A world without GIS? Post-GIS futures for the New Millennium

Harvey, Francis

doi:0016-7282

- ris
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Csv

A world without GIS? Post-GIS futures for the New Millennium Harvey, Francis

Object structure

A world without GIS? Post-GIS futures for the New Millennium

Geographia Polonica Vol. 87 No. 2 (2014)

GIS ; społeczeństwo informacyjne ; Internet ; nauki oparte na danych ; wszechobecne obliczenia

1. Ahlqvist O., Harvey F., Ban H., Chen W., Fontanella S., Guo M., Singh N., 2013. Making journal articles 'live': Turning academic writing into scientific dialog. GeoJournal, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 61-68.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10708-011-9431-9 -
2. Bell G., Gray J., 1997. The revolution yet to happen [in:] P.J. Denning, R.H. Metcalfe (eds.), Beyond calculation: The next fifty years of computing. New York: Springer Verlag.
3. Brotton J., 2012. A history of the world in twelve maps. London: Penguin Books.
4. Bowker G.C., 2005. Memory: Practices in the sciences. Cambridge (Massachusetts): MIT Press.
5. Bowker G.C., Star S.L., 1999. Sorting things out. Classification and its consequences. Cambridge (Massachusetts): MIT Press.
6. Brown M., Harding J., Sharples S., 2010. Exploring the usability of geographic information: A grounded theory analysis [in:] Proceedings of the GIS Research UK 18th Annual Conference. University College London, pp. 417-422.
7. Brown M., Sharples S., Harding J., Parker C.J., Bearman N., Maguire M., Forrest D., Haklay M., Jackson M., 2012. Usability of geographic information: Current challenges and future directions. Applied Ergonomics, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 855-865.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2012.10.013 -
8. Chrisman N., 2005. Full circle: More than just social implications of GIS. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 23-35.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/8U64-K7M1-5XW3-2677 -
9. Chrisman N., 2006. Charting the unknown. How computer mapping at Harvard became GIS. Redlands (California): ESRI Press.
10. Couclelis H., 2012. Climbing on a milestone for a better view: Goodchild's 'Geographical Information Science' paper as vantage point and ground for reflection. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 2291-2300.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2012.713959 -
11. De Paoli S., Miscione G., 2011. Relationality in geoIT software development: How data structures and organization perform together. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 173-182.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.09.003 -
12. Dowd M., 2013. A mad Tea Party. The New York Times, published 12 October 2013.
13. Dumbill E., 2013. The future of programming: Unraveling what programming will need for the next 10 years. Radar. Insight Analysis and Research about Emerging Technologies, published 11 January 2013.
14. Edsall R., 2013. Volunteered geographic analysis: Crowd-sourcing hypothesis generation with interactive Internet mapping applications. Paper read at Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, at Los Angeles, CA, 9-13April 2013.
15. Elwood S., Leszczynski A., 2011. Privacy, reconsidered: New representations, data practices, and the geoweb. Geoforum, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 6-15.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.08.003 -
16. Erik De Man W.H., 2006. Understanding Sdi: Complexity and institionalization. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 329-43.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13658810500399688 -
17. Fisher T., 2012. Place-based knowledge in the digital age. ArcNews. Esri. Fall 2012, vol. 34, no. 3. GIBSON W., 2012. Distrust that particular flavor. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons.
18. Goodchild M.F., 2007. Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 211-221.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y -
19. Gould M., Craglia M., Goodchild M.F., Annoni A., Camara G., Kuhn W., Mark D., Masser I., Maguire D., Liang S., Parsons E., 2008. Nextgeneration digital earth: A position paper from the Vespucci initiative for the advancement of Geographic Information Science. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, vol. 3, pp. 146-167.
20. Gryl I., Jekel T., 2012. Re-centring geoinformation in secondary education: Toward a spatial citizenship approach. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 18-28.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/carto.47.1.18 -
21. Haklay M., Singleton A., Parker C., 2008. Web Mapping 2.0: The Neogeography of the Geoweb. Geography Compass, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 2011-2039.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00167.x -
22. Harvey F., 2014. We know where you are. And we're more and more sure what that means [in:] K. Pimple (ed.), Emerging pervasive information communication technology (PICT) Berlin: Springer Verlag [in print].
23. Harvey F., Chrisman N.R., 1998. Boundary objects and the social construction of GIS technology. Environment and Planning A, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1683-94.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a301683 -
24. Harvey F., Iwaniak A., Coetzee S., Cooper A.K., 2012. Sdi past, present and future: A review and status assessment [in:] A. Rajabifard, D. Coleman (eds.), Spatial enabling government, industry and citizens. Needham (Massachusetts): GSDI Association Press, pp. 23-38.
25. Harvey F., Kne L., Manson S., 2013. U-Spatial: A consortium for the spatial university. Arc News, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1-6.
26. Hendriks P.H.J., Dessers E., Van Hootegem G., 2012. Reconsidering the definition of a spatial data infrastructure. International Journal of Geographic Information Science, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1479-1494.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2011.639301 -
27. Howard A., 2013. On the power and perils of "preemptive government": Stephen Goldsmith on the potential of urban predictive data analytics in municipal government. O'Reily: Data, published 28 February 2013.
28. IBM, 2014. IBM big data and analytics platform. http://www-01.ibm.com/software/data/bigdata/[12 January 2014].
29. Kurgan L., 2013. Close up at a distance: Mapping, technology, and politics. Cambridge (Massachusetts): MIT Press.
30. Lecher C., 2013. From DARPA, a navigational device that fits on a penny and works when GPS doesn't. Australian Popular Science, published online 11 April 2013.
31. Levinson P., 1997. The soft edge: A natural history and future of the information revolution. London-New York: Routledge.
32. Maceachren A.M. 1995. How maps work. Representation, visualization, design. New York: Guilford Press.
33. Maceachren A.M., Cai G., Sharma R., Rauschert I., Brewer I., Bolelli L., Shaparenko B., Fuhrmann S., Wang H., 2005. Enabling collaborative geoinformation access and decision-making through a natural, multimodal interface. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 293-317.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13658810412331280158 -
34. Mogel L., Bhagat A. (eds.), 2008. An atlas of radical cartography. Los Angeles: Journal of Aesthetics & Protest Press.
35. Nedovic-Budic Z., Pinto J.K., 2000. Information sharing in an interorganizational GIS environment. Environment and Planning B. Planning and Design, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 455-474.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/b2652 -
36. Norman D.A., 1993. Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Reading (Massachusetts): Addison-Wesley.
37. Roche S., Nabian N., Kloeckl K., Ratti C., 2012. Are 'smart cities' smart enough [in:] Global Geospatial Conference 2012 "Spatially Enabling Government, Industry and Citizens". Quebec City, Canada, 14-17 May 2012, pp. 215-235.
38. Solis B., Webber A., 2012. The rise of digital influence A "how-to" guide for businesses to spark desirable effects and outcomes through social media influence. San Mateo (California): Altimeter Group.
39. Solnit R., Pease B., Siegel S., 2010. Infinite city: A San Francisco atlas. Berkeley (California): University of California Press.
40. Star S.L., 1995. The politics of formal representations: Wizards, gurus, and organizational complexity [in:] S.L. Star (ed.) Ecologies of knowledge: Work and politics in science and technology. Albany: State University of New York Press.
41. Star S.L., 1999. The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 43, no. 3. pp. 377-391.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00027649921955326 -
42. Star S.L., Ruhleder K., 1996. Steps towards and ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large-scale collaborative systems. Information Systems Research, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 111-134.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.1.111 -
43. SUI D., 2012. Beyond mathematics and the deflationary turn: Fundamental concepts in Giscience - to whom and for what ends? [in:] F. Harvey (ed.), Are there fundamental principles in Geographic Information Science? Tobler Lecture Event 2012, Seattle: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
44. Taleb N.N., 2007. The black swan: The impact of the highly improbably. London: Penguin Books.
45. Turner A., 2006. Introduction to neogeography. Sebastopol (California): O'Reilly Media.
46. Walcott-Bryan, A., Kaess M., Johannsson H., Leonard J.J., 2012. Dynamic pose graph Slam: Long-term mapping in low dynamic environments [in:] Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference, pp. 1871-1878.
47. Wing J.M., 2006. Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 33-35.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215 -
48. WORLD BANK, 2012. Mobile phone access reaches three quarters of planet's population. World Bank. News, published 17 July, 2012.
49. Wright D., 2012. Theory and application in a post- GISsystems world. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 2197-2209.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2012.713957 -