Metadata language
Common Agricultural Policy and Cohesion Policy in the Context of the EU Budget's Revision
Creator: Publisher:Instytut Rozwoju Wsi i Rolnictwa Polskiej Akademii Nauk
Place of publishing: Date issued/created: Type of object: Subject and Keywords:development of rural areas ; common agricultural policy ; cohesion policy ; revision of the EU budget
Abstract:Activities connected with the development of rural areas are conducted both within the so-called Second pillar of the European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and within programmes financed from the cohesion policy fund. The question of selection of the method of implementation of the rural development policy becomes particularly important in the present situation of discussions on changes in CAP. These discussions are stimulated both by internal factors (revision of the EU budget and CAP’s health check) and external factors (WTO negotiations and changes on the global food market). All these factors have been thoroughly analysed in this article. The resulting conclusion is that the revision of the EU budget, which relates both to CAP and to the cohesion policy, may prove to be the most important catalyst of changes in the manner of implementation of the rural development policy. The article describes the key dilemmas connected with the selection of methods for the introduction of solutions linked to the policy of rural development. The author of the article claims that because of the low mobility of production factors in Poland it could prove advantageous to shift much of the burden of implementation of the rural development policy onto the cohesion policy. He also presents arguments to prove that an increase in the EU funds allocated to rural development via the cohesion policy, introduced at the expense of means flowing into the rural areas via the Second pillar of CAP may reduce the risk of a decrease in the transfer of EU funds to Poland’s rural areas after 2013. The author of the article also proposes an institutional mechanism for the implementation of rural development policy that would be less dependant on CAP’s Second pillar.
References:
Burkiewicz W., Grochowska R., Hardt Ł., 2007: Przyszłość polityki rolnej a przegląd budżetu UE w latach 2008–2009. UKIE, Warszawa.
Daugbjerg C., Swinbank A., 2007: The Politics of Cap Reform: Trade Negotiations, Institutional Settings and Blame Avoidance, „Journal of Common Market Studies” 45(1): 1–22.
Fouilleux E., 2004: CAP Reforms and Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Another View on Discourse Efficiency. „West European Politics” 27(2): 235–255.
Gylfason T., 1995: The Macroeconomics of European Agriculture. „Princeton Studies in International Finance” 78.
Hardt Ł., 2007a: Wartość dodana wspólnej polityki rolnej dla Unii Europejskiej i Polski. W: Społeczno-ekonomiczne aspekty rozwoju polskiej wsi. Red. M. Błąd, D. Klepacka-Kołodziejska. IRWIR PAN, Warszawa: 195–209.
Hardt Ł., 2007b: Polska w UE – reforma budżetu UE oraz ocena wykorzystania środków unijnych w Polsce. W: Raport INE PAN 11: 60–64.
Putnam R., 1988: Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. „International Organization” 42(3): 427–460.
Sarkozy N., 2007: Wystąpienie w Rennes, 11.09.07.
Wichern R., 2004: Economics of the Common Agricultural Policy. „European Economy” 211, European Commission, Brussels.
doi:10.53098/wir.2008.4.141/03 ; 0137-1673 (print); 2657-5213 (on-line)
Source: Language: Language of abstract: Rights:Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license
Terms of use: Digitizing institution:Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development of the Polish Academy of Sciences
Original in:Library of the Institute of Rural and Agriculture Development of the PAS
Projects co-financed by: Access: