Metadata language
territorial cohesion ; territorial approaches ; ESPON
References:
1. Barca F., 2009, An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations (Independent Report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy). http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/policy/future/pdf/report_barca_v0306.pdf
2. Bourdeau-Lepage L., & Huriot J.-M., 2002, Metropolisation in Warsaw: Economic Change and Urban Growth. Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 25(3), pp. 423–446.
3. Camagni R., 2008, Towards a Concept of Territorial Capital. [in:] R. Capello, R. Camagni, B Chizzolini & U. Fratesi (eds.) Modelling Regional Scenarios for the Enlarged Europe. Springer, Berlin, pp. 29-45.
4. Castells M., 1996, The Rise of the Network Society (Vol. 1). Malden, Mass.: Blackwell, 556 pp.
5. CEC, 1999, European Spatial Development Perspective: Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union (Agreed at the Informal Council of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning in Potsdam). European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/pdf/sum_en.pdf
6. CEC, 2008, Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion: Turning territorial diversity into strength. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ. do?uri=COM:2008:0616:FIN:EN:PD
7. Davoudi S., 2005, Understanding territorial cohesion. Planning, Practice & Research, 20(4), pp. 433–441.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02697450600767926 -
8. Davoudi S., Evans N., Governa F., & Santangelo M., 2008, Territorial Governance in the Making: Approaches, Methodologies, Practices. Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Espańoles, 46, pp. 33–52.
9. De Boe P., Grasland C., Healy A., Hanquet T., & Robert D., 1999, Spatial Integration (Final Report). http://www.mcrit.com/spesp/SPESP_REPORT/spatial_integration.pdf
10. Duehr S, Colomb C. & Nadin V., 2010, European Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation. Routledge: London, New York, 480 pp.
11. ESPON 2010, Regional Use of ESPON Knowledge: Inspiration for Researchers and Practioners involved in Regional Territorial Analysis and Policy Development (Working Paper from the internal ESPON Seminar on 3-4 December 2009 in Malmö). http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Publications/SeminarsReports/Malmoe_Seminar_Report.pdf
12. ESPON 2011, Regional Typologies, data and metadata. http://www.espon.eu/main/Menu_ToolsandMaps/ESPONTypologies/
13. ESPON 1.1.1., 2005, Urban areas as nodes in a polycentric development (Final Report). http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/ESPON2006Projects/ThematicProjects/Polycentricity/fr-1.1.1_revised-full.pdf
14. ESPON 2.3.2., 2007, Governance of Territorial and Urban Policies from EU to Local Level (Final Report). http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/ESPON2006Projects/PolicyImpactProjects/Governance/fr-2.3.2_final_feb2007.pdf
15. Espon CAEE, 2010, The case for agglomeration economies in Europe (Appendix C1: Investigating Agglomeration Economies in a panel of European Cities and Regions). http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/TargetedAnalyses/CAEE/CAEE_Investigating_Agglomeration_Economies_Appendix_C1.pdf
16. Espon EATIA, 2012, ESPON and Territorial Impact Assessment (Final Report). http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/TargetedAnalyses/EATIA/FinalReportEATIA28June2012Afinal.pdf
17. ESPON M4D, 2014, ESPON 2013 Database Dictionary of Spatial Units (Draft). http://database.espon.eu/db2/jsf/DicoSpatialUnits/DicoSpatialUnits_onehtml/index.html
18. Espon METROBORDER, 2010, Cross-border Polycentric Metropolitan Regions (Final Report). http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/TargetedAnalyses/METROBORDER/METROBORDER_-_Final_Report_-_29_DEC_2010.pdf
19. Espon POLYCE, 2012, Metropolisation and Polycentric Development in Central Europe (Final Report). http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/TargetedAnalyses/POLYCE/FR/POLYCE_FINAL_MAINREPORT.pdf
20. ESPON SS-LR, 2010, Spatial Perspectives at Nuts-3 Level (Final Report). http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/TargetedAnalyses/SS_LR/SS-LR_final_report_and_annexes.pdf21.
21. Espon SURE, 2010, Structured empirical analysis for convergence regions: identifying success factors for consolidated growth (Final Report). http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/TargetedAnalyses/SURE/SURE_FinalReport_and_annexes.pdf
22. Espon TANGO, 2012, Territorial Approaches for New Governance (Interim Report). Retrieved from http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/AppliedResearch/TANGO/ESPON_TANGO_Interim_Report_final.pdf
23. Espon TPM, 2013, Territorial Performance Monitoring (Final Report). Retrieved from http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/TargetedAnalyses/TPM/FinalReport/ESPON_TPM_FinalReport.pdf
24. ESPON DeTeC, 2014, Detecting Territorial Potentials and Challenges (Final Report).
25. Evers D., 2012, A Solution in Search of a Problem: A "Garbage Can" Approach to the Politics of Territorial Cohesion. European Journal of Spatial Development, February (45). http://www.nordregio.se/Global/EJSD/Refereed%20articles/refereed45.pdf
26. Kloosterman R. C., Musterd S., 2001, The Polycentric Urban Region: Towards a Research Agenda. Urban Studies, 38(4), pp. 623–633.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00420980120035259 -
27. Krätke S., 2007, Metropolisation of the European economic territory as a consequence of increasing specialisation of urban agglomerations in the knowledge economy. European Planning Studies, 15(1), pp. 1–27.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654310601016424 -
28. Lovering J., 1999, Theory led by Policy: The Inadequacies of the 'New Regionalism' (Illustrated from the Case of Wales). International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(2), pp. 379–395.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00202 -
29. Massey, D. (2004). For Space. London: SAGE, 222 pp.
30. OECD, 2001, OECD Territorial Outlook. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 279 pp.
31. Paasi A., 2004, Place and region: looking through the prism of scale. Progress in Human Geography, 28(4), pp. 536–546.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph502pr -
32. Planning Theory and Practice (2005). Interface on: Territorial cohesion 6(3), pp. 387-409.
33. Schön P., 2005, Territorial Cohesion in Europe? Planning Theory and Practice 6(3), pp. 389-400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14649350500209397 -
34. Schmitt P., 2011, The Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020 – A turning point in striving for Territorial Cohesion? Nordregio News 1/2011, pp 3-8.
35. Scott J. W., 2009, Europe of Regions. [in:] R. Kitchin & N. Thrift (eds.) International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 649-657.
36. Shields C., 2013, Aristotle. [in:] E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2013 Edition.). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/aristotle/
37. SPESP, 2000, Study Programme on European Spatial Planning 1998-1999. http://www.mcrit.com/SPESP/
38. TA, 2007, Territorial Agenda of the European Union: Towards a More Competitive and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions (Agreed on the occasion of the Informal Ministerial Meeting on Urban Development and Territorial Cohesion in Leipzig on 24 / 25 May 2007). http://www.eu-territorial-agenda.eu/Reference%20Documents/Territorial-Agenda-of-the-European-Union-Agreed-on-25-May-2007.pdf
39. TA 2020, 2011, Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020: Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions (agreed at the Informal Ministerial Meeting of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development on 19th May 2011 Gödöllő, Hungary).
40. Vandermotten C., Halbert L., Roelandts M., Cornut P., 2008, European Planning and the Polycentric Consensus: Wishful Thinking? Regional Studies, 42(8), pp. 1205–1217.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343400701874206 -
41. Vanolo A., 2010, European spatial planning between competitiveness and territorial cohesion: Shadows of neo-liberalism. European Planning Studies, 18(8), pp. 1301–1315.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654311003791358 -
42. Vasanen A., 2013, Spatial Integration and Functional Balance in Polycentric Urban Systems: A Multi-Scalar Approach. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 104(4), pp. 410–425.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12029 -
File size 1 MB ; application/pdf
Resource Identifier:1429-7132 ; 10.7163/Eu21.2014.25.3
Source:CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407 ; click here to follow the link
Language: Rights: Terms of use:Copyright-protected material. May be used within the limits of statutory user freedoms
Digitizing institution:Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences
Original in: Projects co-financed by:European Union. European Regional Development Fund ; Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure
Access: