Metadata language
Regional planning in France and Germany: towards convergence?
Subtitle: Creator:
Zimmermann, Karsten
:
Autor
;
Feiertag, Patricia
:
Autor
comparative method ; France ; Germany ; metropolitan region ; regional planning
Abstract:
The comparison of planning systems is a well-established field of study in the planning sciences. However, the typologies in use seem to be outdated as planning systems in Europe change continuously, showing disruption as well as path-dependent trajectories. The eventual demise of regional planning has been one of the focal points in this debate. In this paper, we compare two planning systems following the idea of variation-finding comparison. We seek to find the differences within a group of similar systems (i.e. western European social-democratic welfare states). The two countries chosen for this contribution are Germany and France and our empirical focus is on regional planning in city-regions. The two countries usually are considered to be very different in terms of politics and governmental structure as well as with regard to the planning system. Recent reforms in France demonstrate that regional planning goes into the direction of a more consolidated system, eventually showing more convergence with the German system than expected. Our results demonstrate that differences continue to exist but that there is also considerable sub-national variation in both countries so that there is more convergence on the level of city-regions than on the national level. In addition, we put into question the widely assumed demise of regional planning.
Baden-Württemberg (2002). Landesentwicklungsplan. Stuttgart.
Bariol-Mathais, B. (Ed.). (2015). L'expérience métropolitaine lyonnaise. Collection Alternatives. Paris: FNAU, Gallimard.
Béhar, D., Czertok, S., & Desjardins, X. (2021). Au fil du débat. Faire région, faire France: Quand la région planifie. Boulogne-Billancourt: Berger-Levrault.
Berisha, E.; Cotella, G.; Janin Rivolin, U. & Solly, A. (2021). Spatial governance and planning systems in the public control of spatial development: a European typology, European Planning Studies, 29(1), 181-200.
Blotevogel, H.-H., Danielzyk, R., & Münter, A. (2014). Spatial Planning in Germany: Institutional Inertia and New Challenges. In M., Reimer, P., Getimis & H.H., Blotevogel (Eds.). Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe. A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes (pp. 83-107). London: Routledge.
Boino, P. (2007). Lyon: le territoire comme facteur de métropolisation. In A., Motte (Ed.). Collection Villes. Les agglomérations françaises face aux défis métropolitains (pp. 42-61). Paris: Economica, Anthropos.
Demazière, C. (2018). Strategic Spatial Planning in a Situation of Fragmented Local Government: The Case of France. disP - The Planning Review, 54(2), 58-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2018.1487645
Dembski, S., & O'Brien, P. (2023). The quest for certainty: Introducing zoning into a discretionary system in England and the European experience. Raumforschung und Raumordnung. Spatial Research and Planning, 81(6), pp. 579-590. https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.1695
Desjardins, X., & Geppert, A. (2019). Governance Rescaling and Regional Planning in France: Is Big Really Beautiful? In V., Lingua & V., Balz (Eds.). Shaping Regional Futures: Designing and Visioning in Governance Rescaling (pp. 121-132). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23573-4_9
Diedrich, L., & Dahl, C. (2016). Ile de Nantes 2000-2010: A method for the meantime? Journal of Landscape Architecture, 11(2), 72-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2016.1188576
Ducos, J.-P. (2015). L'efficacité environnementale des documents d'urbanisme : les Schémas de Cohérence Territoriale: Echelle nationale et locale: le cas du Maine-et-Loire. PhD thesis. Angers: Université d'Angers. Retrieved from https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01475750
Eichhorn, S.; Diller, C.; Pehlke, D. (2023). The Development of the Regulatory Intensity of German Regional Plans from 1985 to 2017. An Empirical Contribution to the Discussion on the Loss of Importance of Spatial Planning. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 81(3), 207-24. https://rur.oekom.de/index.php/rur/article/view/941
Einig, K. (2012). Regulierung des Siedlungsflächenwachstums als Herausforderung des Raumordnungsrechts. DisP - the Planning Review, 41(160), 48-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2005.10556906
Fédération des SCoT (2018). SCoT et PLUi. Panorama au 1er janvier 2018. Paris.
Furkert, M., & Skowronski, S. (2018): Eine Disziplin im Wandel. Entwicklung, aktueller Stellenwert und Handlungsoptionen der Raumordnung. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung 3. Retrieved from https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/veroeffentlichungen/izr/2018/3/downloads/disziplin-im-wandel.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1
Fürst, D. (2010). Raumplanung: Herausforderungen des deutschen Institutionensystems. Detmold: Rohn.
Galland, D. (2012). Is Regional Planning Dead or Just Coping? The Transformation of a State Sociospatial Project into Growth-Oriented Strategies. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(3), 536-552. https://doi.org/10.1068/c11150
Geppert, A. (2014). France, drifting away from the 'regional economic' approach. In M., Reimer, P., Getimis & H.H., Blotevogel, 2014 (Eds.). Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe. A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes (pp. 109-126). Routledge: London.
Griggs, S., Howarth, D., & Feandeiro, A. (2018). The logics and limits of "collaborative governance" in Nantes: Myth, ideology, and the politics of new urban regimes. Journal of Urban Affairs, 9(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1516508
Gustedt, E., Grabski-Kieron, U., Demazière, C., Paris, D. (Eds.). (2022). Cities and Metropolises in France and Germany. Hanover: ARL. Retrieved from https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0156-11198
Harrison, J., Galland, D., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2021). Regional planning is dead: long live planning regional futures. Regional Studies, 55(1), 6-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1750580
Henger, R., Schröter-Schlaack, C., Ulrich, P., & Distelkamp, M. (2010). Flächeninanspruchnahme 2020 und das 30-ha-Ziel: Regionale Verteilungsschlüssel und Anpassungserfordernisse. Raumforschung und Raumordnung. Spatial Research and Planning, 68(4), 297-309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-010-0038-2
Hertzog, R. (2018). Inter-municipal Cooperation in France: A Continuous Reform, New Trends. In F., Teles & P., Swianiewicz (Eds.). Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Europe: Institutions and Governance (pp. 133-155). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Janin Rivolin, U. (2008). Conforming and performing planning systems in Europe: an unbearable cohabitation. Planning Practice & Research, 23(2), 167-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450802327081
Janin Rivolin, U. (2012). Planning Systems as Institutional Technologies: a Proposed Conceptualization and the Implications for Comparison. Planning Practice & Research, 27(1), 63-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.661181
Klee, A. (2022). Zum Bedeutungsverlust der Landesplanung, In M., Miosga, S., Dudek & A., Klee (Eds.). Neue Perspektiven für eine zukunftsfähige Raumordnung in Bayern (pp. 59-75). Hannover: ARL. https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0156-4394046
Mahé, S., & Bois, S. (2012). Naissance d'un grand territoire. In A., Masboungi (Ed.). Collection projet urbain. Estuaire Nantes - Saint-Nazaire. Écométropole, mode d'emploi (pp. 18-25). Paris: Éditions du Moniteur.
Moscarelli, F. (2016). La place de la biodiversité dans les documents de planification urbaine en France. urbe. Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbana, 8(3), 407-424. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-3369.008.003.AO09
Nadin, V., & Fernández-Maldonado, A. M. (2023). Spatial planning systems in Europe: multiple trajectories. Planning Practice & Research, 38(5), 625-638. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2023.2258568
Nadin, V., Stead, D., Dąbrowski, M., & Fernandez-Maldonado, A. M. (2021). Integrated, adaptive and participatory spatial planning: trends across Europe. Regional Studies, 55(5), 791-803. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1817363
NRW (2017). Landesentwicklungsplan Nordrhein-Westfalen (LEP NRW). Düsseldorf.
Ouvrard, P. (2016). Le nouvel esprit de l'urbanisme, entre scènes et coulisses: Une ethnographie de la fabrique du territoire de Saint-Nazaire à Nantes. PhD thesis. Nantes: ENSA Nantes. Retrieved from http://archive.bu.univ-nantes.fr/pollux/fichiers/download/a889bf5a-0366-475c-a290-0408ffc91517
Parnet, C. (2016). Two faces of the city: Varieties of metropolitanisation in Lyon and Marseilles. In A., Cole & R., Payre (Eds.). Cities as Political Objects. Historical Evolution, Analytical Categorisations and Institutional Challenges of Metropolitanisation (pp. 241-264). Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12619
Purkarthofer, E., Humer, A., & Mäntysalo, R. (2021). Regional planning: an arena of interests, institutions and relations. Regional Studies, 55(5), 773-777. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1875128
RVR (2023). Regionalplan Ruhr. November 2023. Essen: Regionalverband Ruhr.
Salamin, G. (2023). The mapping of forms of spatial planning: An instrument-oriented tool for the international comparison of spatial planning activities. European Spatial Research and Policy, 30(1), 55-78. https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.30.1.03
Schmidt, S., Siedentop, S., & Fina, S. (2018). How effective are regions in determining urban spatial patterns? Evidence from Germany. Journal of Urban Affairs, 40(5), 639-656. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2017.1360741
Sellers, J. (2019). From Within to Between Nations: Subnational Comparison across Borders. Perspective on Politics, 17(1), 85-105. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592718002104
Siedentop, S., Fina, S., & Krehl, A. (2016). Greenbelts in Germany's regional plans-An effective growth management policy? Landscape and Urban Planning, 145, 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.09.002
Smas, L., & Schmitt, P. (2021). Positioning Regional Planning Across Europe. Regional Studies, 55(5), 778-790. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1782879
Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: institutional change in advanced political economies. In W., Streeck & K., Thelen (Eds.). Beyond continuity: institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 1-39). Oxford: University Press. Retrieved from https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-194981
Tilly, C. (1984). Big structures, large processes, huge comparisons. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
van Straaten, F. M., Janssen-Jansen, L. B., & van den Brink, A. (2014). Delivering planning objectives through regional based land-use planning and land policy instruments: an assessment of recent experiences in the Dutch provinces. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(3), 567-584. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1277
Vanier, M. (2018). SRADDET, la carte et le territoire. Revue Urbanisme, 408, 51.
Verhage, R., Baker, M., & Boino, P. (2007). Strategic spatial planning at the metropolitan level: The case of Manchester and Lyon. In P., Booth, M., Breuillard, C., Fraser, & D., Paris (Eds.). Spatial planning systems of Britain and France: A comparative analysis (pp. 83-98). London, New York: Routledge.
Waterhout, B., Othengrafen, F., & Sykes, O. (2013). Neo-liberalization processes and spatial planning in France, Germany, and the Netherlands: an exploration. Planning Practice & Research, 28(1), 141-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.699261
Zimmermann, K., & Feiertag, P. (2022). Governance and City Regions: Policy and Planning in Europe. London: Routledge.
1429-7132 (print) ; 2300-8547 (online) ; 10.7163/Eu21.2024.46.1
Source:CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407 ; click here to follow the link
Language: Language of abstract: Rights:Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license
Terms of use:Copyright-protected material. [CC BY 4.0] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license, full text available at: ; -
Digitizing institution:Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences
Original in: Projects co-financed by:European Union. European Regional Development Fund ; Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure
Access: