Object structure
Title:

The prospects for the implementation of Planning Support Systems (PSS)in participatory decision-making in local governments in Poland

Subtitle:

Geographia Polonica Vol. 97 No. 4 (2024)

Creator:

Bąkowska-Waldmann, Edyta : Autor Affiliation ORCID

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Date issued/created:

2024

Description:

24 cm

Subject and Keywords:

local government ; spatial planning ; decision-making ; planning support systems ; public participation

Abstract:

The aim of the research was to investigate the use and potential of Planning Support Systems (PSS) in public participation within spatial planning in Polish local governments. Data from 718 local spatial planning departments, collected using CATI method, reveals limited current use of PSS tools in public participation, primarily passive online document viewing. Despite this, there is a growing potential for online methods, such as interactive meetings, necessitating PSS tools for real-time interaction. The study highlights a strong adherence to statutory consultation forms, suggesting a need for PSS development focused on legal requirements in public participation.

References:

Act of 7 July 2023 amending the Act on Spatial Planning and Development and certain other acts, Journal of Laws 2023, item 1688.
Alfrink, K., Keller, I., Doorn, N., & Kortuem, G. (2022). Tensions in transparent urban AI: Designing a smart electric vehicle charge point. AI & Society, 38(3), 1049-1065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01436-9 DOI
Aspen, D. M., & Amundsen, A. (2021). Developing a participatory planning support system for sustainable regional planning - A problem structuring case study. Sustainability, 13, 5723. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105723 DOI
Bąkowska-Waldmann, E. (2023). Residents' experiential knowledge and its importance for decision-making processes in spatial planning: A PPGIS based study. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12, 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12030102 DOI
Bąkowska-Waldmann, E., & Kaczmarek, T. (2021). The use of PPGIS: Towards reaching a meaningful public participation in spatial planning. International Journal of Geo-Information, 10, 581. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10090581 DOI
Bąkowska-Waldmann, E., & Kaczmarek, T. (2022). PPGIS potential in local governance and spatial planning: Lessons from Poland. In C. S. Silva (Ed.), Trends and innovations in urban e-planning (pp. 17-41). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9090-4.ch002 DOI
Batty, M. (2007). Planning support systems: Progress, predictions, and speculations on the shape of things to come. UCL Working Paper Series, 122, 1-25.
Blijleven, W. (2022). Expert, bureaucrat, facilitator: The role of expert public servants in interactive governance. Local Government Studies, 49(4), 841-860. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2022.2047028 DOI
Brown, G., & Kyttä, M. (2014). Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research. Applied Geography, 46, 122-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004 DOI
Brown, G., & Raymond, C. M. (2014). Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping. Landscape and Urban Planning, 122, 196-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.007 DOI
Campagna, M., Steinitz, C., Di Cesare, E. A., Cocco, Ch., Ballal, H., & Canfield, T. (2016). Collaboration in planning: The Geodesign approach. Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna, 35, 55-72.
Cardullo, P. (2021). Citizens in the 'Smart City': Participation, co-production, governance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429438806 DOI
Carver, S., Evans, A., Kingston, R., & Turton, I. (2001). Public participation, GIS, and cyberdemocracy: Evaluating on-line spatial decision support systems. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28(6), 907-921. https://doi.org/10.1068/b2751t DOI
Clark, T., Foster, L., Sloan, L., & Bryman, A. (2021). Bryman's social research methods (6th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Craig, W., Harris, T., & Weiner, D. (2002). Community participation and Geographic Information Systems. In W. J. Craig, T. M. Harris, & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and Geographic Information Systems (pp. 3-16). London: Taylor and Francis. DOI
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Davoudi, S. (2015). Planning as practice of knowing. Planning Theory, 14(3), 316-331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095215575919 DOI
Denters, B. (2017). Participation and democratic accountability: Making a difference for the citizens. In Ch. Schwab, G. Bouckaert, & S. Kuhlmann (Eds.), The future of local government in Europe: Lessons from research and practice in 31 countries (pp. 79-100). Baden-Baden: Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845280639-79 DOI
Elwood, S. (2006). Negotiating knowledge production: The everyday inclusions, exclusions, and contradictions of Participatory GIS research. The Professional Geographer, 58(2), 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9272.2006.00526.x DOI
European Commission. (2022). eGovernment Benchmark 2022. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/egovernment-benchmark-2022
Falco, E. (2016). Digital community planning. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 5(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijepr.2016040101 DOI
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.
Fischer, F. (2012). Participatory governance: From theory to practice. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 457-471). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199560530.013.0032 DOI
Flacke, J., Shrestha, R., & Aguilar, R. (2020). Strengthening participation using interactive planning support systems: A systematic review. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9010049 DOI
Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and power. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Fowler, F. J. (2013). Survey research methods. Sage.
Friedmann, J. (1973). Retracking America: A theory of transactive planning. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.
Friedmann, J. (1993). Toward a non-Euclidian mode of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 59(4), 482-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369308975902 DOI
Geertman, S. (2002). Participatory planning and GIS: A PSS to bridge the gap. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29, 21-35. https://doi.org/10.1068/b2760 DOI
Geertman, S., & Stillwell, J. (Eds.). (2009). Planning support systems: Best practice and new methods. Springer DOI
Geertman, S., & Stillwell, J. (Eds.). (2020). Handbook of planning support science. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI
Geertman, S., & Stillwell, J. (2009). Planning support systems: Content, issues, and trends. In S. Geertman & J. Stillwell (Eds.), Planning support systems: Best practice and new methods (pp. 1-26). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8952-7_1 DOI
Geertman, S., & Stillwell, J. (Eds.). (2003). Planning support systems in practice. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24795-1 DOI
Geertman, S., Ferreira, J., Goodspeed, R., & Stillwell, J. (Eds.). (2015). Planning support systems and smart cities. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18368-8 DOI
Gunton, T. (2007). Collaborative planning. In M. Bevir (Ed.), Encyclopedia of governance (pp. 106-107). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
Hansson, K., Göran, C., Love, E., & Mats, D. (2013). The importance of recognition for equal representation in participatory processes: Lessons from Husby. Footprint, 13, 81-98. https://doi.org/10.7480/footprint.7.2.771 DOI
Harris, B. (1989). Beyond geographic information systems: Computers and the planning professional. Journal of the American Planning Association, 55, 85-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368908975408 DOI
Healey, P. (1996). The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 23(2), 217-234. https://doi.org/10.1068/b230217 DOI
Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. Hampshire and London: McMillan Press Limited. DOI
Herzog, R. H., Gonçalves, J. E., Slingerland, G., Kleinhans, R., Prang, H., Brazier, F., & Verma, T. (2022). Identifying public values and spatial conflicts in urban planning. arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.04719 DOI
Innes, J. E. (1995). Planning theory's emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14(3), 183-189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x9501400307 DOI
Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2004). Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice, 5(4), 419-436. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935042000293170 DOI
Jankowski, P., Czepkiewicz, M., Młodkowski, M., & Zwoliński, Z. (2016). Geo-questionnaire: A method and tool for public preference elicitation in land use planning. Transactions in GIS, 20(6), 903-924. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12191 DOI
Jankowski, P., Czepkiewicz, M., Młodkowski, M., Zwoliński, Z., & Wójcicki, M. (2017). Evaluating the scalability of public participation in urban land use planning: A comparison of Geoweb methods with face-to-face meetings. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(3), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317719709 DOI
Jankowski, P., Czepkiewicz, M., Zwoliński, Z., Kaczmarek, T., Młodkowski, M., Bąkowska-Waldmann, E., Mikuła, Ł., Brudka, C., & Walczak, D. (2019). Geoweb methods for public participation in urban planning: Selected cases from Poland. In K. Koutsopoulos, R. Gonzalez, & K. Donert (Eds.), Geospatial Challenges in 21st Century (pp. 249-269). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04750-4_13 DOI
Jędraszko, A. (2008). Gospodarka przestrzenna w Polsce wobec standardów europejskich, czyli jak ustanowić dobre prawo dla zrównoważonego rozwoju. Biblioteka Urbanisty, 13. Warszawa: Urbanista.
Jeon, C. M., & Lee, H. C. (2016). The trends and characteristics of engaged urban planning in Korea: Focused on 2030 master plans for Cheongju, Suwon, and Seoul. Seoul Studies, 17, 1-16.
Jiang, H., Geertman, S., & Witte, P. (2020). Avoiding the planning support system pitfalls? What smart governance can learn from the planning support system implementation gap. Urban Analytics and City Science, 47(8), 1343-1360. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320934824 DOI
Johnson, P. A., Corbett, J. M., Gore, C., Robinson, P., Allen, P., & Sieber, R. (2015). A web of expectations: Evolving relationships in community participatory Geoweb projects. ACME: An International Journal of Critical Geography, 14(3), 827-848. https://doi.org/10.14288/acme.v14i3.1235 DOI
Jordan, T. (2014). Deliberative methods for complex issues: A typology of functions that may need scaffolding. Group Facilitation: A Research and Applications Journal, 13, 50-71.
Kaczmarek, T., & Mikuła, Ł. (2021). Konsultacje społeczne w planowaniu przestrzennym z użyciem narzędzi PPGIS. In A. Bochentyn, & J. H. Szlachetko (Eds.), Cyfrowa czy analogowa? Funkcjonowanie administracji publicznej w stanie kryzysu (pp. 410-433). Pelplin: Wydawnictwo Bernardinum.
Kahila-Tani, M. (2015). Reshaping the planning process using local experiences: Utilising PPGIS in participatory urban planning (Doctoral dissertation). Aalto University.
Kahila-Tani, M., Broberg, A., Kyttä, M., & Tyger, T. (2016). Let the citizens map -Public Participation GIS as a planning support system in the Helsinki master plan process. Planning Practice & Research, 31(2), 195-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2015.1104203 DOI
Kahila-Tani, M., Kyttä, M., & Geertman, S. (2019). Does mapping improve public participation? Exploring the pros and cons of using public participation GIS in urban planning practices. Landscape and Urban Planning, 186, 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.02.019 DOI
Kahila, M., & Kyttä, M. (2009). SoftGIS as a bridge builder in collaborative urban planning. In S. Geertman & J. Stillwell (Eds.), Planning Support Systems: Best Practices and New Methods (pp. 389-412). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8952-7_19 DOI
Keenan, B. P., & Jankowski, P. (2019). Spatial decision support systems: Three decades on. Decision Support Systems, 116, 64-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2018.10.010 DOI
Kingston, R. (2002). The role of e-government and public participation in the planning process. Paper presented at XVI AESOP Congress, Volos, Greece, July 14-20.
Klosterman, R. E. (1997). Planning support systems: A new perspective on computer-aided planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 17(1), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9701700105 DOI
Klosterman, R. E. (1999). New perspectives on planning support systems. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26, 317-320. https://doi.org/10.1068/b260317 DOI
Klosterman, R. E. (2009). Planning support systems: Retrospect and prospect. In S. Geertman & J. Stillwell (Eds.), Planning Support Systems. Best Practice and New Methods (pp. V-VII). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8952-7 DOI
Koekoek, A., Van Lammeren, R., & Vonk, G. (2009). The potential of integrating e-participation in planning support systems. URISA Journal, 21(2), 39-47.
Lehtiö, A., Hartikainen, M., Ala-Luopa, S., Olsson, T., & Väänänen, K. (2023). Understanding citizen perceptions of AI in the smart city. AI & Society, 38, 1123-1134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01589-7 DOI
Lohr, S. (2009). Sampling: Design and Analysis. Cengage Learning.
Luusua, A., Ylipulli, J., Foth, M., & Aurigi, A. (2023). Urban AI: Understanding the emerging role of artificial intelligence in smart cities. AI & Society, 38, 1039-1044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01537-5 DOI
Miessen, M. (2010). The Nightmare of Participation: Crossbench Praxis as a Mode of Criticality. New York: Sternberg Press.
Miller, D., Vogt, N., Nijnik, M., Brondizio, E., & Fiorini, S. (2009). Integrating analytical and participatory techniques for planning the sustainable use of land resources and landscapes. In S. Geertman & J. Stillwell (Eds.), Planning Support Systems. Best Practice and New Methods (pp. 317-345). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8952-7_16 DOI
Murray, M., & Greer, J. (2002). Participatory planning as dialogue: The Northern Ireland regional strategic framework and its public examination process. Policy Studies, 23(3), 191-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144287022000045984 DOI
Niewiadomski, Z. (2002). Planowanie Przestrzenne. Zarys Systemu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Prawnicze LexisNexis.
Obermeyer, N. J. (1998). The evolution of public participation GIS. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 25(2), 65-66. https://doi.org/10.1559/152304098782594599 DOI
OECD. (2023). Economic Survey of Poland 2023. Retrieved May 7, 2023, from https://www.oecd.org/economy/poland-economic-snapshot/
Panek, J. (2018). Mapping citizens' emotions: Participatory planning support system in Olomouc, Czech Republic. Journal of Maps, 15(1), 8-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2018.1546624 DOI
Pantić, M., Cilliers, J., Cimadomo, G., Montaño, F., Olufemi, O., Torres Mallma, S., & van den Berg, J. (2021). Challenges and opportunities for public participation in urban and regional planning during the COVID-19 pandemic -Lessons learned for the future. Land, 10, 1379. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10121379 DOI
Peltonen, L., & Sairinen, R. (2010). Integrating impact assessment and conflict management in urban planning: Experiences from Finland. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(5), 328-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.04.006 DOI
Pfeffer, K., Martinez, J., O'Sullivan, D., Scott, D. (2015). Geo-technologies for spatial knowledge: Challenges for inclusive and sustainable urban development. In J. Gupta, K. Pfeffer, H. Verrest, & M. Ros-Tonen (Eds.), Geographies of Urban Governance: Advanced Theories, Methods and Practices (pp. 147-174). Berlin: Springer. DOI
Quan, S. J., Li, Q., Augenbroe, G., Brown, J., & Yang, P. P. (2015). Urban data and building energy modeling: A GIS-based urban building energy modeling system using the Urban-EPC engine. In S. Geertman, J. Ferreira, R. Goodspeed, & J. Stillwell (Eds.), Planning Support Systems and Smart Cities (pp. 447-470). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18368-8_24 DOI
Schlossberg, M., & Shuford, E. (2005). Delineating "Public" and "Participation" in PPGIS. URISA Journal, 16(2), 15-26.
Shiffer, M. J. (1995). Interactive multimedia planning support: Moving from stand-alone systems to the World Wide Web. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 22, 649-664. https://doi.org/10.1068/b220649 DOI
Sieber, R. (2006). Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(3), 491-507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x DOI
Silva, C. S. (Ed.). (2022). Trends and Innovations in Urban e-Planning. Hershey: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9090-4 DOI
Steinitz, C. (2012). A Framework for Geodesign: Changing Geography by Design. Redlands: Esri Press.
Stepanova, O., Polk, M., & Saldert, H. (2020). Understanding mechanisms of conflict resolution beyond collaboration: An interdisciplinary typology of knowledge types and their integration in practice. Sustainability Science, 15, 263-279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00690-z DOI
Stevens, D., Dragicevic, S., & Rothley, K. (2007). iCity: A GISeCA modelling tool for urban planning and decision making. Environmental Modelling & Software, 22, 761-773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.02.004 DOI
Sugumaran, R., & DeGroote, J. (2019). Spatial Decision Support Systems: Principles and Practices. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Talen, E. (1999). Constructing neighborhoods from the bottom up: The case for resident-generated GIS. Environment and Planning B, 26, 533-55. https://doi.org/10.1068/b260533 DOI
Talen, E. (2000). Bottom-Up GIS: A new tool for individual and group expression in participatory planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(3), 279-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360008976107 DOI
Tulloch, D. L., & Shapiro, T. (2003). The intersection of data access and public participation: Impacting GIS users' success? Urban and Regional Information Systems Association (URISA) Journal, 15 APA II, 55-60.
Velibeyoglu, K. (2010). E-Planning applications in Turkish local governments. In S. N. Silva (Ed.), Handbook of Research on E-Planning: ICTs for Urban Development and Monitoring (pp. 420-434). Hershey: IGI Global. DOI
Vonk, G., Geertman, S., & Schot, P. (2005). Bottlenecks blocking widespread usage of planning support systems. Environment and Planning A, 37(5), 909-924. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3712 DOI
Wouters, R., De Fraine, B., & Simons, M. (2019). What is at stake in deliberative inquiry? A review about a deliberative practice. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 32, 193-217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-018-9457-8 DOI
Würstle, P., Santhanavanich, T., Padsala, R., & Coors, V. (2021). Development of a digital 3D participation platform - Case study of Weilimdorf (Stuttgart, Germany). The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLVI-4/W1-2021, 123-129. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVI-4-W1-2021-123-2021 DOI
Yigitcanlar, T., Saygin, O., & Han, J. H. (Eds.). (2008). Online Participatory Decision Support Tools for Knowledge-Based Urban Development. Hershey: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-838-3.ch011 DOI
Zhang, L., Geertman, S., Hooimeijer, P., & Lin, Y. (2019). The usefulness of a Web-based Participatory Planning Support System in Wuhan, China. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 74, 208-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.11.006 DOI

Relation:

Geographia Polonica

Volume:

97

Issue:

4

Start page:

403

End page:

423

Resource type:

Text

Detailed Resource Type:

Article

Resource Identifier:

0016-7282 (print) ; 2300-7362 (online) ; 10.7163/GPol.0285

Source:

CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.2085, Cz.2173, Cz.2406 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Language of abstract:

eng

Rights:

Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. [CC BY 4.0] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license, full text available at: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

European Union. European Regional Development Fund ; Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure

Access:

Open

×

Citation

Citation style: