework), administration, education, services offered on-line that are impossible to obtain elsewhere, of different kinds of databases, entertainment as well as contact with other users. Thus, both social and economic aspects can be distinguished. These aspects can be studied in the digital divide context, which the authors try to investigate in this paper.
References:
1. Bański J., 2006, Geografia wsi polskiej, PWE, Warszawa.
2. Brandtzæg P.B., Heim J., Karahasanović A., 2011, Understanding the new digital divide – A typology of Internet users in Europe, International journal of human-computer studies 69, 3, pp. 123–138.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.11.004 -
3. Chakraborty J., Bosman M.M., 2005, Measuring the Digital Divide in the United States: Race, Income, and Personal Computer Ownership, The Professional Geographer, 57, 3, pp. 395–410.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.2005.00486.x -
4. Davison E., Cotten S., 2003, Connection discrepancies: Unmasking further layers of the digital divide, First Monday, 8, 3.
https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v8i3.1039 -
5. van Deursen A.J., van Dijk J.A.G.M., 2014, The digital divide shifts to differences in usage, New Media & Society, 16, 3, pp. 507–526.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487959 -
6. van Dijk J.A.G.M., 2005, The Deepening Divide, Inequality in the information Society, Sage, London.
7. Gannon R., 2006, Digital divides within households [in:] G. Rusten., S. Skerratt (eds.): Information and Communication Technologies in Rural Society. Being rural in a digital age, Oxon, Routledge, pp. 107–124.
8. Graham M., De Sabbata S., Zook M.A., 2015, Towards a study of information geographies: (im) mutable augmentations and a mapping of the geographies of information, Geo: Geography and Environment, 2, 1, pp. 88–105.
https://doi.org/10.1002/geo2.8 -
9. Grodzka D., 2009, Społeczeństwo informacyjne – idea, programy, badania, Społeczeństwo informacyjne, Studia Biura Analiz Sejmowych Kancelarii Sejmu, 3, 19, pp. 9–37.
10. Grubesic T.H., 2002, Spatial dimensions of Internet activity, Telecommunications Policy, 26, 7, pp. 363–387.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-5961(02)00021-6 -
11. Grubesic T.H., Murray A.T., 2002, Constructing the divide: Spatial disparities in broadband access, Papers in Regional Science, 81, 2, pp. 197–221.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5597.2002.tb01230.x -
12. Hargittai E., 2001, Second-Level Digital Divide: Mapping Differences in People's Online Skills [arXiv preprint cs/0109068].
13. Janc K., Czapiewski K., 2013, The Internet as a Development Factor of Rural Areas and Agriculture [in:] W. Kamińska, K. Heffener (eds.) Transformation Processes of Rural Areas, Studia Regionalia KPZK PAN, 36, pp. 89–105.
14. Janc K., Czapiewski K.Ł., 2014, Internet jako czynnik poprawy sytuacji społecznej i ekonomicznej obszarów wiejskich [in:] W. Kamińska, K. Heffner (eds.) Polityka spójności UE a rozwój obszarów wiejskich. Stare problemy i nowe wyzwania, Studia KPZK PAN, CLVI, pp. 195–218.
15. Jasiński A., 2015. Skuteczność promocji z wykorzystaniem internetowych portali agroturystycznych w świetle opinii ich użytkowników, http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/baztech/download/import/contents/BPB9-0007-0008-httpwww_zneiz_pb_edu_plkwartalnik120092_4stepaniuk.pdf [19.11.2015].
16. Lee H., Park N., Hwang Y., 2015, A new dimension of the digital divide: Exploring the relationship between broadband connection, smartphone use and communication competence, Telematics and Informatics, 32, 1, pp. 45–56.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2014.02.001 -
17. Li F., Wang D., 2014, Cyberspace: connected or segregated? Examining virtual segregation among Hong Kong Internet users, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 41, 2, pp. 323–340.
https://doi.org/10.1068/b39010 -
18. Di Maggio P., Hargittai E., 2001. From the 'digital divide' to 'digital inequality': Studying Internet use as penetration increases, Princeton University Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Working Paper Series number 15, http://www.princeton.edu/%7Eartspol/workpap/WP15%20%20DiMaggio+Hargittai.pdf [19.11.2015].
19. Malecki E.J., Moriset B., 2008, The Digital Economy. Business organization, production processes, and regional development, Oxon, Routledge.
20. Di Martino V., Wirth L., 1990, Telework: A new way of working and living, International Labour Review, 129, 5, pp. 529–554.
21. Millward P., 2003, The 'grey digital divide': Perception, exclusion and barriers of access to the Internet for older people, First Monday, 8, 7.
https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v8i7.1066 -
22. Philip L.J., Cottrill C., Farrington J., 2015, 'Two-speed' Scotland: Patterns and Implications of the Digital Divide in Contemporary Scotland, Scottish Geographical Journal, 131, 3–4, pp. 148–170.
23. Prieger J.E., 2003, The supply side of the digital divide: is there equal availability in the broadband Internet access market?, Economic Inquiry, 41, 2, pp. 346–363.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ei/cbg013 -
24. Raport pokrycia terytorium Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej istniejącą infrastrukturą telekomunikacyjną oraz budynkami umożliwiającymi kolokację, 2015, Urząd Komunikacji Elektronicznej, Warszawa (available at: https://www.uke.gov.pl/raport-pokrycia-polski-infrastruktura-telekomunikacyjna-w-2014-r-17009).
25. Salemnik K., Strijker D., Bosworth G., 2015, Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas, Journal of Rural Studies (in press).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001 -
26. Schwanen T., Kwan M-P., 2008, The Internet, mobile phone and space-time constraints, Geoforum, 39, 3, pp. 1362–1377.6
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.11.005 -
27. Stephens M., Poorthuis A., 2015, Follow thy neighbor: Connecting the social and the spatial networks on Twitter, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 53, pp. 87–95.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.07.002 -
28. Taipale S., 2013, The use of e-government services and the Internet: The role of socio-demographic, economic and geographical predictors, Telecommunications Policy, 37, 4, pp. 413–422.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2012.05.005 -
29. Warf B., 2011, Geographies of global Internet censorship, Geo-Journal, 76, 1, pp. 1–23.
ttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-010-9393-3 -
30. Wellman B., Salaff J., Dimitrova D., Garton L., Gulia M., Haythornthwaite C., 1996, Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, telework, and virtual community, Annual Review of Sociology, 22, pp. 213–238.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.213 -
31. Whitacre B.E., Mills B.F., 2007, Infrastructure and the Rural-urban Divide in High-speed Residential Internet Access, International Regional Science Review, 30, 3, pp. 249–273.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017607301606 -
32. Young K.S., 1998, Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder, CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1, 3, pp. 237–244.
https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237 -
File size 3,1 MB ; application/pdf
Resource Identifier: Source:CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, call no. Cz.4488 ; CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, call no. Cz.4489 ; click here to follow the link
Language: Language of abstract: Rights:Creative Commons Attribution BY 3.0 PL license
Terms of use: Digitizing institution:Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences
Original in: Projects co-financed by:European Union. European Regional Development Fund ; Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure
Access: