Metadata language
Rural development, globalization and European regional policy: Perspectives from the DERREG project
Subtitle:Geographia Polonica Vol. 86 No. 2 (2013)
Creator: Publisher: Place of publishing: Date issued/created: Description: Type of object: Subject and Keywords:rural development ; regional development ; globalization ; regional policy ; Europe ; territorial cohesion ; DERREG project
References:
1. Allmendinger P., Haughton G., 2009. Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and metagovernance: The new spatial planning in the Thames Gateway. Environment and Planning A, vol. 41, iss. 3, pp. 617-633.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a40208 -
2. Amin A., 2002. Spatialities of globalisation. Environment and Planning A, vol. 34, iss. 3, pp. 385-400.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a3439 -
3. Amin A., 2004. Regions unbound: Towards a new politics of place. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 33-44.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00152.x -
4. Amin A., Thrift N., 2002. Cities: Reimagining the urban. Cambridge: Polity Press, 184 pp.
5. CEC, 2007. The European interest: Succeeding the age of globalization. Contribution of the Commission of the European Communities to the October Meeting of Heads of State and Government. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities, 9 pp.
6. Copus A., Dubois A. Hedström M., 2011. Expanding horizons: Local embeddedness and global engagement among small firms in the European Countryside. European Countryside, vol. 3, iss. 3, pp. 164-182.
7. Domínguez García M. D., Swagemakers P., Bock B.B., Simón Fernández X., 2012. Making a living: Googlerassroots development initiatives, natural resource management, and institutional support in Galicia, Spain. European Countryside, vol. 4, iss. 1, pp. 16-29.
8. Fischer Boel M., 2007. Globalization and agriculture: the EU response. Mumbai University Kalina campus, Speech in Mumbai, 9 March, 2007, Internet: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-07-136_en.htm [20 October 2012].
9. Frys W., Nienaber B., 2011. Protected areas and regional development: Conflicts and opportunities – the example of the UNESCO Biosphere Reserve Bliesgau. European Countryside, vol. 3, iss. 3, pp. 208-226.
10. Gray J., 2000. The Common Agricultural Policy and the re-invention of the rural in the European Community. Sociologia Ruralis, vol. 40, iss. 1, pp. 30-52.
11. Hoggart K., Buller H., Black R., 1995. Rural Europe: Identity and change. London: Edward Arnold, 319 pp.
12. Lampič B., Mrak I., 2012. Globalization and foreign amenity migrants: The case of foreign home owners in the Pomurska region of Slovenia. European Countryside, vol. 4, iss. 1, pp. 44-56.
13. Massey D., 2004. Geographies of responsibility. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, vol. 86, no.1, pp. 5-18.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00150.x -
14. Massey D., 2005. For space. London: Sage, 232 pp.
15. Nienaber B., Frys W., 2013. Saarland. [in:] J. McDonagh, B. Nienaber, M. Woods (eds.), Globalization and Europe's Rural Regions, Perspectives on rural policy and planning, Farnham: Ashgate [in print].
16. Potočnik-Slavič I., 2011. The relevance of linking favourable business environments with embeddedness: SMEs in rural areas of the Goriška region, Slovenia. European Countryside, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 183-197.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10091-012-0003-x -
17. Ray C., 2006. Neo-endogenous rural development in the EU. [in:] P. Cloke, T. Marsden, P. Mooney (eds.), The Handbook of Rural Studies, London: Sage, 511 pp.
18. Richardson T., 2000. Discourses of rurality in EU Spatial Policy: The European Spatial Development Perspective. Sociologia Ruralis, vol. 40, iss. 1, pp. 53-71.
19. Roep D., Wellbrock W., 2013. The Westerkwartier. [in:] J. McDonagh, B. Nienaber, M. Woods (eds.), Globalization and Europe's rural regions, Perspectives on rural policy and planning, Farnham: Ashgate [in print].
20. Schmied D., 2005. Winning and losing in Europe's rural areas. [in:] D. Schmied (ed.), Winning and losing: The changing geography of Europe's rural areas, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 1-18.
21. Skaptadóttir U. D., Wojtynska A., 2008. Labour migrants negotiating places and engagements. [in:] J.O. Baerenholdt, B. Granås (eds.), Mobility and place: Enacting Northern European peripheries, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 115-126.
22. Smith A., 1998. The politics of economic development in a French rural area. [in:] N. Walzer, B.D. Jacobs (eds.), Public-private partnerships for local economic development, Wesport-Conn: Praeger, pp. 227-241.
23. Steger M.B., 2003. Globalization: a very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 147 pp.
24. Van Der Ploeg J.D., Renting H., Brunori G., Knickel K., Mannion J., Marsden T., De Roest K., Sevilla Guzmán E., Ventura F., 2000. Rural development: From practice and policies to theory. Sociologia Ruralis, vol. 40, iss. 4, pp. 391-408.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00156 -
25. Van Der Ploeg J.D., Marsden T. (eds.), 2008. Unfolding webs: The dynamics of regional rural development. Assen: Van Gorcum, 262 pp.
26. Wellbrock W., Roep D., Wiskerke J.S.C., 2012. An integrated perspective on rural regional learning. European Countryside, vol. 4, iss. 1, pp. 1-15.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10091-012-0010-y -
27. Woods M., 2007. Engaging the global countryside: Globalization, hybridity and the reconstitution of rural place. Progress in Human Geography, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 485-507.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309132507079503 -
28. Woods M., 2011. Rural. Abingdon-New York: Routledge, 336 pp.
29. Woods, M., Burdack, J., Kriszan, M., 2010, Regional resilience and the global environment: Multiple scales of environmental discourse in rural development policy. Paper presented to Regional Studies Association Winter Conference, London, November 2010, http://www.derreg.eu/system/files/Regional% 20Resilience%20and%20the%20Global%20Environment. pdf [5 November 2012].
File size 0,8 MB ; application/pdf
Resource Identifier: Source:CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.2085, Cz.2173, Cz.2406 ; click here to follow the link
Language: Rights: Terms of use:Copyright-protected material. May be used within the limits of statutory user freedoms
Digitizing institution:Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences
Original in: Projects co-financed by:European Union. European Regional Development Fund ; Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure
Access: