Perspectives on internationalism in Geography

Meadows, Michael E.

doi:0016-7282

- ris
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Csv

Perspectives on internationalism in Geography Meadows, Michael E.

Object structure

Perspectives on internationalism in Geography

Geographia Polonica Vol. 93 No. 4 (2020)

Meadows, Michael E. : Autor

internacjonalizacja ; hegemonia ; publikacje naukowe ; Międzynarodowa Unia Geograficzna

International collaboration in science in general continues to grow and the discipline of Geography is increasingly becoming internationalized. Although there are many benefits to internationalism and, indeed, it is essential if we are to address major global challenges, there is debate as to whether or not existing power relations contribute to cementing unevenness and inequity among the global community of geographers. This is reflected in academic publication practices which clearly advantage particular communities over others. In this essay, I offer some thoughts on the nature of internationalism and its influence on representation in the global geographical community. Important constraints to greater inclusivity are highlighted and the role of the International Geographical Union in potentially offsetting some of the apparent inequities is discussed. The paper concludes with some thoughts as to what is needed if internationalism is to help reduce rather than accentuate such imbalances.

Cochrane, L., Thompson, A. (2018). The Geography of Development Studies: leaving no one behind. Forum for Development Studies 45(1), 167-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2017.1345786
Crutzen, P.J. (2002). Geology of mankind: The Anthropocene. Nature, 415(23). https://doi.org/10.1038/415023a
Czaika, M., Neumayer, E. (2017). Visa restrictions and economic globalization. Applied Geography, 84, 75-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.04.011
Czaika, M., Orazbayev, S. (2018). The globalization of scientific mobility, 1970 to 2014. Applied Geography, 96, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.04.017
Derudder, B., Liu, X. (2016). How international is the annual meeting of the Association of American Geographers? A social network analysis perspective. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 48(2), 309-349. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0308518X15611892
Fu, B., Tian, T., Liu, Y., Zhao, W. (2019). New developments and perspectives in physical geography in China. China Geographical Sciences, 29(3), 363-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-019-1038-y
Gui, Q., Liu, C., Du, D. (2019). Globalization of science and international scientific collaboration: A network perspective. Geoforum, 105, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.06.017
Hinks, A.R. (1922). The International Geographical Union. Geographical Journal, 60(4), 291-294. https://doi.org/10.2307/1781315
Kitchin, R. (2005). Commentary: Disrupting and destabilizing Anglo-American and English language hegemony in geography. Social and Cultural Geography, 6, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464936052000335937
Lee, J.J., Haupt, J.P. (2020). International research collaborations on COVID-19 amidst geopolitical tensions with China. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-37599/v1
Liverman, D.M. (2018). Geographic perspectives on development goals: Constructive engagements and critical perspectives on the MDGs and the SDGs. Dialogues in Human Geography, 8(2), 168-185. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2043820618780787
Martin, G. (1996). One hundred and twenty five years of Geographical Congresses and the formation of the International Geographical Union. Or, from Antwerp to The Hague. IGU Bulletin, 46, 5-26.
Meadows, M.E., Dietz, T., Vandermotten, C. (2016). A perspective on problems and prospects for academic publishing in Geography. Geo, 3(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/geo2.16
Meadows, E.M. (2019). Perspektywy internacjonalizacji badań i współpracy w naukach geograficznych. In Wiśniewski, R., Regulska, E. (Eds.), /Tradycja i współczesność geografii w Polsce/ (pp. 85-94). Warszawa: Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania im. S. Leszczyckiego PAN.
Mikki, S. (2017). Scholarly publications beyond pay-walls: increased citation advantage for open publishing. Scientometrics, 113, 1529-1538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2554-0
Olechnicka, A., Ploszaj, A., Celińska-Janowicz, D. (2019). The geography of scientific collaboration. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315471938-7
Paasi, A. (2005). Globalisation, academic capitalism, and the uneven geographies of international journal publishing spaces. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 37(5), 769-789. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3769
Paasi, A. (2015). "Hot spots, dark-side dots, tin pots": The uneven internationalism of the global academic market. In P. Meusburger, D. Gregory, L. Suarsana (Eds.), Geographies of knowledge and power (pp. 247-262). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9960-7_12
Rockström, J., Steffen, W.L., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin III, F.S., Lambin, E., … Nykvist, B. (2009). Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society 14(2), 32. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03180-140232
Roussou, R., Ding, J. (2016). Does international collaboration yield a higher citation potential for US scientists publishing in highly visible interdisciplinary journals? Journal of the Association of Information Science and Technology, 67(4), 1009-1013. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23565
Royal Society. (2011). Knowledge, networks and nations: Global scientific collaboration in the 21st century. London: The Royal Society.
Yang, R., Chen, Y. (2018). Change in key research area and prospect of Chinese rural geography. Progress in Geography, 37(5), 601-616.
Zhao, W., Zhang, J., Meadows, M.E., Liu, Y., Hua, T., Fu, B. (2020). A systematic approach is needed to contain COVID-19 globally: China's experiences for the world. Science Bulletin, 65, 876-878. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.scib.2020.03.024