Metadata language
Fake or real EU Territorialicy? Debating the territorial universe of EU policies
Subtitle: Creator: Publisher: Place of publishing: Date issued/created: Description:
29 cm ; Każdy numer posiada własny tytuł.
Type of object: Subject and Keywords:ESPON ; spójność terytorialna Unii Europejskiej ; kapitał terytorialny ; spójność terytorialna ; rozwój terytorialny ; territorialicy ; polityki terytorialne
Abstract:This paper provides new insights into the main pillars of the territorial universe of EU policies, by undertaking a systematic overview of European Union (EU) key territorial development reports, agendas and programmes. These include the European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP), the three Territorial Agendas, and the European Territorial Observatory Network (ESPON) reports. The evidence shows widespread territorialicy, understood as a process of incorporating a territorial driven policy design, implementation and evaluation paradigm, still largely dominated by territorial development and territorial cohesion policy rationales. However, the socioeconomic policy prism continues to dominate the design and analysis of EU policies by EU entities.
References:
Abrahams, G. (2014). What "Is" Territorial Cohesion? What Does It "Do"?: Essentialist Versus Pragmatic Approaches to Using Concepts, European Planning Studies, 22(10), 2134-2155. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.819838
Agnew, J. (2017). The tragedy of the nation-state. Territory, Politics, Governance, 5(4), 347-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2017.1357257
Asprogerakas, E., & Zachari, V. (2020). The EU territorial cohesion discourse and the spatial planning system in Greece. European Planning Studies, 28(3), 583-603. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1628925
Bachtler, J., Martings, J. O., Wostner, P., & Żuber, P. (2019). Towards Cohesion Policy 4.0. Structural Transformation and Inclusive Growth. Regional Studies Policy Impact Books. Abington: Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429282058
Bachtrögler, J., Fratesi, U., & Perucca, G. (2020). The influence of the local context on the implementation and impact of EU Cohesion Policy. Regional Studies, 54(1), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1551615
Barca, F. (2009). An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy: a place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Independent Report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy. Brussels: DG Regional Policy.
Beer, A., & Clower, T. L. (Eds.). (2019). Globalization, Planning and Local Economic Development. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315749624
Berkowitz, P., Monfort, P., & Pieńkowski, J. (2020). Unpacking the growth impacts of European Union Cohesion Policy: transmission channels from Cohesion Policy into economic growth, Regional Studies, 54(1), 60-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1570491
Blatter, J. (2004). 'From Spaces of Place' to 'Spaces of Flows'? Territorial and Functional Governance in Cross-border Regions in Europe and North America. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(3), 530-548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00534.x
Böhme, K. (2016). Territorial evidence supporting policy-making in Europe. disP - The Planning Review, 52(2), 62-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2016.1195589
Bradley, J., & Zaucha, J. (Eds.) (2017). Territorial Cohesion: A missing link between economic growth and welfare. Lessons from the Baltic Tiger. Gdańsk: Uniwersytet Gdański.
Camagni, R. (2009). Territorial Impact Assessment for European regions: A methodological proposal and an application to EU transport policy. Evaluation and Program Planning, 32(4), 342-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.06.014
Camagni, R., & Capello, R. (2013). Regional Competitiveness and Territorial Capital: A Conceptual Approach and Empirical Evidence from the European Union. Regional Studies, 47(9), 1383-1402. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.681640
Capello, R., & Perucca, G. (2019). Citizens' perception of Cohesion Policy: from theory to empirical evidence. Regional Studies, 53(11), 1520-1530. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1587398
Colomb, C., & Tomaney, J. (2020). Spatial planning, nationalism and territorial politics in Europe. Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1744552
CoR (2018). Spatial planning and governance within EU policies and legislation and their relevance to the New Urban Agenda. Brussels: Committee of the Regions. Retrieved from https://cor.europa.eu/en/engage/studies/Documents/Spatial-planning-new-urban-agenda.pdf
Crescenzi, F., Fratesi, U., & Monastiriotis, V. (2020). Back to the member states? Cohesion Policy and the national challenges to the European Union. Regional Studies, 54(1), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1662895
Crescenzi, R., & Giua, M. (2020). One or many Cohesion Policies of the European Union? On the differential economic impacts of Cohesion Policy across member states. Regional Studies, 54(1), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1665174
Dąbrowski, M., Musiałkowska, I., & Polverari, L. (2018). EU-China and EU-Brazil policy transfer in regional policy. Regional Studies, 52(9), 1169-1180. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1431389
Dao, H., Cantoreggi, P. P., & Rousseaux, V. (2017). Operationalizing a contested concept: indicators of territorial cohesion. European Planning Studies, 25(4), 638-660. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1281230
Delaney, D. (2009). Territory and Territoriality. In N., Castree, et al. (Eds.). International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (vol. 4, pp. 136‑145). Coventry: Elsevier.
Di Cataldo, M., & Monastiriotis, V. (2020). Regional needs, regional targeting and regional growth: an assessment of EU Cohesion Policy in UK regions. Regional Studies, 54(1), 35-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1498073
DTA (2019). Draft Territorial Agenda 2030. Retrieved from https://territorialagenda.eu/renewal-reader/draft-terrtorialagenda.html
Dühr, S. (2018). A Europe of 'Petites Europes': an evolutionary perspective on transnational cooperation on spatial planning. Planning Perspectives, 33(4), 543-569. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2018.1483262
Dühr, S., Colomb, C., & Nadin, V. (2010). European Spatial Planning and Territorial Co-operation. London: Routledge.https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203895290
Durand, F., & Decoville, A. (2018). Establishing Cross-Border Spatial Planning. In E., Medeiros (Ed.). European Territorial Cooperation (pp. 229-244). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74887-0_12https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74887-0_12
EC (1996). First Report on Economic and Social Cohesion. Brussels: European Commission.
EC (1999). ESDP - European Spatial Development Perspective. Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union. Luxembourg European Communities. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/pdf/sum_en.pdf
EC (2001). Second Report on Economic and Social Cohesion. Brussels: European Commission.
EC (2004). Third Report on Economic and Social Cohesion. Brussels: European Commission.
EC (2007). Fourth report on economic and social cohesion. Brussels: European Commission.
EC (2010). Fifth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion. Brussels: European Commission.
EC (2013). Assessing territorial impacts: Operational guidance on how to assess regional and local impacts within the Commission Impact Assessment System. Commission Staff Working Document. Brussels: European Commission.
EC (2013). EVALSED - The resource for the Evaluation for Socio-Economic Development. Brussels: European Commission.
EC (2014). Sixth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/reports/2014/6th-report-on-economic-social-and-territorial-cohesion
EC (2015). Territorial Agenda 2020 put in practice. Enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of Cohesion Policy by a place-based approach. Volume I - Synthesis Report. Brussels: Regional and Urban Policy.
EC (2017). Seventh report on economic, social and territorial cohesion. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/cohesion-report/
EC (2020). Knowledge Centre for Territorial Policies. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/knowledge4policy/territorial_en
Elden, S. (2010). Thinking Territory Historically. Geopolitics, 15(4), 757-761. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650041003717517
Elden, S. (2013). How Should We Do the History of Territory? Territory, Politics, Governance, 1(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2012.733317
EP (2016). Report on New Territorial Development Tools in Cohesion Policy 2014-2020: Integrated Territorial Investment (ITI) and Community-Led Local Development (CLLD). Brussels: European Parliament.
ESPON (2018). The territorial dimension of future policies. Policy Brief. Luxembourg: ESPON.
Evrard, E., & Engl, A. (2018). Taking Stock of the European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC): From Policy Formulation to Policy Implementation. In E., Medeiros (Ed.). European Territorial Cooperation (pp. 207-227). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74887-0_11
Faludi, A. (2012). Multi-Level (Territorial) Governance: Three Criticisms. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), 197-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.677578
Faludi, A. (2013). Territorial Cohesion and Subsidiarity under the European Union Treaties: A Critique of the 'Territorialism' Underlying. Regional Studies, 47(9), 1594-1606. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.657170
Faludi, A. (Ed.) (2018). The Poverty of Territorialism. A Neo-Medieval View of Europe and European Planning. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788973618
Faludi, F. (2010). Cohesion, Coherence, Cooperation: European Spatial Planning Coming of Age? New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203842324
Fischer, T., Sykes, O., Gore, T., Marot, N., Golobič, M., Pinho, P., Waterhout, B., & Perdicoulis, A. (2015). Territorial Impact Assessment of European Draft Directives. The Emergence of a New Policy Assessment Instrument. European Planning Studies, 23(3), 433-451. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.868292
Fratesi, U., & Perucca, G. (2018). Territorial capital and the resilience of European regions. The Annals of Regional Science, 60, 241-264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-017-0828-3
Fratesi, U., & Wishlade, F. G. (2017). The impact of European Cohesion Policy in different contexts. Regional Studies, 51(6), 817-821. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1326673
Gagliardi, L., & Percoco, M. (2017). The impact of European Cohesion Policy in urban and rural regions. Regional Studies, 51(6), 857-868. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1179384
Glinka, K. (2017). Integrated Territorial Investment as Instrument for Managing Transport Security in Lower Silesia's Largest Cities. Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology. Series Transport, 94, 37-46. https://doi.org/10.20858/sjsutst.2017.94.4
Gold, J. R. (2009). Territory and Territoriality. In N., Castree, et al. (Eds.). International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (vol. 1, pp. 282‑293). Coventry: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00665-9
Greiner, A. L. (Ed.) (2014). Visualizing Human Geography (Second Edition). New Jersey, NJ: Wiley.
Haggett, P. (2001). Geography. A global synthesis. London: Prentice Hall.
INTERACT (2020). Bringing Territoriality into Interreg. Retrieved from http://www.interact-eu.net/download/file/fid/18848
István Tóth, B. (2015). Territorial Capital: Theory, Empirics and Critical Remarks. European Planning Studies, 23(7), 1327-1344. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2014.928675
Janin Rivolin, U. (2005). The Future of the ESDP in the Framework of Territorial Cohesion. disP - The Planning Review, 41(161), 19-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2005.10556921
Kidd, S., & Shaw, D. (2013). Reconceptualising territoriality and spatial planning: insights from the sea. Planning Theory & Practice, 14(2), 180-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2013.784348
Luukkonen, J., & Moilanen, H. (2012). Territoriality in the Strategies and Practices of the Territorial Cohesion Policy of the European Union: Territorial Challenges in Implementing "Soft Planning". European Planning Studies, 20(3), 481-500. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.651806
Mackinnon, D., & Cumbers, A. (Eds.) (2011). Introduction to economic Geography. Globalization, Uneven Development and Place (Second Edition). Essex: Pearson.
McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2019). Perspectives on Smart Specialisation Policies in Lagging Regions. Regional Studies Policy Impact Books, 1, 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/2578711X.2019.1621098
McClintock, J. (Ed.) (2010). The Uniting of Nations: An Essay on Global Governance (3rd Edition). Bern: Peter Lang.
Medeiros, E. (2015). Territorial Impact Assessment and Cross-Border Cooperation. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2(1), 95-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2014.999108
Medeiros, E. (2016). Territorial Cohesion: An EU Concept. European Journal of Spatial Development, 60, pp. 30.
Medeiros, E. (2016). Is there a rise of the territorial dimension in EU Cohesion policy? Finisterra, 10, 89‑113. http://dx.doi.org/10.18055/Finis7940
Medeiros, E. (2017). From Smart Growth to European Spatial Planning: a new paradigm for EU Cohesion Policy post-2020. European Planning Studies, 25(10), 1856-1875. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1337729
Medeiros, E. (2017). European Union Cohesion Policy and Spain: a territorial impact assessment. Regional Studies, 51(8), 1259-1269. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1187719
Medeiros, E. (2018). The Age of Sustainable Development. Journal of Geography, 118(1), 49-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2018.1515240
Medeiros, E. (2019). The Poverty of Territorialism. Planning Theory & Practice, 20(4), 619-624. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2019.1653033
Medeiros, E. (2019). Spatial Planning, Territorial Development and Territorial Impact Assessment. Journal of Planning Literature, 34(2), 171-182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412219831375
Medeiros, E. (2020). Portugal 2020. An effective policy platform to promote Sustainable Territorial Development? Sustainability, 12(3), 1126. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031126
Medeiros, E. (Ed.) (2017). Uncovering the Territorial Dimension of European Union Cohesion Policy. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315169743
Medeiros, E. (Ed.) (2018). European Territorial Cooperation. Theoretical and empirical approaches to the process and impacts of Cross-Border and Transnational Cooperation in Europe. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74887-0
Medeiros, E., & Rauhut, D. (2020). Territorial Cohesion Cities: a policy recipe for achieving Territorial Cohesion? Regional Studies, 54(1), 120-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1548764
Mendez, C. (2011). The Lisbonization of EU Cohesion Policy: A Successful Case of Experimentalist Governance? European Planning Studies, 19(3), 519-537. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.548368
Newman, D. (2010). Territory, Compartments and Borders: Avoiding the Trap of the Territorial Trap. Geopolitics, 15(4), 773-778. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650041003717541
OECD (2001). OECD Territorial Outlook. Paris: OECD Publishing. OECD (2001). OECD Territorial Outlook. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD (2012). Growth in All Regions. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264174634-en
Pagliacci, F., Pavone, P., Russo, M., & Giorgi, A. (2019). Regional structural heterogeneity: evidence and policy implications for RIS3 in macroregional strategies. Regional Studies, 54(6), 765-775. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1635689
Percoco, M. (2017). Impact of European Cohesion Policy on regional growth: does local economic structure matter? Regional Studies, 51(6), 833-843. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1213382
Perrin, T. (2010). Inter-territoriality as a new trend in cultural policy? The case of Euroregions. Cultural Trends, 19(1-2), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548961003696153
Plangger, M. (2016). A 'macro-regional' Europe in the making. Theoretical approaches and empirical evidence. Regional Studies, 50(12), 2084-2085. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1217406
Potter R.; Binns, T., Elliott, J., & Smith, D. (2008). Geographies of Development. An Introduction to Development Studies (Third Edition). Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Reitel, B., Wassenberg, B., & Peyrony, J. (2018). The INTERREG Experience in Bridging European Territories. A 30-Year Summary. In E., Medeiros (Ed.). European Territorial Cooperation (pp. 7-23). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74887-0_2
Sachs, F. (2015). The age of sustainable development. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Sassen, S. (2013). When Territory Deborders Territoriality. Territory, Politics, Governance, 1(1), 21-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2013.769895
Sielker, F., & Rauhut, D. (2018). The Rise of Macro-Regions in Europe. In E., Medeiros (Ed.). European Territorial Cooperation (pp. 153-169). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74887-0_9
Stead, D. (2014). The Rise of Territorial Governance in European Policy. European Planning Studies, 22(7), 1368-1383. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.786684
Stead, D., & Meijers, E. (2009). Spatial Planning and Policy Integration: Concepts, Facilitators and Inhibitors. Planning Theory & Practice, 10(3), 317-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350903229752
Storey, D. (2016). Territory, Space and Society. In P., Daniels, M., Bradshaw, D., Shaw, J., Sidaway, & T., Hall (Eds.). An introduction to human geography (Fifth edition, pp. 422-438). New York, NY: Pearson.
Stutz, F., & Warf, B. (2012). The World Economy. Geography, Business, Development (6th Edition). New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
TA (2007). Territorial agenda of the European Union: Towards a more competitive and sustainable Europe of diverse regions. Retrieved from http://www.eu-territorial-agenda.eu/ReferenceDocuments/Territorial-Agenda-of-the-European-Union-Agreed-on-25-May-2007.pdf
TA (2011). Territorial agenda of the European Union 2020 - Towards an inclusive, smart and sustainable Europe of diverse regions. Retrieved from http://www.eu2011. hu/files/bveu/documents/TA2020.pdf
TA (2019). Territorial Agenda 2030. A future for all places. Draft version. Retrieved from https://territorialagenda.eu/renewal-reader/draft-terrtorialagenda.html
UN (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations.
Urban Agenda (2016). Establishing the Urban Agenda for the EU 'Pact of Amsterdam'. Agreed at the Informal Meeting of EU Ministers Responsible for Urban Matters on 30 May 2016. Amsterdam.
Van Well, L. (2012). Conceptualizing the Logics of Territorial Cohesion. European Planning Studies, 20(9), 1549-1567. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.708021
Walsh, C. (2012). Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020: Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(3), 493-496. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.707391
Walsh, C., & Allin, S. (2012). Strategic Spatial Planning: Responding to Diverse Territorial Development Challenges: Towards an Inductive Comparative Approach. International Planning Studies, 17(4), 377-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2012.726852
Waterhout, B. (Ed.) (2008). The institutionalisation of European Spatial Planning. Sustainable Urban Areas, 18. Delft: Delft University of Technology. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-58603-882-3-i
Zaucha, J. (2017). The territorial keys of policies. In E., Medeiros (Ed.). Uncovering the Territorial Dimension of European Union Cohesion Policy (pp. 23-43). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315169743-3
Zaucha, J., & Böhme, K. (2020). Measuring territorial cohesion is not a mission impossible. European Planning Studies, 28(3), 627-649. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1607827
Zaucha, J., & Gee, K. (Eds.) (2019). Maritime Spatial Planning. Past, Present, Future. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98696-8
Zaucha, J., Komornicki, T., Böhme, K., Świątek, D., & Żuber, P. (2014). Territorial Keys for Bringing Closer the Territorial Agenda of the EU and Europe 2020. European Planning Studies, 22(2), 246-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.722976
Zonneveld, W., & Spaans, M. (2014). Meta-governance and developing integrated territorial strategies: The case study of MIRT territorial agendas in the Randstad (Netherlands). Planning Theory & Practice, 15(4), 543-562. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2014.963379
Rozmiar pliku 0,9 MB ; application/octet-stream
Resource Identifier:1429-7132 ; 10.7163/Eu21.2020.38.4
Source:CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407 ; click here to follow the link
Language: Language of abstract: Rights:Licencja Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0
Terms of use:Zasób chroniony prawem autorskim. [CC BY 4.0 Międzynarodowe] Korzystanie dozwolone zgodnie z licencją Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0, której pełne postanowienia dostępne są pod adresem: ; -
Digitizing institution:Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Polskiej Akademii Nauk
Original in: Projects co-financed by: Access: