Metadata language
Far-Right Digital Activism During and Beyond the Pandemic: A Patchwork Ethnographic Approach
Creator: Publisher:Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology Polish Academy of Sciences
Place of publishing: Date issued/created: Description: Type of object: Subject and Keywords:ethnography -- journal ; Digital activism ; ethnography ; far right ; pandemic ; PEGIDA ; protest
Abstract:While digital activism has formed part of social movements’ contentious repertoires for at least two decades, online forms of protest have risen to unprecedented importance across the globe in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. This article studies continuities and shifts in digital activism before, during and beyond the pandemic, drawing from a case study conducted of the Dresden-based far-right social movement organisation PEGIDA. Seeking to shed new light on the role of the internet and social media for sustained far-right mobilisation, I explore long-term trends in PEGIDA’s digital activism since its emergence in 2014. To this aim, I draw from an original patchwork ethnographic dataset generated through participant observation of demonstrations in Dresden and digital ethnography in 2019-21 as well as undertaking a thorough literature review. The empirical analysis indicates three key findings: Firstly, the longitudinal perspective reveals that a social movement actor’s digital practices are not bound to one or a few ideal-types, but highly dynamic over time. Secondly, my interpretive-ethnographic lens emphasises the constitutive dimensions of digital activism. Thirdly, the analytical focus on digital activism during the pandemic adds new insights into the relationship between the online and offline worlds of mobilisation. As a whole, this article underscores some of the key advantages of (patchwork) ethnography in relation to other methods in protest research.
References:
Abidin, Crystal, and Gabriele de Seta. 2020. “Private Messages from the Field: Confessions on Digital Ethnography and Its Discomforts.” Journal of Digital Social Research 2 (1): 1–19.
Aronoff, Myron J., and Jan Kubik. 2013. Anthropology and Political Science: A Convergent Approach. New York: Berghahn Books.
Balsiger, Philip, and Alexandre Lambelet. 2014. “Participant Observation” In Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research, edited by Donatella della Porta, 144–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baringhorst, Sigrid, Mundo Yang, Kathrin Voss, and Lisa Villioth. 2017. “Webzentrierte Hybridkampagnen – Ausdruck postdemokratischer Protestpartizipation?” In Protest in Bewegung. Zum Wandel von Bedingungen, Formen und Effekten politischen Protests, edited by Priska Daphi, Nicole Deitelhoff, Dierter Rucht and Simon Teune, 171–98. Nomos: Baden-Baden.
Berntzen, Lars Erik, and Manès Weisskircher. 2016. “Anti-Islamic PEGIDA beyond Germany: Explaining Differences in Mobilisation.” Journal of Intercultural Studies 37 (6): 556–73.
Blee, Kathleen M. 2007. “Ethnographies of the Far Right.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 36 (2): 119–28.
Bogerts, Lisa, and Maik Fielitz. 2018. “‘Do You Want Meme War?’ Understanding the Visual Mems of the German Far Right.” In Post-Digital Cultures of the Far Right, edited by Maik Fielitz and Nick Thurston, 137–54. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Brodkin, Evelyn Z. 2017. “The Ethnographic Turn in Political Science: Reflections on the State of the Art.” Political Science & Politics 50 (1): 131–34.
Buyse, Antoine. 2021. “Pandemic Protests: Creatively Using the Freedom of Assembly during COVID - 19.” Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 39 (4): 265–67.
Cammaerts, Bart. 2021. “The New-New Social Movements: Are Social Media Changing the Ontology of Social Movements?” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 26 (3): 343–58.
Carmen Mayer, Maria del, Verena Stern, and Priska Daphi. 2021. “Soziale Bewegungen in Zeiten von Covid-19 zwischen Anpassung, Innovation und Brüchen.” Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen 34 (2): 203–17.
Casquete, Jesus. 2006. “The Power of Demonstrations.” Social Movement Studies 5 (1): 45–60.
Castelli Gattinara, Pietro. 2020. “The Study of the Far Right and Its Three E’s: Why Scholarship Must Go beyond Eurocentrism, Electoralism and Externalism.” French Politics 18 (3): 314–33.
Earl, Jennifer, Katrina Kimport, Greg Prieto, Carly Rush, and Kimberly Reynoso. 2010. “Changing the World One Webpage at a Time: Conceptualizing and Explaining Internet Activism.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 15 (4): 425–46.
Eggeling, Kristin A. 2022. “Embracing the ‘Inverted Commas’, or How COVID -19 Can Show Us New Directions for Ethnographic ‘Fieldwork’. Qualitative Research.
Fangen, Katrin. 2020. “An Observational Study of the Norwegian Far Right: Some Reflections.” In Researching the Far Right: Theory, Method and Practice, edited by Stephen D. Ashe, Joel Busher, Graham Macklin, and Aaron Winter. London and New York: Routledge.
Fielitz, Maik, and Daniel Staemller. 2020. “Hashtags, Tweets, Protest? Varianten des digitalen Aktivismus.” Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen 33 (2): 425–41.
Flesher Fominaya, Cristina, and Kevin Gillan. 2017. “Navigating the Technology-Media-Movements Complex.” Social Movement Studies 16 (4): 383–402.
Froio, Caterina and Bharath Ganesh. 2019. “The Transnationalisation of Far Right Discourse on Twitter.” European Societies 21 (4): 513–39.
Geiges, Lars, Stine Marg, and Franz Walter. 2015. PEGIDA. Die Schmutzige Seite der Zivilgesellschaft? Bielefeld: Transcript.
Goodwin, Matthew J. 2006. “The Rise and Faults of the Internalist Perspective in Extreme Right Studies.” Representation 42 (4): 347–64.
Góralska, Magdalena. 2020. “Anthropology from Home: Advice on Digital Ethnography for the Pandemic Times.” Anthropology in Action 27 (1): 46–52.
Günel, Gökçe, Saiba Varma, and Chika Watanabe. 2020. “A Manifesto for Patchwork Ethnography.” Fieldsights (blog). September 6, 2020. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/a-manifesto-for-patchwork-ethnography.
Hine, Christine. 2017. “Virtual Ethnography: Modes, Varieties, Affordances.” In The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods, edited by Nigel G. Fielding, Raymond M. Lee, and Blank, Grant, 2nd ed., 401–15. London: SAGE .
Hunger, Sophia, and Swen Hutter. 2021. “Fridays for Future in der Corona-Krise: Welche Mobilisierungskraft haben Online-Proteste?” Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen 34 (2): 218–34.
Institut für Demokratieforschung. 2016. “Die Büchse der Pandora? PEGIDA im Jahr 2016 und die Profanisierung rechtspopulistischer Positionen.” (accessed 26 July 2022).
Jasser, Greta, Jordan McSwiney, Ed Pertwee, and Savvas Zannettou. 2021. “‘Welcome to #GabFam’: Farright Virtual Community on Gab.” In New Media & Society.
Joyce, Mary. 2010. “Introduction: How to Think about Digital Activism.” In Digital Activism Decoded: The New Mechanics of Change, edited by Mary Joyce, 1–14. New York: International debate education association.
Kavada, Anastasia. 2016. “Social Movements and Political Agency in the Digital Age: A Communication Approach.” Media and Communication 4 (4): 8–12.
Kocyba, Piotr. 2018. “Pegida: A Movement of Right-wing Extremists or Simply ‘Concerned Citizens’?” Intersections: East European Journal of Society and Politics 4 (4): 72–88.
Kocyba, Piotr, and Sebastian Sommer. 2022. “On (Missing) Critical Distance and (Involuntary) Alliances: A Warning About the Reproduction of Far-right Ideologies in Academic Papers.” Intersections: East European Journal of Society and Politics 8 (1): 208–12.
McCaughey, Martha, and Michael Ayers. 2003. Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.
Miller-Idriss, Cynthia. 2020. Hate in the Homeland: The New Global Far Right. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mosca, Lorenzo. 2014. “Methodological Practices in Social Movement Online Research.” In Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research, edited by Donatella della Porta, 397–417. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mudde, Cas. 2019. The Far Right Today. Cambridge: Polity.
Nissen, Anita. 2022. Europeanisation of the Contemporary Far Right: Generation Identity and Fortress Europe. New York: Routledge.
Pasieka, Agnieszka. 2019. “Anthropology of the Far Right: What If We Like the ‘Unlikeable’ Others?” Anthropology Today 35 (1): 3–6.
Patzelt, Werner J., and Joachim Klose. 2016. Pegida. Warnsignale aus Dresden. Dresden: Thelem Verlag.
Pilkington, Hilary. 2016. Loud and Proud: Passion and Politics in the English Defence League. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Pilkington, Hilary. 2021. “Why Should We Care What Extremists Think? The Contribution of Emic Perspectives to Understanding the ‘Right-Wing Extremist’ Mind-Set.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, September.
Pirro, Andrea. 2022. “Far Right: The Significance of an Umbrella Concept.” Nations and Nationalism, online first.
Pressman, Jeremy, and Choi-Fitzpatrick. 2020. “Covid19 and Protest Repertoires in the United States: An Initial Description of Limited Change.” Social Movement Studies 20 (6): 766–73.
Rone, Julia. 2022. “Far Right Alternative News Media as ‘Indignation Mobilization Mechanisms’: How the Far Right Opposed the Global Compact for Migration.” In Information, Communication & Society 25 (9): 1333–50.
Rucht, Dieter. 2014. “Die Bedeutung von Online-Mobilisierung für Offline-Proteste.” In Internet und Partizipation. Bürgergesellschaft und Demokratie, edited by Kathrin Voss, 115–28. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Rucht, Dieter, Priska Daphi, Piotr Kocyba, Michael Neuber, Jochen Roose, Franziska Scholl, Moritz Sommer, Wolfgang Stuppert, and Sabrina Zajak. 2015. “Protestforschung am Limit. Eine Soziologische Annäherung an Pegida.” Ipb working paper. Berlin: Verein für Protest- und Bewegungsforschung. https://protestinstitut.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/protestforschung-am-limit_ipb-workingpaper_web.pdf.
Scharf, Stefan, and Clemens Pleul. 2016. “Im Netz ist jeden Tag Montag.” In PEGIDA: Rechtspopulismus zwischen Fremdenangst und “Wende”-Enttäuschung? Analysen im Überblick, edited by Karl-Siegbert Rehberg, Franziska Kunz, and Tino Schlinzig, 83–98. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine, and Dvora Yanow. 2012. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes. New York: Routledge.
Seta, Gabriele de. 2020. “Three Lies of Digital Ethnography.” Journal of Digital Social Research 2 (1): 77–97.
Snow, David A. 2013. “Case Studies and Social Movements.” In The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements, edited by David A. Snow, Donatella della Porta, Bert Klandermans, and Doug McAdam, 146–72. Hoboken Wiley.
Virchow, Fabian. 2011. “Die „Demonstrationspolitik“ der extremen Rechten im Bundesgebiet und im Land Brandenburg.” In Die Grenzen der Toleranz: Rechtsextremes Milieu und demokratische Gesellschaft in Brandenburg. Bilanz und Perspektiven, edited by Christoph Kopke, 109–28. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
Volk, Sabine. 2019. “Speaking for ‘the European People’? How the Transnational Alliance Fortress Europe Constructs a Populist Counter-Narrative to European Integration.” Politique Européenne 66: 120–49.
Volk, Sabine. 2021. “Die rechtspopulistische PEGIDA in der COVID -19 Pandemie: Virtueller Protest ‘für unsere Bürgerrechte.’” Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen.
Volk, Sabine. 2022. “Explaining PEGIDA’s ‘Strange Survival’: An Ethnographic Approach to Far-Right Protest Rituals”. Political Research Exchange. https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736X.2022.2136036
Vorländer, Hans, Maik Herold, and Steven Schäller. 2018. PEGIDA and New Right-Wing Populism in Germany. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wedeen, Lisa. 2010. “Reflections on Ethnographic Work in Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 13 (1): 255–72.
Weisskircher, Manès. 2020. “Neue Wahrheiten von rechts außen? Alternative Nachrichten und der ‘Rechtspopulismus’ in Deutschland.” In Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen 33 (2): 474–90.
Wilkinson, Cai. 2014. “On Not Just Finding What You (Thought You) Were Looking For: Reflections on Fieldwork Data and Theory.” In Interpretation and Methods: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn, edited by Dvora Yanow and Peregrine Schwartz-Shea. New York: Routledge.
0137-4079 ; eISSN 2719-6976 ; doi:10.23858/ethp.2022.43.3001
Source:IAiE PAN, call no. P 366 ; IAiE PAN, call no. P 367 ; IAiE PAN, call no. P 368 ; click here to follow the link
Language: Rights:Creative Commons Attribution BY-NC-ND 4.0 license
Terms of use:Copyright-protected material. [CC BY-NC-ND 4.0] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, full text available at: ; -
Digitizing institution:Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences
Original in:Library of the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences
Access: